JISCMail - ENVIROETHICS Archives

Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Subscriber's Corner

Email Lists

ENVIROETHICS Archives

2000

View:

Show Author | Hide Author

		LISTSERV Archives
		ENVIROETHICS Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Get Password

Subject	From	Date	Size
Re: Entropy as a moral foundation (was Autopoesis)	Adam Gottschalk	Fri, 01 Jan 1904 08:46:08 -0500	188 lines
Re: Autopoesis	Adam Gottschalk	Fri, 01 Jan 1904 10:20:04 -0400	66 lines
FWD - Survey on Opinions on Social Issues	Good Goals	Tue, 04 Jan 2000 21:44:16 -0500	37 lines
Asst. Prof. Environmental Studies/Humanities-Job Announcement	Bron Taylor	Wed, 05 Jan 2000 19:24:28 -0600	102 lines
Asst. Prof. Environmental Studies/Humanities-Job Announcement	Bron Taylor	Wed, 05 Jan 2000 19:24:34 -0600	102 lines
[Fwd: Asst. Prof. Environmental Studies/Humanities-Job Announcement]	Andrew Jameton	Thu, 06 Jan 2000 09:58:05 -0600	160 lines
SDEST Application Reminder	Hollander, Rachelle	Mon, 10 Jan 2000 09:19:37 -0500	53 lines
upcoming workshop: Sustainability Best Practices in Higher Education	<>	Tue, 11 Jan 2000 14:56:28 -0500	185 lines
FW: Research grant, dissertation grant and data base studies fell owship opportunities	Hollander, Rachelle	Fri, 14 Jan 2000 08:42:27 -0500	39 lines
Beyond Leopold Conference	Chris Perley	Fri, 21 Jan 2000 13:14:06 +1300	423 lines
Revised Call for Project 2005 Partitipation	AoM	Fri, 21 Jan 2000 12:17:54 -0500	69 lines
Regional Institute of Environmental Technoloy: IMPACTS OF ISO 140 00 CERTIFICATION ON BUSINESS PERFORMANCE Dec '99	Wong Ee Ling	Mon, 24 Jan 2000 16:25:58 +0800	102 lines
RE: ENB Vol. 9 No. 132 CBD ExCOP (Biosafety)	Wong Ee Ling	Tue, 25 Jan 2000 11:22:07 +0800	299 lines
now Shakespeare's all mud....to dig or not to dig, that is the qu estion!	Wong Ee Ling	Tue, 25 Jan 2000 11:25:03 +0800	626 lines
RNS Jan 25 2000	Wong Ee Ling	Tue, 25 Jan 2000 12:31:52 +0800	3692 lines
GIS/EM4 Deadline Reminder	<>	Wed, 26 Jan 2000 14:06:33 -0700	80 lines
Life Cycle Assessment Conference	Prof. Walter Leal Filho	Fri, 28 Jan 2000 17:35:49 +0100	47 lines
"Why do hunters kill?"	David Pearson	Mon, 31 Jan 2000 14:58:22 +0000	32 lines
FW: Call for Papers: Autonomy of Nature	Clare Palmer	Mon, 31 Jan 2000 16:20:31 -0000	112 lines
Ethics of immunocontraception?	JOSH WINCHELL	Tue, 1 Feb 2000 10:22:51 -0500	56 lines
Re: My Webpage for your Journal	Eugene Hargrove	Tue, 01 Feb 2000 11:34:38 -0600	17 lines
Re: Ethics of immunocontraception?	David C Anderson	Tue, 1 Feb 2000 09:47:44 -0800	87 lines
The Size of the Potential Market for the Kyoto Flexibility Mecha	Wong Ee Ling	Wed, 2 Feb 2000 10:47:14 +0800	73 lines
Re: [Ethics of immunocontraception?]	VeggieBiggs	Wed, 2 Feb 00 08:04:50 EST	98 lines
RE: [Ethics of immunocontraception?]	JOSH WINCHELL	Fri, 4 Feb 2000 13:08:07 -0500	165 lines
AET Techno News (complimentary)	Wong Ee Ling	Tue, 8 Feb 2000 15:07:03 +0800	101 lines
Asia-EcoBest (for your use if applicable)	Wong Ee Ling	Wed, 9 Feb 2000 11:49:18 +0800	1833 lines
Asia-EcoBest funding (for your use if applicable) members record	Wong Ee Ling	Wed, 9 Feb 2000 12:13:31 +0800	1835 lines
Re: Ethics of immunocontraception?	Jim Tantillo	Wed, 9 Feb 2000 10:55:09 -0500	99 lines
Re: [Re: Ethics of immunocontraception?]	VeggieBiggs	Wed, 9 Feb 00 13:52:39 EST	43 lines
RE: Ethics of immunocontraception?	Steven Bissell	Wed, 9 Feb 2000 12:52:47 -0700	106 lines
RE: Ethics of immunocontraception?	JOSH WINCHELL	Wed, 9 Feb 2000 14:58:55 -0500	171 lines
Re: [RE: Ethics of immunocontraception?]	VeggieBiggs	Thu, 10 Feb 00 12:44:07 EST +0000	26 lines
GIS/EM4 Student Competition	<>	Fri, 11 Feb 2000 15:35:53 -0700	55 lines
ASIA ENVIRONMENT TRADER Feb 8, '00	Wong Ee Ling	Mon, 14 Feb 2000 13:46:22 +0800	141 lines
advanced professional training program "Instruments of Environmen tal	Wong Ee Ling	Mon, 14 Feb 2000 13:57:06 +0800	115 lines
ERN Professional Announcements and Job Openings, 02/10/2000	Wong Ee Ling	Mon, 14 Feb 2000 16:54:07 +0800	350 lines
RNS supplement	Wong Ee Ling	Mon, 14 Feb 2000 17:42:31 +0800	297 lines
World Day for Water 2000	David Pearson	Wed, 16 Feb 2000 14:43:37 +0000	136 lines
Env. related vacancies from UN and others	Wong Ee Ling	Thu, 17 Feb 2000 15:22:57 +0800	282 lines
Pls remember 22 March as World Day for Water 2000	Wong Ee Ling	Thu, 17 Feb 2000 16:32:16 +0800	149 lines
RE: [RE: Ethics of immunocontraception?]	JOSH WINCHELL	Thu, 17 Feb 2000 13:00:25 -0500	90 lines
Re: [RE: [RE: Ethics of immunocontraception?]]	VeggieBiggs	Fri, 17 Feb 00 14:20:45 EST +0000	40 lines
The problem of death, Was [RE: Ethics of immunocontraception?]	Jim Tantillo	Thu, 17 Feb 2000 15:04:30 -0500	499 lines
Zencey	Heather Keith	Thu, 17 Feb 2000 15:57:23 -0500	170 lines
Re: The problem of death, Was [RE: Ethics of immunocontraception?]	Adam Gottschalk	Thu, 17 Feb 2000 13:23:08 -0800	282 lines
vegetarianism, was, The problem of death, Was [RE: Ethics of immunocontraception?]	michael	Fri, 18 Feb 2000 10:22:49 +0800	44 lines
Re: [RE: Ethics of immunocontraception?]	John Foster	Thu, 17 Feb 2000 18:33:56 -0800	34 lines
Re: vegetarianism, was, The problem of death, Was [RE: Ethics ofimmunocontraception?]	Ray Lanier	Thu, 17 Feb 2000 22:41:14 -0500	95 lines
Re: [Re: vegetarianism, was, The problem of death, Was [RE: Ethics ofimmunocontraception?]]	VeggieBiggs	Sat, 18 Feb 00 08:31:41 EST +0000	51 lines
Ilisu Dam and British Ethical policy	Ronnie Sheridan	Fri, 18 Feb 2000 14:31:20 GMT	70 lines
Re: Zencey	Jim Tantillo	Fri, 18 Feb 2000 09:39:00 -0500	121 lines
On the importance of cows, was Should we use something besides Wood?	Jim Tantillo	Fri, 18 Feb 2000 12:56:27 -0500	582 lines
Re: Should we use something besides Wood? was [RE: Ethics of immunocontraception?]	John Foster	Fri, 18 Feb 2000 11:30:04 -0800	272 lines
Re: [On the importance of cows, was Should we use something besides Wood?]	VeggieBiggs	Sat, 18 Feb 00 15:00:55 EST +0000	26 lines
Should we use something besides Wood? was [RE: Ethics of immunocontraception?]	Chris Perley	Sat, 19 Feb 2000 00:28:15 +1300	84 lines
RE: [RE: [RE: Ethics of immunocontraception?]]	Steven Bissell	Sat, 19 Feb 2000 08:44:22 -0700	66 lines
Re: Should we use something besides Wood? was [RE: Ethics of immunocontraception?]	John Foster	Sun, 20 Feb 2000 08:44:28 -0800	161 lines
RE: Should we use something besides Wood? was [RE: Ethics of immunocontraception?]	Chris Perley	Sun, 20 Feb 2000 21:35:41 +1300	374 lines
Re: Ethics of immunocontraception?	Ray Lanier	Sun, 20 Feb 2000 21:53:58 -0500	123 lines
Re: The problem of death, Was [RE: Ethics of immunocontraception?]	Ray Lanier	Sun, 20 Feb 2000 22:19:56 -0500	35 lines
Re: The problem of death, Was [RE: Ethics of immunocontraception?]	Ray Lanier	Sun, 20 Feb 2000 22:19:56 -0500	35 lines
RE: Should we use something besides Wood? was [RE: Ethics of immunocontraception?]	Chris Perley	Mon, 21 Feb 2000 09:16:30 +1300	187 lines
An excerpt of "Ecofascism: What is It?"	Helga Hoffmann	Mon, 21 Feb 2000 08:07:10 -0800	56 lines
RE: Ethics of immunocontraception?	Steven Bissell	Mon, 21 Feb 2000 12:36:47 -0700	57 lines
RE: The problem of death, Was [RE: Ethics of immunocontraception?]	Steven Bissell	Tue, 22 Feb 2000 09:02:15 -0700	85 lines
RE: The problem of death, Was [RE: Ethics of immunocontraception?]	Steven Bissell	Tue, 22 Feb 2000 11:47:21 -0700	150 lines
Ethical framework for global warming	Renée Dreyfus	Tue, 22 Feb 2000 11:30:37 -0800	65 lines
Re: The problem of death, Was [RE: Ethics of immunocontraception?]	Steven Thompson	Tue, 22 Feb 2000 12:16:44 -0800	215 lines
Ilisu Dam and British Ethical policy	Ronnie Sheridan	Tue, 22 Feb 2000 21:01:11 GMT	70 lines
ASIA ENVIRONMENT TRADER Feb 23, 2000	Wong Ee Ling	Wed, 23 Feb 2000 12:26:36 +0800	307 lines
Re: [Re: Ethics of immunocontraception?]	VeggieBiggs	Mon, 23 Feb 00 07:33:51 EST +0000	40 lines
	waterwrats	Wed, 23 Feb 2000 08:21:07 -0500	37 lines
Re: [Re: Ethics of immunocontraception?]	Jim Tantillo	Wed, 23 Feb 2000 09:38:56 -0500	77 lines
RE: [Re: Ethics of immunocontraception?]	Steven Bissell	Wed, 23 Feb 2000 07:55:21 -0700	47 lines
Re: [Re: [Re: Ethics of immunocontraception?]]	VeggieBiggs	Mon, 23 Feb 00 10:12:37 EST +0000	41 lines
Re: [RE: [Re: Ethics of immunocontraception?]]	VeggieBiggs	Mon, 23 Feb 00 10:20:16 EST +0000	35 lines
RE: [RE: [Re: Ethics of immunocontraception?]]	Steven Bissell	Wed, 23 Feb 2000 08:52:58 -0700	57 lines
Re: killing cats	Jim Tantillo	Wed, 23 Feb 2000 11:08:44 -0500	95 lines
Re: killing cats	John Foster	Wed, 23 Feb 2000 09:54:29 -0800	55 lines
RE: [RE: [Re: Ethics of immunocontraception?]]	JOSH WINCHELL	Wed, 23 Feb 2000 17:44:18 -0500	165 lines
RE: [RE: [Re: Ethics of immunocontraception?]]	Jim Tantillo	Wed, 23 Feb 2000 23:02:03 -0500	143 lines
Job Announcement, Was Re: killing cats	Jim Tantillo	Thu, 24 Feb 2000 08:28:13 -0500	63 lines
Re: [RE: [RE: [Re: Ethics of immunocontraception?]]]	VeggieBiggs	Tue, 24 Feb 00 08:43:52 EST +0000	65 lines
Re: [RE: [RE: [Re: Ethics of immunocontraception?]]]	John Foster	Thu, 24 Feb 2000 10:25:19 -0800	171 lines
Re: [RE: [RE: [Re: Ethics of immunocontraception?]]]	Ray Lanier	Thu, 24 Feb 2000 18:02:31 -0500	36 lines
Complimentary copy: ASIA ENVIRONMENT TRADER Feb 23, 2000	Wong Ee Ling	Fri, 25 Feb 2000 11:21:47 +0800	284 lines
Complimentary : RNS Feb23 '00	Wong Ee Ling	Fri, 25 Feb 2000 11:22:20 +0800	1133 lines
Re: [RE: [RE: [Re: Ethics of immunocontraception?]]]	<>	Fri, 25 Feb 2000 03:22:42 EST	43 lines
Q. Sand County Almanac ref. to Weaver?	David Pearson	Fri, 25 Feb 2000 10:48:17 +0000	41 lines
Re: Q. Sand County Almanac ref. to Weaver?	David Pearson	Fri, 25 Feb 2000 15:45:10 +0000	30 lines
FW: Q. Sand County Almanac ref. to Weaver?	Steven Bissell	Fri, 25 Feb 2000 08:50:29 -0700	75 lines
Re: Ethics of immunocontraception?	Ray Lanier	Fri, 25 Feb 2000 11:48:59 -0500	117 lines
Re: [RE: [Re: Ethics of immunocontraception?]]	Ray Lanier	Fri, 25 Feb 2000 12:32:49 -0500	111 lines
human evolution, vegetarianism and EE.	Steven Bissell	Fri, 25 Feb 2000 10:51:24 -0700	94 lines
Re: human evolution, vegetarianism and EE.	Steve Thompson	Fri, 25 Feb 2000 13:35:04 -0500	96 lines
Re: human evolution, vegetarianism and EE.	Adam Gottschalk	Fri, 25 Feb 2000 10:38:01 -0800	85 lines
Re: human evolution, vegetarianism and EE.	John Foster	Fri, 25 Feb 2000 11:20:54 -0800	133 lines
Re: Ethics of immunocontraception?	Adam Gottschalk	Fri, 25 Feb 2000 11:21:11 -0800	157 lines
Re: human evolution, vegetarianism and EE.	Adam Gottschalk	Fri, 25 Feb 2000 11:41:42 -0800	87 lines
RE: human evolution, vegetarianism and EE.	JOSH WINCHELL	Fri, 25 Feb 2000 14:45:04 -0500	169 lines
RE: human evolution, vegetarianism and EE.	Steven Bissell	Fri, 25 Feb 2000 12:47:27 -0700	141 lines
RE: human evolution, vegetarianism and EE.	Steven Bissell	Fri, 25 Feb 2000 12:53:53 -0700	189 lines
RE: Ethics of immunocontraception?	Steven Bissell	Fri, 25 Feb 2000 13:51:50 -0700	151 lines
Re: human evolution, vegetarianism and EE.	Adam Gottschalk	Fri, 25 Feb 2000 12:53:58 -0800	44 lines
RE: Ethics of immunocontraception?	<>	Fri, 25 Feb 2000 16:24:20 EST	30 lines
RE: Ethics of immunocontraception?	Steven Bissell	Fri, 25 Feb 2000 14:40:20 -0700	52 lines
Re: Ethics of immunocontraception?	Ray Lanier	Fri, 25 Feb 2000 18:10:48 -0500	221 lines
Re: human evolution, vegetarianism and EE.	John Foster	Fri, 25 Feb 2000 17:07:33 -0800	50 lines
Fw: e-volve	Andy Nolan	Sat, 26 Feb 2000 12:42:34 -0000	318 lines
RE: Ethics of immunocontraception?	Steven Bissell	Sat, 26 Feb 2000 08:49:10 -0700	262 lines
Re: [vegetarianism]	John Foster	Sat, 26 Feb 2000 09:05:37 -0800	95 lines
Unsubscribe	Melinda Meyer	Sun, 27 Feb 2000 17:26:33 +1100	37 lines
	Paul Williams	Sun, 27 Feb 2000 15:50:12 -0000	14 lines
Enviroethics: leaving the list, etc.	David 'n' Lesley	Sun, 27 Feb 2000 18:33:48 +0000	38 lines
Re: killing cats	Jim Tantillo	Mon, 28 Feb 2000 09:24:46 -0500	98 lines
Re: [RE: Ethics of immunocontraception?]	VeggieBiggs	Sat, 28 Feb 00 09:26:41 EST +0000	37 lines
Re: [RE: human evolution, vegetarianism and EE.]	VeggieBiggs	Tue, 28 Feb 00 10:08:31 EST +0000	45 lines
Re: [RE: Ethics of immunocontraception?]	Paul Kirby	Mon, 28 Feb 2000 15:11:04 +0000	38 lines
RE: [RE: Ethics of immunocontraception?]	Steven Bissell	Mon, 28 Feb 2000 08:25:23 -0700	53 lines
Re: killing cats	Ray Lanier	Mon, 28 Feb 2000 10:33:00 -0500	38 lines
Re: [RE: human evolution, vegetarianism and EE.]	VeggieBiggs	Tue, 28 Feb 00 10:40:40 EST +0000	41 lines
Re: [RE: human evolution, vegetarianism and EE.]	Ray Lanier	Mon, 28 Feb 2000 11:38:14 -0500	28 lines
humility - when?	paola cavalieri	Mon, 28 Feb 2000 18:29:05 +0100	51 lines
Re: human evolution, vegetarianism and EE.	Jim Tantillo	Mon, 28 Feb 2000 13:10:35 -0500	255 lines
Re: [humility - when?]	VeggieBiggs	Tue, 28 Feb 00 13:30:18 EST +0000	64 lines
RE: human evolution, vegetarianism and EE.	Steven Bissell	Mon, 28 Feb 2000 12:14:25 -0700	46 lines
Mark Twain ways in	Steven Bissell	Mon, 28 Feb 2000 12:16:28 -0700	23 lines
Re: human evolution, vegetarianism and EE.	Heather Keith	Mon, 28 Feb 2000 14:32:12 -0500	45 lines
Re: human evolution, vegetarianism and EE.	Adam Gottschalk	Mon, 28 Feb 2000 12:16:51 -0800	29 lines
Enviroethics and animal rights?	Adam Gottschalk	Mon, 28 Feb 2000 12:37:57 -0800	55 lines
	Warren Fritze	Mon, 28 Feb 2000 14:40:18 -0600	54 lines
RE: human evolution, vegetarianism and EE.	Steven Bissell	Mon, 28 Feb 2000 13:40:25 -0700	71 lines
RE: human evolution, vegetarianism and EE.	Steven Bissell	Mon, 28 Feb 2000 13:49:27 -0700	53 lines
Re: human evolution, vegetarianism and EE.	<>	Mon, 28 Feb 2000 15:56:29 EST	28 lines
Re: human evolution, vegetarianism and EE.	John Foster	Mon, 28 Feb 2000 13:03:04 -0800	35 lines
Re: human evolution, vegetarianism and EE.	Adam Gottschalk	Mon, 28 Feb 2000 13:07:12 -0800	43 lines
Re: [Enviroethics and animal rights?]	VeggieBiggs	Tue, 28 Feb 00 16:24:02 EST +0000	65 lines
RE: human evolution, vegetarianism and EE.	Steven Bissell	Mon, 28 Feb 2000 16:32:22 -0700	80 lines
Re: vegetarianism and EE	Adam Gottschalk	Mon, 28 Feb 2000 17:42:20 -0800	51 lines
Re: humility - when?	Ray Lanier	Mon, 28 Feb 2000 21:28:09 -0500	191 lines
Re:articles on veganism	michael	Tue, 29 Feb 2000 11:51:12 +0800	41 lines
Re: [RE: Enviroethics and animal rights?]	VeggieBiggs	Wed, 29 Feb 00 07:29:39 EST +0000	38 lines
Zencey on entropy, was Re: vegetarianism and EE	Jim Tantillo	Tue, 29 Feb 2000 09:38:34 -0500	40 lines
RE: Enviroethics and animal rights?	Chris Perley	Tue, 29 Feb 2000 15:57:20 +1300	125 lines
Enviroethics and animal rights?	Maynard S. Clark	Tue, 29 Feb 2000 11:40:37 -0500	23 lines
	Warren Fritze	Tue, 29 Feb 2000 11:11:22 -0600	37 lines
Re: Enviroethics and animal rights?	Jim Tantillo	Tue, 29 Feb 2000 13:46:34 -0500	45 lines
Fw: Conference Reminder: New Directions in Animal Training	Ray Lanier	Tue, 29 Feb 2000 17:50:02 -0500	73 lines
Re: Enviroethics and animal rights?	Adam Gottschalk	Tue, 29 Feb 2000 20:22:36 -0800	231 lines
Re: Enviroethics and animal rights?	Michael B. Harris	Wed, 01 Mar 2000 11:37:17 -0600	91 lines
Ancient Vegetarians	Steven Bissell	Wed, 1 Mar 2000 11:17:49 -0700	34 lines
RE: human evolution, vegetarianism and EE.	Steven Bissell	Wed, 1 Mar 2000 13:31:12 -0700	117 lines
RE: Enviroethics and animal rights?	Steven Bissell	Wed, 1 Mar 2000 13:43:55 -0700	41 lines
Re: Enviroethics and animal rights?	Jim Tantillo	Wed, 1 Mar 2000 16:12:04 -0500	174 lines
Re: Enviroethics and animal rights?	Adam Gottschalk	Wed, 01 Mar 2000 22:12:13 -0800	152 lines
PhD in Environmental Ethics	amer saifude	Mon, 2 Mar 00 00:27:51 PST +0000	24 lines
Re: [Ancient Vegetarians]	VeggieBiggs	Mon, 2 Mar 00 08:48:26 EST +0000	67 lines
Re: [Ancient Vegetarians]	VeggieBiggs	Mon, 2 Mar 00 08:48:26 EST +0000	67 lines
Moral Significance, (formerly enviroethics, veget..)	VeggieBiggs	Mon, 2 Mar 00 09:02:04 EST +0000	35 lines
Re: PhD in Environmental Ethics	Eugene Hargrove	Thu, 02 Mar 2000 08:33:28 -0600	28 lines
Re: Moral Significance, (formerly enviroethics, veget..)	Chris Hope	Thu, 02 Mar 2000 14:55:39 +0000	66 lines
RE: [Ancient Vegetarians]	Steven Bissell	Thu, 2 Mar 2000 07:58:48 -0700	84 lines
Re: [Re: Moral Significance, (formerly enviroethics, veget..)]	VeggieBiggs	Mon, 2 Mar 00 10:31:41 EST +0000	59 lines
Re: [RE: [Ancient Vegetarians]]	VeggieBiggs	Mon, 2 Mar 00 10:37:40 EST +0000	26 lines
Re: Enviroethics and animal rights?	Jim Tantillo	Thu, 2 Mar 2000 10:44:32 -0500	173 lines
Re: [Re: Moral Significance, (formerly enviroethics, veget..)]	<>	Thu, 2 Mar 2000 15:45:05 EST	28 lines
Re: Enviroethics and animal rights?	<>	Thu, 2 Mar 2000 16:19:03 EST	42 lines
Re: Enviroethics and animal rights?	Adam Gottschalk	Thu, 02 Mar 2000 14:22:11 -0800	143 lines
RE: [RE: [Ancient Vegetarians]]	Chris Perley	Fri, 3 Mar 2000 09:34:49 +1300	27 lines
Re: Enviroethics and animal rights?	Jim Tantillo	Fri, 3 Mar 2000 08:52:41 -0500	31 lines
Re: [Re: Enviroethics and animal rights?]	VeggieBiggs	Tue, 3 Mar 00 09:25:17 EST +0000	56 lines
Re: Enviroethics and animal rights?	Jim Tantillo	Fri, 3 Mar 2000 09:26:22 -0500	75 lines
Re: Enviroethics	Paul Kirby	Fri, 03 Mar 2000 14:44:46 +0000	45 lines
Re: [Re: Enviroethics and animal rights?]	Jim Tantillo	Fri, 3 Mar 2000 10:43:18 -0500	77 lines
Re: [Re: Enviroethics]	VeggieBiggs	Tue, 3 Mar 00 10:56:31 EST +0000	54 lines
Re: [Re: Enviroethics]	VeggieBiggs	Tue, 3 Mar 00 10:56:31 EST +0000	54 lines
RE: Enviroethics	Steven Bissell	Fri, 3 Mar 2000 09:22:25 -0700	68 lines
Re: [Re: Enviroethics and animal rights?]	Ray Lanier	Fri, 3 Mar 2000 12:27:32 -0500	32 lines
RE: Enviroethics	Paul Kirby	Fri, 03 Mar 2000 17:53:31 +0000	37 lines
Re: [Re: Enviroethics and animal rights?]	Jim Tantillo	Fri, 3 Mar 2000 13:16:35 -0500	54 lines
Re: Enviroethics	<>	Fri, 3 Mar 2000 13:17:00 EST	37 lines
RE: Enviroethics	Steven Bissell	Fri, 3 Mar 2000 13:02:02 -0700	67 lines
RNS Mar6,'00	Wong Ee Ling	Mon, 6 Mar 2000 18:01:50 +0800	2012 lines
Re: [Re: Enviroethics]	Paul Kirby	Mon, 06 Mar 2000 13:14:05 +0000	28 lines
Re: [Re: Moral Significance, (formerly enviroethics, veget..)]	Jim Tantillo	Mon, 6 Mar 2000 08:15:57 -0500	81 lines
Re: [Re: Moral Significance, (formerly enviroethics, veget..)]	Volker Bahn	Mon, 6 Mar 2000 08:40:34 -0600	148 lines
The moral life of dogs, was Re: [Re: Enviroethics and animal rights?]	Jim Tantillo	Mon, 6 Mar 2000 11:29:48 -0500	394 lines
Re: The moral life of dogs, was Re: [Re: Enviroethics and animal rights?]	Chris Hope	Mon, 06 Mar 2000 16:32:08 +0000	210 lines
RE: The moral life of dogs,was Re: [Re: Enviroethics and animal rights?]	Steven Bissell	Mon, 6 Mar 2000 10:26:01 -0700	21 lines
Re: The moral life of dogs, was Re: [Re: Enviroethics and animalrights?]	Ray Lanier	Mon, 6 Mar 2000 13:37:41 -0500	69 lines
Re: The moral life of dogs, was Re: [Re: Enviroethics and animal rights?]	Jim Tantillo	Mon, 6 Mar 2000 17:35:14 -0500	248 lines
The Tide Turners	Mopoke	Tue, 07 Mar 2000 09:25:56 +1000	59 lines
Re: The moral life of dogs, was Re: [Re: Enviroethics and animal rights?]	Ray Lanier	Mon, 6 Mar 2000 18:31:36 -0500	176 lines
Fwd: ANN: _Environmental Politics_ Special Issue: Ecological Modernisation	Jim Tantillo	Tue, 7 Mar 2000 08:02:07 -0500	90 lines
Re: [Re: The moral life of dogs, was Re: [Re: Enviroethics and animal rights?]]	VeggieBiggs	Mon, 8 Mar 00 07:31:59 EST +0000	53 lines
Enviroethics: list-owner asks for help	David Pearson	Wed, 08 Mar 2000 13:47:46 +0000	46 lines
Singer's new book, Re: human evolution, vegetarianism and EE.	Jim Tantillo	Wed, 8 Mar 2000 09:25:42 -0500	298 lines
Re: [Re: The moral life of dogs, was Re: [Re: Enviroethics and animal rights?]]	Ray Lanier	Wed, 8 Mar 2000 12:23:11 -0500	35 lines
journal suggestions	Dr LS McLeod	Thu, 09 Mar 2000 16:09:22 -0500 (EST)	44 lines
now this is just fascinating. . . .	Jim Tantillo	Fri, 10 Mar 2000 09:00:21 -0500	23 lines
Re: now this is just fascinating. . . .	Chris Hope	Fri, 10 Mar 2000 14:35:11 +0000	45 lines
RE: journal suggestions	Hollander, Rachelle	Fri, 10 Mar 2000 09:54:56 -0500	60 lines
Re: now this is just fascinating. . . .	Jim Tantillo	Fri, 10 Mar 2000 13:44:02 -0500	144 lines
RE: now this is just fascinating. . . .	Steven Bissell	Fri, 10 Mar 2000 11:48:41 -0700	158 lines
Re: [Re: The moral life of dogs, was Re: [Re: Enviroethics and animal rights?]]	Jim Tantillo	Fri, 10 Mar 2000 15:18:54 -0500	20 lines
GIS/EM4 Extended Student Deadline	<>	Fri, 10 Mar 2000 17:01:03 -0700	119 lines
More on wildlife contraception	Jim Tantillo	Fri, 10 Mar 2000 23:54:30 -0500	486 lines
Fwd: SOME HARD TRUTHS FOR ETHICAL VEGETARIANS	Jim Tantillo	Mon, 13 Mar 2000 10:10:26 -0500	21 lines
"Environmental Problem Solving" Green Web Bulletin now available	Helga Hoffmann	Mon, 13 Mar 2000 09:16:17 -0800	68 lines
Re: [Fwd: SOME HARD TRUTHS FOR ETHICAL VEGETARIANS]	VeggieBiggs	Mon, 14 Mar 00 09:29:53 EST +0000	45 lines
Re: [Fwd: SOME HARD TRUTHS FOR ETHICAL VEGETARIANS]	Ray Lanier	Tue, 14 Mar 2000 11:53:25 -0500	65 lines
World water use to soar to crisis levels: study	Maynard S. Clark	Wed, 15 Mar 2000 02:31:08 -0500	103 lines
Environment News Service Earth Charter Highlights Environmental Ethics	Ray Lanier	Wed, 15 Mar 2000 12:22:15 -0500	1412 lines
Conference Call	Hollander, Rachelle	Thu, 16 Mar 2000 17:17:41 -0500	89 lines
ANOTHER VIRUS ...pls take precaution	Wong Ee Ling	Fri, 17 Mar 2000 08:32:20 +0800	417 lines
information sharing	Damien Thuriaux	Fri, 17 Mar 2000 19:02:23 -0000	40 lines
ROC: Sustainable Industrial Development Newsletter (SIDN) - Vol. 1, No. 1, March 2000	Wong Ee Ling	Mon, 20 Mar 2000 16:01:38 +0800	824 lines
Fwd: conference announcement	Jim Tantillo	Wed, 22 Mar 2000 10:05:26 -0500	23 lines
Sustainable Development Online	<>	Wed, 22 Mar 2000 16:37:33 +0100	90 lines
New NSF Program Announcements: SBE Infrastructure, IGERT, IT Work force	Hollander, Rachelle	Wed, 22 Mar 2000 16:39:57 -0500	34 lines
Candidates for Swedish Seminar on Environmental Journalism	Wong Ee Ling	Thu, 23 Mar 2000 14:38:56 +0800	49 lines
Fwd: Eco-Terrorists Wreak Havoc	Jim Tantillo	Fri, 24 Mar 2000 08:15:52 -0500	153 lines
Re: Fwd: Eco-Terrorists Wreak Havoc	Benjamin S Hale	Fri, 24 Mar 2000 12:05:12 -0500 (EST)	223 lines
RE: Fwd: Eco-Terrorists Wreak Havoc	Steven Bissell	Fri, 24 Mar 2000 13:15:00 -0700	255 lines
[SEA-SPAN] SARCS-supported Remote Sensing / GIS training worksho p in Singapore	Wong Ee Ling	Mon, 27 Mar 2000 10:59:41 +0800	93 lines
