Thanks to cindy and the contributors to her call.
Indeed, the contribution and the compilation of articles and books related to
philsophy and design are something very good and very useful ... but in a twisted
way.
1
i think that this list of books and articles is very good and very useful because
it reflects our different fundamental assumptions of design(ing) at the present.
2
i suggest that we are not to take this list as the canon and put it on the
pedastal to admire worship, and follow ... but rather
3
i suggest that we need to unpack the assumptions that underlie the choices of
these books and articles and subject them to critical analysis.
4
i maintain that it is through executing point 3, can we advance our understanding
on design(ing).
i am saying this because i wish someone had said it to me at the beginning of my
phd studies.
best regards, rosan
"Lubomir S. Popov" wrote:
> Thanks Cindy,
>
> That was something good.
|