Is this a legal definition or an EH working definition/standard, and is it
published anywhere?
I have experienced barristers at Planning appeals and Public Inquiries
arguing about the thickness and precise meaning of a line on a map....
I have not yet had to fight over an archaeological line, but I would like to
know if there is a legal basis for interpreting one
Annie Given
NI Sites and Monuments Record
Environment & Heritage Service: Built Heritage
5-33 Hill St
BELFAST BT1 2LA
tel: 028 9054 3013 fax: 028 9054 3111
[log in to unmask]
www.ehsni.gov.uk
-----Original Message-----
From: Deborah Porter [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 05 November 2001 09:09
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: SM Boundaries, Thursday lunch rant
Just as a point of fact: the thickness of the 'red line' is immaterial. It
is the inside of the line that defines the monument, thus whatever the
thickness, the monument is whatever is in the inside edge of the line.
Deborah
_________________________________________________________________
This e-mail is intended solely for the above-mentioned recipient
and it may contain confidential or privileged information. If you
have received it in error, please notify us immediately and delete
the e-mail. You must not copy, distribute, disclose or take any
action in reliance on it.
English Heritage
Telephone 020 7973 3000
Facsimile 020 7973 3001
_________________________________________________________________
|