Very interesting.
At 11:01 AM 5/15/2000 -0600, you wrote:
>No. That question is ecologically identical to "Would the Earth be better
>off without trees?" Humans are of Earth, there is no ecological separation.
>IMO
>sb
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [log in to unmask]
>[mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Dennis Kostecki
>Sent: Monday, May 15, 2000 10:15 AM
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: an old question...(ENVIROETHICS)
>
>
>Hello.
>
>I am curious to hear what thoughts there might be on a rather old but timely
>(I think) question.
>I hope this is appropriate for this discussion list.
>
>Brief, non-essay responses would greatly be appreciated.
>
>Q: Would the Earth be better off without man?
>
>Thank you.
>
>Dennis Kostecki
>http://www.artecology.org
>[log in to unmask]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|