ARTAUD.
the mise-en-scene becomes linear time. or out-of-tim?!
sometimes in an effort to innovate artists confuse
tearing down others (pervasiveness of capitalism,
deluse, the dadaists) with extolling the purity of
artistic integrity.
obviously as an anarchist i am biased. but which way is
myu bias?
pythagoras tells me my bias is towards the center, away
from the imbalanced extremes of left and right.
"illusionist cinema"?
--- Mike Frank <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >What is the "scene" we are experiencing if not the
> one that is shown on
> the cinematic screen? How
> >can we hold claim to an original "experience" of an
> actual actor, when,
> as spectators, we were
> >never able to be with the actor at the same time of
> his/her utterance or
> performance.
>
> simple . . . all i mean is that we imagine a
> continuous action, event, and/or performance
> that is presented to us through a transparent
> medium . . . now i
> of course know that the
> medium is NOT transparent at all -- but the
> idea that it may be
> seen as transparent is
> central to illusionist cinema
>
> *
> *
> Film-Philosophy Email Discussion Salon.
> After hitting 'reply' please always delete the text of
> the message you are replying to.
> To leave, send the message: leave film-philosophy to:
> [log in to unmask]
> For help email:
> [log in to unmask], not the salon.
> **
http://particlezen.proboards7.com/index.cgi
the edge of everything. no, really.
http://www.deadjournal.com/users/cataleptik/
catal3ptik is a rav3r
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
*
*
Film-Philosophy Email Discussion Salon.
After hitting 'reply' please always delete the text of the message you are replying to.
To leave, send the message: leave film-philosophy to: [log in to unmask]
For help email: [log in to unmask], not the salon.
**
|