Hi Ged,
On 14 Sep 2007, at 14:26, Ged Ridgway wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm wondering if there is a tidier way to support both 32 and 64
> bit Linux machines (which share the same networked storage) than
> having entirely duplicated fsl-4_64 and fsl-4_32 directory trees?
>
> Presumably it's not as simple as having one tree with bin_32 and
> bin_64, and adding the relevant one to the path, since, firstly,
> there are e.g. bin/DR and extras/bin/ (and others?) to worry about,
> and secondly, I believe some (lots?) of scripts contain full
> references to e.g. $FSLDIR/bin/fslmaths instead of just using the
> fslmaths in the path.
>
> Any thoughts, anyone? "Don't be so stingy; disk space is cheap"
> might well turn out to be the best answer,
That's right :)
Probably the best thing if you're tight (for disk space) is to delete
$FSLDIR/data from one of the installs and create a symbolic link for
it to the other install.
> but I just thought I'd check whether anyone's got a simple and neat
> solution?
>
> Cheers,
> Ged.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
Stephen M. Smith, Professor of Biomedical Engineering
Associate Director, Oxford University FMRIB Centre
FMRIB, JR Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
+44 (0) 1865 222726 (fax 222717)
[log in to unmask] http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/~steve
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
|