JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN Archives

PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN  February 2007

PHD-DESIGN February 2007

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Liberal?

From:

Eduardo Corte Real <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Eduardo Corte Real <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 28 Feb 2007 10:02:59 -0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (176 lines)

Dear Ken, Terry and Joseph,



I guess Terry was being ironic. He was the one that drifted the most from 
the original questions. Whigs have always done that.

But we are coming somewhere. The question is what a Design Philosophy Doctor 
should be like?

First, a liberal bachelor.

Secondly a Labour Master,

Finally a Conservative Doctor?



(Of course that our Nordic friends would say: No, just a Social Democrat 
from the beginning to the end.)



But what I meant was:

Liberal: pick what you like from the sciences, the arts, the humanities, the 
classics (don't forget drawing!) as long as you learn diverse stuff for 
three years.

Labour: Young man/woman you must learn a trade, these are the tricks to do 
it.

Conservative: The are rules in this, meta rules, some say is science, some 
say its art, but first of all, in the end, it entitles you to wear a funny 
hat and a funny gown.





Is this useful PhD thinking or what?

Cheers,



Eduardo

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Terence Love" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 6:48 AM
Subject: Re: Liberal?


> Hello,
> One suggestion made by Phil Agre is that to understand the shift in once
> radical liberalism to the current confused  bundle of contradictory 
> concepts
> one needs to understand how conservatism has coopted concepts relating to
> ethics and  human values and redefined them,  often to mean their 
> opposites
> (see, http://polaris.gseis.ucla.edu/pagre/conservatism.html ).
>
> This is broadly supported by historic analyses in Wikipedia:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberalism ,
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_liberalism ,
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoliberalism )
>
> Many of Phil Agre's papers are found on his home page: at
> http://polaris.gseis.ucla.edu/pagre/ or in RedRock Eater newsletter 
> archives
> at http://polaris.gseis.ucla.edu/pagre/rre.html
>
> They are engaging and useful reading - you've been warned!
>
> Finally, just wondering if this thread is drifting a bit off topic for
> PhD-Design?
>
> Terry
>
> ===
> Dr. Terence Love
> Tel/Fax: +61 (0)8 9305 7629
> Mobile: 0434975 848
> [log in to unmask]
> ===
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: PhD-Design - This list is for discussion of PhD studies and related
> research in Design [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Dr.
> Joseph Chiodo
> Sent: Wednesday, 28 February 2007 11:24 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Liberal?
>
> Hello Chris & Ken,
>
>  1st off, thank you for the clarification. My mistake - I misinterpreted
> the word. I must confess, I did not read the first few posts of that 
> string
> - my perpetually jetlagged busyness has cost me quite a bit of rigor here. 
> I
> therefore interpreted the word according to my sometimes tumultuous
> experience in a half-dozen or so universities that I have received degrees
> and post graduate degrees from. Most of these institutions were very 
> leftist
> and self-proclaimed 'liberals'; as in overtly liberal leftist thinking.  I
> took a couple of courses in critical thinking and deductive process 
> without
> mention of the historical term of liberal as you put it.  Mind you I was
> educated in a postcolonial world mindset in North America, Europe and UK:
> I'm barely 30odd with interests in molecular physics,
> mathematics/probability - not much to do with this topic. Needless to say,
> as a scientist/inventor etc. eventually, I was clearly not at home amongst
> these hardline socialists (some
> communist) who proclaimed ownership of the term 'liberal' as such. 
> Ironic,
> some might say.
>
>  My experience with conservatives is very different than yours.  I have
> found more bigots on the 'left' than on the 'right'.  I myself, can not
> consider myself either.  I think they both have some decent intentions. 
> But
> as for practical solutions.... that's a whole new debate.
>
>  I believe the role of relativism however, is largely taken for granted.
> Would you not say that most people, at least in our circles, are more
> relativistic in their deductive process than purely deductive logic would
> warrant?  Perhaps this is a bold thing to say but I would be interested to
> know your thoughts, perhaps in another string.
>
>  Nonetheless, I'm no expert in this field. Interesting topics indeed.
>  Joe
>
> Chris Rust <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>  Dr. Joseph Chiodo wrote:
>> Most fundamentalist or neo-liberals however, are too simply minded in
> their constructs to notice...
> Sorry Joe, I'm afraid you are perpetuating the problem here. I am
> concerned about our responsibility, as academics and researchers, to be
> precise.
>
> What I was trying to say, in my oblique British way, is that terminology
> can be very misleading, especially in an international arena. The very
> term "neo-liberal" would be an oxymoron in my country where political
> Liberals are soft-left with an undercurrent of Adam Smith. In Australia
> the Liberal Party is the most right-leaning mainstream party which would
> probably have some ideas in common with the Republicans in the USA.
> "Liberal" and "libertarian" do connect. As you look around the world you
> see that the idea of liberalism has been very liberally interpreted.
>
> And liberal education, or liberal arts education, which I've always been
> told is the foundation of US university education, is nothing to do with
> the kind of political thinking that seem to be implied by the term
> liberal in that country. It implies a broad foundation of knowledge
> rather than a specialism and I assume it produced George Bush and Dick
> Cheney as well as more "liberal" thinkers. If such a foundation leads
> people to question demagoguery that's a consequence of education and
> awareness. I read a while ago that people with a higher education are
> less likely to be racist - in my book that means they are more liberal
> (ie open-minded and inclusive) and better for it. If you have a
> different specialist definition of the word, as a researcher, I'm afraid
> you have to be precise about that and aware of the possibility of 
> confusion.
>
> Best
> Chris
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> The best gets better. See why everyone is raving about the All-new Yahoo!
> Mail. 

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager