medieval-religion: Scholarly discussions of medieval religion and culture
Dear list-members,
I´m wondering if anyone can suggest a good study of the development of,
if not canon law, at least papal expectations, concerning new saints around 1200?
Obviously a few miracles help get the canonization process started . . . I´m trying
to find a discussion (or contemporary examples) of how the process got underway,
between, say, 1180 and 1220. I would be interested in examples both when the pope
was involved and when he was not. (Icelandic example: miracles reported - bishop permits
vows to the saint - success of vows leads to translation.)
Meg
________________________________
From: Scholarly discussions of medieval religion and culture on behalf of John Dillon
Sent: fim. 3.2.2005 23:57
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [M-R] "approved" cults
medieval-religion: Scholarly discussions of medieval religion and culture
"Approved cult" is also used for post-eleventh-century individuals whose
veneration has been sanctioned for a particular locality or a particular
order but who have not yet been formally beatified or declared saints.
An example would be Conrad/Corrado of Noto (or of Piacenza), d. 1395;
cult said to have been approved in 1515, formally beatified only in
1544, and canonized in 1615. From 1515 to 1544, C. will have had an
approved cult but no formal title of beatitude or sanctity.
Beyond this, biographical accounts of later medieval or of modern
persons sometimes use the term "cult approved" as a general indication
that veneration has been permitted. Sometimes they qualify that by
specifying "with the title of blessed" or "with the title of saint"; at
other times, though, they don't specify, even in cases of individuals
recognized as "blessed" or declared to be saints. So one cannot infer
from the mere appearance of this term what sort of formal recognition
has been granted.
Best,
John Dillon
----- Original Message -----
From: Phyllis Jestice <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thursday, February 3, 2005 8:42 pm
Subject: "approved" cults
> medieval-religion: Scholarly discussions of medieval religion and
> culture
> >I think the "approved cult" label is only used for early medieval
> >saints and only in cases where somebody has gone to the bother of
> >getting an official Roman seal of approval for a longstanding cult.
> >The vast majority of pre-twelfth century saints remain
> >"non-approved"---rather than reviewed and rejected.
**********************************************************************
To join the list, send the message: join medieval-religion YOUR NAME
to: [log in to unmask]
To send a message to the list, address it to:
[log in to unmask]
To leave the list, send the message: leave medieval-religion
to: [log in to unmask]
In order to report problems or to contact the list's owners, write to:
[log in to unmask]
For further information, visit our web site:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/medieval-religion.html
**********************************************************************
To join the list, send the message: join medieval-religion YOUR NAME
to: [log in to unmask]
To send a message to the list, address it to:
[log in to unmask]
To leave the list, send the message: leave medieval-religion
to: [log in to unmask]
In order to report problems or to contact the list's owners, write to:
[log in to unmask]
For further information, visit our web site:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/medieval-religion.html
|