The missing spin system merge warnings have now been added.
T.
> > If however, I use "set sequential spin system" before any residue
> > assignment the (i-1) spin system number changes. The previous number
> > (34 in my example) disappears from the edit spin system table and is
> > replaced by a new spin system. The resonance numbers remain the same.
> > This makes keeping track of spin systems quite problematic. Is this the
> > intended behaviour?
>
> In general I cannot reproduce this (spin system number remains the same),
> unless I already have an i-1 spin system and I set another different spin
> system to be i-1 which triggers a merge - it will be arbitrary which spin
> system number remains after the merge. I could perhaps add a warning
> here or maybe the option of which spin system number to keep. - But one of
> them really ought to go.
>
>
> > Now the more serious problem. Using set sequential spin systems wrongly
> > with 0 0 -1 and 0 0 +1 will cause two spin systems that were
> > independently numbered to have the same number i.e they have been
> > merged into the same spin system without warning. This is as would be
> > expected based on the sequential connectivity information you have
> > entered.
>
> There is just a merge warning missing which I can add. I think this is the
> same issue as above.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr Tim Stevens Email: [log in to unmask]
Department of Biochemistry [log in to unmask]
University of Cambridge Phone: +44 1223 766022 (office)
80 Tennis Court Road +44 7816 338275 (mobile)
Old Addenbrooke's Site +44 1223 364613 (home)
Cambridge CB2 1GA WWWeb: http://www.bio.cam.ac.uk/~tjs23
United Kingdom http://www.pantonia.co.uk
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------ +NH3CH(CH(CH3)OH)C(O)NHCH(CH(CH3)CH2CH3)C(O)NHCH(CH2CH2SCH3)CO2- -------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|