JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for STARDEV Archives


STARDEV Archives

STARDEV Archives


STARDEV@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

STARDEV Home

STARDEV Home

STARDEV  March 2004

STARDEV March 2004

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Primdat's bad values

From:

Norman Gray <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Starlink development <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 17 Mar 2004 17:27:32 +0000

Content-Type:

TEXT/PLAIN

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

TEXT/PLAIN (90 lines)

All,

Here's what I now think is the full (?) story about bad values,
condensing various folk's comments, plus a bit of scouting around.

-- Primdat, HDS and IMG all _separately_ define bad values,
which match, though they aren't taken from a common source.

-- Primdat specifies its bad values in files prm_par_* as hex integers
interpreted as floats (where the Fortran compiler supports that VAX
Fortran extension), or as magic float values which match those integers.
It therefore doesn't have to worry about endianness, since the bytesex
of integers is the same as the bytesex of floats; we can distinguish this
from specifying a bit pattern, which would be a bytesex-independent thing
(for the purposes of the discussion below: 12345678 is the same integer
on a big- and little-endian machine, but different bit patterns).

-- As it happens (apparently, though this isn't noticably documented in
the Primdat sources) these bad values are the same as the most negative
float and double, -FLT_MAX and -DBL_MAX from <float.h>.  However none
of the primdat definitions use float.h.

-- This has to be the case, since the primdat, img and hds bad values
must be the same.

-- The HDS bad values are explicitly the most negative values for floats
and signed integer types (for example -FLT_MAX and INT_MIN), and the
maximum values for unsigned integer types.  These aren't specified in
a header file, but initialised in HDS's dat1_init_ndr.c, based on the
values in float.h.  Somewhat surprisingly, these seem _not_ to be written
to a header file anywhere.  It's essentially the result of
dat1_init_ndr.c that hds_machine.f reports, and puts into
hds_datestamp, but this is purely informational, and isn't
machine-readable.

-- That means that the HDS bad float value is the same as integer ff7fffff
on both big- and little-endian IEEE machines, and the same as integer
ffffffff on VAXes (that's the most negative f_float; float ff7fffff is
a legal VAX float, but not the most negative one).  That's presumably
why (as Malcolm reports) SUN/39 lists ffffffff as the primdat bad float.

-- Thus there isn't a fixed bit pattern, nor even a fixed integer
equivalent, which is the bad value stored in HDS files (ain't HDS
clever): this is presumably a good thing for the prospective 64-bit HDS
and primdat.

-- Thus the VAX and IEEE bad values don't have the same integer
equivalent, nor the same numerical value (-1.7e38 and -3.4e38
respectively), and the way that HDS's dat1_cvt_format.c handles this
appears to be by explicitly spotting one format's bad value on input
and replacing it with the other.

-- Primdat slightly complicates this by defining both NUM__MINR, which
is the most negative float (and thus necessarily identical to
VAL__BADR) and VAL__MINR, which is the most negative non-bad float (and
thus necessarily the next float after NUM__MINR).  It defines the
latter with a hex integer, and thus _not_ using float.h, and thus not
portably to VAXes (big deal) or 64-bit machines (which would require
special handling here anyway).


SO:

I think the best thing would be for me to modify HDS so that it generates
and installs Fortran and C include files which define the bad values
which it expects on the local platform, plus the minimum and maximum
values, and the minimum and maximum non-bad values, all based on float.h.
Perhaps call them HDS__BADR, HDS__MINRX and HDS__MINR (etc).  Then either
(a) components like IMG or primdat reprocess these headers into their
own headers (though there might be worries about converting these back
and forth into decimal representation); or (b) we lose prm_par and (the
relevant parts of) img.h and have those applications just use the HDS
values instead (probably more reliable, and might require little more
than a bit of sedding, but it would temporarily break any applications
outside our tree which use these headers -- are there any?).

Of the two I probably prefer (a).  Or (b).  No, (a).  (b).

Is there anything I've missed?

See you,

Norman


--
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Norman Gray                        http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/norman/
Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, UK     [log in to unmask]

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

December 2023
January 2023
December 2022
July 2022
June 2022
April 2022
March 2022
December 2021
October 2021
July 2021
April 2021
January 2021
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
May 2020
November 2019
October 2019
July 2019
June 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
August 2018
July 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
December 2017
October 2017
August 2017
July 2017
May 2017
April 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
2004
April 2003
2003


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager