> From [log in to unmask] Wed Feb 14 02:31 MET 2001
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 11:30:43 +1000
> From: Renato Iannella <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: [POLL] URI for DCES, DCQ and DCT
> To: [log in to unmask]
>
> --On 13/2/01 10:54 PM +0000 Andy Powell wrote:
>
> > The reason for this is that, as far as I recall, the DCMI made an explicit
> > decision *not* to version the qualifiers with a version number but to use
> > a date stamp instead.
>
> No. No decision was made wrt to versioning the qualifier set.
> (I still have scares to prove it ;-)
There was a lot of discussion about methods and meaning of versioning, but no final agreement found.
>
>
> Cheers...Renato <http://purl.net/net/renato>
> Chief Scientist, IPR Systems Pty Ltd <http://iprsystems.com>
>
|