While I agree with the overall message of Norm's post, I would like to
object to the apparent generalization that quantitative methods are
inappropriate in complex contexts. In the sciences such methods are used
precisely because they enable an overview or a "way into" complex contexts
and enable the researcher to see patterns, etc. However, I agree that such
methods can overlook important factors in situated contexts, although we
should be clear what we mean by "situated". All research is in some
situation, but I suppose design (for example) is requires an engagement in
the context that is in conflict with traditional concepts of the
independent observer.
Michael Biggs
At 00:38 22/09/2004, Norm Sheehan wrote:
>Quantitative methods are a species of cultural artefacts that
>generate dualistic outcomes...i do not believe that these methods are valid
>in complex or situated contexts like design.
************************************************************
Dr Michael A R Biggs
Associate Dean Research and Reader in Visual Communication
School of Art and Design, University of Hertfordshire
College Lane, Hatfield, Herts. AL10 9AB
UK
T 00 44 (0)1707 285341
F 00 44 (0)1707 285350
E <[log in to unmask]>
http://www.herts.ac.uk/artdes/research/tvad/biggs1.html
For information about University research in art and design visit
http://www.herts.ac.uk/artdes/research/
************************************************************
|