Re: Eco-Terrorists Wreak Havoc	tkintz	Mon, 27 Mar 2000 14:42:46 +0100	178 lines
Fwd: FW: [NTANews] Perspectives on lynx listing	Jim Tantillo	Mon, 27 Mar 2000 12:10:37 -0500	96 lines
subsistence hunting and extinctions.	Steven Bissell	Mon, 27 Mar 2000 12:05:29 -0700	99 lines
RE: FW: [NTANews] Perspectives on lynx listing	Chris Perley	Tue, 28 Mar 2000 10:21:27 +1200	165 lines
Re: Eco-Terrorists Wreak Havoc	Chris Lees	Mon, 27 Mar 2000 23:21:46 +0100	90 lines
RE: subsistence hunting and extinctions.	Chris Perley	Tue, 28 Mar 2000 10:37:36 +1200	132 lines
Re: FW: [NTANews] Perspectives on lynx listing	John Foster	Mon, 27 Mar 2000 16:05:41 -0800	86 lines
Re: FW: [NTANews] Perspectives on lynx listing	Ray Lanier	Mon, 27 Mar 2000 22:02:54 -0500	31 lines
Re: subsistence hunting and extinctions.	Ray Lanier	Mon, 27 Mar 2000 22:17:26 -0500	30 lines
RE: FW: [NTANews] Perspectives on lynx listing	Chris Perley	Tue, 28 Mar 2000 16:01:18 +1200	180 lines
What is ecological health?: [NTANews] Perspectives on lynx listing	Chris Perley	Tue, 28 Mar 2000 18:01:26 +1200	189 lines
yikes	tkintz	Tue, 28 Mar 2000 13:34:03 +0100	295 lines
Re: [RE: FW: [NTANews] Perspectives on lynx listing]	VeggieBiggs	Mon, 28 Mar 00 07:40:46 EST +0000	42 lines
ecoterrorism?	Steven Bissell	Tue, 28 Mar 2000 11:38:43 -0700	38 lines
RE: FW: [NTANews] Perspectives on lynx listing	Jim Tantillo	Tue, 28 Mar 2000 13:50:12 -0500	111 lines
Canada Lynx Rare in Maine	Jim Tantillo	Tue, 28 Mar 2000 13:55:07 -0500	131 lines
Re: [Canada Lynx Rare in Maine]	VeggieBiggs	Mon, 28 Mar 00 15:47:51 EST +0000	46 lines
RE: [RE: FW: [NTANews] Perspectives on lynx listing]	Chris Perley	Wed, 29 Mar 2000 14:12:01 +1200	88 lines
Re: What is ecological health?: [NTANews] Perspectives on lynx listing	Ray Lanier	Tue, 28 Mar 2000 21:28:35 -0500	48 lines
Re: [Canada Lynx Rare in Maine]	Jim Tantillo	Tue, 28 Mar 2000 23:16:31 -0500	162 lines
What is human health?: What is ecological health?: [NTANews] Perspectives on lynx listing	Chris Perley	Wed, 29 Mar 2000 17:58:43 +1200	150 lines
Fwd: Philosophical Issues in Biodiversity Conservation (fwd)	Jim Tantillo	Wed, 29 Mar 2000 08:39:40 -0500	96 lines
Fwd: New e-group: Ethics Announcements	Jim Tantillo	Wed, 29 Mar 2000 08:56:29 -0500	55 lines
RE: [Canada Lynx Rare in Maine]	Steven Bissell	Wed, 29 Mar 2000 06:56:34 -0700	84 lines
Re: ECO EFFICIENCY 2000: MAKING SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC GROWTH A REALITY	Prof. Walter Leal Filho	Wed, 29 Mar 2000 16:40:42 +0200	51 lines
biologist suspended, his research paper seized	tkintz	Wed, 29 Mar 2000 17:11:10 +0100	161 lines
Re: Canada Lynx Rare in Maine	John Foster	Wed, 29 Mar 2000 15:45:28 -0800	236 lines
RE: Canada Lynx Rare in Maine	Chris Perley	Thu, 30 Mar 2000 12:12:58 +1200	299 lines
RE: [Canada Lynx Rare in Maine]	Jim Tantillo	Wed, 29 Mar 2000 21:43:33 -0500	140 lines
Re: Canada Lynx Rare in Maine	John Foster	Wed, 29 Mar 2000 19:30:15 -0800	569 lines
Re: [Canada Lynx Rare in Maine]	Ray Lanier	Wed, 29 Mar 2000 22:42:55 -0500	184 lines
RE: Canada Lynx Rare in Maine	Chris Perley	Thu, 30 Mar 2000 17:23:01 +1200	695 lines
Re: [Canada Lynx Rare in Maine]	Volker Bahn	Thu, 30 Mar 2000 00:06:31 -0600	189 lines
Re: Canada Lynx Rare in Maine	Chris Lees	Thu, 30 Mar 2000 11:40:25 +0100	59 lines
Re: [Canada Lynx Rare in Maine]	Jim Tantillo	Thu, 30 Mar 2000 10:15:53 -0500	81 lines
Lynx, Genes, and EE	Steven Bissell	Thu, 30 Mar 2000 08:56:57 -0700	103 lines
Philosophical Issues in Biodiversity Conservation	Ray Lanier	Thu, 30 Mar 2000 11:35:27 -0500	30 lines
RE: Canada Lynx Rare in Maine	Chris Perley	Fri, 31 Mar 2000 09:34:15 +1200	116 lines
Re: Lynx, Genes, and EE	Volker Bahn	Thu, 30 Mar 2000 23:47:40 -0600	40 lines
Re: [Canada Lynx Rare in Maine]	Volker Bahn	Fri, 31 Mar 2000 00:30:20 -0600	114 lines
Chaos and nature	Chris Lees	Fri, 31 Mar 2000 09:31:32 +0100	189 lines
RE: Chaos and nature	Chris Perley	Sat, 1 Apr 2000 00:05:24 +1200	281 lines
RE: Lynx, Genes, and EE	Steven Bissell	Fri, 31 Mar 2000 07:51:56 -0700	62 lines
Re: Chaos and nature	Steve	Fri, 31 Mar 2000 14:58:03 -0800 (PST)	284 lines
Re: Chaos and nature	Steve	Fri, 31 Mar 2000 15:00:20 -0800 (PST)	20 lines
Re: Chaos and nature	Chris Lees	Sat, 01 Apr 2000 12:19:45 +0100	25 lines
When animal rights activism goes too far. . .	Jim Tantillo	Sat, 1 Apr 2000 08:15:31 -0500	20 lines
Re: When animal rights activism goes too far. . .	Philosophy News Service * richard jones	Sat, 01 Apr 2000 11:30:07 -0500	33 lines
US Builders to Ban Lumber From Canada	John Foster	Sun, 2 Apr 2000 11:45:49 -0700	117 lines
Armed Defence of the Environment	Chris Lees	Sun, 02 Apr 2000 21:26:20 +0100	49 lines
Maynard Clark invites you along for the ride	Maynard Clark	Sun, 2 Apr 2000 22:52:37 -0400 (EDT)	60 lines
Rainforest/Marine Ecology Workshops	Mike Nolan	Mon, 03 Apr 2000 10:53:28 -0400	294 lines
Problems with ecosystem health?	Jim Tantillo	Mon, 3 Apr 2000 11:05:23 -0500	238 lines
No Problems With Ecosystems Health	John Foster	Mon, 3 Apr 2000 09:39:51 -0700	276 lines
More news from France, was Re: Armed Defence of the Environment	Jim Tantillo	Mon, 3 Apr 2000 16:00:39 -0500	88 lines
What is environmentally "good": Problems with ecosystem health?	Chris Perley	Tue, 4 Apr 2000 19:01:05 +1200	516 lines
Re: What is environmentally "good": Problems with ecosystem health?	Jim Tantillo	Tue, 4 Apr 2000 12:10:14 -0500	483 lines
lynx link	Steven Bissell	Tue, 4 Apr 2000 11:21:51 -0600	22 lines
RE: What is environmentally "good": Problems with ecosystemhealth?	Chris Perley	Wed, 5 Apr 2000 11:31:48 +1200	841 lines
Re: What is environmentally "good": Problems with ecosystem health?	Chris Hope	Wed, 05 Apr 2000 08:43:19 +0100	31 lines
Re: What is environmentally "good": Problems with ecosystem health?	Jim Tantillo	Wed, 5 Apr 2000 09:00:20 -0500	46 lines
more lynx links	Steven Bissell	Wed, 5 Apr 2000 08:22:15 -0600	16 lines
Fwd: ANN: New List "Envirotech" up and running	Jim Tantillo	Wed, 5 Apr 2000 13:23:32 -0500	61 lines
RE: What is environmentally "good": Problems with ecosystem health?	Chris Perley	Thu, 6 Apr 2000 08:45:21 +1200	57 lines
Re: What is environmentally "good": Problems with ecosystem health?	Chris Lees	Wed, 05 Apr 2000 22:42:06 +0100	18 lines
Anyone for GM food?	<>	Wed, 5 Apr 2000 23:05:42 EDT	38 lines
Re: Anyone for GM food?	John Foster	Wed, 5 Apr 2000 22:32:06 -0700	24 lines
Re: [RE: What is environmentally "good"? number 2]	VeggieBiggs	Mon, 6 Apr 00 12:15:11 EDT +0000	42 lines
RE: What is environmentally "good": Problems with ecosystemhealth?	Jim Tantillo	Thu, 6 Apr 2000 11:53:16 -0500	414 lines
RE: What is environmentally "good"? number 2	Jim Tantillo	Thu, 6 Apr 2000 11:55:49 -0500	590 lines
RE: What is environmentally "good": Problems with ecosystem health?	Chris Perley	Fri, 7 Apr 2000 10:29:53 +1200	679 lines
RE: What is environmentally "good"? number 2	Chris Perley	Fri, 7 Apr 2000 11:13:34 +1200	741 lines
Re: What is environmentally "good": Problems with ecosystem health?	Ray Lanier	Thu, 6 Apr 2000 19:29:50 -0400	92 lines
Re: Anyone for GM food?	Jim Tantillo	Fri, 7 Apr 2000 00:12:32 -0500	48 lines
Online launch of the Regional Institute of Environment Technology 's RIET News SERVICE online V20Issue6	Wong Ee Ling	Fri, 7 Apr 2000 18:02:43 +0800	41 lines
Re: What is environmentally "good": Problems with ecosystemhealth?	John Foster	Fri, 7 Apr 2000 08:12:01 -0700	457 lines
Conference on EC Environmental Law for the New Millennium	Prof. Walter Leal Filho	Mon, 10 Apr 2000 12:03:59 +0200	54 lines
online discussion of genetically altered food	<>	Mon, 10 Apr 2000 06:21:01 -0500	36 lines
Science & GM - Discussion on-line	Ray Lanier	Mon, 10 Apr 2000 09:26:41 -0400	22 lines
RE: What is environmentally "good": Problems with ecosystem health?	Jim Tantillo	Mon, 10 Apr 2000 08:32:11 -0500	164 lines
Re: Setting Sail for Lost Legends	Ray Lanier	Mon, 10 Apr 2000 12:22:38 -0400	53 lines
RE: What is environmentally "good": Problems with ecosystemhealth?	Chris Perley	Tue, 11 Apr 2000 10:00:50 +1200	213 lines
Re: Setting Sail for Lost Legends	Chris Lees	Mon, 10 Apr 2000 23:48:27 +0100	255 lines
Re: Setting Sail for Lost Legends	Ray Lanier	Mon, 10 Apr 2000 21:10:29 -0400	56 lines
Re: Setting Sail for Lost Legends	Chris Lees	Tue, 11 Apr 2000 03:58:25 +0100	95 lines
Announcement - IHCMD Online Summer School	Axel Dorscht	Mon, 10 Apr 2000 22:41:02 -0700	96 lines
Re: online discussion of genetically altered food	Lars Ekman	Tue, 11 Apr 2000 01:50:36 -0500	14 lines
Re: online discussion of genetically altered food	Lars Ekman	Tue, 11 Apr 2000 03:54:28 -0500	31 lines
Re: [Re: Setting Sail for Lost Legends]	VeggieBiggs	Mon, 11 Apr 00 08:18:45 EDT +0000	40 lines
Re: online discussion of genetically altered food	Stephanie	Tue, 11 Apr 2000 16:53:45 -0400	18 lines
Ecocentric and Homocentric	John Foster	Tue, 11 Apr 2000 16:11:23 -0700	139 lines
AET Code 777	Wong Ee Ling	Wed, 12 Apr 2000 15:11:36 +0800	27 lines
False claims regarding global warming	Jim Tantillo	Wed, 12 Apr 2000 10:36:46 -0500	155 lines
Re: False claims regarding global warming	John Foster	Wed, 12 Apr 2000 11:14:00 -0700	141 lines
Re: False claims regarding global warming	Chris Lees	Wed, 12 Apr 2000 20:47:53 +0100	6378 lines
Re: False claims regarding global warming	Chris Lees	Wed, 12 Apr 2000 20:48:38 +0100	480 lines
Re: False claims regarding global warming	Steve	Wed, 12 Apr 2000 15:07:10 -0700 (PDT)	126 lines
Re: False claims regarding global warming	Chris Lees	Thu, 13 Apr 2000 00:11:47 +0100	24 lines
Re: False claims regarding global warming	<>	Wed, 12 Apr 2000 19:26:16 EDT	27 lines
Global Warming - Electric Industry view #1	Ray Lanier	Wed, 12 Apr 2000 19:36:02 -0400	208 lines
Global Warming - Electric Industry view #2	Ray Lanier	Wed, 12 Apr 2000 19:36:09 -0400	95 lines
Re: False claims regarding global warming	Chris Lees	Thu, 13 Apr 2000 01:18:37 +0100	56 lines
RE: False claims regarding global warming	Chris Perley	Thu, 13 Apr 2000 12:26:32 +1200	77 lines
Global Warming - My comments on Electric Industry view	Ray Lanier	Wed, 12 Apr 2000 20:30:44 -0400	50 lines
Re: False claims regarding global warming	Steve	Wed, 12 Apr 2000 17:31:39 -0700 (PDT)	37 lines
Re: False claims regarding global warming	Ray Lanier	Wed, 12 Apr 2000 20:42:26 -0400	21 lines
Re: False claims regarding global warming	Chris Lees	Thu, 13 Apr 2000 01:56:17 +0100	25 lines
RE: False claims regarding global warming	Chris Perley	Thu, 13 Apr 2000 12:58:16 +1200	32 lines
Re: False claims regarding global warming	Ray Lanier	Wed, 12 Apr 2000 21:22:08 -0400	25 lines
Re: False claims regarding global warming	Steve	Wed, 12 Apr 2000 18:41:34 -0700 (PDT)	41 lines
Re: False claims regarding global warming	Chris Lees	Thu, 13 Apr 2000 03:19:02 +0100	568 lines
Re: False claims regarding global warming	<>	Wed, 12 Apr 2000 22:32:43 EDT	78 lines
Animals without rights; was: Re: False claims regarding global warming	Ray Lanier	Wed, 12 Apr 2000 22:50:17 -0400	26 lines
Re: False claims regarding global warming	Chris Lees	Thu, 13 Apr 2000 04:29:24 +0100	64 lines
Organic agriculture and starving was: False claims..	michael	Thu, 13 Apr 2000 13:54:51 +0800	44 lines
Re: Organic agriculture and starving was: False claims..	Chris Lees	Thu, 13 Apr 2000 08:34:09 +0100	219 lines
Re: [Re: False claims regarding global warming]	VeggieBiggs	Mon, 13 Apr 00 07:40:01 EDT +0000	28 lines
Truth of Global Warming	Paul Kirby	Thu, 13 Apr 2000 12:57:58 +0100	39 lines
[StumpsDon'tLie] Fwd: OUCH! (#46--Global Warming & Hog Farming)	tkintz	Thu, 13 Apr 2000 13:48:03 +0100	252 lines
Re: Truth of Global Warming	Steve	Thu, 13 Apr 2000 11:12:05 -0700 (PDT)	62 lines
Re: [Re: False claims regarding global warming]	Steve	Thu, 13 Apr 2000 11:16:00 -0700 (PDT)	27 lines
Re: [Re: False claims regarding global warming]	Chris Lees	Thu, 13 Apr 2000 21:21:14 +0100	60 lines
Re: Truth of Global Warming	Chris Lees	Thu, 13 Apr 2000 21:45:40 +0100	60 lines
Re: Truth of Global Warming	Steve	Thu, 13 Apr 2000 14:46:31 -0700 (PDT)	119 lines
Re: [Re: False claims regarding global warming]	Steve	Thu, 13 Apr 2000 14:50:13 -0700 (PDT)	44 lines
Re: Truth of Global Warming	Chris Lees	Thu, 13 Apr 2000 23:48:36 +0100	96 lines
Global Warming and Arctic Birds	John Foster	Thu, 13 Apr 2000 18:48:10 -0700	80 lines
Some further thoughts on despair . . .	Jim Tantillo	Thu, 13 Apr 2000 21:20:15 -0500	379 lines
RE: [Re: False claims regarding global warming]	Chris Perley	Fri, 14 Apr 2000 14:21:32 +1200	41 lines
Re: Global Warming and Arctic Birds	<>	Thu, 13 Apr 2000 22:38:41 EDT	83 lines
Re: Global Warming and Arctic Birds	<>	Thu, 13 Apr 2000 22:49:00 EDT	26 lines
Re: Some further thoughts on despair . . .	Chris Lees	Fri, 14 Apr 2000 03:52:29 +0100	455 lines
Re: Animals without rights; was: Re: False claims regarding global warming	<>	Thu, 13 Apr 2000 22:59:29 EDT	41 lines
Re: Global Warming and Arctic Birds	John Foster	Thu, 13 Apr 2000 21:59:09 -0700	38 lines
Global warming	michael	Fri, 14 Apr 2000 13:09:51 +0800	37 lines
Re: Global Warming and Arctic Birds	Steve	Thu, 13 Apr 2000 23:10:26 -0700 (PDT)	107 lines
Re: Global Warming (technical)	Chris Hope	Fri, 14 Apr 2000 10:32:38 +0100	73 lines
Re: Some further thoughts on despair . . .	Jim Tantillo	Fri, 14 Apr 2000 08:14:53 -0500	98 lines
Re: Global Warming (technical)	Chris Hope	Fri, 14 Apr 2000 14:44:02 +0100	54 lines
Re: Global Warming (technical)	Jim Tantillo	Fri, 14 Apr 2000 09:02:33 -0500	37 lines
Gordon Conference on Science and Technology Policy	Hollander, Rachelle	Fri, 14 Apr 2000 10:37:22 -0400	35 lines
Re: [Re: Truth of Global Warming]	VeggieBiggs	Mon, 14 Apr 00 10:41:19 EDT +0000	49 lines
Re: [Re: Truth of Global Warming]	VeggieBiggs	Mon, 14 Apr 00 10:41:19 EDT +0000	49 lines
Re: Truth of Global Warming	Paul Kirby	Fri, 14 Apr 2000 16:31:16 +0100	34 lines
Re: Truth of Global Warming	Steve	Fri, 14 Apr 2000 08:55:55 -0700 (PDT)	64 lines
Re: Global Warming (technical)	Steve	Fri, 14 Apr 2000 09:03:44 -0700 (PDT)	104 lines
Re: Global Warming (technical)	Steve	Fri, 14 Apr 2000 09:09:13 -0700 (PDT)	59 lines
Re: [Re: Truth of Global Warming]	Steve	Fri, 14 Apr 2000 09:11:02 -0700 (PDT)	82 lines
Re: Global warming	Jim Tantillo	Fri, 14 Apr 2000 11:16:41 -0500	51 lines
Fwd: CALL FOR PAPERS - Nature & Technology Conf. (fwd)	Jim Tantillo	Fri, 14 Apr 2000 11:40:54 -0500	142 lines
Re: [Re: [Re: Truth of Global Warming]]	VeggieBiggs	Mon, 14 Apr 00 14:13:56 EDT +0000	102 lines
Re: CALL FOR PAPERS - Nature & Technology Conf. (fwd)	Ray Lanier	Fri, 14 Apr 2000 15:31:15 -0400	20 lines
Re: Truth of Global Warming	Steve	Fri, 14 Apr 2000 15:11:05 -0700 (PDT)	186 lines
Re: [Re: [Re: Truth of Global Warming]]	Steve	Fri, 14 Apr 2000 16:42:39 -0700 (PDT)	136 lines
Re: [Re: [Re: Truth of Global Warming]]	<>	Sat, 15 Apr 2000 03:43:08 EDT	135 lines
Re: Global warming	Chris Lees	Sat, 15 Apr 2000 16:54:13 +0100	65 lines
Re: [Re: Truth of Global Warming]	Chris Lees	Sat, 15 Apr 2000 16:56:16 +0100	45 lines
Re: Truth of Global Warming	Chris Lees	Sat, 15 Apr 2000 16:58:05 +0100	224 lines
climate change and political posturing	John Foster	Sat, 15 Apr 2000 09:58:02 -0700	411 lines
Re: Truth of Global Warming]]	John Foster	Sat, 15 Apr 2000 11:10:43 -0700	127 lines
Re: Truth of Global Warming	Steve	Sat, 15 Apr 2000 13:44:13 -0700 (PDT)	279 lines
Re: Truth of Global Warming	Chris Lees	Sun, 16 Apr 2000 00:05:49 +0100	30 lines
Re: climate change and political posturing	Chris Lees	Sun, 16 Apr 2000 03:58:44 +0100	186 lines
Re: Some further thoughts on despair . . .	Jim Tantillo	Sat, 15 Apr 2000 22:24:39 -0500	669 lines
Re: Some further thoughts on despair . . .	Chris Lees	Sun, 16 Apr 2000 05:58:23 +0100	1591 lines
Re: Truth of Global Warming]] and the questions of ethical approach.	<>	Sun, 16 Apr 2000 01:56:06 EDT	140 lines
Re: Some further thoughts on despair . . .	Chris Lees	Sun, 16 Apr 2000 11:02:01 +0100	45 lines
Re: Truth of Global Warming	Steve	Sun, 16 Apr 2000 14:21:17 -0700 (PDT)	36 lines
Re: Truth of Global Warming	Steve	Sun, 16 Apr 2000 14:24:00 -0700 (PDT)	37 lines
Re: Truth of Global Warming	Steve	Sun, 16 Apr 2000 15:25:13 -0700 (PDT)	22 lines
Re: Truth of Global Warming	Ray Lanier	Sun, 16 Apr 2000 19:43:50 -0400	50 lines
Re: Truth of Global Warming	Steve	Sun, 16 Apr 2000 17:24:47 -0700 (PDT)	88 lines
Re: Truth of Global Warming	Ray Lanier	Sun, 16 Apr 2000 21:31:49 -0400	151 lines
Re: Truth of Global Warming	Chris Lees	Mon, 17 Apr 2000 03:23:32 +0100	27 lines
Re: Truth of Global Warming	Jim Tantillo	Sun, 16 Apr 2000 21:24:11 -0500	166 lines
Re: Truth of Global Warming	Chris Hope	Mon, 17 Apr 2000 10:51:29 +0100	54 lines
Re: Truth of Global Warming	Jim Tantillo	Mon, 17 Apr 2000 08:44:23 -0500	60 lines
Re: Global Warming (technical)	Chris Hope	Mon, 17 Apr 2000 15:02:33 +0100	84 lines
Re: Truth of Global Warming	Jim Tantillo	Mon, 17 Apr 2000 10:10:35 -0500	81 lines
Re: Truth of Global Warming	Ray Lanier	Mon, 17 Apr 2000 11:14:24 -0400	73 lines
Re:	Paul Kirby	Mon, 17 Apr 2000 16:16:43 +0100	32 lines
Fwd: CFP: Global Water Issues Since 1945	Jim Tantillo	Mon, 17 Apr 2000 10:33:41 -0500	49 lines
Re: Truth of Global Warming	Chris Lees	Mon, 17 Apr 2000 16:56:21 +0100	85 lines
Environmental Philosophies - Question?	John Foster	Mon, 17 Apr 2000 09:01:38 -0700	105 lines
Re: Truth of Global Warming	Steve	Mon, 17 Apr 2000 09:31:38 -0700 (PDT)	224 lines
Re: Truth of Global Warming	Steve	Mon, 17 Apr 2000 09:39:32 -0700 (PDT)	90 lines
Fwd: CFP: Aesthetics and Ethics, Oct. 21-22, 2000 (fwd)	Jim Tantillo	Mon, 17 Apr 2000 11:47:27 -0500	95 lines
Re: Truth of Global Warming	John Foster	Mon, 17 Apr 2000 09:53:27 -0700	88 lines
Re: Truth of Global Warming	Steve	Mon, 17 Apr 2000 10:08:27 -0700 (PDT)	134 lines
Re: Truth of Global Warming	Chris Lees	Mon, 17 Apr 2000 18:39:31 +0100	67 lines
Re: Truth of Global Warming	Steve	Mon, 17 Apr 2000 10:55:48 -0700 (PDT)	120 lines
Re: Truth of Global Warming	Steve	Mon, 17 Apr 2000 11:04:38 -0700 (PDT)	48 lines
Re: Truth of Global Warming	Chris Lees	Mon, 17 Apr 2000 19:36:58 +0100	76 lines
Global warming, ethics, good, bad, email, lists, ....	David 'n' Lesley	Mon, 17 Apr 2000 19:50:24 +0100	26 lines
Re: The truth on global warming.	<>	Mon, 17 Apr 2000 15:10:18 EDT	509 lines
Moderators...	Steve	Mon, 17 Apr 2000 13:52:27 -0700 (PDT)	108 lines
Re: Truth of Global Warming	Steve	Mon, 17 Apr 2000 13:57:32 -0700 (PDT)	114 lines
Re: Truth of Global Warming	Steve	Mon, 17 Apr 2000 14:00:35 -0700 (PDT)	31 lines
Re: Truth of Global Warming	Bryan Eugen Quinn	Mon, 17 Apr 2000 16:15:49 -0500	35 lines
Re: Truth of Global Warming	<>	Mon, 17 Apr 2000 17:17:43 -0400 (EDT)	14 lines
Re: Truth of Global Warming	Chris Lees	Mon, 17 Apr 2000 23:29:54 +0100	38 lines
Re: Truth of Global Warming	John Foster	Mon, 17 Apr 2000 15:52:46 -0700	69 lines
Re: Truth of Global Warming	Steve	Mon, 17 Apr 2000 15:57:16 -0700 (PDT)	61 lines
Re: Truth of Global Warming	Steve	Mon, 17 Apr 2000 16:03:13 -0700 (PDT)	42 lines
Re: Truth of Global Warming	<>	Mon, 17 Apr 2000 19:13:58 EDT	37 lines
Re: Truth of Global Warming	Chris Lees	Tue, 18 Apr 2000 00:47:23 +0100	26 lines
Policy paper on global warming	Ray Lanier	Mon, 17 Apr 2000 20:56:16 -0400	26 lines
Re: Policy paper on global warming	Steve	Mon, 17 Apr 2000 18:11:28 -0700 (PDT)	40 lines
Re: Policy paper on global warming	Steve	Mon, 17 Apr 2000 18:22:23 -0700 (PDT)	50 lines
Corporate Discpline Question!	John Foster	Mon, 17 Apr 2000 18:57:36 -0700	43 lines
Re: Corporate Discpline Question!	<>	Mon, 17 Apr 2000 21:59:32 EDT	13 lines
Re: Truth of Global Warming	John Foster	Mon, 17 Apr 2000 19:05:22 -0700	50 lines
Re: Truth of Global Warming	Steve	Mon, 17 Apr 2000 21:08:09 -0700 (PDT)	79 lines
Re: Truth of Global Warming	Chris Lees	Tue, 18 Apr 2000 05:10:10 +0100	75 lines
Re: Truth of Global Warming	Steve	Mon, 17 Apr 2000 21:30:43 -0700 (PDT)	66 lines
The Moral Equivalent of War, was Re: Truth of Global Warming	Jim Tantillo	Tue, 18 Apr 2000 00:35:51 -0500	563 lines
Re: The Moral Equivalent of War, was Re: Truth of Global Warming	Chris Lees	Tue, 18 Apr 2000 07:58:48 +0100	502 lines
Re: The Moral Equivalent of War, was Re: Truth of Global Warming	<>	Tue, 18 Apr 2000 03:34:26 EDT	24 lines
Re: The Moral Equivalent of War, was Re: Truth of Global Warming	Chris Lees	Tue, 18 Apr 2000 11:49:44 +0100	41 lines
Re: The Moral Equivalent of War, was Re: Truth of Global Warming	Chris Hope	Tue, 18 Apr 2000 12:05:27 +0100	41 lines
Re: Policy paper on global warming	Chris Hope	Tue, 18 Apr 2000 12:24:36 +0100	50 lines
Re: Policy paper on global warming	Steve	Tue, 18 Apr 2000 08:37:04 -0700 (PDT)	69 lines
Re: Truth of Global Warming	Bryan Eugen Quinn	Tue, 18 Apr 2000 10:56:48 -0500	63 lines
Re: The Moral Equivalent of War, was Re: Truth of Global Warming	John Foster	Tue, 18 Apr 2000 09:16:27 -0700	131 lines
Re: Moderators...	Jim Tantillo	Tue, 18 Apr 2000 13:00:28 -0500	117 lines
Not elastic demand for a gasoline?	Georg Tamm	Tue, 18 Apr 2000 21:25:06 +0300	34 lines
Re: The Moral Equivalent of War, was Re: Truth of Global Warming	Chris Lees	Tue, 18 Apr 2000 20:08:52 +0100	62 lines
Re: Not elastic demand for a gasoline?	Steve	Tue, 18 Apr 2000 13:30:11 -0700 (PDT)	71 lines
Re: The Moral Equivalent of War, was Re: Truth of Global Warming	Steve	Tue, 18 Apr 2000 13:34:52 -0700 (PDT)	31 lines
Re: Not elastic demand for a gasoline?	Ray Lanier	Tue, 18 Apr 2000 18:16:30 -0400	90 lines
Re: Not elastic demand for a gasoline?	Steve	Tue, 18 Apr 2000 15:45:10 -0700 (PDT)	131 lines
Re: Moral Equivalant of War,	<>	Tue, 18 Apr 2000 19:21:48 EDT	26 lines
Re: Not elastic demand for a gasoline?	Ray Lanier	Tue, 18 Apr 2000 19:25:42 -0400	176 lines
Re: Not elastic demand for a gasoline?	Steve	Tue, 18 Apr 2000 17:02:16 -0700 (PDT)	264 lines
Re: Policy paper on global warming	Chris Hope	Wed, 19 Apr 2000 10:24:09 +0100	31 lines
Education for Sustainable Development	Amy Cruse	Wed, 19 Apr 2000 11:15:48 +0100	234 lines
Conference: Research on Research Integrity	Hollander, Rachelle	Wed, 19 Apr 2000 08:34:17 -0400	87 lines
A Modest Proposal, was Re: Moral Equivalant of War,	Jim Tantillo	Wed, 19 Apr 2000 09:40:13 -0500	115 lines
Re: A Modest Proposal	Chris Lees	Wed, 19 Apr 2000 16:17:37 +0100	22 lines
Re: The Moral Equivalent of War,	Chris Lees	Wed, 19 Apr 2000 16:48:11 +0100	47 lines
