JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for MEDIEVAL-RELIGION Archives


MEDIEVAL-RELIGION Archives

MEDIEVAL-RELIGION Archives


MEDIEVAL-RELIGION@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

MEDIEVAL-RELIGION Home

MEDIEVAL-RELIGION Home

MEDIEVAL-RELIGION  March 2005

MEDIEVAL-RELIGION March 2005

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: (Un)Christian names

From:

Christopher Crockett <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

medieval-religion - Scholarly discussions of medieval religious culture <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 9 Mar 2005 09:54:43 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (126 lines)

medieval-religion: Scholarly discussions of medieval religion and culture

From: "Ms Brenda M. Cook" <[log in to unmask]>

> There is also a Tunic of Christ in Argenteuil which was given to the
original nunnery by Charlemagne as part of the "dowry" for the daughter who
was the first abbess. IIRC Theodrada.
> It survived the French Revolution buried in the Presbytery garden and there
was as "Ostentation" some years ago. 


what does it look like?

what is the Scientific Consensus regarding its date and provenance?

>However, this tunic purports to have been Christ's tunic when he was a child
and to have been woven for him by the Virgin Mary. So I suppose this, too is a
Marian relic as well.

> It had lain forgotten in the treasury (possibly as a result of the change in
occupation of 1127- Heloise + nuns OUT; Suger's henchman + monks IN - tho I
cannot help feeling that the lust to possess such a relic might have been yet
another element in Suger's greed) 



well, that might be true, but certianly isn't the way St. Suger tells the
story.

here in a probably defective translation (with Latin following, should anyone
wish to offer corrections).

c

3.-The Recovery of the Abbey of Argenteuil. 

  When, as an adolescent student, I read the old charters in the archives
recording the abbey's possessions, as well as the books recording the
immunities (due to the numerous abuses and frauds being perpetrated), I often
came across the foundation charter of the monastery of Argenteuil by Hermenric
and his wife Numma. It was written there that, in the time of king Pepin, this
abbey belonged to St. Denis, but, due to a disadvantageous agreement, it was
alienated during the time of Pepin's son, Charlemagne. This emperor obtained
from the abbot and brothers the right to install there one of his daughters,
who had refused human marriage, as abbess of a convent. This was done on
condition that, on her death, the abbey would return to us. But, due to the
disturbances in the realm caused by the quarrels of the children of his son
Louis the Pious, this contract was not fulfilled. 

  Our predecessors had often studied the question, but without significant
results. This is why, in council with our brothers, we sent our messengers to
Rome with the old foundation and donation charters, and the confirmations to
the late Pope Honorius, asking him to examine our rights and reestablish them
canonically. Wise guardian of justice that he was he returned this place to
us, as much for the cause of justice as for the scandal caused by the evil
life which the nuns led there, and to restore religious order. 

  Moreover, King Louis, [son of] Philip, our dear lord and friend, confirmed
this restoration and, by the authority of the royal majesty, issued a charter
confirming all the regalian rights which he possessed there. Whoever wishes to
better understand the nature of this restoration will find more details in
these charters of the kings and the apostolic privileges. Those who study this
question will see the importance of this abbey and its dependencies: Trappes,
Elancourt, Chavenay, Bourdonné, Chérisy, the land of Montmélian, of Bondy,
of Montereau near Melun, and other lands. 
  The old rents of Argenteuil, which did not belong to the abbey, amounted to
£20 because it was of old no more than £20, and now it amounts to forty. In
grain, we once received six muids, but today get fifteen. 

[On this episode, cf. Thomas G. Waldman, "Abbot Suger and the Nuns of
Argenteuil," Traditio XLI (1985): 239-272.] 


3. - De recuperatione Argentoilensis abbatiĉ. 

  Cum etate docibili adolescentiĉ meĉ antiquas armarii possessionum
revolverem cartas, et immunitatum biblos propter multorum calumniatorum
improbitates frequentarem, crebro manibus occurrebat de cenobio Argentoilensi
fundationis carta ab Hermenrico et conjuge ejus Numma, in qua continebatur
quod a tempore Pipini regis beati Dyonisii abbatia extiterat. Sed quadam
occasione contractus incommodi, in tempore Karoli Magni filii ejus, alienata
fuerat. Prefatus enim imperator, ut quandam filiam suam matrimonium humanum
recusantem ibidem abbatissam sanctimonialium constitueret, eo pacto ut post
mortem ejus in usum ecelesiĉ reverteretur, ab abbate et fratribus obtinuerat.
Sed turbatione regni filiorum filii ejus, videlicet Ludovici Pii,
altercatione, quoadusque supervixerat, perfici non potuit. 

  Unde, cum antecessores nostri sepius super hoc laborantes parum
profecissent, communicato cum fratribus nostris consilio, nuncios nostros et
cartas antiquas fundationis et donationis et confirmationum privilegia bonĉ
memoriĉ papĉ Honorio Romam delegavimus, postulantes ut justitiam nostram
canonico investigaret et restitueret scrutinio. Qui, ut erat vir consilii et
justitiĉ tutor, tam pro nostra justitia quam pro enormitate monacharum ibidem
male viventium, eundem nobis locum cum appendiciis suis, ut reformaretur ibi
religionis ordo, restituit. 

Rex vero Ludovicus [p. 66] Philippi, carissimus dominus et amicus noster,
eandem restitutionem confirmavit, et quecumque regalia ibidem habebat,
auctoritate regiĉ majestatis ecclesiĉ precepto firmavit. Cujus quidem
recuperationis tenorem si quis plenius nosse voluerit, in cartis regum et
privilegiis apostolicorum enueleatius poterit reperire. Cujus scilicet
abbatiĉ et appendiciorum ejus, quĉ sunt Trappe, Herencurtis, Chaveniacus,
Burdeniacus, Cerisiacus, et terra de Monte Meliano et Bunziaco, sive de
Mosteriolo quod est prope Milidunum, et aliorum incrementum quanti constet,
qui sapienter illa tractabunt pro magno prelati cognoscere poterunt. 
  De antiquo censu Argentoili, qui ad abbatiam non pertinet, incrementum est
viginti librarum: quia, cum olim non haberemus nisi viginti libras, modo XL
redduntur. De annona prius sex modios, modo XV recipimus. 



Françoise Gasparri, ed. Les classiques de l'histoire de France au moyen age:
Suger. Oeuvres, tome I. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1996.

**********************************************************************
To join the list, send the message: join medieval-religion YOUR NAME
to: [log in to unmask]
To send a message to the list, address it to:
[log in to unmask]
To leave the list, send the message: leave medieval-religion
to: [log in to unmask]
In order to report problems or to contact the list's owners, write to:
[log in to unmask]
For further information, visit our web site:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/medieval-religion.html

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager