On 20 Nov 2002, at 12:42, Bakker, A.J. wrote:
> When you are using the rate blanked 26 µmol/l compensated method, the
> results compare well with the results obtained by the enzymatic method
> from Roche. Therefore, in the enzymatic measurement you 've got the
> same problems with the low results. As far as I know, meaurement in
> urine usually has a low protein content, so the compensation does not
> to be needed for urine measurements since the compensation is needed
> for protein interference.
And of course one's serum creatinine results become dependent
on the serum protein concentration - not exactly a desirable feature
of any method . . .
Dr David Bullock
Director, Wolfson EQA Laboratory
P O Box 3909, Birmingham B15 2UE, U K
FAX: 0121 414 1179 [+44 121 414 1179]
------ACB discussion List Information--------
This is an open discussion list for the academic and clinical
community working in clinical biochemistry.
Please note, archived messages are public and can be viewed
via the internet. Views expressed are those of the individual and
they are responsible for all message content.
ACB Web Site
http://www.acb.org.uk
List Archives
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN.html
List Instructions (How to leave etc.)
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/
|