Re: The Moral Equivalent of War,	<>	Wed, 19 Apr 2000 13:49:49 EDT	26 lines
Moral Equivalant of War/	<>	Wed, 19 Apr 2000 14:13:05 EDT	27 lines
FW: Latest evidence supporting the theory of global warming	Chris Perley	Thu, 20 Apr 2000 09:27:33 +1200	32 lines
Re: A Modest Proposal, was Re: Moral Equivalant of War,	<>	Wed, 19 Apr 2000 18:18:26 EDT	20 lines
Re:	Patrick Longfield	Thu, 20 Apr 2000 06:53:28 -0700	132 lines
Enviroethics list-owners change	David 'n' Lesley	Thu, 20 Apr 2000 16:12:31 +0100	40 lines
Re: Enviroethics list-owners change	Ray Lanier	Thu, 20 Apr 2000 16:55:16 -0400	59 lines
Re: And now, the top ten reasons cited to "Celebrate the Heat". . .	Steve	Fri, 21 Apr 2000 11:49:59 -0700 (PDT)	37 lines
Global warming is no laughing matter . . . .	Jim Tantillo	Fri, 21 Apr 2000 14:07:32 -0500	491 lines
And now, the top ten reasons cited to "Celebrate the Heat". . .	Jim Tantillo	Fri, 21 Apr 2000 14:17:09 -0500	19 lines
Re: And now, the top ten reasons cited to "Celebrate the Heat". . .	John Foster	Fri, 21 Apr 2000 14:44:55 -0700	180 lines
Re: And now, the top ten reasons cited to "Celebrate the Heat". . .	Steve	Fri, 21 Apr 2000 15:22:53 -0700 (PDT)	46 lines
Re: And now, the top ten reasons cited to "Celebrate the Heat". . .	John Foster	Fri, 21 Apr 2000 15:32:10 -0700	139 lines
Re: And now, the top ten reasons cited to "Celebrate the Heat". . .	John Foster	Fri, 21 Apr 2000 15:51:18 -0700	107 lines
Re: Global warming is no laughing matter . . . .	Chris Lees	Fri, 21 Apr 2000 23:57:09 +0100	851 lines
"It's life Jim, but not as we know it."	David 'n' Lesley	Sat, 22 Apr 2000 00:10:48 +0100	31 lines
Re: And now, the top ten reasons cited to "Celebrate the Heat". . .	Steve	Fri, 21 Apr 2000 16:42:24 -0700 (PDT)	144 lines
Re: "It's life Jim, but not as we know it."	<>	Fri, 21 Apr 2000 19:48:55 EDT	18 lines
Re: Global warming is no laughing matter . . . .	Steve	Fri, 21 Apr 2000 17:02:14 -0700 (PDT)	115 lines
Info on Discovery program, and Global Warming.	<>	Fri, 21 Apr 2000 20:16:37 EDT	53 lines
Bios Theoretikos	John Foster	Fri, 21 Apr 2000 18:18:17 -0700	148 lines
Re: Bios Theoretikos	John Foster	Fri, 21 Apr 2000 20:23:11 -0700	120 lines
Re: Bios Theoretikos	Chris Lees	Sat, 22 Apr 2000 04:49:05 +0100	204 lines
Funny stuff?	John Foster	Fri, 21 Apr 2000 21:17:10 -0700	260 lines
Re: Funny stuff?	Chris Lees	Sat, 22 Apr 2000 08:26:41 +0100	108 lines
Re: Bios Theoretikos	<>	Sat, 22 Apr 2000 04:26:13 EDT	119 lines
Re: Bios Theoretikos	Chris Lees	Sat, 22 Apr 2000 10:52:26 +0100	127 lines
Re: Bios Theoretikos--funny stuff.	<>	Sat, 22 Apr 2000 12:30:20 EDT	41 lines
Earth Day 2000	<>	Sat, 22 Apr 2000 12:55:19 EDT	63 lines
Re: Bios Theoretikos--funny stuff.	Chris Lees	Sun, 23 Apr 2000 02:16:27 +0100	65 lines
Re: Bios Theoretikos--funny stuff.	John Foster	Sat, 22 Apr 2000 19:54:45 -0700	143 lines
Re: Bios Theoretikos--funny stuff.	John Thomas	Sat, 22 Apr 2000 20:40:59 -0700	31 lines
Poisoning the Earth	Steve	Sat, 22 Apr 2000 21:30:19 -0700 (PDT)	37 lines
Re: Bios Theoretikos--funny stuff.	Chris Lees	Sun, 23 Apr 2000 07:25:35 +0100	131 lines
Re: Bios Theoretikos--funny stuff.	John Foster	Sun, 23 Apr 2000 01:14:14 -0700	333 lines
Re: Bios Theoretikos--funny stuff.	Chris Lees	Sun, 23 Apr 2000 10:45:44 +0100	573 lines
Unsubscribe	Trang	Sun, 23 Apr 2000 19:21:32 +0700	62 lines
Re: Bios Theoretikos--funny stuff.	Chris Lees	Sun, 23 Apr 2000 14:30:30 +0100	501 lines
Fwd: ancient forest conference, May 18-20, VA	Jim Tantillo	Sun, 23 Apr 2000 13:28:20 -0500	35 lines
Re: Bios Theoretikos--funny stuff.	Chris Lees	Mon, 24 Apr 2000 18:03:32 +0100	280 lines
Re: Bios Theoretikos--funny stuff.	<>	Mon, 24 Apr 2000 17:35:46 EDT	140 lines
Re: Bios Theoretikos--funny stuff.	Chris Lees	Tue, 25 Apr 2000 04:38:21 +0100	659 lines
Re: Bios Theoretikos--funny stuff.	Chris Lees	Tue, 25 Apr 2000 09:25:05 +0100	127 lines
	SD Online	Tue, 25 Apr 2000 17:02:22 -0700	105 lines
the future..	Chris Lees	Wed, 26 Apr 2000 08:56:44 +0100	998 lines
the future	<>	Wed, 26 Apr 2000 10:24:26 EDT	456 lines
the future	<>	Wed, 26 Apr 2000 15:05:48 EDT	31 lines
Anti-Envrironmental Propaganda	Maria Stella	Thu, 27 Apr 2000 00:11:41 +0100 (BST)	23 lines
Re: the future	Chris Lees	Thu, 27 Apr 2000 05:55:42 +0100	48 lines
Re: the future	Chris Lees	Thu, 27 Apr 2000 07:22:53 +0100	173 lines
State of the World Report	John Foster	Thu, 27 Apr 2000 01:19:51 -0700	125 lines
artists & the environment	artecology	Thu, 27 Apr 2000 10:52:34 -0600 (MDT)	53 lines
Re: State of the World Report	Chris Lees	Mon, 1 May 2000 01:08:42 +0100	882 lines
IRONITE INERT?	Maria Stella	Mon, 1 May 2000 12:40:39 +0100 (BST)	31 lines
Re: IRONITE INERT?	John Foster	Mon, 1 May 2000 07:26:06 -0700	57 lines
Sex Pistols Go 'Green'	<>	Mon, 1 May 2000 15:54:02 EDT	105 lines
Re: IRONITE INERT?	Chris Lees	Tue, 2 May 2000 00:35:24 +0100	255 lines
(Enviroethics) Enviro-News Network	artecology	Tue, 2 May 2000 08:20:01 -0600 (MDT)	42 lines
Env Ethics: Decision model under conditions of uncertainty	Ray Lanier	Tue, 2 May 2000 23:46:10 -0400	248 lines
Re: Unsubscribe	David Pearson	Wed, 03 May 2000 10:25:50 +0100	29 lines
[EE] Apology from list-owner	David Pearson	Wed, 03 May 2000 10:32:02 +0100	29 lines
Unsubscribe me too!	Jonah Rosenfield	Wed, 03 May 2000 07:05:08 EDT	23 lines
How to leave Enviroethics	David Pearson	Wed, 03 May 2000 12:26:01 +0100	44 lines
Seeking Profound Childhood Nature Experiences (fwd)	Jim Tantillo	Wed, 3 May 2000 10:08:41 -0500	31 lines
Environmental ethics of native americans	Ray Lanier	Wed, 3 May 2000 20:27:43 -0400	24 lines
Environmental Job Posting: EarthSave Executive Director	Maynard S. Clark	Wed, 03 May 2000 23:51:28 -0400	45 lines
The Good News: Elephants,tigers,and whales, oh my!	artecology	Thu, 4 May 2000 11:02:02 -0600 (MDT)	35 lines
John Peet page	Chris Perley	Fri, 5 May 2000 11:07:36 +1200	17 lines
Re: Env Ethics: Decision model under conditions of uncertainty	<>	Thu, 04 May 2000 18:02:30 -0700	74 lines
(US) GMOs May Pose New Risk to Endangered Plants, Animals	Good Goals	Fri, 05 May 2000 00:47:09 -0400	21 lines
Re: Env Ethics: Decision model under conditions of uncertainty	Jim Tantillo	Fri, 5 May 2000 12:00:53 -0500	156 lines
Re: Seeking Profound Childhood Nature Experiences (fwd)	artecology	Sat, 6 May 2000 09:30:53 -0600 (MDT)	48 lines
RE: Seeking Profound Childhood Nature Experiences (fwd)	Jeri Pollock	Sat, 6 May 2000 14:05:09 -0700	54 lines
Re: Seeking Profound Childhood Nature Experiences (fwd)	Cheryl Cline	Sat, 6 May 2000 18:53:14 -0400	58 lines
Re: Seeking Profound Childhood Nature Experiences (fwd)	John Foster	Sat, 6 May 2000 22:33:12 -0700	174 lines
Ansel Adams: An American Icon and Visionary	artecology	Sun, 7 May 2000 08:50:28 -0600 (MDT)	44 lines
Ethics and the Environment	Philosophy News Service * richard jones	Sun, 07 May 2000 16:30:22 -0400	49 lines
Re: The Precautionary Principle--A Race to the Bottom?	Bryan Eugen Quinn	Tue, 09 May 2000 13:56:39 -0500	79 lines
The Precautionary Principle--A Race to the Bottom?	Jim Tantillo	Tue, 9 May 2000 14:14:32 -0500	468 lines
re: info needed	Jeri Pollock	Tue, 9 May 2000 12:18:04 -0700	18 lines
Re: The Precautionary Principle--the case of GMOs	Jim Tantillo	Wed, 10 May 2000 10:46:41 -0500	120 lines
Re: The Precautionary Principle--A Race to the Bottom?	Steve	Wed, 10 May 2000 10:54:21 -0700 (PDT)	85 lines
Fwd: FELLOWSHIP: Carnegie Council on Ethics and International Affairs	Jim Tantillo	Wed, 10 May 2000 16:36:23 -0500	70 lines
Re: The Precautionary Principle--A Race to the Bottom?	<>	Thu, 11 May 2000 22:34:42 -0700	58 lines
RE: The Precautionary Principle--A Race to the Bottom?	Steven Bissell	Fri, 12 May 2000 08:26:45 -0600	102 lines
Re: The Precautionary Principle--A Race to the Bottom?	John Foster	Fri, 12 May 2000 10:27:28 -0700	229 lines
Re: [Re: The Precautionary Principle--A Race to the Bottom?]	VeggieBiggs	Mon, 12 May 00 13:49:59 EDT +0000	231 lines
Re: The Precautionary Principle--A Race to the Bottom?	Jim Tantillo	Fri, 12 May 2000 12:58:25 -0500	455 lines
Re: The Precautionary Principle--A Race to the Bottom?	Steve	Fri, 12 May 2000 13:37:42 -0700 (PDT)	93 lines
Re: [Re: The Precautionary Principle--A Race to the Bottom?]	John Foster	Fri, 12 May 2000 13:48:13 -0700	346 lines
Re: The Precautionary Principle--A Race to the Bottom?	Steve	Fri, 12 May 2000 13:58:08 -0700 (PDT)	69 lines
Job Posting: The PP in Action- funny stuff!	John Foster	Fri, 12 May 2000 14:13:51 -0700	46 lines
Re: [Re: The Precautionary Principle--A Race to the Bottom?]	Jim Tantillo	Fri, 12 May 2000 17:18:16 -0500	912 lines
Genetic Engineering: USDA seeks input!	John Foster	Fri, 12 May 2000 15:48:40 -0700	314 lines
Brazilian Rainforest Destruction News.	John Foster	Fri, 12 May 2000 16:09:18 -0700	242 lines
the precautionary principle	Steven Bissell	Sat, 13 May 2000 09:38:23 -0600	54 lines
Re: the precautionary principle	Steve	Sun, 14 May 2000 20:35:30 -0700 (PDT)	100 lines
Re: the precautionary principle	michael	Mon, 15 May 2000 16:59:45 +0800	58 lines
Re: the precautionary principle	John Foster	Mon, 15 May 2000 07:56:53 -0700	291 lines
an old question...(ENVIROETHICS)	Dennis Kostecki	Mon, 15 May 2000 10:14:49 -0600 (MDT)	35 lines
Re: an old question...(ENVIROETHICS)	Bryan Eugen Quinn	Mon, 15 May 2000 11:40:50 -0500	18 lines
Re: an old question...(ENVIROETHICS)	Bryan Eugen Quinn	Mon, 15 May 2000 11:43:37 -0500	20 lines
RE: an old question...(ENVIROETHICS)	Steven Bissell	Mon, 15 May 2000 11:01:06 -0600	50 lines
an old question...(revised)	dennis kostecki	Mon, 15 May 2000 11:09:14 -0600 (MDT)	41 lines
Re: an old question...(ENVIROETHICS)	Ray Lanier	Mon, 15 May 2000 13:40:40 -0400	64 lines
RE: an old question...(ENVIROETHICS)	dennis kostecki	Mon, 15 May 2000 11:42:03 -0600 (MDT)	58 lines
Re: an old question...(ENVIROETHICS)	John Foster	Mon, 15 May 2000 10:51:18 -0700	57 lines
Re: an old question...(ENVIROETHICS)	John Foster	Mon, 15 May 2000 10:58:37 -0700	33 lines
Re: an old question...(ENVIROETHICS)	<>	Mon, 15 May 2000 14:07:34 EDT	15 lines
SD-ONLINE - 657 Links to Sustainable Development Web Sites	SD Online	Mon, 15 May 2000 11:36:13 -0700	122 lines
Re: [Re: an old question...(ENVIROETHICS)]	VeggieBiggs	Mon, 15 May 00 14:51:13 EDT +0000	87 lines
RE: an old question...(ENVIROETHICS)	Steven Bissell	Mon, 15 May 2000 13:55:51 -0600	27 lines
Precautionary Principle	John Foster	Mon, 15 May 2000 15:48:41 -0700	188 lines
Re: Zen and the art of pHarming	michael	Tue, 16 May 2000 11:22:45 +0800	20 lines
Re: an old question. ...mea culpa	John Foster	Tue, 16 May 2000 09:45:20 -0700	331 lines
Re: an old question...(ENVIROETHICS)	Jim Tantillo	Tue, 16 May 2000 12:12:32 -0500	114 lines
Re: an old question...(ENVIROETHICS)	dennis kostecki	Tue, 16 May 2000 11:23:41 -0600 (MDT)	99 lines
Re: an old question...(ENVIROETHICS)	John Foster	Tue, 16 May 2000 11:52:04 -0700	138 lines
Re: an old question...(revised)	Volker Bahn	Tue, 16 May 2000 15:15:58 -0500	99 lines
Re: an old question...(ENVIROETHICS)	Jim Tantillo	Tue, 16 May 2000 16:16:07 -0500	586 lines
Survivalism, misanthropy, and the abandonment of enviroethics	Jim Tantillo	Tue, 16 May 2000 17:59:40 -0500	365 lines
Re: Survivalism, misanthropy, and the abandonment of enviroethics	Ray Lanier	Tue, 16 May 2000 19:34:40 -0400	65 lines
Re: Survivalism, misanthropy, and the abandonment of enviroethics	John Foster	Tue, 16 May 2000 17:21:35 -0700	703 lines
Re: Survivalism, misanthropy, and the abandonment of enviroethics	John Foster	Tue, 16 May 2000 17:55:56 -0700	133 lines
Re: an old question...(ENVIROETHICS)	Jim Tantillo	Tue, 16 May 2000 22:20:51 -0500	207 lines
Re: Survivalism, misanthropy, and the abandonment of enviroethics	Jim Tantillo	Wed, 17 May 2000 01:17:18 -0500	347 lines
Re: Survivalism, misanthropy, and the abandonment of enviroethics	Jim Tantillo	Wed, 17 May 2000 08:45:15 -0500	68 lines
RE: an old question. ...mea culpa	Steven Bissell	Wed, 17 May 2000 09:01:09 -0600	131 lines
RE: an old question. ...mea culpa	Chris Hope	Wed, 17 May 2000 16:12:20 +0100	33 lines
Re: Survivalism, misanthropy, and the abandonment of enviroethics	John Foster	Wed, 17 May 2000 08:32:11 -0700	575 lines
The bird with the beautiful song	lynda roberts	Wed, 17 May 2000 11:53:12 -0600 (MDT)	42 lines
Re: The bird with the beautiful song	Steven Thompson	Wed, 17 May 2000 16:37:38 EDT	16 lines
Pre-caution Principle and Lawn Chemicals	John Foster	Wed, 17 May 2000 17:01:16 -0700	117 lines
RE: an old question...(ENVIROETHICS)	Chris Perley	Thu, 18 May 2000 12:44:23 +1200	48 lines
GMO and PP	Steven Bissell	Thu, 18 May 2000 06:23:07 -0600	60 lines
Re: GMO and PP	John Foster	Thu, 18 May 2000 08:11:38 -0700	133 lines
Integrating Ethics into Technical Education II	Hollander, Rachelle	Thu, 18 May 2000 11:18:56 -0400	39 lines
RE: GMO and PP	Steven Bissell	Thu, 18 May 2000 09:32:08 -0600	148 lines
Fwd: Nowadays we idolize nature -- or fear it	Jim Tantillo	Thu, 18 May 2000 10:46:53 -0500	190 lines
Re: Nowadays we idolize nature -- or fear it	John Foster	Thu, 18 May 2000 08:49:58 -0700	84 lines
Environmental education and PP, was Re: Fwd: Nowadays we idolize nature	Jim Tantillo	Thu, 18 May 2000 11:24:37 -0500	63 lines
RE: Nowadays we idolize nature -- or fear it	Chris Perley	Fri, 19 May 2000 10:08:28 +1200	236 lines
Green Web bulletin on "Handling Contradictions" available	<>	Mon, 18 May 2000 18:13:55 -0700	55 lines
Re: Green Web bulletin on "Handling Contradictions" available	Steven Thompson	Fri, 19 May 2000 08:40:29 EDT	69 lines
RE: more Maxine Kumin poetry	Vanessa Von Struensee	Fri, 19 May 2000 09:14:08 -0400	31 lines
Re: The bird with the beautiful song	Jim Tantillo	Fri, 19 May 2000 08:37:41 -0500	197 lines
more Maxine Kumin poetry	Jim Tantillo	Fri, 19 May 2000 09:05:36 -0500	16 lines
Bonding and Continuity	Vanessa Von Struensee	Fri, 19 May 2000 10:19:02 -0400	162 lines
Environmental articles on globalization-links	Vanessa Von Struensee	Fri, 19 May 2000 10:56:19 -0400	173 lines
RE: more Maxine Kumin poetry	Amanda Tolson	Fri, 19 May 2000 15:02:25 BST	53 lines
RE: Nowadays we idolize nature -- or fear it	Jim Tantillo	Fri, 19 May 2000 11:38:40 -0500	257 lines
Environment & Myth (enviroethics)	dennis kostecki	Fri, 19 May 2000 11:55:23 -0600 (MDT)	59 lines
Fwd: CFP: Reason and Nature:	Jim Tantillo	Fri, 19 May 2000 15:35:12 -0500	71 lines
Re: GMO and PP	Steve	Fri, 19 May 2000 15:13:39 -0700 (PDT)	157 lines
Update for GIS/EM4 participants and contributors	<>	Fri, 19 May 2000 17:26:26 -0600 (MDT)	52 lines
PP and technology.	<>	Fri, 19 May 2000 20:27:01 EDT	167 lines
Re: PP and technology.	Benjamin S Hale	Fri, 19 May 2000 20:56:08 -0400 (EDT)	30 lines
Environment, Myth, Einstein's Brain, and Wrestling	Jim Tantillo	Fri, 19 May 2000 21:25:19 -0500	447 lines
Re: PP and technology.	Jim Tantillo	Fri, 19 May 2000 23:57:07 -0500	214 lines
RE: PP and technology.	Steven Bissell	Sat, 20 May 2000 08:02:17 -0600	54 lines
RE: PP and technology.	Jim Tantillo	Sat, 20 May 2000 12:06:08 -0500	238 lines
RE: PP and technology.	Steven Bissell	Sat, 20 May 2000 11:37:20 -0600	305 lines
Ayn Rand and biocentrism	Jim Tantillo	Sat, 20 May 2000 12:39:57 -0500	36 lines
Who is a philosopher? was RE: PP and technology.	Jim Tantillo	Sun, 21 May 2000 00:31:40 -0500	493 lines
Ayn Rand and Alan Greenspan	Jim Tantillo	Sun, 21 May 2000 01:09:47 -0500	117 lines
RE: Who is a philosopher? was RE: PP and technology.	Steven Bissell	Sun, 21 May 2000 08:48:34 -0600	624 lines
Re: Green Web bulletin on "Handling Contradictions" available	<>	Mon, 21 May 2000 09:36:33 -0700	68 lines
Re: PP and technology.	Steve	Sun, 21 May 2000 16:24:54 -0700 (PDT)	92 lines
Re: PP and technology.	dennis kostecki	Sun, 21 May 2000 17:56:14 -0600 (MDT)	109 lines
Re: PP and technology.	Steve	Sun, 21 May 2000 17:33:03 -0700 (PDT)	138 lines
Re: PP and technology.	Steve	Sun, 21 May 2000 17:51:06 -0700 (PDT)	24 lines
Re: Environmental education and PP, was Re: Fwd: Nowadays we idolizenature	Volker Bahn	Sun, 21 May 2000 20:07:04 -0500	177 lines
Re: PP and technology.	Steve	Sun, 21 May 2000 18:08:34 -0700 (PDT)	41 lines
Re: PP and technology.	<>	Sun, 21 May 2000 21:09:58 EDT	37 lines
RE: Environmental education and PP, was Re: Fwd: Nowadays we idolizenature	Chris Perley	Mon, 22 May 2000 16:23:27 +1200	204 lines
Re: PP and technology.	michael	Mon, 22 May 2000 12:33:24 +0800	23 lines
Re: Who is a philosopher?	Chris Hope	Mon, 22 May 2000 10:40:30 +0100	50 lines
RE: Environmental education and PP, was Re: Fwd: Nowadays we idolizenature	Volker Bahn	Mon, 22 May 2000 08:07:08 PDT	62 lines
Re: Environmental education and PP, was Re: Fwd: Nowadays we idolizenature	Ray Lanier	Mon, 22 May 2000 12:10:42 -0400	95 lines
Re: Environmental education and PP, was Re: Fwd: Nowadays we idolizenature	dennis kostecki	Mon, 22 May 2000 10:56:58 -0600 (MDT)	42 lines
Re: Environmental education and PP, was Re: Fwd: Nowadays we idolizenature	Bryan Eugen Quinn	Mon, 22 May 2000 12:10:08 -0500	109 lines
Re: Environmental education and PP, was Re: Fwd: Nowadays we idolizenature	Jim Tantillo	Mon, 22 May 2000 13:00:20 -0500	419 lines
Fwd: Hawaiian Elves Destroy GE Crops and Research on Island of Kauai	Jim Tantillo	Mon, 22 May 2000 14:23:40 -0500	163 lines
Re: Environmental education and PP, was Re: Fwd: Nowadays we idolizenature	Steve	Mon, 22 May 2000 12:59:26 -0700 (PDT)	260 lines
Re: Environmental education and PP, was Re: Fwd: Nowadays we idolizenature	Bryan Eugen Quinn	Mon, 22 May 2000 16:17:25 -0500	50 lines
Re: Environmental education and PP, was Re: Fwd: Nowadays we idolizenature	Volker Bahn	Mon, 22 May 2000 14:59:06 PDT	231 lines
Re: Who is a philosopher?	Jim Tantillo	Mon, 22 May 2000 17:51:23 -0500	581 lines
Re: Environmental education and PP, was Re: Fwd: Nowadays we idolizenature	Ray Lanier	Mon, 22 May 2000 20:09:59 -0400	84 lines
Re: Lying and politics	Ray Lanier	Mon, 22 May 2000 20:22:09 -0400	88 lines
Re: Environmental education and PP, was Re: Fwd: Nowadays we idolizenature	Ketil Rogn	Mon, 22 May 2000 18:24:26 -0600	79 lines
Re: Lying and politics	michael	Tue, 23 May 2000 09:15:20 +0800	28 lines
Fw: (ENS) News May, 22, 2000	Ray Lanier	Mon, 22 May 2000 22:40:01 -0400	446 lines
RE: Environmental education and PP, was Re: Fwd: Nowadays we idolizenature	Chris Perley	Tue, 23 May 2000 17:03:19 +1200	76 lines
Re: Environmental education and PP, was Re: Fwd: Nowadays we idolizenature	Lars Ekman	Mon, 22 May 2000 22:40:46 -0700	24 lines
Type A and Type B Foresters and Agriculturalists: was Environmental education and PP, was Re: Fwd: Nowadays we idolizenature	Chris Perley	Tue, 23 May 2000 17:44:41 +1200	171 lines
Nature as whore or Madonna: Environmental education and PP, was Re: Fwd: Nowadays we idolizenature	Chris Perley	Tue, 23 May 2000 17:50:50 +1200	66 lines
RE: Environmental education and PP, was Re: Fwd: Nowadays we idolizenature	Chris Perley	Tue, 23 May 2000 18:15:27 +1200	175 lines
Re: Environmental education and PP, was Re: Fwd: Nowadays we idolizenature	Lars Ekman	Tue, 23 May 2000 00:45:09 -0700	127 lines
re: Nature as whore or Madonna: Environmental education and PP, w as Re: Fwd: Nowadays we idolize nature	Vanessa Von Struensee	Tue, 23 May 2000 08:42:19 -0400	458 lines
Re: [Re: Lying and politics]	VeggieBiggs	Mon, 23 May 00 09:29:26 EDT	55 lines
Re: Environmental education and PP, was Re: Fwd: Nowadays we idolizenature	Chris Hope	Tue, 23 May 2000 15:16:38 +0100	48 lines
E.O. Wilson's numbers and Budiansky's qualifications	Jim Tantillo	Tue, 23 May 2000 11:54:27 -0500	633 lines
Forestry practices	Chris Perley	Wed, 24 May 2000 11:31:00 +1200	221 lines
Re: Environmental education and PP, was Re: Fwd: Nowadays we idolizenature	<>	Tue, 23 May 2000 18:19:39 -0700	263 lines
Re: Fwd: Hawaiian Elves Destroy GE Crops and Research on Island of Kauai	<>	Tue, 23 May 2000 18:19:54 -0700	75 lines
Re: Lying and politics	<>	Tue, 23 May 2000 18:20:01 -0700	66 lines
Re: Environmental education and PP, was Re: Fwd: Nowadays we idolizenature	Jim Tantillo	Tue, 23 May 2000 21:02:44 -0500	94 lines
Re: Environmental education and PP, was Re: Fwd: Nowadays we idolizenature	<>	Tue, 23 May 2000 20:01:27 -0700	221 lines
Re: Environmental education and PP, was Re: Fwd: Nowadays we idolizenature	Jim Tantillo	Tue, 23 May 2000 23:56:24 -0500	416 lines
re: Nature as whore or Madonna: Environmental education and PP, was Re: Fwd: Nowadays we idolize nature	<>	Tue, 23 May 2000 21:58:42 -0700	157 lines
re: Nature as whore or Madonna: Environmental education and PP, was Re: Fwd: Nowadays we idolize nature	dennis kostecki	Wed, 24 May 2000 06:31:46 -0600 (MDT)	33 lines
Madonna/Whore as metaphor of nature and what is postmodernism?	Vanessa Von Struensee	Wed, 24 May 2000 08:42:39 -0400	109 lines
RE: Nature as whore or Madonna: Environmental education and PP, w as Re: Fwd: Nowadays we idolize nature	Vanessa Von Struensee	Wed, 24 May 2000 08:44:45 -0400	624 lines
Re: More On GM	<>	Wed, 31 May 2000 20:17:00 EDT	36 lines
Re: More on GMO	<>	Wed, 31 May 2000 20:58:14 EDT	96 lines
RE: Altruism	Chris Perley	Thu, 1 Jun 2000 15:51:25 +1200	201 lines
Does it cost nothing to protect the environment?	Chris Perley	Thu, 1 Jun 2000 16:23:45 +1200	57 lines
Re: Does it cost nothing to protect the environment?	john foster	Thu, 1 Jun 2000 00:25:43 -0700	137 lines
A Potato is Less Complex: Was Rand	<>	Thu, 01 Jun 2000 00:29:58 -0700	244 lines
RE: Altruism	<>	Thu, 01 Jun 2000 00:30:08 -0700	185 lines
NSF Societal Dimensions Program	Hollander, Rachelle	Thu, 1 Jun 2000 09:55:44 -0400	85 lines
Re: A Potato is Less Complex: Was Rand	Steve	Thu, 1 Jun 2000 09:37:05 -0700 (PDT)	190 lines
No TKO here, a physical knockout	john foster	Thu, 1 Jun 2000 10:28:14 -0700	59 lines
Western Fuels Defamation Suit Against ENGOs	john foster	Thu, 1 Jun 2000 10:37:23 -0700	26 lines
Lack of Ethics No Surprise	VeggieBiggs	MOn, 1 Jun 00 14:02:57 EDT	42 lines
Re: Lack of Ethics No Surprise	Steve	Thu, 1 Jun 2000 11:51:59 -0700 (PDT)	120 lines
Re: Lack of Ethics No Surprise	Chris Lees	Thu, 1 Jun 2000 19:54:36 +0100	135 lines
Re: Western Fuels Defamation Suit Against ENGOs	Steve	Thu, 1 Jun 2000 11:58:30 -0700 (PDT)	42 lines
Re: Lack of Ethics No Surprise	john foster	Thu, 1 Jun 2000 12:10:02 -0700	317 lines
Re: Western Fuels Defamation Suit Against ENGOs	john foster	Thu, 1 Jun 2000 13:09:51 -0700	58 lines
Earth Day Network	john foster	Thu, 1 Jun 2000 14:00:28 -0700	449 lines
Re: Western Fuels Defamation Suit Against ENGOs	Steve	Thu, 1 Jun 2000 14:26:03 -0700 (PDT)	79 lines
Re: Earth Day Network	Steve	Thu, 1 Jun 2000 14:31:21 -0700 (PDT)	166 lines
RE: Lack of Ethics No Surprise	Steven Bissell	Thu, 1 Jun 2000 15:43:10 -0600	246 lines
Re: No TKO here, a physical knockout	Steve	Thu, 1 Jun 2000 14:51:33 -0700 (PDT)	56 lines
Re: Earth Day Network	john foster	Thu, 1 Jun 2000 17:17:08 -0700	261 lines
The Ecology of War	john foster	Thu, 1 Jun 2000 19:08:42 -0700	443 lines
Re: More on Rand: Altruism	Benjamin S Hale	Thu, 1 Jun 2000 23:09:45 -0400 (EDT)	39 lines
Re: Does it cost nothing to protect the environment?	Benjamin S Hale	Thu, 1 Jun 2000 23:15:18 -0400 (EDT)	33 lines
Re: More on Rand: Altruism	Benjamin S Hale	Thu, 1 Jun 2000 23:35:39 -0400 (EDT)	44 lines
Enviroethics - debate, not insults, please	David Pearson	Fri, 02 Jun 2000 11:26:39 +0100	38 lines
Re: More on Rand: Altruism	Jim Tantillo	Fri, 2 Jun 2000 05:59:16 -0500	63 lines
Re: Earth Day Network	Steve	Fri, 2 Jun 2000 08:57:50 -0700 (PDT)	280 lines
Re: Enviroethics - debate, not insults, please	Steve	Fri, 2 Jun 2000 08:59:40 -0700 (PDT)	53 lines
Re: The Ecology of War	Steve	Fri, 2 Jun 2000 09:13:39 -0700 (PDT)	218 lines
New mailing list on Ecotourism	Ernest Rukangira	Fri, 02 Jun 2000 19:28:15 +0300	64 lines
Fwd: [NAIA-AnimalTalk] Eco-terrorism article	Jim Tantillo	Fri, 2 Jun 2000 11:51:30 -0500	80 lines
Re: More on Rand: Altruism	Volker Bahn	Fri, 2 Jun 2000 13:44:23 -0500	269 lines
Re: Earth Day Network	john foster	Fri, 2 Jun 2000 12:06:25 -0700	31 lines
Re: More on Rand: Altruism	Steve	Fri, 2 Jun 2000 13:39:18 -0700 (PDT)	242 lines
CO2 colonialism	john foster	Fri, 2 Jun 2000 16:48:49 -0700	111 lines
Re: More on Rand: Altruism	Volker Bahn	Fri, 2 Jun 2000 18:53:24 -0500	58 lines
Re: More on Rand: Altruism	Steve	Fri, 2 Jun 2000 21:40:14 -0700 (PDT)	95 lines
Vita Bella:counter will to power	John Foster	Fri, 2 Jun 2000 21:53:11 -0700	214 lines
Suspend GM Crops For 5 Years-Scientists	john foster	Sat, 3 Jun 2000 06:36:44 -0700	292 lines
Genetic Risks: who is liable	john foster	Sat, 3 Jun 2000 08:36:13 -0700	701 lines
RE: Genetic Risks: who is liable	Steven Bissell	Sat, 3 Jun 2000 10:18:30 -0600	176 lines
RE: Genetic Risks: who is liable	Steven Bissell	Sat, 3 Jun 2000 11:10:20 -0600	213 lines
Nazis, Environmentalists, whose on left? Right!	Steven Bissell	Sat, 3 Jun 2000 11:40:36 -0600	34 lines
Leopold and Heartland	Steven Bissell	Sat, 3 Jun 2000 11:49:05 -0600	17 lines
Re: Genetic Risks: who is liable	john foster	Sat, 3 Jun 2000 11:00:39 -0700	488 lines
Re: Genetic Risks: who is liable	john foster	Sat, 3 Jun 2000 11:04:45 -0700	99 lines
RE: Genetic Risks: who is liable	Steven Bissell	Sat, 3 Jun 2000 12:45:04 -0600	203 lines
Westra and Pepperman	john foster	Sat, 3 Jun 2000 11:51:57 -0700	139 lines
Re: Genetic Risks: who is liable	john foster	Sat, 3 Jun 2000 12:02:54 -0700	297 lines
Further info on B. P. Taylor	john foster	Sat, 3 Jun 2000 12:09:03 -0700	63 lines
Salmon in NZ - and dolphins	Chris Perley	Sun, 4 Jun 2000 12:41:16 +1200	164 lines
Rand, Part 2: The Pursuit of Happiness	Jim Tantillo	Sat, 3 Jun 2000 23:41:05 -0500	396 lines
Rand: Money, trade, and happiness	Jim Tantillo	Sat, 3 Jun 2000 23:46:28 -0500	283 lines
Rand on "good work" and human flourishing	Jim Tantillo	Sun, 4 Jun 2000 00:07:34 -0500	515 lines
Re: Salmon in NZ - and dolphins	Patrick Longfield	Sun, 4 Jun 2000 22:49:25 -0700	97 lines
Re:Rand & Contract	Paul Kirby	Mon, 05 Jun 2000 15:12:22 +0100	41 lines
Fwd: What philosophy is	Jim Tantillo	Mon, 5 Jun 2000 09:30:42 -0500	110 lines
Re:Rand & Contract	Jim Tantillo	Tue, 6 Jun 2000 09:28:51 -0500	107 lines
Re:Rand & Contract	Paul Kirby	Tue, 06 Jun 2000 15:50:46 +0100	47 lines
FW: women, antiperspirants, radiation & breast cancer	Cindy MacDonald	Wed, 7 Jun 2000 11:42:22 -0400	224 lines
Fwd: Fw: humor	Jim Tantillo	Wed, 7 Jun 2000 11:49:03 -0500	22 lines
Fwd: Biotech sabotage hits Oregon	Jim Tantillo	Thu, 8 Jun 2000 22:08:59 -0500	30 lines
Our Fellow Animals	Ray Lanier	Fri, 9 Jun 2000 09:37:27 -0400	41 lines
Re: Our Fellow Animals	Tom Frank	Fri, 9 Jun 2000 16:20:17 -0400	96 lines
Re: FW: women, antiperspirants, radiation & breast cancer	john foster	Fri, 09 Jun 2000 21:38:23 -0700	31 lines
RE: FW: women, antiperspirants, radiation & breast cancer	Cindy MacDonald	Sat, 10 Jun 2000 14:20:23 -0400	48 lines
RE: Neanderthals ate meat -- and little else, study says	Steven Bissell	Tue, 13 Jun 2000 08:27:35 -0600	90 lines
Neanderthals ate meat -- and little else, study says	Jim Tantillo	Tue, 13 Jun 2000 09:37:25 -0500	40 lines
Re: Neanderthals ate meat -- and little else, study says	Maynard S. Clark	Tue, 13 Jun 2000 12:21:31 -0400	49 lines
RE: Neanderthals ate meat -- and little else, study says	Steven Bissell	Tue, 13 Jun 2000 11:13:03 -0600	69 lines
Re: Old conversation, EE and veganism	<>	Wed, 14 Jun 2000 01:07:59 EDT	19 lines
Need source of C.S. Lewis quote	Jim Tantillo	Wed, 14 Jun 2000 09:25:47 -0500	106 lines
I really must go.	VeggieBiggs	Mon, 14 Jun 00 10:41:48 EDT	20 lines
Re: I really must go.	Adam Gottschalk	Wed, 14 Jun 2000 11:07:32 -0400	33 lines
Re: Need source of C.S. Lewis quote	Jim Tantillo	Wed, 14 Jun 2000 12:25:22 -0500	136 lines
GM pros & cons	Ray Lanier	Wed, 14 Jun 2000 18:48:50 -0400	31 lines
"Aboriginal Issues and Left Biocentrism" Green Web bulletin available	<>	Mon, 14 Jun 2000 16:04:11 -0700	71 lines
Russian Environmental Digest (REDfiles) I of II	<>	Thu, 15 Jun 2000 16:36:12 EDT	1051 lines
[ENWL-eng] STOP THE ENVIRONMENTAL WEAPONS-SAVE THE EARTH	<>	Thu, 15 Jun 2000 16:44:08 EDT	47 lines
Orginizations, population and the environment	<>	Fri, 16 Jun 2000 16:58:56 EDT	118 lines
ELF, ALF, EarthFirst! and terrorism	Jim Tantillo	Sat, 17 Jun 2000 12:01:40 -0500	624 lines
Re: ELF, ALF, EarthFirst! and terrorism	Ray Lanier	Sat, 17 Jun 2000 20:42:31 -0400	76 lines
GM and terrorism	<>	Sun, 18 Jun 2000 11:18:54 EDT	196 lines
Re: ELF, ALF, EarthFirst! and terrorism	john foster	Sun, 18 Jun 2000 09:58:20 -0700	109 lines
Re: ELF, ALF, EarthFirst! and terrorism	Steve	Sun, 18 Jun 2000 15:34:12 -0700 (PDT)	45 lines
Re: ELF, ALF, EarthFirst! and terrorism	Ray Lanier	Sun, 18 Jun 2000 19:01:19 -0400	63 lines
Re: ELF, ALF, EarthFirst! and terrorism	Steve	Sun, 18 Jun 2000 17:03:07 -0700 (PDT)	116 lines
Re: Is ecoterror a hate crime?	Ray Lanier	Sun, 18 Jun 2000 20:17:02 -0400	308 lines
Is ecoterror a hate crime?	Jim Tantillo	Sun, 18 Jun 2000 19:42:08 -0500	214 lines
Re: ELF, ALF, EarthFirst! and terrorism	Jim Tantillo	Sun, 18 Jun 2000 19:58:13 -0500	87 lines
Re: Is ecoterror a hate crime?	john foster	Sun, 18 Jun 2000 20:16:35 -0700	311 lines
Re: Is ecoterror a hate crime?	<>	Mon, 19 Jun 2000 01:45:59 EDT	150 lines
Who Are the Criminals in the Forest?	john foster	Sun, 18 Jun 2000 22:46:00 -0700	630 lines
Re: Is ecoterror a hate crime?	<>	Mon, 19 Jun 2000 02:01:03 EDT	172 lines
Re: Is ecoterror a hate crime?	john foster	Sun, 18 Jun 2000 23:25:13 -0700	262 lines
Risk Summer Course 2000 in San Sebastian	Hollander, Rachelle	Mon, 19 Jun 2000 09:13:18 -0400	1208 lines
Re: ELF, ALF, EarthFirst! and terrorism	Ray Lanier	Mon, 19 Jun 2000 11:05:18 -0400	200 lines
Re: ELF, ALF, EarthFirst! and terrorism	john foster	Mon, 19 Jun 2000 09:05:22 -0700	230 lines
RE: Is ecoterror a hate crime?	Steven Bissell	Mon, 19 Jun 2000 10:26:54 -0600	352 lines
Re: ELF, ALF, EarthFirst! and terrorism	john foster	Mon, 19 Jun 2000 09:35:37 -0700	132 lines
Re: Is ecoterror a hate crime?	john foster	Mon, 19 Jun 2000 09:52:12 -0700	180 lines
Shaping a Sustainable Future: Best Practices in Higher Education Workshop	<>	Mon, 19 Jun 2000 12:57:44 -0400	59 lines
Re: Is ecoterror a hate crime?	<>	Mon, 19 Jun 2000 16:04:50 EDT	43 lines
Re: Is ecoterror a hate crime?	john foster	Mon, 19 Jun 2000 13:23:37 -0700	37 lines
Re: ELF, ALF, EarthFirst! and terrorism	<>	Mon, 19 Jun 2000 16:52:05 EDT	59 lines
RE: Is ecoterror a hate crime?	Steven Bissell	Mon, 19 Jun 2000 15:52:28 -0600	71 lines
Re: ELF, ALF, EarthFirst! and terrorism	Jim Tantillo	Mon, 19 Jun 2000 17:03:12 -0500	357 lines
Re: ELF, ALF, EarthFirst! and terrorism	Jim Tantillo	Mon, 19 Jun 2000 17:14:14 -0500	53 lines
What is environmental ethics?	Jim Tantillo	Mon, 19 Jun 2000 17:38:31 -0500	141 lines
Re: ELF, ALF, EarthFirst! and terrorism	john foster	Mon, 19 Jun 2000 16:11:12 -0700	465 lines
Re: Is ecoterror a hate crime?	Steve	Mon, 19 Jun 2000 18:40:45 -0700 (PDT)	40 lines
Re: Is ecoterror a hate crime?	<>	Mon, 19 Jun 2000 22:03:40 EDT	36 lines
Re: Is ecoterror a hate crime?	Ray Lanier	Mon, 19 Jun 2000 23:36:07 -0400	59 lines
Environment News Service World Expo 2000 Hears Urgent Warning to Limit Resource	Ray Lanier	Mon, 19 Jun 2000 23:42:16 -0400	1975 lines
Greetings from a Newcomer	Ernest Partridge	Mon, 19 Jun 2000 22:17:05 -0700	73 lines
Re: Teleological Acts of Organisms	john foster	Mon, 19 Jun 2000 22:29:45 -0700	222 lines
RE: Teleological Acts of Organisms	Steven Bissell	Tue, 20 Jun 2000 07:32:19 -0600	277 lines
Re: ELF, ALF, EarthFirst! and terrorism	Ray Lanier	Tue, 20 Jun 2000 11:21:53 -0400	62 lines
Re: ELF, ALF, EarthFirst! and terrorism	Jim Tantillo	Tue, 20 Jun 2000 10:47:53 -0500	627 lines
RE: Teleological Acts of Organisms	john foster	Tue, 20 Jun 2000 09:36:04 -0700	102 lines
Satan the Selfhood	john foster	Tue, 20 Jun 2000 09:36:08 -0700	125 lines
Re: Satan the Self	john foster	Tue, 20 Jun 2000 10:53:47 -0700	64 lines
Re: Satan the Selfhood	Jim Tantillo	Tue, 20 Jun 2000 13:41:02 -0500	43 lines
Re: Satan the Self	Steve	Tue, 20 Jun 2000 12:00:13 -0700 (PDT)	40 lines
Re: Satan the Self	john foster	Tue, 20 Jun 2000 12:29:43 -0700	84 lines
Re: Satan the Self, and Thoreau on ecoterror	Jim Tantillo	Tue, 20 Jun 2000 17:30:16 -0500	680 lines
Re: Satan the Self, and Thoreau on ecoterror	john foster	Wed, 21 Jun 2000 01:05:02 -0700	121 lines
Alston Chase on the Unabomber	Jim Tantillo	Wed, 21 Jun 2000 08:01:49 -0500	189 lines
Re: Alston Chase on the Unabomber	john foster	Thu, 22 Jun 2000 09:23:54 -0700	61 lines
Re: Alston Chase on the Unabomber	john foster	Thu, 22 Jun 2000 10:29:17 -0700	79 lines
Re: Alston Chase on the Unabomber	Steve	Thu, 22 Jun 2000 13:18:47 -0700 (PDT)	135 lines
Re: Alston Chase on the Unabomber	Steve	Thu, 22 Jun 2000 13:28:19 -0700 (PDT)	71 lines
Let the Squeamish Beware: Animal Lover	john foster	Thu, 22 Jun 2000 13:52:41 -0700	71 lines
Re: Alston Chase on the Unabomber	john foster	Thu, 22 Jun 2000 14:04:48 -0700	54 lines
Re: Alston Chase on the Unabomber	Steve	Thu, 22 Jun 2000 15:56:53 -0700 (PDT)	50 lines
Re: Let the Squeamish Beware: Animal Lover	Steve	Thu, 22 Jun 2000 16:06:55 -0700 (PDT)	129 lines
Re: Let the Squeamish Beware: Animal Lover	john foster	Thu, 22 Jun 2000 16:28:12 -0700	138 lines
Re: Alston Chase on the Unabomber	john foster	Thu, 22 Jun 2000 16:47:28 -0700	81 lines
Re: Alston Chase on the Unabomber	Ray Lanier	Thu, 22 Jun 2000 20:49:50 -0400	51 lines
Re: Alston Chase on the Unabomber	john foster	Thu, 22 Jun 2000 18:20:52 -0700	74 lines
Re: Let the Squeamish Beware: Animal Lover	Steve	Fri, 23 Jun 2000 08:23:30 -0700 (PDT)	178 lines
REPETITION	Maria Stella	Fri, 23 Jun 2000 16:34:04 +0100 (BST)	52 lines
Re: Alston Chase on the Unabomber	Steve	Fri, 23 Jun 2000 08:34:20 -0700 (PDT)	133 lines
Re: Alston Chase on the Unabomber	Steve	Fri, 23 Jun 2000 08:39:16 -0700 (PDT)	54 lines
Re: Alston Chase on the Unabomber	David Pearson	Fri, 23 Jun 2000 17:32:22 +0100	30 lines
Re: Let the Squeamish Beware: Animal Lover	<>	Fri, 23 Jun 2000 13:09:07 EDT	21 lines
Re: Let the Squeamish Beware: Animal Lover	<>	Fri, 23 Jun 2000 13:29:36 EDT	24 lines
Re: Alston Chase on the Unabomber	Steve	Fri, 23 Jun 2000 10:30:13 -0700 (PDT)	26 lines
Re: REPETITION	<>	Fri, 23 Jun 2000 13:36:34 EDT	63 lines
Enviroethics archives	David 'n' Lesley	Fri, 23 Jun 2000 18:38:40 +0100	34 lines
[EE] List owners absent	David 'n' Lesley	Fri, 23 Jun 2000 18:46:27 +0100	31 lines
unsubscribe	Bryan Eugen Quinn	Fri, 23 Jun 2000 13:06:29 -0500	15 lines
RE: Teleological Acts of Organisms	Steven Bissell	Fri, 23 Jun 2000 13:45:43 -0600	36 lines
STATE & CORPORATE TERRORISM	Maria Stella	Sat, 24 Jun 2000 03:24:20 +0100 (BST)	167 lines
Re: STATE & CORPORATE TERRORISM	<>	Sat, 24 Jun 2000 00:00:59 EDT	201 lines
Re: Let the Squeamish Beware: Animal Lover	Ray Lanier	Sun, 25 Jun 2000 11:38:55 -0400	52 lines
Re: Let the Squeamish Beware: Animal Lover	<>	Sun, 25 Jun 2000 13:06:28 EDT	29 lines
Free subscription to SD-Online	SD Online	Sun, 25 Jun 2000 10:39:08 -0700	64 lines
Re: Let the Squeamish Beware: Animal Lover	Steven Thompson	Sun, 25 Jun 2000 13:51:18 EDT	46 lines
Re: STATE & CORPORATE TERRORISM	Maria Stella	Sun, 25 Jun 2000 19:06:17 +0100 (BST)	170 lines
minteer	Ray Lanier	Sun, 25 Jun 2000 23:41:20 -0400	1077 lines
Re: STATE & CORPORATE ???? Ethical Decisions; former; state and corporate terrorism	<>	Tue, 27 Jun 2000 14:02:21	38 lines
Fwd: Some Conferences to do with Agricultural Ethics	Jim Tantillo	Wed, 28 Jun 2000 09:08:26 -0500	90 lines
Minteer - Foundationalism	Ray Lanier	Wed, 28 Jun 2000 11:35:39 -0400	104 lines
Re: Minteer - Foundationalism	Jim Tantillo	Wed, 28 Jun 2000 16:00:07 -0500	122 lines
STATE & CORPORATE ???? Ethical (fwd)	Maria Stella	Thu, 29 Jun 2000 03:11:44 +0100 (BST)	58 lines
Re: Minteer - Foundationalism	Chris Hope	Thu, 29 Jun 2000 09:00:08 +0100	47 lines
Environmental Stewardship	Philosophy News Service * richard jones	Thu, 29 Jun 2000 05:09:11 -0400	61 lines
Re: Minteer - Foundationalism	Jim Tantillo	Thu, 29 Jun 2000 12:10:51 -0500	267 lines
Fur and freedom, was Re: STATE & CORPORATE TERRORISM	Jim Tantillo	Thu, 29 Jun 2000 17:42:11 -0500	266 lines
Re: Fur and freedom, was Re: STATE & CORPORATE TERRORISM	Steve	Thu, 29 Jun 2000 17:33:05 -0700 (PDT)	39 lines
People DO change their views. . . .	Jim Tantillo	Fri, 30 Jun 2000 08:26:44 -0500	74 lines
Re: Minteer - Foundationalism	Ray Lanier	Fri, 30 Jun 2000 10:27:25 -0400	370 lines
Re:Axioms for Moral Machines	Paul Kirby	Fri, 30 Jun 2000 16:35:21 +0100	48 lines
Re: Re:Axioms for Moral Machines	Ray Lanier	Fri, 30 Jun 2000 12:17:10 -0400	71 lines
Re: Re:Axioms for Moral Machines	Paul Kirby	Fri, 30 Jun 2000 17:36:23 +0100	29 lines
Re:Minteer	Paul Kirby	Fri, 30 Jun 2000 18:20:25 +0100	41 lines
Re:Axioms for Moral Machines	Jim Tantillo	Fri, 30 Jun 2000 13:56:30 -0500	332 lines
Re:Minteer	Jim Tantillo	Sat, 1 Jul 2000 15:38:29 -0500	497 lines
Ecotage	Ernest Partridge	Sat, 01 Jul 2000 23:45:12 -0700	92 lines
Re: STATE & CORPORATE TERRORISM	john foster	Mon, 03 Jul 2000 11:09:53 -0700	62 lines
some new GM stuff	Steven Bissell	Mon, 3 Jul 2000 13:37:04 -0600	23 lines
Pragmatic (shallow) ecology as democratic realism, was Re:Minteer	Jim Tantillo	Mon, 3 Jul 2000 17:11:18 -0500	483 lines
Re: Pragmatic (shallow) ecology as democratic realism, was Re:Minteer	john foster	Mon, 03 Jul 2000 16:01:08 -0700	113 lines
Re: some new GM stuff	john foster	Mon, 03 Jul 2000 16:27:13 -0700	56 lines
Biological Engines In Decline (WRI Report)	john foster	Mon, 03 Jul 2000 18:42:39 -0700	118 lines
[earthprophecy-l] Earth Changes/EMF Weapons	<>	Tue, 4 Jul 2000 00:15:58 EDT	80 lines
Re:Foundations (skip if bored)	Paul Kirby	Tue, 04 Jul 2000 15:23:40 +0100	82 lines
RE: some new GM stuff	Steven Bissell	Tue, 4 Jul 2000 08:29:33 -0600	57 lines
Re: some new GM stuff	<>	Tue, 4 Jul 2000 11:33:50 EDT	33 lines
RE: some new GM stuff	Steven Bissell	Tue, 4 Jul 2000 09:52:22 -0600	52 lines
Re: Fur and freedom, was Re: STATE & CORPORATE TERRORISM	john foster	Tue, 04 Jul 2000 09:34:07 -0700	326 lines
Re: Re:Foundations (skip if bored)	Ray Lanier	Tue, 4 Jul 2000 12:47:36 -0400	25 lines
Re: some new GM stuff	Ray Lanier	Tue, 4 Jul 2000 12:58:20 -0400	80 lines
Re:Foundations (skip if bored)	Jim Tantillo	Tue, 4 Jul 2000 16:39:50 -0500	413 lines
Re: Fur and freedom, was Re: STATE & CORPORATE TERRORISM	Jim Tantillo	Tue, 4 Jul 2000 17:02:07 -0500	58 lines
Fwd: AT THE ANIMAL RIGHTS 2000 CONVENTION	Jim Tantillo	Tue, 4 Jul 2000 22:07:55 -0500	293 lines
Minteer on Callicott and intellectual slipperiness	Jim Tantillo	Tue, 4 Jul 2000 23:58:56 -0500	343 lines
Re: Fur and freedom, was Re: STATE & CORPORATE TERRORISM	Steve	Tue, 4 Jul 2000 22:29:51 -0700 (PDT)	55 lines
Only a conscience can feel shame.	john foster	Wed, 05 Jul 2000 06:47:37 -0700	116 lines
Re: Minteer on Callicott and intellectual slipperiness	john foster	Wed, 05 Jul 2000 06:47:41 -0700	253 lines
Re: Fur and freedom, was Re: STATE & CORPORATE TERRORISM	john foster	Wed, 05 Jul 2000 07:02:48 -0700	74 lines
RE: Fur and freedom, was Re: STATE & CORPORATE TERRORISM	Steven Bissell	Wed, 5 Jul 2000 08:31:36 -0600	45 lines
Puritans and Pagans	john foster	Wed, 05 Jul 2000 09:13:54 -0700	118 lines
RE: Minteer on Callicott and intellectual slipperiness	Chris Perley	Thu, 6 Jul 2000 09:07:13 +1200	327 lines
RE: some new GM stuff	Maria Stella	Thu, 6 Jul 2000 03:03:11 +0100 (BST)	79 lines
Re: Fur and freedom, was Re: STATE & CORPORATE TERRORISM	Maria Stella	Thu, 6 Jul 2000 03:16:14 +0100 (BST)	41 lines
RE: Minteer on Callicott and intellectual slipperiness	Jim Tantillo	Wed, 5 Jul 2000 21:25:30 -0500	822 lines
Re: Fur and freedom, was Re: STATE & CORPORATE TERRORISM	Steve	Wed, 5 Jul 2000 20:23:24 -0700 (PDT)	73 lines
RE: Minteer on Callicott and intellectual slipperiness	john foster	Thu, 06 Jul 2000 07:08:19 -0700	193 lines
Fw: The Danger Point	Ray Lanier	Thu, 6 Jul 2000 10:42:23 -0400	657 lines
Re: Fur and freedom, was Re: STATE & CORPORATE TERRORISM	Steve	Thu, 6 Jul 2000 08:13:34 -0700 (PDT)	140 lines
Re: Minteer on Callicott and intellectual slipperiness	Ray Lanier	Thu, 6 Jul 2000 12:15:06 -0400	127 lines
Caring, was RE: Minteer on Callicott	Jim Tantillo	Thu, 6 Jul 2000 11:35:52 -0500	157 lines
Re: Minteer on Callicott and intellectual slipperiness	Jim Tantillo	Thu, 6 Jul 2000 13:17:06 -0500	346 lines
Life, liberty and the pursuit of foxes, was Re: Fur and freedom	Jim Tantillo	Thu, 6 Jul 2000 16:06:04 -0500	129 lines
Non Enviro-Test-Ethics-Response	john foster	Thu, 06 Jul 2000 14:33:29 -0700	74 lines
Re: Minteer on Callicott and intellectual slipperiness	john foster	Thu, 06 Jul 2000 16:05:28 -0700	143 lines
Plotinus on universal participation.	john foster	Thu, 06 Jul 2000 16:05:32 -0700	24 lines
Re: Non Enviro-Test-Ethics-Response	Steve	Thu, 6 Jul 2000 16:37:15 -0700 (PDT)	130 lines
RE: Minteer on Callicott and intellectual slipperiness	Tom Frank	Fri, 7 Jul 2000 10:47:54 +0800	202 lines
Re: Fur and freedom, was Re: STATE & CORPORATE TERRORISM	Maria Stella	Fri, 7 Jul 2000 05:40:09 +0100 (BST)	27 lines
Re: Minteer on Callicott and intellectual slipperiness	Paul Kirby	Fri, 07 Jul 2000 12:13:31 +0100	48 lines
RE: Minteer on Callicott and intellectual slipperiness	Steven Bissell	Fri, 7 Jul 2000 08:25:37 -0600	83 lines
Re: Caring, was RE: Minteer on Callicott	john foster	Fri, 07 Jul 2000 09:13:40 -0700	236 lines
Re: Minteer on Callicott and intellectual slipperiness	john foster	Fri, 07 Jul 2000 09:13:46 -0700	190 lines
RE: Minteer on Callicott and intellectual slipperiness	Paul Kirby	Fri, 07 Jul 2000 17:18:13 +0100	31 lines
FW: [Biomonitor] The Rainforest Site Petition	Jeri Pollock	Fri, 7 Jul 2000 12:54:55 -0700	54 lines
Fwd: Re: George Will on Fox Hunting	Jim Tantillo	Fri, 7 Jul 2000 14:57:03 -0500	220 lines
RE: Minteer on Callicott and intellectual slipperiness	Steven Bissell	Fri, 7 Jul 2000 17:26:08 -0600	46 lines
Saving the biosphere, was Re: Caring, was RE: Minteer on Callicott	Jim Tantillo	Fri, 7 Jul 2000 23:26:48 -0500	626 lines
Fw: New Web Site On Population & Environment	john foster	Sat, 08 Jul 2000 23:13:56 -0700	71 lines
RE: Minteer on Callicott and intellectual slipperiness	Chris Perley	Sun, 9 Jul 2000 21:34:24 +1200	266 lines
RE: Minteer on Callicott and intellectual slipperiness	john foster	Sun, 09 Jul 2000 09:30:37 -0700	309 lines
Value, worth and quality	Chris Perley	Mon, 10 Jul 2000 09:18:07 +1200	400 lines
Re: Value, worth and quality	Ray Lanier	Sun, 9 Jul 2000 19:13:55 -0400	184 lines
RE: Minteer on Callicott and intellectual slipperiness	Jim Tantillo	Mon, 10 Jul 2000 00:38:53 -0500	369 lines
Value, worth and quality	Chris Perley	Mon, 10 Jul 2000 17:41:16 +1200	525 lines
RE: Minteer on Callicott and intellectual slipperiness	Chris Lees	Mon, 10 Jul 2000 14:22:46 +0100	138 lines
Re: Value, worth and quality	Jim Tantillo	Mon, 10 Jul 2000 10:25:06 -0500	484 lines
Re: Value, Quality and Worth	<>	Mon, 10 Jul 2000 13:03:05 EDT	34 lines
RE: Minteer on Callicott and intellectual slipperiness	Jim Tantillo	Mon, 10 Jul 2000 13:08:44 -0500	272 lines
Re: Value, Quality and Worth	Jim Tantillo	Mon, 10 Jul 2000 14:05:05 -0500	262 lines
RE: Minteer on Callicott and intellectual slipperiness	Chris Lees	Mon, 10 Jul 2000 20:19:48 +0100	43 lines
RE: Minteer on Callicott and intellectual slipperiness	john foster	Mon, 10 Jul 2000 13:03:02 -0700	68 lines
RE: Minteer on Callicott and intellectual slipperiness	Jim Tantillo	Mon, 10 Jul 2000 15:40:39 -0500	67 lines
RE: Minteer on Callicott and intellectual slipperiness	Chris Lees	Mon, 10 Jul 2000 22:09:50 +0100	132 lines
RE: Minteer on Callicott and intellectual slipperiness	Chris Lees	Mon, 10 Jul 2000 23:21:31 +0100	57 lines
RE: Minteer on Callicott and intellectual slipperiness	john foster	Mon, 10 Jul 2000 17:45:52 -0700	134 lines
SARA / Ethics, Place and Environment	David Pearson	Tue, 11 Jul 2000 14:50:47 +0100	77 lines
RE: Minteer on Callicott and intellectual slipperiness	Jim Tantillo	Tue, 11 Jul 2000 09:32:06 -0500	254 lines
Oh no! Not another mind control conspiracy . . . . was Re: One potato	Jim Tantillo	Tue, 11 Jul 2000 10:41:54 -0500	248 lines
Re: Oh no! Not another mind control conspiracy . . . . was Re: One potato	john foster	Tue, 11 Jul 2000 08:56:14 -0700	198 lines
Re: Oh no! Not another mind control conspiracy . . . . was Re: One potato	Steve	Tue, 11 Jul 2000 13:45:38 -0700 (PDT)	59 lines
Re: Oh no! Not another mind control conspiracy . . . . was Re: One potato	Jim Tantillo	Tue, 11 Jul 2000 16:02:03 -0500	959 lines
Re: Oh no! Not another mind control conspiracy . . . . was Re: One potato	john foster	Tue, 11 Jul 2000 14:37:49 -0700	132 lines
RE: Minteer on Callicott and intellectual slipperiness	Chris Lees	Tue, 11 Jul 2000 22:45:04 +0100	302 lines
some more GM stuff. . .	Jim Tantillo	Tue, 11 Jul 2000 16:48:39 -0500	43 lines
Re: Oh no! Not another mind control conspiracy . . . . was Re: One potato	Chris Lees	Tue, 11 Jul 2000 23:08:48 +0100	35 lines
RE: Minteer on Callicott and intellectual slipperiness	Chris Lees	Tue, 11 Jul 2000 23:58:54 +0100	33 lines
Re: Oh no! Not another mind control conspiracy . . . . was Re: One potato	Chris Lees	Wed, 12 Jul 2000 01:49:48 +0100	104 lines
Re: Oh no! Not another mind control conspiracy . . . . was Re: One potato	john foster	Tue, 11 Jul 2000 18:28:03 -0700	107 lines
Re: Oh no! Not another mind control conspiracy . . . . was Re: One potato	john foster	Tue, 11 Jul 2000 20:42:59 -0700	121 lines
Re: Oh no! Not another mind control conspiracy . . . . was Re: One potato	Chris Lees	Wed, 12 Jul 2000 13:09:33 +0100	167 lines
Re: Oh no! Not another mind control conspiracy . . . . was Re: One potato	Chris Lees	Wed, 12 Jul 2000 14:47:23 +0100	136 lines
Collapsing the wave function	Chris Hope	Wed, 12 Jul 2000 14:52:12 +0100	40 lines
Re: Collapsing the wave function	Chris Lees	Wed, 12 Jul 2000 15:43:09 +0100	56 lines
Re: Collapsing the wave function	john foster	Wed, 12 Jul 2000 08:58:20 -0700	210 lines
Transcendental and Transempirical consciousness	john foster	Wed, 12 Jul 2000 10:25:15 -0700	214 lines
A New Initiate into the Inner Circle	Steve	Wed, 12 Jul 2000 12:44:20 -0700 (PDT)	174 lines
Re: Transcendental and Transempirical consciousness	Chris Lees	Thu, 13 Jul 2000 00:33:05 +0100	38 lines
Re: Oh no! Not another mind control conspiracy . . . . was Re: One potato	Chris Lees	Thu, 13 Jul 2000 11:52:15 +0100	489 lines
Re: Oh no! Not another mind control conspiracy . . . . was Re: One potato	Chris Lees	Thu, 13 Jul 2000 13:01:51 +0100	63 lines
wolves, quanta and a little Kant	William J. McKinney, Ph.D.	Thu, 13 Jul 2000 09:28:11 -0500	47 lines
Re: Transcendental and Transempirical consciousness	Steve	Thu, 13 Jul 2000 07:33:13 -0700 (PDT)	59 lines
Re: wolves, quanta and a little Kant	Chris Lees	Thu, 13 Jul 2000 16:50:51 +0100	65 lines
Re: wolves, quanta and a little Kant	Ray Lanier	Thu, 13 Jul 2000 12:14:26 -0400	26 lines
John McDowell on "Values and Secondary Qualities"	Jim Tantillo	Thu, 13 Jul 2000 11:34:27 -0500	460 lines
Part 2: McDowell on the secondary quality of "fear"	Jim Tantillo	Thu, 13 Jul 2000 11:40:19 -0500	154 lines
Sustainable Development ONLINE - 44 More Links to WWW Resources.	SD Online	Thu, 13 Jul 2000 09:43:18 -0700	53 lines
Re: A New Initiate into the Inner Circle	john foster	Thu, 13 Jul 2000 10:04:54 -0700	68 lines
Re: Oh no! Not another mind control conspiracy . . . . was Re: One potato	john foster	Thu, 13 Jul 2000 10:04:58 -0700	114 lines
Re: wolves, quanta and a little Kant	john foster	Thu, 13 Jul 2000 10:05:03 -0700	83 lines
Re: Part 2: McDowell on the secondary quality of "fear"	john foster	Thu, 13 Jul 2000 10:41:59 -0700	124 lines
Re: wolves, quanta and a little Kant	john foster	Thu, 13 Jul 2000 10:42:02 -0700	45 lines
Re: wolves, quanta and a little Kant	Chris Lees	Thu, 13 Jul 2000 20:23:23 +0100	138 lines
Re: wolves, quanta and a little Kant	Steve	Thu, 13 Jul 2000 13:17:22 -0700 (PDT)	90 lines
Re: A New Initiate into the Inner Circle	Steve	Thu, 13 Jul 2000 13:19:40 -0700 (PDT)	105 lines
Fwd: Re: FBI email scanner	Jim Tantillo	Thu, 13 Jul 2000 15:45:57 -0500	40 lines
Re: Part 2: McDowell on the secondary quality of "fear"	Jim Tantillo	Thu, 13 Jul 2000 16:42:12 -0500	77 lines
Re: Part 2: McDowell on the secondary quality of "fear"	Steve	Thu, 13 Jul 2000 15:09:20 -0700 (PDT)	236 lines
Re: wolves, quanta and a little Kant	Chris Lees	Thu, 13 Jul 2000 23:11:35 +0100	127 lines
Bio-Invaders	Steve	Thu, 13 Jul 2000 16:02:42 -0700 (PDT)	32 lines
Re: Part 2: McDowell on the secondary quality of "fear"	Ray Lanier	Thu, 13 Jul 2000 20:54:49 -0400	76 lines
bio & a question about a book	Jim Lewis	Thu, 13 Jul 2000 23:01:16 EDT	44 lines
RE: Part 2: McDowell on the secondary quality of "fear"	Chris Perley	Fri, 14 Jul 2000 15:07:13 +1200	145 lines
RE: Bio-Invaders	Chris Perley	Fri, 14 Jul 2000 15:36:13 +1200	50 lines
"Mark Sagoff versus the Bio-Invaders" was just plain Re: Bio-Invaders	Jim Tantillo	Fri, 14 Jul 2000 00:57:12 -0500	270 lines
Re: "Mark Sagoff versus the Bio-Invaders" was just plain Re: Bio-Invaders	john foster	Fri, 14 Jul 2000 00:01:25 -0700	88 lines
RE: bio & a question about a book	Jeri Pollock	Fri, 14 Jul 2000 07:07:40 -0700	69 lines
RE: "Mark Sagoff	Chris Hope	Fri, 14 Jul 2000 15:16:00 +0100	34 lines
RE: "Mark Sagoff versus the Bio-Invaders" was just plain Re: Bio-Invaders	Steven Bissell	Fri, 14 Jul 2000 08:22:39 -0600	32 lines
Re: "Mark Sagoff versus the Bio-Invaders" was just plain Re: Bio-Invaders	Ray Lanier	Fri, 14 Jul 2000 10:56:58 -0400	59 lines
RE: "Mark Sagoff	Steven Bissell	Fri, 14 Jul 2000 09:00:56 -0600	52 lines
RE: "Mark Sagoff versus the Bio-Invaders" was just plain Re:Bio-Invaders	Steven Bissell	Fri, 14 Jul 2000 09:06:01 -0600	75 lines
Re: "Mark Sagoff	Ray Lanier	Fri, 14 Jul 2000 11:08:22 -0400	21 lines
Re: "Mark Sagoff versus the Bio-Invaders" was just plain Re: Bio-Invaders	Jim Tantillo	Fri, 14 Jul 2000 10:50:11 -0500	454 lines
Re: "Mark Sagoff versus the Bio-Invaders" was just plain Re: Bio-Invaders	Steve	Fri, 14 Jul 2000 08:53:21 -0700 (PDT)	98 lines
Re: Oh no! Not another mind control conspiracy . . . . was Re: One potato	Maria Stella	Fri, 14 Jul 2000 16:56:52 +0100 (BST)	126 lines
RE: "Mark Sagoff versus the Bio-Invaders" was just plain Re: Bio-Invaders	Steve	Fri, 14 Jul 2000 08:57:09 -0700 (PDT)	53 lines
Re: Fwd: Re: FBI email scanner	Maria Stella	Fri, 14 Jul 2000 16:58:03 +0100 (BST)	51 lines
Re: "Mark Sagoff versus the Bio-Invaders" was just plain Re: Bio-Invaders	Maria Stella	Fri, 14 Jul 2000 17:23:42 +0100 (BST)	24 lines
RE: bio & a question about a book	Jim Lewis	Fri, 14 Jul 2000 12:23:43 EDT	83 lines
Re: "Mark Sagoff	Ray Lanier	Fri, 14 Jul 2000 12:27:49 -0400	103 lines
Who is a philosopher? RE: "Mark Sagoff	Jim Tantillo	Fri, 14 Jul 2000 11:35:01 -0500	34 lines
Re: Part 2: McDowell on the secondary quality of "fear"	john foster	Fri, 14 Jul 2000 09:43:02 -0700	101 lines
Primary and Secondary Qualities	john foster	Fri, 14 Jul 2000 09:43:07 -0700	29 lines
RE: bio & a question about a book	Jeri Pollock	Fri, 14 Jul 2000 09:59:59 -0700	106 lines
Re: "Mark Sagoff versus the Bio-Invaders" was just plain Re: Bio-Invaders	john foster	Fri, 14 Jul 2000 10:09:37 -0700	48 lines
Re: "Mark Sagoff	Jim Tantillo	Fri, 14 Jul 2000 13:04:16 -0500	81 lines
Re: "Mark Sagoff versus the Bio-Invaders" was just plain Re: Bio-Invaders	john foster	Fri, 14 Jul 2000 11:07:38 -0700	168 lines
Re: "Mark Sagoff	Ray Lanier	Fri, 14 Jul 2000 14:12:33 -0400	120 lines
Re: "Mark Sagoff versus the Bio-Invaders" was just plain Re: Bio-Invaders	john foster	Fri, 14 Jul 2000 11:20:32 -0700	39 lines
Re: "Mark Sagoff versus the Bio-Invaders" was just plain Re: Bio-Invaders	Steve	Fri, 14 Jul 2000 11:54:51 -0700 (PDT)	188 lines
Re: "Mark Sagoff versus the Bio-Invaders" was just plain Re: Bio-Invaders	john foster	Fri, 14 Jul 2000 12:04:35 -0700	164 lines
Re: "Mark Sagoff versus the Bio-Invaders" was just plain Re: Bio-Invaders	Steve	Fri, 14 Jul 2000 12:07:47 -0700 (PDT)	83 lines
Re: "Mark Sagoff versus the Bio-Invaders" was just plain Re: Bio-Invaders	Steve	Fri, 14 Jul 2000 12:17:18 -0700 (PDT)	40 lines
RE: bio & a question about a book	Jim Lewis	Fri, 14 Jul 2000 15:41:58 EDT	101 lines
RE: "Mark Sagoff versus the Bio-Invaders" was just plain Re:Bio-Invaders	Steven Bissell	Fri, 14 Jul 2000 13:50:30 -0600	72 lines
Re: "Mark Sagoff versus the Bio-Invaders" was just plain Re: Bio-Invaders	john foster	Fri, 14 Jul 2000 13:01:17 -0700	341 lines
Re: "Mark Sagoff versus the Bio-Invaders" was just plain Re: Bio-Invaders	Steve	Fri, 14 Jul 2000 13:14:51 -0700 (PDT)	134 lines
(Fwd) PRG Press Release - 7/14/00	<>	Fri, 14 Jul 2000 16:22:31 EDT	133 lines
Re: "Mark Sagoff versus the Bio-Invaders" was just plain Re: Bio-Invaders	john foster	Fri, 14 Jul 2000 13:29:59 -0700	191 lines
Invasive Species Websites	john foster	Fri, 14 Jul 2000 13:53:12 -0700	47 lines
Re: "Mark Sagoff versus the Bio-Invaders" was just plain Re: Bio-Invaders	Steve	Fri, 14 Jul 2000 14:02:57 -0700 (PDT)	261 lines
Re: "Mark Sagoff versus the Bio-Invaders" was just plain Re: Bio-Invaders	Steve	Fri, 14 Jul 2000 14:47:37 -0700 (PDT)	257 lines
A Note to the List, was Re: "Mark Sagoff	Jim Tantillo	Fri, 14 Jul 2000 17:07:22 -0500	648 lines
zebra mussels	john foster	Fri, 14 Jul 2000 15:18:07 -0700	61 lines
Re: A Note to the List, was Re: "Mark Sagoff	Chris Lees	Sat, 15 Jul 2000 00:12:45 +0100	104 lines
Re: "Mark Sagoff versus the Bio-Invaders" was just plain Re: Bio-Invaders	Ray Lanier	Fri, 14 Jul 2000 19:23:05 -0400	29 lines
Re: "Mark Sagoff versus the Bio-Invaders" was just plain Re: Bio-Invaders	Chris Lees	Sat, 15 Jul 2000 01:19:59 +0100	52 lines
Re: "Mark Sagoff versus the Bio-Invaders" was just plain Re: Bio-Invaders	john foster	Fri, 14 Jul 2000 17:32:06 -0700	157 lines
FW: On the human legacy - vanishing bugs	Ray Lanier	Fri, 14 Jul 2000 20:45:09 -0400	299 lines
Re: "Mark Sagoff versus the Bio-Invaders" was just plain Re: Bio-Invaders	Soft Fluffy Cloud	Fri, 14 Jul 2000 18:53:25 -0700	141 lines
Intrinsics	Soft Fluffy Cloud	Sat, 15 Jul 2000 09:29:20 -0700	86 lines
RE: Intrinsics	Steven Bissell	Sat, 15 Jul 2000 11:15:27 -0600	48 lines
RE: Intrinsics	Chris Lees	Sat, 15 Jul 2000 19:54:23 +0100	68 lines
RE: Intrinsics	Steven Bissell	Sat, 15 Jul 2000 14:13:42 -0600	127 lines
"Living" Ecosystems (was:RE: Intrinsics)	Jim Lewis	Sat, 15 Jul 2000 17:07:27 EDT	65 lines
RE: Intrinsics	Chris Lees	Sat, 15 Jul 2000 22:26:25 +0100	152 lines
RE: Intrinsics	Steven Bissell	Sat, 15 Jul 2000 15:46:30 -0600	62 lines
RE: Intrinsics	Chris Lees	Sat, 15 Jul 2000 23:14:11 +0100	66 lines
RE: bio & a question about a book	Jeri Pollock	Sat, 15 Jul 2000 18:13:54 -0700	124 lines
RE: Intrinsics	Soft Fluffy Cloud	Sat, 15 Jul 2000 21:28:51 -0700	141 lines
RE: Intrinsics	Chris Lees	Sun, 16 Jul 2000 14:26:12 +0100	55 lines
The aesthetics of soft fluffy clouds, was RE: Intrinsics	Jim Tantillo	Sun, 16 Jul 2000 10:19:57 -0500	144 lines
RE: Intrinsics	Steven Bissell	Sun, 16 Jul 2000 09:33:57 -0600	58 lines
Re: The aesthetics of soft fluffy clouds, was RE: Intrinsics	Chris Lees	Sun, 16 Jul 2000 16:34:15 +0100	135 lines
RE: The aesthetics of soft fluffy clouds, was RE: Intrinsics	Steven Bissell	Sun, 16 Jul 2000 09:36:05 -0600	161 lines
RE: Intrinsics	Steven Bissell	Sun, 16 Jul 2000 09:46:39 -0600	186 lines
Re: The aesthetics of soft fluffy clouds, was RE: Intrinsics	<>	Sun, 16 Jul 2000 12:33:36 EDT	107 lines
RE: Intrinsics	Chris Lees	Sun, 16 Jul 2000 17:33:55 +0100	56 lines
RE: Intrinsics	Steven Bissell	Sun, 16 Jul 2000 11:52:56 -0600	73 lines
Re: The ad hominem argument	Maria Stella	Sun, 16 Jul 2000 19:00:26 +0100 (BST)	227 lines
RE: Intrinsics	Soft Fluffy Cloud	Sun, 16 Jul 2000 11:34:32 -0700	140 lines
Re: The aesthetics of soft fluffy clouds, was RE: Intrinsics	Ray Lanier	Sun, 16 Jul 2000 14:54:47 -0400	23 lines
RE: Intrinsics	Chris Lees	Sun, 16 Jul 2000 19:59:06 +0100	78 lines
Re: The aesthetics of soft fluffy clouds, was RE: Intrinsics	Chris Lees	Sun, 16 Jul 2000 20:04:35 +0100	31 lines
Re: The aesthetics of soft fluffy clouds, was RE: Intrinsics	Soft Fluffy Cloud	Sun, 16 Jul 2000 12:17:28 -0700	130 lines
Two explanatory paths, was Re:ality of soft fluffy clouds	Jim Tantillo	Sun, 16 Jul 2000 14:59:30 -0500	233 lines
Re: The aesthetics of soft fluffy clouds, was RE: Intrinsics	Jim Tantillo	Sun, 16 Jul 2000 15:45:10 -0500	75 lines
RE: The aesthetics of soft fluffy clouds, was RE: Intrinsics	Chris Perley	Mon, 17 Jul 2000 08:56:40 +1200	54 lines
RE: The aesthetics of soft fluffy clouds, was RE: Intrinsics	Jim Tantillo	Sun, 16 Jul 2000 17:46:18 -0500	80 lines
Re: The aesthetics of soft fluffy clouds, was RE: Intrinsics	Soft Fluffy Cloud	Sun, 16 Jul 2000 15:46:26 -0700	120 lines
Re: Two explanatory paths, was Re:ality of soft fluffy clouds	Ray Lanier	Sun, 16 Jul 2000 18:46:29 -0400	120 lines
Soft Fluffy Cloud	Soft Fluffy Cloud	Sun, 16 Jul 2000 15:46:31 -0700	26 lines
Interpretive Core & Forest Paths	Soft Fluffy Cloud	Sun, 16 Jul 2000 16:00:58 -0700	92 lines
have you written of a desert in bloom?	Soft Fluffy Cloud	Sun, 16 Jul 2000 16:01:02 -0700	99 lines
complementing human excellence (arete)	Soft Fluffy Cloud	Sun, 16 Jul 2000 16:08:28 -0700	108 lines
Re: Two explanatory paths, was Re:ality of soft fluffy clouds	Chris Lees	Mon, 17 Jul 2000 00:30:50 +0100	232 lines
Mares Tails Pop Up	Soft Fluffy Cloud	Sun, 16 Jul 2000 16:46:20 -0700	206 lines
Re: Two explanatory paths, was Re:ality of soft fluffy clouds	Chris Lees	Mon, 17 Jul 2000 00:49:22 +0100	93 lines
Re: The ad hominem argument	Steve	Sun, 16 Jul 2000 23:09:48 -0700 (PDT)	315 lines
Re: Two explanatory paths, was Re:ality of soft fluffy clouds	Chris Lees	Mon, 17 Jul 2000 13:48:53 +0100	323 lines
Re: Two explanatory paths, was Re:ality of soft fluffy clouds	Jim Tantillo	Mon, 17 Jul 2000 08:30:51 -0500	338 lines
Re: Two explanatory paths, was Re:ality of soft fluffy clouds	Jim Tantillo	Mon, 17 Jul 2000 09:09:27 -0500	56 lines
Re: The ad hominem argument	Soft Fluffy Cloud	Mon, 17 Jul 2000 08:21:28 -0700	48 lines
Autopoeisis	john foster	Mon, 17 Jul 2000 09:27:00 -0700	150 lines
On the Heart's Beginning to Cloud the Mind	Jim Tantillo	Mon, 17 Jul 2000 12:00:27 -0500	80 lines
Is Bad Writing Necessary? Re: Two explanatory paths	Jim Tantillo	Mon, 17 Jul 2000 13:18:08 -0500	146 lines
At Woodward's Gardens	Jim Tantillo	Mon, 17 Jul 2000 14:10:18 -0500	69 lines
RE: Intrinsics	Steven Bissell	Mon, 17 Jul 2000 14:29:01 -0600	132 lines
Re: The ad hominem argument	Steve	Mon, 17 Jul 2000 13:33:23 -0700 (PDT)	77 lines
Re: The ad hominem argument	john foster	Mon, 17 Jul 2000 13:52:58 -0700	113 lines
Re: "Blind prejudice on your part Jim", was Re: Two explanatory paths	Ray Lanier	Mon, 17 Jul 2000 18:30:34 -0400	106 lines
"Blind prejudice on your part Jim", was Re: Two explanatory paths	Jim Tantillo	Mon, 17 Jul 2000 17:38:11 -0500	318 lines
Re: Is Bad Writing Necessary? Re: Two explanatory paths	Ray Lanier	Mon, 17 Jul 2000 18:54:55 -0400	68 lines
Re: The ad hominem argument	Maria Stella	Tue, 18 Jul 2000 00:17:29 +0100 (BST)	31 lines
Re: Two explanatory paths, was Re:ality of soft fluffy clouds	Chris Lees	Tue, 18 Jul 2000 00:49:41 +0100	205 lines
Stagmatics=Pragmatics	shabs du wah	Mon, 17 Jul 2000 17:07:31 -0700	73 lines
Re: The ad hominem argument	Steve	Mon, 17 Jul 2000 18:34:59 -0700 (PDT)	56 lines
Nature's keepers	Chris Perley	Tue, 18 Jul 2000 14:00:17 +1200	54 lines
Fwd: Nature's keepers	<>	Mon, 17 Jul 2000 23:10:11 EDT	82 lines
Re: "Blind prejudice on your part Jim", was Re: Two explanatory paths	Ray Lanier	Mon, 17 Jul 2000 23:51:27 -0400	32 lines
Re: "Blind prejudice on your part Jim", was Re: Two explanatory paths	Jim Tantillo	Mon, 17 Jul 2000 23:16:14 -0500	173 lines
Re: Stagmatics=Pragmatics	Jim Tantillo	Mon, 17 Jul 2000 23:51:27 -0500	41 lines
RE: Nature's keepers	Chris Perley	Tue, 18 Jul 2000 17:01:30 +1200	84 lines
Re: The ad hominem argument	Maria Stella	Tue, 18 Jul 2000 14:36:01 +0100 (BST)	66 lines
Re: Nature's keepers	Maria Stella	Tue, 18 Jul 2000 14:40:46 +0100 (BST)	70 lines
RE: Nature's keepers	Steven Bissell	Tue, 18 Jul 2000 08:09:12 -0600	90 lines
Re: "Blind prejudice on your part Jim", was Re: Two explanatory paths	Jim Tantillo	Tue, 18 Jul 2000 09:20:03 -0500	133 lines
Re: Stagmatics=Pragmatics	shabs du wah	Tue, 18 Jul 2000 08:39:57 -0700	152 lines
Re: Nature's keepers	John Foster	Tue, 18 Jul 2000 08:40:02 -0700	82 lines
Re: The ad hominem argument	Ray Lanier	Tue, 18 Jul 2000 14:40:42 -0400	30 lines
Re: The ad hominem argument	Jim Tantillo	Tue, 18 Jul 2000 13:43:51 -0500	109 lines
Re: The ad hominem argument	John Foster	Tue, 18 Jul 2000 14:41:13 -0700	34 lines
Transcendental Ego	John Foster	Tue, 18 Jul 2000 14:41:16 -0700	210 lines
RE: Nature's keepers	Chris Perley	Wed, 19 Jul 2000 09:41:28 +1200	173 lines
Re: The ad hominem argument	<>	Tue, 18 Jul 2000 17:46:34 EDT	28 lines
Re: Transcendental Ego	Ray Lanier	Tue, 18 Jul 2000 19:55:40 -0400	53 lines
Re: The ad hominem argument	Jim Tantillo	Tue, 18 Jul 2000 20:59:09 -0500	41 lines
Re: Transcendental Ego	John Foster	Tue, 18 Jul 2000 19:48:50 -0700	65 lines
Re: The ad hominem argument	John Foster	Tue, 18 Jul 2000 19:48:54 -0700	38 lines
Re: The ad hominem argument	John Foster	Tue, 18 Jul 2000 20:01:22 -0700	39 lines
Re: The ad hominem argument	Jim Tantillo	Wed, 19 Jul 2000 00:14:25 -0500	44 lines
Re: The ad hominem argument	Chris Hope	Wed, 19 Jul 2000 08:40:59 +0100	34 lines
Re: The ad hominem argument	Jim Tantillo	Wed, 19 Jul 2000 08:45:30 -0500	46 lines
Re: Stagmatics=Pragmatics	Steve	Wed, 19 Jul 2000 08:52:31 -0700 (PDT)	56 lines
Re: The ad hominem argument: hoping for closure :-)	<>	Wed, 19 Jul 2000 16:40:38 EDT	46 lines
Re: The ad hominem argument: hoping for closure :-)	Jim Tantillo	Wed, 19 Jul 2000 16:19:19 -0500	112 lines
Re: The ad hominem argument	Maria Stella	Thu, 20 Jul 2000 00:45:59 +0100 (BST)	39 lines
Budianski	Maria Stella	Thu, 20 Jul 2000 01:08:12 +0100 (BST)	53 lines
Re: The ad hominem argument: hoping for closure :-)	michael	Wed, 19 Jul 2000 20:02:23 -0500	44 lines
Re: The ad hominem argument	<>	Wed, 19 Jul 2000 21:25:30 EDT	17 lines
Re: The ad hominem argument	<>	Wed, 19 Jul 2000 21:27:22 EDT	16 lines
Re: The ad hominem argument: hoping for closure :-)	Jim Tantillo	Wed, 19 Jul 2000 22:51:15 -0500	99 lines
Functions/Operators	John Foster	Wed, 19 Jul 2000 21:42:41 -0700	55 lines
Re: The ad hominem argument: hoping for closure :-)	John Foster	Wed, 19 Jul 2000 21:42:49 -0700	41 lines
Re: The ad hominem argument: hoping for closure :-)	John Foster	Wed, 19 Jul 2000 21:42:53 -0700	51 lines
RE: Stagmatics=Pragmatics	Chris Perley	Thu, 20 Jul 2000 17:04:32 +1200	72 lines
RE: Budianski	Chris Perley	Thu, 20 Jul 2000 17:35:31 +1200	87 lines
Budianski	Chris Perley	Thu, 20 Jul 2000 17:42:38 +1200	83 lines
Re: The ad hominem argument: hoping for closure :-)	John Foster	Wed, 19 Jul 2000 23:43:46 -0700	78 lines
Animal Syllogisms	John Foster	Wed, 19 Jul 2000 23:43:49 -0700	40 lines
Re: The ad hominem: well, I was hoping for closure :-)	Jim Tantillo	Thu, 20 Jul 2000 08:52:14 -0500	289 lines
RE: The ad hominem argument: hoping for closure :-)	Steven Bissell	Thu, 20 Jul 2000 08:26:18 -0600	64 lines
Re: The ad hominem: well, I was hoping for closure :-)	John Foster	Thu, 20 Jul 2000 07:40:25 -0700	69 lines
Re: Functions/Operators	Steve	Thu, 20 Jul 2000 08:48:53 -0700 (PDT)	65 lines
Re: The ad hominem argument: hoping for closure :-)	Steve	Thu, 20 Jul 2000 09:18:23 -0700 (PDT)	75 lines
Re: The ad hominem argument: hoping for closure :-)	Steve	Thu, 20 Jul 2000 09:18:46 -0700 (PDT)	75 lines
The ad hominem argument	Steve	Thu, 20 Jul 2000 09:19:38 -0700 (PDT)	75 lines
Re: The ad hominem: well, I was hoping for closure :-)	<>	Thu, 20 Jul 2000 12:29:35 EDT	28 lines
Re: Functions/Operators	John Foster	Thu, 20 Jul 2000 11:39:57 -0700	44 lines
Re: The ad hominem argument: hoping for closure :-)	John Foster	Thu, 20 Jul 2000 11:40:01 -0700	48 lines
Re: The ad hominem: well, I was hoping for closure :-)	John Foster	Thu, 20 Jul 2000 11:40:05 -0700	34 lines
Re: The ad hominem: well, I was hoping for closure :-)	Steve	Thu, 20 Jul 2000 13:20:38 -0700 (PDT)	48 lines
Re: The ad hominem: well, I was hoping for closure :-)	<>	Thu, 20 Jul 2000 17:33:24 EDT	42 lines
RE: The ad hominem argument: hoping for closure :-)	Chris Perley	Fri, 21 Jul 2000 09:53:22 +1200	110 lines
More on Budiansky	Chris Perley	Fri, 21 Jul 2000 11:02:15 +1200	186 lines
Re: The ad hominem: well, I was hoping for closure :-)	John Foster	Thu, 20 Jul 2000 16:05:44 -0700	55 lines
Fw: Genetically Engineered Food Alert	John Foster	Thu, 20 Jul 2000 16:05:48 -0700	124 lines
Nature's Keepers	John Foster	Thu, 20 Jul 2000 16:05:53 -0700	64 lines
RE: The ad hominem: well, I was hoping for closure :-)	Chris Perley	Fri, 21 Jul 2000 11:09:48 +1200	57 lines
FW: You bring out the best in people Jim	Chris Perley	Fri, 21 Jul 2000 11:16:31 +1200	264 lines
Re: Functions/Operators	Steve	Thu, 20 Jul 2000 16:20:32 -0700 (PDT)	93 lines
Re: The ad hominem argument: hoping for closure :-)	Steve	Thu, 20 Jul 2000 16:26:37 -0700 (PDT)	60 lines
Re: More on Budiansky	John Foster	Thu, 20 Jul 2000 16:38:46 -0700	238 lines
Timberindustry turns south	Ray Lanier	Thu, 20 Jul 2000 20:02:52 -0400	104 lines
Re: Timberindustry turns south	Ray Lanier	Thu, 20 Jul 2000 20:28:04 -0400	20 lines
Re: Timberindustry turns south	Jim Lewis	Thu, 20 Jul 2000 20:30:51 EDT	49 lines
Re: FW: You bring out the best in people Jim	John Foster	Thu, 20 Jul 2000 17:37:00 -0700	47 lines
Re: Functions/Operators	John Foster	Thu, 20 Jul 2000 17:37:04 -0700	119 lines
Re: The ad hominem argument: hoping for closure :-)	John Foster	Thu, 20 Jul 2000 17:37:08 -0700	47 lines
Re: Timberindustry turns south	John Foster	Thu, 20 Jul 2000 17:38:32 -0700	30 lines
Re: Functions/Operators	Steve	Thu, 20 Jul 2000 18:37:58 -0700 (PDT)	47 lines
Re: The ad hominem argument: hoping for closure :-)	Steve	Thu, 20 Jul 2000 18:43:56 -0700 (PDT)	88 lines
Intrinsic value: remark on Smith	John Foster	Thu, 20 Jul 2000 20:39:53 -0700	192 lines
Re: Timberindustry turns south	Ray Lanier	Thu, 20 Jul 2000 23:47:59 -0400	72 lines
Re: Timberindustry turns south	John Foster	Thu, 20 Jul 2000 21:20:08 -0700	96 lines
RE: More on Budiansky	Chris Perley	Fri, 21 Jul 2000 17:09:31 +1200	329 lines
RE: More on Budiansky	John Foster	Thu, 20 Jul 2000 23:42:14 -0700	71 lines
RE: FW: You bring out the best in people Jim	Chris Perley	Fri, 21 Jul 2000 23:11:39 +1200	165 lines
RE: More on Budiansky	Chris Perley	Sat, 22 Jul 2000 01:02:30 +1200	218 lines
NZ X BC	John Foster	Fri, 21 Jul 2000 07:02:59 -0700	160 lines
	Stephanie Hodge	Fri, 21 Jul 2000 10:23:50 -0400	14 lines
The ad hominem issue is not trivial, was Re: Timberindustry turns south	Jim Tantillo	Fri, 21 Jul 2000 10:26:01 -0500	220 lines
Re: The ad hominem issue is not trivial, was Re: Timberindustry turns south	Steve	Fri, 21 Jul 2000 08:37:20 -0700 (PDT)	323 lines
Re:	David Pearson	Fri, 21 Jul 2000 16:50:48 +0100	30 lines
Re: The ad hominem issue is not trivial, was Re: Timberindustry turns south	Paul Kirby	Fri, 21 Jul 2000 16:51:18 +0100	42 lines
List-owner apology.	David Pearson	Fri, 21 Jul 2000 17:32:33 +0100	28 lines
Precautionary Principle: Monsanto	John Foster	Fri, 21 Jul 2000 10:22:24 -0700	187 lines
Article on Sustainable Development	Steve	Fri, 21 Jul 2000 10:24:50 -0700 (PDT)	43 lines
Uh-oh...Even the Microbiologist Have Been Bought and Paid For....	Steve	Fri, 21 Jul 2000 10:34:46 -0700 (PDT)	33 lines
Re: The ad hominem issue is not trivial, was Re: Timberindustry turnssouth	Ray Lanier	Fri, 21 Jul 2000 13:49:07 -0400	18 lines
Re: Precautionary Principle: Monsanto	Steve	Fri, 21 Jul 2000 10:59:40 -0700 (PDT)	96 lines
Re: Timberindustry turns south	Jim Lewis	Fri, 21 Jul 2000 14:00:47 EDT	61 lines
Re: The ad hominem issue is not trivial, was Re: Timberindustry turns south	Jim Lewis	Fri, 21 Jul 2000 14:10:54 EDT	89 lines
Re: Precautionary Principle: Monsanto	John Foster	Fri, 21 Jul 2000 11:21:55 -0700	36 lines
What Principle to apply?	John Foster	Fri, 21 Jul 2000 11:31:33 -0700	45 lines
Re: The ad hominem issue is not trivial, was Re: Timberindustry turns south	John Foster	Fri, 21 Jul 2000 12:35:42 -0700	62 lines
Fw: Helicopter Highgrading	John Foster	Fri, 21 Jul 2000 13:05:06 -0700	45 lines
Re: The ad hominem issue is not trivial, was Re: Timberindustry turns south	Jim Tantillo	Fri, 21 Jul 2000 15:16:18 -0500	135 lines
Re: The ad hominem issue is not trivial, was Re: Timberindustry turns south	Jim Lewis	Fri, 21 Jul 2000 17:48:40 EDT	56 lines
Re: The ad hominem issue is not trivial, was Re: Timberindustry turns south	Steve	Fri, 21 Jul 2000 15:30:17 -0700 (PDT)	97 lines
Re: What Principle to apply?	Steve	Fri, 21 Jul 2000 16:30:35 -0700 (PDT)	93 lines
Re: The ad hominem issue is not trivial, was Re: Timberindustry turns south	Jim Tantillo	Fri, 21 Jul 2000 19:30:24 -0500	33 lines
help	Ramsy Ayoub	Sat, 22 Jul 2000 10:58:32 +0400	26 lines
My apologies	Ramsy Ayoub	Sat, 22 Jul 2000 11:03:21 +0400	33 lines
An example of unethical "preservationism"	Chris Perley	Sun, 23 Jul 2000 12:29:36 +1200	353 lines
Re: An example of unethical "preservationism"	John Foster	Sat, 22 Jul 2000 18:13:13 -0700	92 lines
Re: The ad hominem argument: hoping for closure :-)	Maria Stella	Sun, 23 Jul 2000 13:29:41 +0100 (BST)	63 lines
RE: The ad hominem argument: hoping for closure :-)	Maria Stella	Sun, 23 Jul 2000 13:33:51 +0100 (BST)	122 lines
A LATIN WORD	Maria Stella	Sun, 23 Jul 2000 13:54:03 +0100 (BST)	21 lines
Re: Timberindustry turns south	Maria Stella	Sun, 23 Jul 2000 14:12:29 +0100 (BST)	105 lines
RE: More on Budiansky	Maria Stella	Sun, 23 Jul 2000 14:29:55 +0100 (BST)	58 lines
RE: FW: You bring out the best in people Jim	Maria Stella	Sun, 23 Jul 2000 15:12:58 +0100 (BST)	64 lines
RE: More on Budiansky	Maria Stella	Sun, 23 Jul 2000 15:25:31 +0100 (BST)	51 lines
RE: More on Budiansky	Steven Bissell	Sun, 23 Jul 2000 08:48:14 -0600	77 lines
RE: More on Budiansky	Maria Stella	Sun, 23 Jul 2000 16:00:49 +0100 (BST)	91 lines
Re: A LATIN WORD	paola cavalieri	Sun, 23 Jul 2000 19:49:25 +0200	39 lines
In a word - A LATIN WORD - denique	John Foster	Sun, 23 Jul 2000 11:43:40 -0700	215 lines
RE: More on Budiansky	John Foster	Sun, 23 Jul 2000 12:46:15 -0700	57 lines
RE: The ad hominem argument: hoping for closure :-)	Chris Perley	Mon, 24 Jul 2000 10:18:36 +1200	157 lines
RE: Timberindustry turns south	Chris Perley	Mon, 24 Jul 2000 10:25:13 +1200	152 lines
RE: Timberindustry turns south	John Foster	Sun, 23 Jul 2000 15:45:25 -0700	57 lines
RE: More on Budiansky	John Foster	Sun, 23 Jul 2000 15:45:29 -0700	46 lines
RE: More on Budiansky	Chris Perley	Mon, 24 Jul 2000 10:49:39 +1200	142 lines
RE: Timberindustry turns south	Chris Perley	Mon, 24 Jul 2000 11:19:25 +1200	78 lines
concrete vs. wood	michael	Sun, 23 Jul 2000 19:47:21 -0500	39 lines
Re: concrete vs. wood	John Foster	Sun, 23 Jul 2000 18:39:44 -0700	43 lines
Forest Restoration	John Foster	Mon, 24 Jul 2000 09:15:59 -0700	39 lines
RE: More on Budiansky	Maria Stella	Mon, 24 Jul 2000 22:01:33 +0100 (BST)	161 lines
Re: concrete vs. wood	Jim Lewis	Mon, 24 Jul 2000 17:32:56 EDT	36 lines
MacCleery paper - Aldo Leopolds Land Ethic: Is it Only Half a Loaf Unless a Consumption Ethic Accompanies It?	Chris Perley	Tue, 25 Jul 2000 09:34:33 +1200	480 lines
FW: Leopold: his career encompasses both consumption and land ethics	Chris Perley	Tue, 25 Jul 2000 10:19:32 +1200	193 lines
Budiansky, RE: The ad hominem argument	Jim Tantillo	Mon, 24 Jul 2000 21:41:23 -0500	195 lines
Re: Budiansky, RE: The ad hominem argument	John Foster	Mon, 24 Jul 2000 20:44:48 -0700	187 lines
Re: Budiansky, RE: The ad hominem argument	Jim Tantillo	Tue, 25 Jul 2000 07:20:12 -0500	124 lines
Fwd: THE GREAT DEBATE: Re: SUBJECT: Re: EVOLUTIONARY PSYCHOLOGY: Is evolutionary psychology "culturally pernicious"?	Jim Tantillo	Tue, 25 Jul 2000 08:57:00 -0500	413 lines
Fwd: Subscribing to THE GREAT DEBATE: Physical Realists and Social Constructionists <[log in to unmask]>	Jim Tantillo	Tue, 25 Jul 2000 08:58:17 -0500	99 lines
environmental success story	Jim Tantillo	Tue, 25 Jul 2000 10:58:24 -0500	31 lines
Re: Budiansky, RE: The ad hominem argument	John Foster	Tue, 25 Jul 2000 09:35:50 -0700	137 lines
Re: environmental success story	John Foster	Tue, 25 Jul 2000 09:35:54 -0700	192 lines
Re: Budiansky, RE: The ad hominem argument	Jim Tantillo	Tue, 25 Jul 2000 14:22:44 -0500	60 lines
Fwd: Subscribing to THE GREAT DEBATE: Physical Realists and Social Constructionists <[log in to unmask]>	Jim Tantillo	Tue, 25 Jul 2000 14:30:56 -0500	106 lines
Sustainable Development	Steve	Tue, 25 Jul 2000 15:34:51 -0700 (PDT)	58 lines
Re: concrete vs. wood	Maria Stella	Tue, 25 Jul 2000 23:58:54 +0100 (BST)	22 lines
Re: MacCleery paper - Aldo Leopolds Land Ethic: Is it Only Half a Loaf Unless a Consumption Ethic Accompanies It?	Maria Stella	Wed, 26 Jul 2000 00:02:34 +0100 (BST)	191 lines
Re: Budiansky, RE: The ad hominem argument	Maria Stella	Wed, 26 Jul 2000 00:15:12 +0100 (BST)	235 lines
Re: Budiansky, RE: The ad hominem argument	Maria Stella	Wed, 26 Jul 2000 00:30:31 +0100 (BST)	64 lines
RE: Budiansky, RE: The ad hominem argument	Chris Perley	Wed, 26 Jul 2000 11:39:45 +1200	112 lines
RE: environmental success story	Chris Perley	Wed, 26 Jul 2000 11:57:27 +1200	132 lines
Greenpeace USA Struggles to Raise Funds to Pay Debt Placing Hopes in Anti-GMO Campaign	Chris Perley	Wed, 26 Jul 2000 12:03:01 +1200	834 lines
RE: Budiansky, RE: The ad hominem argument	Chris Perley	Wed, 26 Jul 2000 12:10:07 +1200	46 lines
Re: Greenpeace USA Struggles to Raise Funds to Pay Debt Placing Hopes in Anti...	<>	Tue, 25 Jul 2000 20:37:50 EDT	327 lines
RE: Budiansky, RE: The ad hominem argument	John Foster	Tue, 25 Jul 2000 19:33:01 -0700	121 lines
MacCleery Paper	John Foster	Tue, 25 Jul 2000 20:38:18 -0700	182 lines
Re: Budiansky on "The Cult of the Wild"	Jim Tantillo	Tue, 25 Jul 2000 23:21:51 -0500	222 lines
Re: Budiansky on "The Cult of the Wild"	John Foster	Tue, 25 Jul 2000 22:51:12 -0700	82 lines
RE: Budiansky, RE: The ad hominem argument	Chris Perley	Wed, 26 Jul 2000 17:57:25 +1200	669 lines
RE: Budiansky, RE: The ad hominem argument	John Foster	Tue, 25 Jul 2000 23:30:35 -0700	66 lines
RE: Sustainable Development	Ramsy Ayoub	Wed, 26 Jul 2000 10:51:48 +0400	86 lines
RE: Budiansky, RE: The ad hominem argument	John Foster	Wed, 26 Jul 2000 00:29:33 -0700	93 lines
RE: Sustainable Development	John Foster	Wed, 26 Jul 2000 00:29:37 -0700	58 lines
RE: Budiansky, RE: The ad hominem argument	Chris Perley	Wed, 26 Jul 2000 19:52:29 +1200	233 lines
RE: Budiansky, RE: The ad hominem argument	Chris Perley	Wed, 26 Jul 2000 20:04:48 +1200	127 lines
RE: Sustainable Development	Steve	Wed, 26 Jul 2000 10:20:38 -0700 (PDT)	153 lines
RE: Sustainable Development	Steve	Wed, 26 Jul 2000 10:26:40 -0700 (PDT)	56 lines
Re: Sustainable Development	Steve	Wed, 26 Jul 2000 10:32:03 -0700 (PDT)	60 lines
Re: Budiansky on "The Cult of the Wild"	Steve	Wed, 26 Jul 2000 10:48:08 -0700 (PDT)	121 lines
RE: Sustainable Development	Jim Lewis	Wed, 26 Jul 2000 15:24:59 EDT	32 lines
Re: Sustainable Development	Jim Lewis	Wed, 26 Jul 2000 15:26:41 EDT	29 lines
RE: Sustainable Development	Jim Lewis	Wed, 26 Jul 2000 15:29:55 EDT	31 lines
Greenpeace U.S.A.	Steve	Wed, 26 Jul 2000 13:34:21 -0700 (PDT)	39 lines
Re: Greenpeace U.S.A.	Jim Lewis	Wed, 26 Jul 2000 19:06:57 EDT	42 lines
RE: Budiansky, RE: The ad hominem argument	Maria Stella	Thu, 27 Jul 2000 00:43:12 +0100 (BST)	23 lines
Re: Budiansky, RE: The ad hominem argument	<>	Wed, 26 Jul 2000 20:34:08 EDT	26 lines
Re: Budiansky, RE: The ad hominem argument	<>	Wed, 26 Jul 2000 20:45:47 EDT	57 lines
Re: Budiansky on "The Cult of the Wild	Maria Stella	Thu, 27 Jul 2000 03:19:01 +0100 (BST)	439 lines
RE: Sustainable Development	John Foster	Wed, 26 Jul 2000 20:04:43 -0700	82 lines
FW: Budiansky on "The Cult of the Wild	Chris Perley	Thu, 27 Jul 2000 15:28:10 +1200	181 lines
Re: Sustainable Development	Patrick Longfield	Wed, 26 Jul 2000 23:48:27 -0700	218 lines
Multinationals Sign U.N. Pact on Rights and Environment	<>	Thu, 27 Jul 2000 12:29:43 EDT	42 lines
RE: Sustainable Development	Steve	Thu, 27 Jul 2000 09:43:50 -0700 (PDT)	61 lines
Re: Greenpeace U.S.A.	Steve	Thu, 27 Jul 2000 09:47:15 -0700 (PDT)	75 lines
RE: Sustainable Development	Steve	Thu, 27 Jul 2000 09:49:37 -0700 (PDT)	45 lines
RE: Sustainable Development	Steve	Thu, 27 Jul 2000 09:54:09 -0700 (PDT)	133 lines
Bush And Enron in Texas scandal	John Foster	Thu, 27 Jul 2000 09:56:12 -0700	47 lines
RE: Sustainable Development	John Foster	Thu, 27 Jul 2000 10:08:17 -0700	48 lines
Re: Greenpeace U.S.A.	John Foster	Thu, 27 Jul 2000 10:15:47 -0700	117 lines
Houston, We Have a Problem	John Foster	Thu, 27 Jul 2000 10:23:32 -0700	62 lines
Re: Greenpeace U.S.A.	<>	Thu, 27 Jul 2000 13:44:28 EDT	41 lines
RE: Greenpeace U.S.A.	Chris Perley	Fri, 28 Jul 2000 10:22:36 +1200	154 lines
RE: Sustainable Development	Jim Lewis	Thu, 27 Jul 2000 20:45:03 EDT	47 lines
Re: Houston, We Have a Problem	Jim Lewis	Thu, 27 Jul 2000 20:52:24 EDT	25 lines
Re: Greenpeace U.S.A.	Jim Lewis	Thu, 27 Jul 2000 21:06:31 EDT	48 lines
Re: Sustainable Development	<>	Thu, 27 Jul 2000 22:29:28 EDT	58 lines
RE: Sustainable Development	Steve	Thu, 27 Jul 2000 19:46:43 -0700 (PDT)	129 lines
RE: Sustainable Development	Steve	Thu, 27 Jul 2000 20:06:08 -0700 (PDT)	88 lines
Re: Greenpeace U.S.A.	Steve	Thu, 27 Jul 2000 20:12:55 -0700 (PDT)	85 lines
Website - developing change in natural resource management	Chris Perley	Fri, 28 Jul 2000 16:49:12 +1200	55 lines
RE: Sustainable Development	John Foster	Fri, 28 Jul 2000 00:25:55 -0700	139 lines
Re: Sustainable Development	John Foster	Fri, 28 Jul 2000 00:26:00 -0700	163 lines
Re: Sustainable Development	Ted Mosquin	Fri, 28 Jul 2000 08:46:01 -0400	48 lines
Greenpeace and an introduction - not necessarily in that order!	emma fieldhouse	Fri, 28 Jul 2000 14:41:37 GMT	47 lines
RE: Sustainable Development	Jim Lewis	Fri, 28 Jul 2000 11:15:35 EDT	54 lines
OT - Prokofiev (was: Greenpeace and an introduction ) ;-))	Jim Lewis	Fri, 28 Jul 2000 11:21:05 EDT	26 lines
RE: Sustainable Development	Steve	Fri, 28 Jul 2000 09:00:18 -0700 (PDT)	73 lines
RE: Sustainable Development	John Foster	Fri, 28 Jul 2000 09:10:39 -0700	153 lines
RE: Sustainable Development	John Foster	Fri, 28 Jul 2000 09:10:48 -0700	100 lines
Re: Sustainable Development	Steve	Fri, 28 Jul 2000 09:14:21 -0700 (PDT)	53 lines
Re: Sustainable Development	Steve	Fri, 28 Jul 2000 09:25:02 -0700 (PDT)	109 lines
RE: Sustainable Development	Steve	Fri, 28 Jul 2000 10:56:14 -0700 (PDT)	57 lines
RE: Sustainable Development	Jim Lewis	Fri, 28 Jul 2000 16:41:04 EDT	33 lines
RE: Sustainable Development	Steve	Fri, 28 Jul 2000 14:38:56 -0700 (PDT)	56 lines
RE: Sustainable Development	Steve	Fri, 28 Jul 2000 15:25:35 -0700 (PDT)	46 lines
Re: Greenpeace USA Struggles in Anti-GMO Campaign	Jim Tantillo	Fri, 28 Jul 2000 21:45:41 -0500	124 lines
RE: Greenpeace USA Struggles in Anti-GMO Campaign	Steven Bissell	Sat, 29 Jul 2000 08:55:19 -0600	195 lines
FW: [Biomonitor] Let's get the message out re Bush!	Jeri Pollock	Sat, 29 Jul 2000 07:56:53 -0700	261 lines
RE: "unethical preservationism" was Re: Sustainable Development	Steven Bissell	Sat, 29 Jul 2000 09:06:39 -0600	39 lines
Re: Sustainable Development	John Foster	Sat, 29 Jul 2000 08:43:03 -0700	53 lines
Unethical Opportunism was unethical preservation	John Foster	Sat, 29 Jul 2000 08:43:08 -0700	110 lines
"unethical preservationism" was Re: Sustainable Development	Jim Tantillo	Sat, 29 Jul 2000 10:46:42 -0500	64 lines
RE: Greenpeace USA Struggles in Anti-GMO Campaign	John Foster	Sat, 29 Jul 2000 13:23:09 -0700	56 lines
Re: Greenpeace and an introduction - not necessarily in that order!	Maynard S. Clark	Sat, 29 Jul 2000 18:32:38 -0400	57 lines
RE: "unethical preservationism" was Re: Sustainable Development	Chris Perley	Sun, 30 Jul 2000 11:59:32 +1200	125 lines
Re: Greenpeace U.S.A.	Maria Stella	Sun, 30 Jul 2000 01:32:09 +0100 (BST)	88 lines
RE: Unethical Opportunism was unethical preservation	Chris Perley	Sun, 30 Jul 2000 13:21:48 +1200	173 lines
A new paradigm for nature/human interaction	Chris Perley	Sun, 30 Jul 2000 13:48:31 +1200	158 lines
RE: "unethical preservationism" was Re: Sustainable Development	John Foster	Sat, 29 Jul 2000 20:50:42 -0700	132 lines
RE: Unethical Opportunism was unethical preservation	John Foster	Sat, 29 Jul 2000 20:50:46 -0700	52 lines
RE: "unethical preservationism" was Re: Sustainable Development	Chris Perley	Sun, 30 Jul 2000 18:45:56 +1200	58 lines
Re: Unethical Opportunism was unethical preservation	Jim Tantillo	Sun, 30 Jul 2000 09:24:27 -0500	123 lines
RE: Greenpeace USA Struggles in Anti-GMO Campaign	Steven Bissell	Sun, 30 Jul 2000 08:51:52 -0600	82 lines
RE: Greenpeace and an introduction - not necessarily in that order!	Steven Bissell	Sun, 30 Jul 2000 09:22:08 -0600	84 lines
Re: Unethical Opportunism was unethical preservation	John Foster	Sun, 30 Jul 2000 08:38:15 -0700	224 lines
RE: Greenpeace USA Struggles in Anti-GMO Campaign	John Foster	Sun, 30 Jul 2000 08:38:21 -0700	52 lines
Ozone Depletion & ecotourismt	John Foster	Sun, 30 Jul 2000 08:42:51 -0700	58 lines
Re: Unethical Opportunism was unethical preservation	Jim Tantillo	Sun, 30 Jul 2000 12:32:57 -0500	19 lines
RE: Greenpeace USA Struggles in Anti-GMO Campaign	Steven Bissell	Sun, 30 Jul 2000 12:09:03 -0600	69 lines
Re: Sustainable Development	Jim Lewis	Sun, 30 Jul 2000 14:34:59 EDT	94 lines
Bountiful!	John Foster	Sun, 30 Jul 2000 13:12:40 -0700	112 lines
Re: Unethical Opportunism was unethical preservation	John Foster	Sun, 30 Jul 2000 13:12:45 -0700	174 lines
RE: Unethical Opportunism was unethical preservation	Chris Perley	Mon, 31 Jul 2000 09:19:55 +1200	95 lines
RE: Bountiful!	Chris Perley	Mon, 31 Jul 2000 09:26:33 +1200	42 lines
NZ Ancient Beech Forests to be Clearcut	John Foster	Sun, 30 Jul 2000 14:48:37 -0700	72 lines
RE: Bountiful!	John Foster	Sun, 30 Jul 2000 14:48:40 -0700	36 lines
NZ: Anti-environmental Campaign: Book Out!!	John Foster	Sun, 30 Jul 2000 14:50:28 -0700	110 lines
Re: Sustainable Development	Patrick Longfield	Sun, 30 Jul 2000 15:22:17 -0700	498 lines
Feel When You Pray	John Foster	Sun, 30 Jul 2000 15:39:34 -0700	140 lines
Re: Sustainable Development	Patrick Longfield	Sun, 30 Jul 2000 16:11:06 -0700	197 lines
Nature's hostile takeover?	Philosophy News Service * richard jones	Sun, 30 Jul 2000 19:15:23 -0400	428 lines
More On NZ Forest Industry PR	John Foster	Sun, 30 Jul 2000 16:19:17 -0700	74 lines
Re: Unethical Opportunism was unethical preservation	Steve	Sun, 30 Jul 2000 16:58:59 -0700 (PDT)	105 lines
Re: Sustainable Development	Steve	Sun, 30 Jul 2000 18:04:34 -0700 (PDT)	128 lines
RE: NZ Ancient Beech Forests to be Clearcut	Chris Perley	Mon, 31 Jul 2000 14:35:46 +1200	101 lines
RE: Anti-environmental Campaign: Book Out!!	Chris Perley	Mon, 31 Jul 2000 15:17:09 +1200	162 lines
Re: Unethical Opportunism was unethical preservation	Jim Tantillo	Mon, 31 Jul 2000 00:41:50 -0500	195 lines
Low Intensity Logging to Hurt Beech Forests	John Foster	Mon, 31 Jul 2000 01:33:00 -0700	70 lines
Habitat Key to Survival: O'Donnell	John Foster	Mon, 31 Jul 2000 02:01:58 -0700	63 lines
Response by Timberlands to DoC	John Foster	Mon, 31 Jul 2000 02:08:58 -0700	114 lines
Re: Unethical Opportunism was unethical preservation	John Foster	Mon, 31 Jul 2000 02:19:08 -0700	57 lines
Conference on Economic Development and Sustainability in Italy	Prof. Walter Leal Filho	Mon, 31 Jul 2000 15:59:37 +0200	36 lines
FW: Fall of the Carbon Club	John Foster	Mon, 31 Jul 2000 09:51:28 -0700	166 lines
Thoreau on vision, perception, and beauty	Jim Tantillo	Mon, 31 Jul 2000 15:21:36 -0500	150 lines
well, just one more thing . . . Re: Thoreau	Jim Tantillo	Mon, 31 Jul 2000 16:12:03 -0500	64 lines
Uncertainty - and ethical management of the environment	Chris Perley	Tue, 1 Aug 2000 09:34:34 +1200	232 lines
RE: Habitat Key to Survival: O'Donnell - well gee, really	Chris Perley	Tue, 1 Aug 2000 13:20:07 +1200	147 lines
RE: Low Intensity Logging to Hurt Beech Forests	Chris Perley	Tue, 1 Aug 2000 13:34:57 +1200	150 lines
UNSUBSCRIBE	Wong Ee Ling	Tue, 1 Aug 2000 10:34:41 +0800	83 lines
RE: Low Intensity Logging to Hurt Beech Forests	John Foster	Mon, 31 Jul 2000 23:39:16 -0700	152 lines
RE: Low Intensity Logging to Hurt Beech Forests	Chris Perley	Tue, 1 Aug 2000 20:22:46 +1200	376 lines
RE: Low Intensity Logging to Hurt Beech Forests	Chris Lees	Tue, 1 Aug 2000 09:34:57 +0100	58 lines
Greenpeace and an introduction	emma fieldhouse	Tue, 01 Aug 2000 12:25:14 GMT	44 lines
environmental criteria (was something else)	Steven Bissell	Tue, 1 Aug 2000 08:41:47 -0600	76 lines
Certainty and the American Evasion of Philosophy	Jim Tantillo	Tue, 1 Aug 2000 10:18:02 -0500	276 lines
RE: Low Intensity Logging to Hurt Beech Forests	Steve	Tue, 1 Aug 2000 09:13:38 -0700 (PDT)	125 lines
RE: Low Intensity Logging to Hurt Beech Forests	John Foster	Tue, 01 Aug 2000 10:18:34 -0700	188 lines
RE: Low Intensity Logging to Hurt Beech Forests	John Foster	Tue, 01 Aug 2000 10:23:34 -0700	32 lines
Re: Certainty and the American Evasion of Philosophy	John Foster	Tue, 01 Aug 2000 11:02:24 -0700	62 lines
Emerson and Thoreau	John Foster	Tue, 01 Aug 2000 11:02:27 -0700	43 lines
Re: Certainty and the American Evasion of Philosophy	John Foster	Tue, 01 Aug 2000 13:34:08 -0700	128 lines
Re: Certainty and the American Evasion of Philosophy	John Foster	Tue, 01 Aug 2000 13:47:00 -0700	72 lines
Proliferat a Provocation (now Jim's PAP test)	John Foster	Tue, 01 Aug 2000 13:49:22 -0700	88 lines
Fwd: CFP: International Journal of Politics & Ethics	Jim Tantillo	Tue, 1 Aug 2000 16:08:27 -0500	132 lines
Duh	Steve	Tue, 1 Aug 2000 16:27:19 -0700 (PDT)	52 lines
RE: Low Intensity Logging to Hurt Beech Forests	Chris Perley	Wed, 2 Aug 2000 13:38:22 +1200	271 lines
RE: Greenpeace USA Struggles in Anti-GMO Campaign	Maria Stella	Wed, 2 Aug 2000 03:14:26 +0100 (BST)	92 lines
RE: Low Intensity Logging to Hurt Beech Forests	Chris Perley	Wed, 2 Aug 2000 14:22:05 +1200	249 lines
Re: Unethical Opportunism was unethical preservation	Maria Stella	Wed, 2 Aug 2000 03:24:40 +0100 (BST)	35 lines
Re: Duh	Maria Stella	Wed, 2 Aug 2000 04:07:46 +0100 (BST)	63 lines
Steady State Revolution	Brian Czech	Tue, 1 Aug 2000 20:33:58 -0700	36 lines
Hallelujah to that - ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS! SOPHISTICATION!	Chris Perley	Wed, 2 Aug 2000 17:24:20 +1200	128 lines
RE: Greenpeace USA Struggles in Anti-GMO Campaign	Jim Tantillo	Wed, 2 Aug 2000 00:27:17 -0500	108 lines
RE: Greenpeace and an introduction	Ramsy Ayoub	Wed, 2 Aug 2000 10:21:23 +0400	82 lines
Bad Seed	John Foster	Tue, 01 Aug 2000 23:42:04 -0700	267 lines
RE: Greenpeace USA Struggles in Anti-GMO Campaign	Steven Bissell	Wed, 2 Aug 2000 08:43:31 -0600	123 lines
RE: Greenpeace USA Struggles in Anti-GMO Campaign	Steven Bissell	Wed, 2 Aug 2000 08:43:33 -0600	146 lines
Re: Certainty and the American Evasion of Philosophy was Re: Duh	Jim Tantillo	Wed, 2 Aug 2000 10:04:19 -0500	125 lines
RE: Bad Seed	Steven Bissell	Wed, 2 Aug 2000 09:16:57 -0600	21 lines
critique of utilitarian ethics	Steven Bissell	Wed, 2 Aug 2000 09:26:27 -0600	28 lines
Re: critique of utilitarian ethics	Jim Tantillo	Wed, 2 Aug 2000 11:26:25 -0500	31 lines
Re: Certainty and the American Evasion of Philosophy was Re: Duh	John Foster	Wed, 02 Aug 2000 09:36:24 -0700	38 lines
RE: Bad Seed	John Foster	Wed, 02 Aug 2000 09:36:28 -0700	105 lines
GMO Action Center	John Foster	Wed, 02 Aug 2000 09:49:30 -0700	21 lines
Biotechnology Watch Center	John Foster	Wed, 02 Aug 2000 09:57:41 -0700	21 lines
RE: Bad Seed	Steven Bissell	Wed, 2 Aug 2000 11:07:01 -0600	52 lines
Two sides, too GM!	<>	Wed, 2 Aug 2000 14:41:12 EDT	87 lines
Re: critique of utilitarian ethics	Chris Hope	Wed, 02 Aug 2000 19:43:14 +0100	31 lines
More on Greenpeace--Patrick Moore	Steve	Wed, 2 Aug 2000 12:21:38 -0700 (PDT)	34 lines
Re: More on Greenpeace--Patrick Moore	Jim Tantillo	Wed, 2 Aug 2000 16:21:05 -0500	145 lines
"Dr. Truth" Re: More on Greenpeace--Patrick Moore	Jim Tantillo	Wed, 2 Aug 2000 16:42:57 -0500	62 lines
RE: critique of utilitarian ethics	Chris Perley	Thu, 3 Aug 2000 10:36:48 +1200	52 lines
RE: More on Greenpeace--Patrick Moore	Chris Perley	Thu, 3 Aug 2000 10:43:20 +1200	50 lines
RE: Low Intensity Logging to Hurt Beech Forests	Chris Lees	Thu, 3 Aug 2000 00:02:19 +0100	518 lines
Re: critique of utilitarian ethics	Jim Lewis	Wed, 02 Aug 2000 19:32:27 EDT	27 lines
RE: Low Intensity Logging to Hurt Beech Forests	Chris Perley	Thu, 3 Aug 2000 13:02:49 +1200	642 lines
Ethical issues associated with endangered species protection	Howard Pharo	Thu, 03 Aug 2000 17:49:08 +1200	22 lines
Re: More on Greenpeace--Patrick Moore	John Foster	Thu, 03 Aug 2000 00:31:21 -0700	30 lines
RE: Bad Seed	John Foster	Thu, 03 Aug 2000 00:31:24 -0700	68 lines
RE: More on Greenpeace--Patrick Moore	Chris Perley	Thu, 3 Aug 2000 22:44:20 +1200	60 lines
Re: Certainty and the American Evasion of Philosophy was Re: Duh	Maria Stella	Thu, 3 Aug 2000 12:43:41 +0100 (BST)	60 lines
RE: Greenpeace USA Struggles in Anti-GMO Campaign	Maria Stella	Thu, 3 Aug 2000 12:46:59 +0100 (BST)	135 lines
RE: Bad Seed	Maria Stella	Thu, 3 Aug 2000 12:48:33 +0100 (BST)	34 lines
RE: Bad Seed	Maria Stella	Thu, 3 Aug 2000 12:54:18 +0100 (BST)	20 lines
Re: Certainty and the American Evasion of Philosophy was Re: Duh	Maria Stella	Thu, 3 Aug 2000 13:05:28 +0100 (BST)	19 lines
