Thomas Baker wrote:
>
> -- This seems to involve creating a catalog (descriptive
> metadata) about all sorts of things, including XML schemas and UML
> classes. The DCMI registry, in contrast, should be in essence a
> database of schemas themselves (not just metadata about schemas).
> Is the API designed to handle schemas?
>
Remind me again why we need the schema in registry (or should that be
repository?). It is not the canonical copy (or is it), but rather a
cached copy that faclitates naviagation (which might be the answer). But
collecting the metadata about the schema seems to do this as well.
Cheers Tod...
--
Ask not for whom the <CONTROL-G> tolls.
|