Hi
Great work on the document, get it up of the official site as soon
as possible!
On Mon 12-May-2003 at 03:10:51PM +0100, Andy Powell wrote:
>
> I agree, that it would be nice for the URI to resolve to a
> machine-readable description of the profile but that doesn't
> appear to be a requirement currently ("This specification does not
> define formats for profiles") and I'm not in the least bit
> convinced that this will ever be the case or that user-agents will
> ever try to do this.
>
> Therefore, providing a URL that is both
>
> 1) a unique and persistent URI for the profile
> 2) a link to a human-readable document
>
> seems to be about the best we can do?
Makes perfect sense to me :-)
I don't doubt that the HTML 4.01 spec will _ever_ be updated -- all
the work is now being done on XHTML 2.0.
Two _tiny_ points, would it be better to have a / on the profile
URI?
<head profile="http://dublincore.org/documents/dcq-html/">
Rather than
<head profile="http://dublincore.org/documents/dcq-html">
Also would this example:
<link rel="copyright" href="http://www.example.org/rights.html" />
Illustrate the point better (use the XHTML built-in link type,
'copyright', instead of (or as well as) 'dc:rights') like this:
<link rel="copyright dc:rights" href="http://www.example.org/rights.html" />
Chris
--
Chris Croome <[log in to unmask]>
web design http://www.webarchitects.co.uk/
web content management http://mkdoc.com/
|