RE: Greenpeace and an introduction	emma fieldhouse	Thu, 03 Aug 2000 13:23:09 GMT	115 lines
RE: Ethical issues associated with endangered species protection	Steven Bissell	Thu, 3 Aug 2000 07:58:35 -0600	45 lines
RE: Bad Seed	Steven Bissell	Thu, 3 Aug 2000 08:09:47 -0600	95 lines
RE: Bad Seed	Steven Bissell	Thu, 3 Aug 2000 08:21:04 -0600	57 lines
RE: Bad Seed	Steven Bissell	Thu, 3 Aug 2000 08:21:05 -0600	37 lines
Re: More on Greenpeace--Patrick Moore	Steve	Thu, 3 Aug 2000 08:20:46 -0700 (PDT)	59 lines
Grave Discrepancies Between Theory and Experiment	Steve	Thu, 3 Aug 2000 09:24:20 -0700 (PDT)	57 lines
Grave Discrepancies Between Theory and Experiment	Steve	Thu, 3 Aug 2000 09:43:14 -0700 (PDT)	25 lines
RE: Bad Seed	John Foster	Thu, 03 Aug 2000 10:29:48 -0700	46 lines
Romantic Passage	John Foster	Thu, 03 Aug 2000 10:29:52 -0700	349 lines
RE: Bad Seed	Steven Bissell	Thu, 3 Aug 2000 12:31:27 -0600	25 lines
frankentrees-NFN] Washington Post on ge trees	<>	Thu, 3 Aug 2000 15:48:23 EDT	303 lines
Re: Ethical issues associated with endangered species protection	Michael B. Harris	Thu, 03 Aug 2000 15:20:53 -0500	96 lines
FW: More on Greenpeace--Patrick Moore	Chris Perley	Fri, 4 Aug 2000 08:32:42 +1200	32 lines
Hurt Forests	Chris Lees	Thu, 3 Aug 2000 22:00:25 +0100	379 lines
RE: FW: More on Greenpeace--Patrick Moore	Chris Perley	Fri, 4 Aug 2000 09:14:52 +1200	92 lines
RE: Greenpeace and an introduction	Jim Tantillo	Thu, 3 Aug 2000 16:21:16 -0500	455 lines
Re: FW: More on Greenpeace--Patrick Moore	Jim Tantillo	Thu, 3 Aug 2000 16:50:48 -0500	55 lines
a war of all worlds	Chris Lees	Thu, 3 Aug 2000 23:02:05 +0100	146 lines
SF5CF3	Chris Lees	Thu, 3 Aug 2000 23:02:14 +0100	79 lines
RE: FW: More on Greenpeace--Patrick Moore	Jim Tantillo	Thu, 3 Aug 2000 18:46:24 -0500	135 lines
Re: Sustainable Development	Patrick Longfield	Thu, 3 Aug 2000 17:08:47 -0700	685 lines
Re: Unethical Opportunism was unethical preservation	Patrick Longfield	Thu, 3 Aug 2000 17:20:36 -0700	133 lines
Re: Ethical issues associated with endangered species protection	Sehjae Chun	Thu, 3 Aug 2000 21:07:18 -0400 (EDT)	59 lines
Cultural criticism	Tom Frank	Fri, 4 Aug 2000 10:07:43 +0800	102 lines
Re: Ethical issues associated with endangered species protection	Brian Czech	Thu, 3 Aug 2000 19:14:04 -0700	41 lines
Apology	Brian Czech	Thu, 3 Aug 2000 19:48:37 -0700	53 lines
Re: Ethical issues associated with endangered species protection	Jim Tantillo	Thu, 3 Aug 2000 21:49:18 -0500	149 lines
RE: critique of utilitarian ethics	Jim Tantillo	Thu, 3 Aug 2000 22:11:46 -0500	62 lines
RE: FW: More on Greenpeace--Patrick Moore	John Foster	Thu, 03 Aug 2000 20:21:18 -0700	63 lines
Dr. Patrick Moore and Environmentalists	John Foster	Thu, 03 Aug 2000 20:21:21 -0700	53 lines
Patrick Moore: Rainforests Irrelevant	John Foster	Thu, 03 Aug 2000 20:39:53 -0700	50 lines
RE: critique of utilitarian ethics	John Foster	Thu, 03 Aug 2000 20:53:04 -0700	20 lines
Dr. Patrick Moore and "Environmentalists"	Chris Perley	Fri, 4 Aug 2000 18:30:11 +1200	46 lines
Social construction of species	Brian Czech	Fri, 4 Aug 2000 04:48:47 -0700	108 lines
Re: Ethical issues associated with endangered species protection	David Pearson	Fri, 04 Aug 2000 14:22:38 +0100	49 lines
RE: Ethical issues associated with endangered species protection	Steven Bissell	Fri, 4 Aug 2000 08:48:12 -0600	70 lines
RE: Ethical issues associated with endangered species protection	Chris Lees	Fri, 4 Aug 2000 16:00:24 +0100	353 lines
Greenpeace input	Maria Stella	Fri, 4 Aug 2000 16:19:02 +0100 (BST)	54 lines
Budiansky on "The Cult of the Wild	Maria Stella	Fri, 4 Aug 2000 16:30:19 +0100 (BST)	110 lines
Endangered Species Coalition News	John Foster	Fri, 04 Aug 2000 09:36:47 -0700	68 lines
Respecting the Deep	John Foster	Fri, 04 Aug 2000 09:36:51 -0700	87 lines
Re: Patrick Moore: Rainforests Irrelevant	Steve	Fri, 4 Aug 2000 09:56:35 -0700 (PDT)	82 lines
Re: Patrick Moore: Rainforests Irrelevant	<>	Fri, 4 Aug 2000 13:23:09 EDT	74 lines
Re: "unethical preservationism" was Re: Sustainable Development	Ted Mosquin	Fri, 04 Aug 2000 14:19:18 -0400	291 lines
Re: Ethical issues associated with endangered species protection	Ted Mosquin	Fri, 04 Aug 2000 15:23:39 -0400	28 lines
Re: Greenpeace input	Steve	Fri, 4 Aug 2000 14:15:46 -0700 (PDT)	80 lines
Greenpeace and Fumento	Steve	Fri, 4 Aug 2000 14:31:03 -0700 (PDT)	57 lines
Re: Greenpeace and Fumento	<>	Fri, 4 Aug 2000 18:32:39 EDT	78 lines
RE: Budiansky on "The Cult of the Wild	Chris Perley	Sat, 5 Aug 2000 13:05:10 +1200	43 lines
RE: Patrick Moore: Rainforests Irrelevant	Chris Perley	Sat, 5 Aug 2000 13:12:34 +1200	106 lines
RE: "unethical preservationism" was Re: Sustainable Development	Chris Perley	Sat, 5 Aug 2000 13:32:16 +1200	492 lines
EUREKA!!! THE HORSE'S Mouth. More on Greenpeace--Patrick Moore	Chris Perley	Sat, 5 Aug 2000 14:02:54 +1200	65 lines
Re: Patrick Moore: Rainforests Irrelevant	John Foster	Fri, 04 Aug 2000 23:08:10 -0700	93 lines
RE: Budiansky on "The Cult of the Wild	Steven Bissell	Sat, 5 Aug 2000 08:17:11 -0600	58 lines
Re: Greenpeace and Fumento	John Foster	Sat, 05 Aug 2000 07:57:24 -0700	32 lines
RE: "unethical preservationism" was Re: Sustainable Development	John Foster	Sat, 05 Aug 2000 07:57:27 -0700	32 lines
Re: EUREKA!!! THE HORSE'S Mouth. More on Greenpeace--Patrick Moore	John Foster	Sat, 05 Aug 2000 07:57:30 -0700	37 lines
More on--Patrick Moore: Forest Alliance BC	John Foster	Sat, 05 Aug 2000 07:57:33 -0700	26 lines
RE: More on--Patrick Moore: Forest Alliance BC	John Foster	Sat, 05 Aug 2000 08:23:39 -0700	28 lines
RE: More on--Patrick Moore: Forest Alliance BC	Steven Bissell	Sat, 5 Aug 2000 09:23:55 -0600	41 lines
Patrick Moore Retracts Claims about Greenpeace	John Foster	Sat, 05 Aug 2000 08:28:35 -0700	46 lines
Burston Mastellar Largest PR firm	John Foster	Sat, 05 Aug 2000 08:53:59 -0700	75 lines
Burson Marstellar and Ozone	John Foster	Sat, 05 Aug 2000 09:09:12 -0700	139 lines
RE: Burston Mastellar Largest PR firm	Steven Bissell	Sat, 5 Aug 2000 12:33:00 -0600	96 lines
Re: Greenpeace and Fumento	Steve	Sat, 5 Aug 2000 12:09:41 -0700 (PDT)	115 lines
Re: Greenpeace and Fumento	Steve	Sat, 5 Aug 2000 12:12:04 -0700 (PDT)	57 lines
Re: Patrick Moore: Rainforests Irrelevant	Steve	Sat, 5 Aug 2000 12:15:12 -0700 (PDT)	123 lines
RE: More on--Patrick Moore: Forest Alliance BC	Steve	Sat, 5 Aug 2000 12:23:35 -0700 (PDT)	55 lines
Re: Burston Mastellar Largest PR firm	Steve	Sat, 5 Aug 2000 12:25:41 -0700 (PDT)	105 lines
Re: Patrick Moore: Rainforests Irrelevant	John Foster	Sat, 05 Aug 2000 12:28:07 -0700	30 lines
RE: Burson Marstellar Largest PR firm	John Foster	Sat, 05 Aug 2000 12:40:41 -0700	75 lines
RE: More on--Patrick Moore: Forest Alliance BC	John Foster	Sat, 05 Aug 2000 12:44:12 -0700	38 lines
Re: Burston Mastellar Largest PR firm	John Foster	Sat, 05 Aug 2000 12:46:21 -0700	33 lines
RE: Patrick Moore: Rainforests Irrelevant	Steven Bissell	Sat, 5 Aug 2000 14:13:59 -0600	44 lines
RE: Patrick Moore: Rainforests Irrelevant	John Foster	Sat, 05 Aug 2000 13:26:59 -0700	30 lines
Re: Greenpeace and Fumento	John Foster	Sat, 05 Aug 2000 13:28:56 -0700	34 lines
Re: Greenpeace input	Maria Stella	Sat, 5 Aug 2000 21:30:19 +0100 (BST)	33 lines
Re: Greenpeace and Fumento	Maria Stella	Sat, 5 Aug 2000 21:32:08 +0100 (BST)	69 lines
RE: Budiansky on "The Cult of the Wild	Maria Stella	Sat, 5 Aug 2000 21:38:36 +0100 (BST)	70 lines
Re: Greenpeace and Fumento	Maria Stella	Sat, 5 Aug 2000 21:42:12 +0100 (BST)	48 lines
RE: Burston Mastellar Largest PR firm	Maria Stella	Sat, 5 Aug 2000 21:50:39 +0100 (BST)	106 lines
Re: Greenpeace and Fumento	John Foster	Sat, 05 Aug 2000 13:56:18 -0700	49 lines
PR firms	Steven Bissell	Sat, 5 Aug 2000 16:36:12 -0600	27 lines
Re: Patrick Moore: Rainforests Irrelevant	Steve	Sat, 5 Aug 2000 16:09:40 -0700 (PDT)	61 lines
RE: Burson Marstellar Largest PR firm	Steve	Sat, 5 Aug 2000 16:16:22 -0700 (PDT)	54 lines
Re: Greenpeace and Fumento	Steve	Sat, 5 Aug 2000 16:18:43 -0700 (PDT)	98 lines
Re: Greenpeace input	Steve	Sat, 5 Aug 2000 16:20:20 -0700 (PDT)	59 lines
RE: Budiansky on "The Cult of the Wild	Chris Perley	Sun, 6 Aug 2000 11:58:17 +1200	70 lines
RE: "unethical preservationism" was Re: Sustainable Development	Chris Perley	Sun, 6 Aug 2000 12:00:50 +1200	47 lines
RE: Patrick Moore Retracts Claims about Greenpeace	Chris Perley	Sun, 6 Aug 2000 12:05:31 +1200	67 lines
RE: Burston Mastellar Largest PR firm	Chris Perley	Sun, 6 Aug 2000 12:10:54 +1200	117 lines
RE: Burson Marstellar Largest PR firm	Chris Perley	Sun, 6 Aug 2000 12:47:17 +1200	132 lines
RE: Burson Marstellar Largest PR firm	John Foster	Sat, 05 Aug 2000 23:24:06 -0700	100 lines
RE: Burson Marstellar Largest PR firm	John Foster	Sat, 05 Aug 2000 23:24:10 -0700	99 lines
Sarcas: Sneer	John Foster	Sun, 06 Aug 2000 09:33:21 -0700	30 lines
RE: Burson Marstellar Largest PR firm	Steve	Mon, 7 Aug 2000 09:55:18 -0700 (PDT)	87 lines
Sustainable Development	Steve	Mon, 7 Aug 2000 10:31:08 -0700 (PDT)	70 lines
Fwd: Amphibian Publication Announcement	Jim Tantillo	Mon, 7 Aug 2000 12:35:29 -0500	145 lines
Fwd: Conference announcement--Democracy and Sustainability	Jim Tantillo	Mon, 7 Aug 2000 14:21:23 -0500	81 lines
Re: Greenpeace and Fumento	Maria Stella	Mon, 7 Aug 2000 23:38:48 +0100 (BST)	108 lines
RE: "Environmentalists"	Chris Perley	Tue, 8 Aug 2000 10:40:43 +1200	56 lines
Re: Greenpeace input	Maria Stella	Mon, 7 Aug 2000 23:43:15 +0100 (BST)	80 lines
RE: Burston Mastellar Largest PR firm	Maria Stella	Mon, 7 Aug 2000 23:45:13 +0100 (BST)	126 lines
RE: Burson Marstellar Largest PR firm	Maria Stella	Mon, 7 Aug 2000 23:53:33 +0100 (BST)	27 lines
Fwd: [ee-internet] Draft Invasive Species Management Plan	Jim Lewis	Mon, 07 Aug 2000 20:38:26 EDT	41 lines
Re: Budiansky on "The Cult of the Wild	Maria Stella	Tue, 8 Aug 2000 03:30:47 +0100 (BST)	83 lines
Book Publication	Robert Brulle	Mon, 07 Aug 2000 22:34:08 -0400	27 lines
Job Opening	Robert Brulle	Mon, 07 Aug 2000 22:34:17 -0400	75 lines
Last' years quotations	Maria Stella	Tue, 8 Aug 2000 03:35:30 +0100 (BST)	54 lines
Re: Budiansky on "The Cult of the Wild	Jim Tantillo	Mon, 7 Aug 2000 21:36:16 -0500	54 lines
Michael Pollan on Gardening, was Re: "unethical preservationism"	Jim Tantillo	Mon, 7 Aug 2000 23:39:11 -0500	466 lines
Re: critique of utilitarian ethics	Jim Tantillo	Mon, 7 Aug 2000 23:49:54 -0500	124 lines
RE: Burson Marstellar Largest PR firm	John Foster	Mon, 07 Aug 2000 22:23:49 -0700	118 lines
Thoreau and Wordsworth	John Foster	Mon, 07 Aug 2000 22:23:57 -0700	49 lines
Gardening, multiple and single accounts analysis	John Foster	Mon, 07 Aug 2000 22:24:01 -0700	106 lines
Re: Michael Pollan on Gardening, was Re: "unethical preservationism"	John Foster	Mon, 07 Aug 2000 22:49:50 -0700	363 lines
Guilt by association - ethical? or just legal?	Chris Perley	Tue, 8 Aug 2000 18:24:06 +1200	173 lines
Re: Thoreau and Wordsworth	Jim Tantillo	Tue, 8 Aug 2000 09:13:33 -0500	53 lines
Biophilia (was cult of the wild)	John Foster	Tue, 08 Aug 2000 08:10:18 -0700	87 lines
Re: Gardening, multiple and single accounts analysis	Jim Tantillo	Tue, 8 Aug 2000 10:14:55 -0500	110 lines
Re: Thoreau and Wordsworth	Eugene Hargrove	Tue, 08 Aug 2000 11:21:06 -0500	71 lines
RE: Burson Marstellar Largest PR firm	Steve	Tue, 8 Aug 2000 09:36:20 -0700 (PDT)	219 lines
Re: Michael Pollan on Gardening, was Re: "unethical preservationism"	Jim Tantillo	Tue, 8 Aug 2000 11:43:39 -0500	131 lines
Schama	Steven Bissell	Tue, 8 Aug 2000 17:15:33 -0600	40 lines
Re: Guilt by association - ethical? or just legal?	Maria Stella	Wed, 9 Aug 2000 00:40:47 +0100 (BST)	191 lines
RE: Guilt by association - ethical? or just legal?	Chris Perley	Wed, 9 Aug 2000 12:04:42 +1200	222 lines
Re: Thoreau and Wordsworth	Tom Frank	Wed, 9 Aug 2000 10:03:57 +0800	72 lines
Schama, and Michael Pollan on weeding	Jim Tantillo	Wed, 9 Aug 2000 00:06:28 -0500	291 lines
Regional Development Strategies and Spatial Planning	Prof. Walter Leal Filho	Wed, 09 Aug 2000 10:38:19 +0200	60 lines
Conference - Wilderness Britain?	S M Fritz	Wed, 9 Aug 2000 13:51:26 +0100 (BST)	12 lines
Questionnaire on wild land perception	S M Fritz	Wed, 9 Aug 2000 13:52:51 +0100 (BST)	12 lines
	S M Fritz	Wed, 9 Aug 2000 14:31:52 +0100 (BST)	83 lines
Re: Last' years quotations	John Foster	Wed, 09 Aug 2000 08:17:52 -0700	125 lines
Michael Pollan Errors On Wildfire	John Foster	Wed, 09 Aug 2000 08:17:56 -0700	188 lines
Don't Get Burned by Good Intentions	John Foster	Wed, 09 Aug 2000 09:00:31 -0700	88 lines
sorry, here comes the questionnaire	S M Fritz	Wed, 9 Aug 2000 18:11:40 +0100 (BST)	35 lines
Re: Guilt by association - ethical? or just legal?	Steve	Wed, 9 Aug 2000 10:33:56 -0700 (PDT)	94 lines
Michael Pollan on woodchucks: Part One	Jim Tantillo	Wed, 9 Aug 2000 12:47:42 -0500	148 lines
Pollan on woodchucks, Phase Two: or, Don't Get Burned by Good Intentions	Jim Tantillo	Wed, 9 Aug 2000 12:53:48 -0500	382 lines
FW: New book on environmentalism	Chris Perley	Thu, 10 Aug 2000 09:39:55 +1200	36 lines
Hey....	Steve	Wed, 9 Aug 2000 15:42:45 -0700 (PDT)	50 lines
Dont Answer Steve, Maria Stella: Expletives to be Deleted	John Foster	Wed, 09 Aug 2000 20:46:38 -0700	47 lines
Re: Pollan on woodchucks, Phase Two: or, Don't Get Burned by Good Intentions	John Foster	Wed, 09 Aug 2000 20:46:41 -0700	67 lines
Re: Dont Answer Steve, Maria Stella: Expletives to be Deleted	Steve	Wed, 9 Aug 2000 21:31:39 -0700 (PDT)	80 lines
Woodchuck Notes #1	John Foster	Wed, 09 Aug 2000 21:36:28 -0700	85 lines
Re: Guilt by association - ethical? or just legal?	John Foster	Wed, 09 Aug 2000 21:46:41 -0700	39 lines
Public relations	Chris Perley	Thu, 10 Aug 2000 16:55:15 +1200	90 lines
RE: Pollan on woodchucks, Phase Two: or, Don't Get Burned by Good Intentions	Chris Perley	Thu, 10 Aug 2000 16:57:01 +1200	92 lines
Farewell - for awhile at least	Ernest Partridge	Thu, 10 Aug 2000 01:30:25 -0700	200 lines
Re: Dont Answer Steve, Maria Stella: Expletives to be Deleted	John Foster	Thu, 10 Aug 2000 07:46:55 -0700	138 lines
Companies not Ethical (Milton Friedman)	John Foster	Thu, 10 Aug 2000 08:02:35 -0700	62 lines
Aspartame--Junkscience?	Steve	Thu, 10 Aug 2000 11:30:29 -0700 (PDT)	65 lines
Fwd: Strong and Weak Sustainability	Steve	Thu, 10 Aug 2000 11:48:58 -0700 (PDT)	78 lines
Re: Farewell - for awhile at least	Jim Lewis	Thu, 10 Aug 2000 17:43:02 EDT	67 lines
RE: Guilt by association-AND FUMENTO	Maria Stella	Thu, 10 Aug 2000 23:40:41 +0100 (BST)	245 lines
Re: Guilt by association - ethical? or just legal?	Maria Stella	Thu, 10 Aug 2000 23:59:06 +0100 (BST)	116 lines
Re: Dont Answer Steve, Maria Stella: Expletives to be Deleted	Maria Stella	Fri, 11 Aug 2000 00:05:26 +0100 (BST)	64 lines
NOT GUILTY by association:	Maria Stella	Fri, 11 Aug 2000 00:08:06 +0100 (BST)	93 lines
Re: Dont Answer Steve, Maria Stella: Expletives to be Deleted	Steve	Thu, 10 Aug 2000 16:15:22 -0700 (PDT)	96 lines
Re: Public relations	Maria Stella	Fri, 11 Aug 2000 00:18:59 +0100 (BST)	114 lines
Re: Farewell - for awhile at least	Steven Thompson	Thu, 10 Aug 2000 19:27:58 EDT	19 lines
Re: NOT GUILTY by association:	Steve	Thu, 10 Aug 2000 16:35:14 -0700 (PDT)	124 lines
Re: Dont Answer Steve, Maria Stella: Expletives to be Deleted	Maria Stella	Fri, 11 Aug 2000 00:37:18 +0100 (BST)	150 lines
Re: Aspartame--Junkscience?	Maria Stella	Fri, 11 Aug 2000 00:41:31 +0100 (BST)	82 lines
Re: Guilt by association - ethical? or just legal?	Steve	Thu, 10 Aug 2000 16:51:46 -0700 (PDT)	150 lines
Re: Farewell - for awhile at least	Ernest Partridge	Thu, 10 Aug 2000 18:50:23 -0700	39 lines
RE: Public relations	Chris Perley	Fri, 11 Aug 2000 14:06:21 +1200	57 lines
RE: Public relations	Chris Perley	Fri, 11 Aug 2000 16:57:02 +1200	25 lines
Pollan and the Woodchuck: Denouement	Jim Tantillo	Fri, 11 Aug 2000 09:14:35 -0500	208 lines
Re: Aspartame--Junkscience?	Steve	Fri, 11 Aug 2000 08:58:56 -0700 (PDT)	133 lines
Re: Guilt by association - ethical? or just legal?	Maria Stella	Fri, 11 Aug 2000 19:21:23 +0100 (BST)	161 lines
Re: NOT GUILTY by association:	Maria Stella	Fri, 11 Aug 2000 19:22:30 +0100 (BST)	134 lines
Re: Dont Answer Steve, Maria Stella: Expletives to be Deleted	Maria Stella	Fri, 11 Aug 2000 19:28:44 +0100 (BST)	48 lines
Environment News Service: Reptiles In Trouble Around the World (fwd)	Maria Stella	Fri, 11 Aug 2000 19:34:03 +0100 (BST)	28 lines
I DON'T ACCEPT BULLYING IN THIS LIST	Maria Stella	Fri, 11 Aug 2000 19:55:18 +0100 (BST)	177 lines
RE: Guilt by association - ethical? or just legal?	Steven Bissell	Fri, 11 Aug 2000 14:27:43 -0600	176 lines
RE: Guilt by association - ethical? or just legal?	Jim Tantillo	Fri, 11 Aug 2000 17:09:18 -0500	24 lines
RE: Dont Answer Steve, Maria Stella: Expletives to be Deleted	Chris Perley	Sat, 12 Aug 2000 14:21:50 +1200	62 lines
Ecophilosophy : a guide to the literature	John Foster	Fri, 11 Aug 2000 23:00:58 -0700	238 lines
Ecophilosophy : a guide to the literature	John Foster	Fri, 11 Aug 2000 23:00:58 -0700	238 lines
Re: NOT GUILTY by association:	John Foster	Fri, 11 Aug 2000 23:01:04 -0700	33 lines
FW: Labeling of GE Foods Media Campaign	Jeri Pollock	Sat, 12 Aug 2000 08:31:50 -0700	210 lines
Berry On Wilderness	John Foster	Sat, 12 Aug 2000 09:27:29 -0700	99 lines
Anti-Environmentalist Hate Propaganda; was Sustainable Development	Ted Mosquin	Sat, 12 Aug 2000 13:52:13 -0400	157 lines
who is who	Maria Stella	Sat, 12 Aug 2000 21:36:32 +0100 (BST)	25 lines
WRONG!	Maria Stella	Sat, 12 Aug 2000 21:57:37 +0100 (BST)	78 lines
Re: WRONG!	John Foster	Sat, 12 Aug 2000 13:59:54 -0700	41 lines
Green Party Talk: Is Left Biocentrism Relevant to Green Parties?	Helga Hoffmann	Sat, 12 Aug 2000 17:29:37 -0700	90 lines
Fwd: Bill Oliver's Eco-Hit song, George W. From Texas	Jim Lewis	Sat, 12 Aug 2000 21:14:42 EDT	40 lines
Pop-ecology and two premises of the nature/culture	Chris Perley	Sun, 13 Aug 2000 13:26:11 +1200	324 lines
Re: Pop-ecology and two premises of the nature/culture	Jim Lewis	Sun, 13 Aug 2000 12:11:55 EDT	164 lines
RE: who is who	Steven Bissell	Mon, 14 Aug 2000 07:38:29 -0600	40 lines
Re: -Environmentalist Hate Propaganda; was Sustainable Development	Jim Tantillo	Mon, 14 Aug 2000 09:02:48 -0500	54 lines
Anti-Environmentalist Hate Propaganda Book Reviews	Jim Tantillo	Mon, 14 Aug 2000 22:10:38 -0500	158 lines
	Maria Stella	Tue, 15 Aug 2000 05:47:54 +0100 (BST)	278 lines
Re: -Environmentalist Hate Propaganda; was Sustainable Development	Maria Stella	Tue, 15 Aug 2000 06:02:05 +0100 (BST)	81 lines
RE: who is who	Maria Stella	Tue, 15 Aug 2000 06:32:40 +0100 (BST)	114 lines
Re: Pop-ecology and two views of obfuscation	Jim Tantillo	Tue, 15 Aug 2000 00:55:39 -0500	165 lines
Enviroethics list changes	David Pearson	Tue, 15 Aug 2000 11:38:04 +0100	36 lines
Re: "unethical preservationism" was Re: Sustainable Development	David Pearson	Tue, 15 Aug 2000 13:09:31 +0100	167 lines
Re: Pop-ecology and two views of obfuscation	David Pearson	Tue, 15 Aug 2000 17:19:14 +0100	83 lines
Unethical preservationism: the ivory ban	David Pearson	Tue, 15 Aug 2000 17:19:40 +0100	254 lines
Fwd: Conference Listing Resource	David Pearson	Tue, 15 Aug 2000 17:20:12 +0100	47 lines
Enviroethics - request from a list-owner	David Pearson	Tue, 15 Aug 2000 17:32:03 +0100	42 lines
Re: Pop-ecology and two views of obfuscation	David and Lesley	Tue, 15 Aug 2000 22:01:42 +0000	64 lines
Burning Fossil Fuels Not the Cause of Global Warming?	David and Lesley	Tue, 15 Aug 2000 22:02:22 +0000	47 lines
Re: Pop-ecology and two views of obfuscation	David and Lesley	Tue, 15 Aug 2000 22:03:48 +0000	98 lines
Re: Pop-ecology and two views of obfuscation	David Pearson	Wed, 16 Aug 2000 09:07:27 +0100	40 lines
LEGENDS AND MYTHS IN SCIENCE (fwd)	David Pearson	Wed, 16 Aug 2000 09:07:54 +0100	301 lines
Bookreview Dispossessing the Wilderness: Indian Removal	David Pearson	Wed, 16 Aug 2000 09:08:19 +0100	380 lines
The diffeence between modern war and modern industry	David Pearson	Wed, 16 Aug 2000 09:08:39 +0100	41 lines
Re: Pop-ecology and two views of obfuscation	David Pearson	Wed, 16 Aug 2000 09:08:57 +0100	52 lines
Re: Anti-Environmentalist Hate Propaganda Book Reviews (fwd)	David Pearson	Wed, 16 Aug 2000 09:09:21 +0100	239 lines
Environment & Climate News: Where's the science in environmental science? (August 2000)	David Pearson	Wed, 16 Aug 2000 09:10:16 +0100	32 lines
RE: Pop-ecology and two views of obfuscation	David Pearson	Wed, 16 Aug 2000 17:29:54 +0100	70 lines
Fw: Animal Intelligence	David Pearson	Wed, 16 Aug 2000 17:30:59 +0100	74 lines
Re: Unethical preservationism: the ivory ban	David Pearson	Wed, 16 Aug 2000 17:31:30 +0100	89 lines
The Ivory Ban-wagon and Anti-Environmentalist Hate Propaganda	David Pearson	Wed, 16 Aug 2000 17:32:03 +0100	111 lines
Enviroethics now not moderated	David Pearson	Wed, 16 Aug 2000 17:38:12 +0100	28 lines
Re: Unethical preservationism: the ivory ban	Jim Tantillo	Wed, 16 Aug 2000 14:12:58 -0500	147 lines
Re: The diffeence between modern war and modern industry	Steve	Wed, 16 Aug 2000 13:12:10 -0700 (PDT)	51 lines
Preserving all the parts, was Re: Unethical preservationism: the ivory ban	Jim Tantillo	Wed, 16 Aug 2000 15:53:48 -0500	134 lines
Re: Pop-ecology and two views of obfuscation	Jim Lewis	Wed, 16 Aug 2000 17:05:44 EDT	49 lines
RE: Unethical preservationism: the ivory ban	Chris Perley	Thu, 17 Aug 2000 09:18:59 +1200	78 lines
Re: Pop-ecology and two views of obfuscation	Steve	Wed, 16 Aug 2000 16:13:18 -0700 (PDT)	37 lines
San Diego Electric Rates--Costs Don't Matter?	Steve	Wed, 16 Aug 2000 16:25:17 -0700 (PDT)	30 lines
Re: San Diego Electric Rates--Costs Don't Matter?	<>	Wed, 16 Aug 2000 19:45:00 EDT	33 lines
Re: San Diego Electric Rates--Costs Don't Matter?	Steve	Wed, 16 Aug 2000 18:05:12 -0700 (PDT)	51 lines
Junkscience: What is it and can we spot it?	Steve	Wed, 16 Aug 2000 18:17:05 -0700 (PDT)	55 lines
Re: San Diego Electric Rates--Costs Don't Matter?	<>	Wed, 16 Aug 2000 23:48:26 EDT	25 lines
Re: San Diego Electric Rates--Costs Don't Matter?	Steve	Thu, 17 Aug 2000 08:25:25 -0700 (PDT)	61 lines
(no subject)	<>	Thu, 17 Aug 2000 12:22:20 EDT	29 lines
R&D--and environmental ethics discussion?	Steve	Thu, 17 Aug 2000 10:04:06 -0700 (PDT)	84 lines
Re: -Environmentalist Hate Propaganda; was Sustainable Development	Ted Mosquin	Thu, 17 Aug 2000 15:39:50 -0400	181 lines
Re: R&D--and environmental ethics discussion?	<>	Thu, 17 Aug 2000 17:12:07 EDT	29 lines
