> PS I am still stunned that Starlink have been reusing document numbers -
> doesn't that mean that document cross referencing is simply pointless?
The citation should include the name of the document too to avoid
ambiguity.
I wish we could undo that mistake, but the citations aren't limited to
within our own documents. Anyone would think we wrote NDG at the outset
of Starlink, being descirbed in SUN/2. Anyone remember the subject of
the original SUN/2? I have paper copies of most of the lost SUNs.
Malcolm
|