JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN Archives

PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN  2000

PHD-DESIGN 2000

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Returning to the Cannon

From:

[log in to unmask]

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Tue, 10 Oct 2000 09:42:09 +0200

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (93 lines)


David and all,

David wrote an interesting story about discovering our lack of rigor and
knowledge:

"Well, in a sense what we had done was to discover that there was no cannon
in the field in which we were asked to investigate. This is not an unusual
experience in advanced
research work. This has happened to me and to many other researchers many
times over. And I am quite excited about this 'discovery'. But the first
time it happened to me was quite scary and disorientating. I think I felt
much like Rosan when she said:
>While I was listening to the discussion, I felt like
>I was standing on a crossroad. But if I want to get somewhere, I need a
point
>of a departure. I fee l a need to make a decision into which ideas I
should
>buy, without a decision I can never find out if I am right or wrong, or
worse,
>I can't change my mind. I need a canon!"

I like these anectotal accounts to illuminate a theoretical point. In my
fields of concern  - market orientation, knowledge management and
innovation we don't even have canons (feel free to chose the number of n's
in the word). The above are therefore termed "fields of investigation" due
to the lack of grounded theory. Most investigations are case studies and
collections of anectotes where we look hard for patterns of thoughts,
feelings and behavior in order to generalize from our collections of
apples, bananas trying to describe fruit baskets or whatever useful to give
order to all the incredible and uninmagined things people invent without
formal theory.

Just out of curiosity, David: Did your team have a lawyer on board?
Regulators are experts at looking at other nation's solutions and the
anectotal and political support giving rationale for whatever the
interested parties want as a solution. Strangely, occationally some
governments even make some efforts of evaluating their laws and regulations
afterwards, but most often the losing parties at the time of law-making
make rather goal-oriented investigations to reverse earlier decisions. Not
much objectivity I am afraid, but you surely get the contrasting views and
arguments! That's one of the reasons I prefer to look for spread and
contrasts rather than canons - it's more fun and you learn more - but you
don't endear yourself to the establishment......

Still, there is a need to identify and teach undergraduate students the
major thoughtS and experiences within a field - not THE cannon, but the
battery of cannons.

I once had a thesis chairman who wrote a book called THE theory of buyer
behavior. In a congressional hearing he said: "We are at the verge of being
able to map the minds of buyers to the extent that we can predict with high
certainty what they will do given certain stimuli." I asked him on return
from Washington whether he really believed that, and that he had discovered
THE ever-lasting answer to understanding materialistic behavior in markets.
"No", he said, "but I did get the federal research grant I was looking
for." Your dissertation is funded. He was a great dissertation chairman!

I guess the need to have canons to believe in to simplify the world and
reduce felt uncertainty is a common human trait. A must, I believe, for
politicians and business leaders who have to make authoritative and
confident decisions about things they do not understand or master to make
the majority accept the decision (called "steel foot selling"), but not
very conducive to research discovery and imaginative investigation.

I therefore believe that the minimum reqirement for a decent doctorate is
that you teach the students that the war of knowledge has many kinds of
strategies and weapons, and that the winner often comes up with the
unexpected, not the cannons of yesterday.

Good hunting for the objective truth. If you convince others you are on the
brink of establishing it, you may get loads of research grants and a nice
pay-rise.

Brynjulf

Brynjulf Tellefsen
Associate Professor
Department of Knowledge Management
Norwegian School of Management
P. O. Box 4676 Sofienberg
N-0506 Oslo, NORWAY

Phone direct:  +47-22985142
Via exchange:  +47-22985000
Faximile: +47-22985111
Private phone/fax: +47-22149697
e-mail: [log in to unmask]



%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager