> > 1/ By careless peak selection and use of the function that sets the
> > sequential spin systems, we managed to convince a spin system that it was
> > sequentially connected to itslef - surely this should be impossible in
> > general?
>
> Easily sorted.
Now patched so hopefully impossible in the future.
> > Unfortunately, whether I merge spin systems or resonances (spin systems
> > seems to me to be the more sensible level to do it at), the connectivity
> > information seems to be lost. Perhaps there are too many possible
> > ambiguities/connection issues to resolve for this to be practcal? I'll
> > see if I can work out what the merging code does.
>
> The connectivities are lost on merge (depending on which way round it is
> done). The merge system simply predates the sequential connectivity
> system. I will put updating the merge on my to-do list.
OK, now spin system merging takes into account the sequential
connectivities. Please try this out and see that everything works OK.
Thanks,
T.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr Tim Stevens Email: [log in to unmask]
Department of Biochemistry [log in to unmask]
University of Cambridge Phone: +44 1223 766022 (office)
80 Tennis Court Road +44 7816 338275 (mobile)
Old Addenbrooke's Site +44 1223 364613 (home)
Cambridge CB2 1GA WWWeb: http://www.bio.cam.ac.uk/~tjs23
United Kingdom http://www.pantonia.co.uk
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------ +NH3CH(CH(CH3)OH)C(O)NHCH(CH(CH3)CH2CH3)C(O)NHCH(CH2CH2SCH3)CO2- -------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|