I'd really appreciate more than a cryptic "Bugger."
Could you elaborate just a bit more? I assume you're
expressing dismay or skepticism and I'm truly
interested.
Thanks,
MG
--- [log in to unmask] wrote:
> Panofsky
> > makes much, however, of Suger's reading of the
> > Pseudo-Dionysius that has been quite thoroughly
> debunked by
> > more recent authors.
>
> Bugger
__________________________________________________
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
|