Dear Christopher
No, that is my reading too. Of course, the move never actually took place.
By the way, was arthisterical more than just a typo? ;-)
John
----- Original Message -----
From: Christopher Crockett <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: 21 May 2000 19:40
Subject: Cistercian glass (was from Brother Cadfael to The name of the rose)
> i believe that there's been a *lot* of work on early cistercian glass
> --archelogical, arthisterical and textual-- up with which i have
> definetly *not* kept. thanks, John, for the interesting note; though it
seems
> to me that the removal of the "coloured" glass in question there would
suggest
> that, c.1139, the white guys definitely didn't want it in their house, at
> least at that place.
>
> or, am i missing/misreading the obvious? surely not.....
>
> best from here,
>
> christopher
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|