Hi David
here is a clarification: i was refering to the 'DESIGN composed of 640
subfields' (i also clarified this on 21 nov 2005 18:22:35)
...but i expect a good dose of confusion arising through these email
exchanges.
rosan
David Sless wrote:
> But I think Rosan is wrong when she asserts:
> > It is a habit of some to suggest that Art and Design is a sub-
> > (field,discipline,tradition-you pick the word/concept you like) of
> > DESIGN. This overarching (field,discipline, tradition) DESIGN, I
> > believe, has never existed, but is under
> > construction...retrospectively...from our present point of view.
|