Re: Pop-ecology and two views of obfuscation	Jim Lewis	Thu, 17 Aug 2000 17:14:27 EDT	41 lines
SD ONLINE - extensive updates	SD Online	Thu, 17 Aug 2000 20:51:26 -0700	53 lines
Re: Pop-ecology and two views of obfuscation	Steve	Fri, 18 Aug 2000 07:05:00 -0700 (PDT)	62 lines
Re: R&D--and environmental ethics discussion?	Steve	Fri, 18 Aug 2000 07:55:53 -0700 (PDT)	58 lines
COUNTRYSIDE STEWARDSHIP (fwd)	Maria Stella	Fri, 18 Aug 2000 16:29:34 +0100 (BST)	242 lines
Re: Environmentalist Hate Propaganda; was Sustainable Development	Jim Tantillo	Fri, 18 Aug 2000 14:55:33 -0500	77 lines
Re: The Ethics of Order in Nature (was Sustainable Development)	Ted Mosquin	Sat, 19 Aug 2000 08:30:11 -0400	133 lines
Re: Pop-ecology and two views of obfuscation	John Foster	Mon, 21 Aug 2000 01:02:31 -0700	142 lines
Re: Junkscience: What is it and can we spot it?	John Foster	Mon, 21 Aug 2000 01:04:10 -0700	51 lines
Testing Format of enviroethics postings	Ted Mosquin	Mon, 21 Aug 2000 08:33:14 -0400	136 lines
Ethics of Ivory Ban Not in Question Now	John Foster	Mon, 21 Aug 2000 07:57:20 -0700	90 lines
RE: Ethics of Ivory Ban Not in Question Now	Steven Bissell	Mon, 21 Aug 2000 09:24:14 -0600	115 lines
Re: Junkscience: What is it and can we spot it?	Steve	Mon, 21 Aug 2000 09:19:43 -0700 (PDT)	78 lines
Re: Junkscience: What is it and can we spot it?	Steve	Mon, 21 Aug 2000 10:09:05 -0700 (PDT)	31 lines
Fwd: Re: The Ethics of Order in Nature (was Sustainable Development)	Steve	Mon, 21 Aug 2000 10:14:14 -0700 (PDT)	218 lines
RE: Ethics of Ivory Ban Not in Question Now	John Foster	Mon, 21 Aug 2000 12:53:21 -0700	99 lines
Re: The pejorative: "Misanthropy" (was Sustainable Development)	Ted Mosquin	Mon, 21 Aug 2000 16:26:56 -0400	145 lines
Re: The Ethics of Order in Nature (was Sustainable Development)	Maria Stella	Mon, 21 Aug 2000 22:20:06 +0100 (BST)	45 lines
Re: The pejorative: "Misanthropy" (was Sustainable Development)	John Foster	Mon, 21 Aug 2000 14:45:14 -0700	125 lines
Junkscience: Some annoying details...	Maria Stella	Mon, 21 Aug 2000 22:52:24 +0100 (BST)	268 lines
Re: Junkscience: Some annoying details...	John Foster	Mon, 21 Aug 2000 14:57:40 -0700	43 lines
RE: Ethics of Ivory Ban Not in Question Now	John Foster	Mon, 21 Aug 2000 18:11:18 -0700	84 lines
RE: Ethics of Ivory Ban Not in Question Now - Not?	Chris Perley	Tue, 22 Aug 2000 14:18:06 +1200	111 lines
RE: The pejorative: "Misanthropy" (was Sustainable Development)	Chris Perley	Tue, 22 Aug 2000 14:34:26 +1200	35 lines
RE: The pejorative: "Misanthropy"	John Foster	Mon, 21 Aug 2000 20:28:53 -0700	99 lines
Re: Junkscience: Some annoying details...	Steve	Mon, 21 Aug 2000 22:40:14 -0700 (PDT)	82 lines
Re: Apologies to Maria Stella (was The Ethics of Order in Nature)	Ted Mosquin	Tue, 22 Aug 2000 08:08:36 -0400	63 lines
R&D, solar energy etc.	emma fieldhouse	Tue, 22 Aug 2000 13:04:13 GMT	49 lines
Re: Junkscience: Some annoying details...	emma fieldhouse	Tue, 22 Aug 2000 13:36:52 GMT	38 lines
Re: R&D, solar energy etc.	John Foster	Tue, 22 Aug 2000 09:23:44 -0700	48 lines
Re: Junkscience: Some annoying details...	John Foster	Tue, 22 Aug 2000 09:28:55 -0700	67 lines
Re: Junkscience: Some annoying details...	Steve	Tue, 22 Aug 2000 09:40:06 -0700 (PDT)	50 lines
Re: The pejorative: "Misanthropy" (was Sustainable Development)	Jim Tantillo	Tue, 22 Aug 2000 13:03:52 -0500	26 lines
Re: Junkscience: Some annoying details...	Steve	Tue, 22 Aug 2000 11:56:27 -0700 (PDT)	66 lines
Re: Junkscience: Some annoying details...	Maria Stella	Tue, 22 Aug 2000 20:18:13 +0100 (BST)	29 lines
Re: Apologies to Maria Stella (was The Ethics of Order in Nature)	Maria Stella	Tue, 22 Aug 2000 20:20:23 +0100 (BST)	16 lines
Re: The Ivory Ban-wagon and Anti-Environmentalist Hate Propaganda (fwd)	Maria Stella	Tue, 22 Aug 2000 20:23:31 +0100 (BST)	113 lines
Re: Preserving all the parts (fwd)	Maria Stella	Tue, 22 Aug 2000 20:24:21 +0100 (BST)	80 lines
Re: Junkscience: Some annoying details...	John Foster	Tue, 22 Aug 2000 13:36:17 -0700	22 lines
Re: Junkscience: Some annoying details...	Steve	Tue, 22 Aug 2000 14:25:53 -0700 (PDT)	48 lines
Debunk the Junk!	<>	Tue, 22 Aug 2000 17:48:25 EDT	23 lines
(US) Genetically altered foods violate bounds of creation	Maynard S. Clark	Tue, 22 Aug 2000 23:11:46 -0400	20 lines
Re: The Ivory Ban-wagon and Anti-Environmentalist Hate Propaganda	Jim Tantillo	Tue, 22 Aug 2000 23:36:27 -0500	308 lines
RE: The Ivory Ban-wagon and Anti-Environmentalist Hate Propaganda	Steven Bissell	Wed, 23 Aug 2000 08:01:41 -0600	232 lines
Re: Poaching Elephants, and Ivory	John Foster	Wed, 23 Aug 2000 07:59:29 -0700	89 lines
Re: Junkscience: Some annoying details...	Steve	Wed, 23 Aug 2000 09:16:30 -0700 (PDT)	42 lines
Re: R&D, solar energy etc.	Steve	Wed, 23 Aug 2000 09:21:43 -0700 (PDT)	70 lines
Re: Preserving all the parts (fwd)	Jim Tantillo	Wed, 23 Aug 2000 15:17:29 -0500	89 lines
Re: Preserving all the parts (fwd)	John Foster	Wed, 23 Aug 2000 16:45:24 -0700	187 lines
Re: Preserving all the parts (fwd)	John Foster	Wed, 23 Aug 2000 17:26:07 -0700	40 lines
Re: Preserving all the parts (fwd)	John Foster	Thu, 24 Aug 2000 01:31:24 -0700	127 lines
Value before Ethics	John Foster	Thu, 24 Aug 2000 08:51:27 -0700	264 lines
Fwd: RE: Preserving all the parts (fwd)	Jim Tantillo	Thu, 24 Aug 2000 16:06:03 -0500	70 lines
That's Baird: Preserving all the parts (fwd)	John Foster	Thu, 24 Aug 2000 23:16:52 -0700	248 lines
John Burroughs (1837-1921)	EJR	Sat, 26 Aug 2000 17:18:44 -0400	21 lines
Preserving all the parts: You can die of baldness. (fwd)	Maria Stella	Sat, 26 Aug 2000 23:28:41 +0100 (BST)	77 lines
"Reasons" for opposing anything new	Chris Perley	Mon, 28 Aug 2000 10:43:52 +1200	51 lines
Re: "Reasons" for opposing anything new	John Foster	Sun, 27 Aug 2000 21:19:58 -0700	46 lines
Re: Preserving all the parts: You can die of baldness. (fwd)	John Foster	Sun, 27 Aug 2000 21:20:01 -0700	99 lines
Re: "Reasons" for opposing anything new	Steve	Sun, 27 Aug 2000 23:41:18 -0700 (PDT)	75 lines
Fwd: hunting	Jim Tantillo	Mon, 28 Aug 2000 13:10:32 -0500	69 lines
Fwd: NEW CALL FOR PAPERS - Nature & Technology Conf. (fwd)	Jim Tantillo	Tue, 29 Aug 2000 17:09:20 -0500	162 lines
Wash. Post editorial on global warming	Jim Tantillo	Wed, 30 Aug 2000 10:31:03 -0500	36 lines
Ethics of ice harvest?	Jim Tantillo	Wed, 30 Aug 2000 22:30:29 -0500	36 lines
Re: Ethics of ice harvest?	Paul Kirby	Thu, 31 Aug 2000 10:52:28 +0100	52 lines
Re: Ethics of ice harvest?	David Pearson	Thu, 31 Aug 2000 15:10:53 +0100	54 lines
Re: Ethics of ice harvest?	John Foster	Thu, 31 Aug 2000 07:53:17 -0700	92 lines
Re: Ethics of ice harvest?	Paul Kirby	Thu, 31 Aug 2000 17:35:30 +0100	46 lines
Re: Ethics of ice harvest?	Steve	Thu, 31 Aug 2000 10:41:05 -0700 (PDT)	30 lines
Sentient rocks was: Ethics of ice harvest?	Chris Perley	Fri, 1 Sep 2000 09:04:46 +1200	47 lines
Re: Sentient rocks was: Ethics of ice harvest?	Steve	Thu, 31 Aug 2000 14:30:19 -0700 (PDT)	71 lines
Re: Ethics of ice & CO2	John Foster	Thu, 31 Aug 2000 19:34:59 -0700	117 lines
Re: Ethics of ice & CO2	John Foster	Thu, 31 Aug 2000 19:34:59 -0700	117 lines
Re: Ethics of ice & CO2	John Foster	Thu, 31 Aug 2000 19:35:36 -0700	29 lines
Re: Ethics of ice harvest?	David Pearson	Fri, 01 Sep 2000 11:07:03 +0100	35 lines
Re: Ethics of ice harvest?	John Foster	Fri, 01 Sep 2000 05:57:27 -0700	26 lines
RE: Ethics of ice harvest?	Chris Perley	Sat, 2 Sep 2000 01:38:19 +1200	24 lines
Democratic ethics	Paul Kirby	Fri, 01 Sep 2000 14:44:43 +0100	54 lines
Re: Democratic ethics	John Foster	Fri, 01 Sep 2000 07:04:12 -0700	64 lines
Re: Wash. Post editorial on global warming	<>	Fri, 1 Sep 2000 22:19:44 EDT	46 lines
Re: Wash. Post editorial on global warming	Steve	Fri, 1 Sep 2000 22:46:08 -0700 (PDT)	56 lines
Re: Wash. Post editorial on global warming	John Foster	Fri, 01 Sep 2000 22:58:56 -0700	70 lines
Re: Wash. Post editorial on global warming	<>	Tue, 5 Sep 2000 14:02:17 EDT	69 lines
Re: Wash. Post editorial on global warming	<>	Tue, 5 Sep 2000 14:08:02 EDT	35 lines
The solution to pollution is dilution . . . .	Jim Tantillo	Sun, 10 Sep 2000 11:34:42 -0500	32 lines
RE: The solution to pollution is dilution . . . .	Steven Bissell	Sun, 10 Sep 2000 11:45:52 -0600	72 lines
Can there be sustainability in capitalist society?	<>	Sun, 10 Sep 2000 23:50:34 EDT	22 lines
RE: Can there be sustainability in capitalist society?	Chris Perley	Mon, 11 Sep 2000 17:20:17 +1200	52 lines
Re: Can there be sustainability in capitalist society?	Andrew Jameton	Mon, 11 Sep 2000 08:08:40 -0500	67 lines
RE: Can there be sustainability in capitalist society?	Steven Bissell	Mon, 11 Sep 2000 07:29:58 -0600	42 lines
Re: Can there be sustainability in capitalist society?	emma fieldhouse	Mon, 11 Sep 2000 13:52:57 GMT	68 lines
RE: Can there be sustainability in capitalist society?	emma fieldhouse	Mon, 11 Sep 2000 14:00:41 GMT	67 lines
RE: The solution to pollution is dilution . . . .	Steve	Mon, 11 Sep 2000 10:37:55 -0700 (PDT)	118 lines
Can there?	Brian Czech	Mon, 11 Sep 2000 16:19:32 -0700	36 lines
RE: Can there be sustainability in capitalist society?	Paul Kirby	Tue, 12 Sep 2000 17:31:11 +0100	46 lines
Re: Can there--Sustainable Development and a Steady State	Steve	Tue, 12 Sep 2000 11:01:20 -0700 (PDT)	71 lines
RE: Can there be sustainability in capitalist society?	Steven Bissell	Tue, 12 Sep 2000 13:10:47 -0600	47 lines
RE: Can there be sustainability in capitalist society?	John Foster	Wed, 13 Sep 2000 07:38:57 -0700	84 lines
Eco Principles	John Foster	Wed, 13 Sep 2000 07:46:26 -0700	128 lines
RE: Can there be sustainability in capitalist society?	Steve	Wed, 13 Sep 2000 10:46:27 -0700 (PDT)	57 lines
Announcement - IHCMD Online Study Program	Axel Dorscht	Wed, 13 Sep 2000 16:04:23 -0400	92 lines
Invitation to join a new electronic discussion list on Climate Change	Ernest Rukangira	Wed, 13 Sep 2000 23:24:05 +0300	75 lines
RE: Can there be sustainability in capitalist society?	Chris Perley	Thu, 14 Sep 2000 09:21:57 +1200	59 lines
Definition of capitalism?	<>	Thu, 14 Sep 2000 01:08:09 EDT	36 lines
Re: Can there be sustainability in capitalist society?	<>	Thu, 14 Sep 2000 01:19:22 EDT	31 lines
Re: Definition of capitalism?	Steve	Thu, 14 Sep 2000 11:25:39 -0700 (PDT)	74 lines
Re: Definition of capitalism?	<>	Thu, 14 Sep 2000 17:00:05 EDT	39 lines
RE: Definition of capitalism?	Steven Bissell	Thu, 14 Sep 2000 15:58:30 -0600	45 lines
RE: Definition of capitalism?	Steve	Thu, 14 Sep 2000 15:59:43 -0700 (PDT)	68 lines
Re: Definition of capitalism?	Steve	Thu, 14 Sep 2000 16:52:10 -0700 (PDT)	102 lines
Re: Definition of capitalism?	<>	Thu, 14 Sep 2000 22:31:57 EDT	58 lines
Re: Definition of capitalism?	<>	Thu, 14 Sep 2000 22:37:41 EDT	38 lines
Re: Definition of capitalism?	<>	Thu, 14 Sep 2000 22:57:32 EDT	95 lines
RE: Definition of capitalism?	Steven Bissell	Fri, 15 Sep 2000 07:47:47 -0600	102 lines
capitalism and EE	Steven Bissell	Fri, 15 Sep 2000 07:58:58 -0600	28 lines
Re: Definition of capitalism?	emma fieldhouse	Fri, 15 Sep 2000 15:10:32 GMT	29 lines
Marketing tangent around the "Definition of capitalism" argument?	emma fieldhouse	Fri, 15 Sep 2000 15:16:41 GMT	38 lines
Re: Marketing tangent around the "Definition of capitalism" argument?	John Foster	Fri, 15 Sep 2000 08:47:51 -0700	104 lines
Re: Definition of capitalism?	John Foster	Fri, 15 Sep 2000 09:02:25 -0700	108 lines
Re: Definition of capitalism?	Steve	Fri, 15 Sep 2000 09:13:16 -0700 (PDT)	94 lines
Re: Definition of capitalism?	Steve	Fri, 15 Sep 2000 09:15:56 -0700 (PDT)	65 lines
Re: Definition of capitalism?	Steve	Fri, 15 Sep 2000 09:27:30 -0700 (PDT)	190 lines
RE: Definition of capitalism?	Steve	Fri, 15 Sep 2000 09:31:11 -0700 (PDT)	63 lines
Re: Definition of capitalism?	Steve	Fri, 15 Sep 2000 09:35:24 -0700 (PDT)	58 lines
Re: Marketing tangent around the "Definition of capitalism" argument?	Steve	Fri, 15 Sep 2000 09:36:55 -0700 (PDT)	40 lines
Re: Marketing tangent around the "Definition of capitalism" argument?	Steve	Fri, 15 Sep 2000 09:43:24 -0700 (PDT)	111 lines
Re: Definition of capitalism?	Steve	Fri, 15 Sep 2000 09:59:59 -0700 (PDT)	129 lines
RE: Definition of capitalism?	Steven Bissell	Fri, 15 Sep 2000 11:38:26 -0600	32 lines
RE: Definition of capitalism?	Chris Perley	Sat, 16 Sep 2000 12:26:32 +1200	59 lines
Re: Marketing tangent around the "Definition of capitalism" argument?	emma fieldhouse	Sat, 16 Sep 2000 12:59:50 GMT	68 lines
Re: Definition of capitalism?	emma fieldhouse	Sat, 16 Sep 2000 13:11:57 GMT	40 lines
RE: Marketing tangent around the "Definition of capitalism" argument?	Steven Bissell	Sat, 16 Sep 2000 07:31:23 -0600	96 lines
Re: Marketing tangent around the "Definition of capitalism" argument?	<>	Sat, 16 Sep 2000 12:08:06 EDT	46 lines
RE: Marketing tangent around the "Definition of capitalism" argument?	Steven Bissell	Sat, 16 Sep 2000 11:32:12 -0600	56 lines
Re: Marketing tangent around the "Definition of capitalism" argument?	<>	Sat, 16 Sep 2000 14:09:59 EDT	82 lines
RE: Definition of capitalism?	Steve	Sat, 16 Sep 2000 11:43:48 -0700 (PDT)	42 lines
Re: Marketing tangent around the "Definition of capitalism" argument?	Steve	Sat, 16 Sep 2000 11:46:40 -0700 (PDT)	38 lines
Re: Definition of capitalism?	Steve	Sat, 16 Sep 2000 11:56:52 -0700 (PDT)	89 lines
Re: Marketing tangent around the "Definition of capitalism" argument?	Steve	Sat, 16 Sep 2000 12:03:00 -0700 (PDT)	60 lines
RE: Marketing tangent around the "Definition of capitalism" argument?	Steve	Sat, 16 Sep 2000 22:19:03 -0700 (PDT)	78 lines
Re: Marketing tangent around the "Definition of capitalism" argument?	Steve	Sat, 16 Sep 2000 22:23:52 -0700 (PDT)	126 lines
Re: Marketing tangent around the "Definition of capitalism" argument?	<>	Sun, 17 Sep 2000 10:50:56 GMT	118 lines
Re: Marketing tangent around the "Definition of capitalism" argument?	John Foster	Sun, 17 Sep 2000 04:43:17 -0700	98 lines
RE: Marketing tangent around the "Definition of capitalism" argument?	Steven Bissell	Sun, 17 Sep 2000 08:19:41 -0600	43 lines
Re: Marketing tangent around the "Definition of capitalism" argument?	<>	Sun, 17 Sep 2000 11:06:41 EDT	43 lines
Marx on Capitalism & Ecology	John Foster	Sun, 17 Sep 2000 09:28:18 -0700	47 lines
Cap. Accumulation as an Ecological Process	John Foster	Sun, 17 Sep 2000 10:05:30 -0700	106 lines
I was eating at McDonalds...	Karin Susan Fester	Sun, 17 Sep 2000 19:59:53 +0200	26 lines
Re: Marketing tangent around the "Definition of capitalism" argument?	Steve	Sun, 17 Sep 2000 13:00:42 -0700 (PDT)	140 lines
Re: I was eating at McDonalds...	Steve	Sun, 17 Sep 2000 13:04:35 -0700 (PDT)	48 lines
Marquez and Big Macs	Chris Hope	Mon, 18 Sep 2000 09:02:13 +0100	46 lines
Can there be sustainability in capitalist society?	Paul Kirby	Mon, 18 Sep 2000 11:48:38 +0100	67 lines
RE: Marquez and Big Macs	Steven Bissell	Mon, 18 Sep 2000 07:14:45 -0600	106 lines
RE: Marketing tangent around the "Definition of capitalism" argument?	emma fieldhouse	Mon, 18 Sep 2000 13:55:27 GMT	118 lines
Re: Marketing tangent around the "Definition of capitalism" argument?	emma fieldhouse	Mon, 18 Sep 2000 14:08:41 GMT	54 lines
Re: Marketing tangent around the "Definition of capitalism" argument?	emma fieldhouse	Mon, 18 Sep 2000 14:26:53 GMT	52 lines
Re: Marketing tangent around the "Definition of capitalism" argument?	<>	Mon, 18 Sep 2000 10:52:13 EDT	83 lines
Re: Marketing tangent around the "Definition of capitalism" argument?	<>	Mon, 18 Sep 2000 10:52:17 EDT	83 lines
Re: Marketing tangent around the "Definition of capitalism" argument?	<>	Mon, 18 Sep 2000 10:52:20 EDT	83 lines
RE: Marquez and Big Macs	John Foster	Mon, 18 Sep 2000 07:53:47 -0700	69 lines
RE: Marquez and Big Macs	emma fieldhouse	Mon, 18 Sep 2000 14:54:06 GMT	40 lines
Compost Heaps May Hold Solution	Maynard S. Clark	Mon, 18 Sep 2000 11:13:22 -0400	145 lines
Burgers and High Heels	Paul Kirby	Mon, 18 Sep 2000 16:34:31 +0100	26 lines
RE: Marquez and Big Macs	Steven Bissell	Mon, 18 Sep 2000 11:03:34 -0600	68 lines
Re: Marketing tangent around the "Definition of capitalism" argument?	Steve	Mon, 18 Sep 2000 10:28:10 -0700 (PDT)	92 lines
Re: Marketing tangent around the "Definition of capitalism" argument?	Steve	Mon, 18 Sep 2000 10:29:49 -0700 (PDT)	86 lines
Fwd: McDonalds	Jim Tantillo	Mon, 18 Sep 2000 19:50:28 -0500	150 lines
news on Sony "global offensive" against environmentalist	Michael Meuser	Tue, 19 Sep 2000 03:04:35 -0000	157 lines
follow up to sony issue	Michael Meuser	Tue, 19 Sep 2000 03:05:25 -0000	187 lines
Re: Fwd: McDonalds	Paul Kirby	Tue, 19 Sep 2000 10:43:01 +0100	30 lines
Re: Marketing tangent around the "Definition of capitalism" argument?	emma fieldhouse	Tue, 19 Sep 2000 11:00:31 GMT	120 lines
Re: Fwd: McDonalds	emma fieldhouse	Tue, 19 Sep 2000 11:08:13 GMT	171 lines
Re: Marketing tangent around the "Definition of capitalism" argument?	Steve	Tue, 19 Sep 2000 09:11:57 -0700 (PDT)	46 lines
More on MacDonald's	Jim Tantillo	Tue, 19 Sep 2000 17:09:09 -0500	31 lines
Illegal GE Corn Found in Taco Shells	John Foster	Tue, 19 Sep 2000 17:11:39 -0700	188 lines
Re: Illegal GE Corn Found in Taco Shells	William J. McKinney, Ph.D.	Wed, 20 Sep 2000 09:26:18 -0500	210 lines
RE: Illegal GE Corn Found in Taco Shells	Steven Bissell	Wed, 20 Sep 2000 08:38:25 -0600	228 lines
Guidelines for posting to Enviroethics	David Pearson	Wed, 20 Sep 2000 15:45:31 +0100	32 lines
RE: Illegal GE Corn Found in Taco Shells	Steve	Wed, 20 Sep 2000 09:29:28 -0700 (PDT)	256 lines
RE: Illegal GE Corn Found in Taco Shells	William J. McKinney, Ph.D.	Wed, 20 Sep 2000 11:34:05 -0500	247 lines
RE: Illegal GE Corn Found in Taco Shells	Steven Bissell	Wed, 20 Sep 2000 11:00:25 -0600	51 lines
RE: Illegal GE Corn Found in Taco Shells	William J. McKinney, Ph.D.	Wed, 20 Sep 2000 13:07:02 -0500	34 lines
RE: Illegal GE Corn Found in Taco Shells	John Foster	Wed, 20 Sep 2000 12:11:25 -0700	72 lines
RE: Illegal GE Corn Found in Taco Shells	Steven Bissell	Wed, 20 Sep 2000 15:04:06 -0600	69 lines
What does the precautionary principle mean?	Chris Perley	Thu, 21 Sep 2000 09:08:39 +1200	69 lines
Re: What does the precautionary principle mean?	Steve	Wed, 20 Sep 2000 14:32:01 -0700 (PDT)	116 lines
Re: What does the precautionary principle mean?	John Foster	Wed, 20 Sep 2000 15:13:07 -0700	167 lines
Fwd: What does the precautionary principle mean?	<>	Wed, 20 Sep 2000 20:34:40 EDT	71 lines
The precautionary principal. Onus of proof?	michael	Wed, 20 Sep 2000 19:47:41 -0500	46 lines
RE: What does the precautionary principle mean?	Chris Perley	Thu, 21 Sep 2000 13:31:46 +1200	131 lines
RE: The precautionary principal. Onus of proof?	Chris Perley	Thu, 21 Sep 2000 13:55:34 +1200	83 lines
Precautionary self-defence	Paul Kirby	Thu, 21 Sep 2000 11:16:25 +0100	44 lines
2 positions: Humanities and Philosophy at UCF	Ronnie Hawkins	Thu, 21 Sep 2000 14:51:20 -0400 (EDT)	130 lines
Fwd: ELF action	Jim Tantillo	Thu, 21 Sep 2000 14:58:58 -0500	95 lines
Sustainable Development ONLINE - News & Updates	SD Online	Thu, 21 Sep 2000 16:04:02 -0700	75 lines
FW: What does the precautionary principle mean?	Steven Bissell	Fri, 22 Sep 2000 09:24:47 -0600	46 lines
Re: FW: What does the precautionary principle mean?	Steve	Fri, 22 Sep 2000 12:45:43 -0700 (PDT)	86 lines
RE: FW: What does the precautionary principle mean?	Steven Bissell	Fri, 22 Sep 2000 13:56:30 -0600	39 lines
Re: FW: What does the precautionary principle mean?	Steve	Fri, 22 Sep 2000 14:17:18 -0700 (PDT)	29 lines
RE: FW: What does the precautionary principle mean?	Steve	Fri, 22 Sep 2000 16:37:58 -0700 (PDT)	70 lines
Re: FW: What does the precautionary principle mean?	<>	Fri, 22 Sep 2000 19:43:07 EDT	29 lines
Re: FW: What does the precautionary principle mean?	Steve	Fri, 22 Sep 2000 18:20:54 -0700 (PDT)	48 lines
RE: FW: What does the precautionary principle mean?	Chris Perley	Sat, 23 Sep 2000 19:23:59 +1200	27 lines
RE: FW: What does the precautionary principle mean?	Steven Bissell	Sat, 23 Sep 2000 07:42:48 -0600	58 lines
RE: FW: What does the precautionary principle mean?	michael	Sat, 23 Sep 2000 20:00:29 -0500	38 lines
Sustainability Principles	John Foster	Sat, 23 Sep 2000 20:47:18 -0700	212 lines
RE: FW: What does the precautionary principle mean?	Steve	Sun, 24 Sep 2000 11:08:57 -0700 (PDT)	77 lines
Re: FW: What does the precautionary principle mean?	<>	Mon, 25 Sep 2000 19:05:07 EDT	37 lines
Multifuncional Landscapes Conference - October 2000	Baerbel Tress	Tue, 26 Sep 2000 12:19:03 +0200	123 lines
More good environmental news. . . .	Jim Tantillo	Tue, 26 Sep 2000 09:22:48 -0500	24 lines
Sustainability Principles	John Foster	Tue, 26 Sep 2000 09:43:55 -0700	239 lines
Sustainability Principles	John Foster	Tue, 26 Sep 2000 09:48:31 -0700	28 lines
Re: FW: What does the precautionary principle mean?	Steve	Tue, 26 Sep 2000 12:56:42 -0700 (PDT)	39 lines
Any Cultural Creatures out there?	Chris Perley	Thu, 28 Sep 2000 18:53:45 +1200	215 lines
RE: Genetically Modified Crop Trials - On-line Discussion.	John Gray	Thu, 28 Sep 2000 13:11:18 +0100	41 lines
Re: More good environmental news. . . .	Adam Gottschalk	Thu, 28 Sep 2000 16:44:42 -0400	75 lines
Re: More good environmental news. . . .	John Foster	Fri, 29 Sep 2000 04:49:51 -0700	80 lines
Re: California gnatcatcher	John Foster	Fri, 29 Sep 2000 06:29:47 -0700	102 lines
RU 486	Ronnie Hawkins	Fri, 29 Sep 2000 09:32:38 -0400 (EDT)	29 lines
Re: More good environmental news. . . .	John Foster	Fri, 29 Sep 2000 06:46:52 -0700	114 lines
California gnatcatcher	Jim Tantillo	Fri, 29 Sep 2000 08:56:28 -0500	82 lines
Re: More good environmental news. . . .	Jim Tantillo	Fri, 29 Sep 2000 09:18:26 -0500	57 lines
Bats and the precautionary principle	Jim Tantillo	Fri, 29 Sep 2000 15:46:44 -0500	135 lines
Re: Bats and the precautionary principle	John Foster	Sat, 30 Sep 2000 07:29:42 -0700	142 lines
Re: Bats and the precautionary principle	John Foster	Sat, 30 Sep 2000 18:58:02 -0700	60 lines
Announcement: 2001 Interdisciplinary Environmental Association Conference / San Francisco - California, USA / July 2-4	Maynard S. Clark	Sun, 01 Oct 2000 10:35:28 -0400	40 lines
Making figures suit a purpose - Fifty percent of what?	Chris Perley	Sun, 1 Oct 2000 17:17:44 +1300	55 lines
Grizzly bears and the precautionary principle	Jim Tantillo	Sun, 1 Oct 2000 15:15:20 -0500	57 lines
(no subject)	<>	Sun, 1 Oct 2000 19:02:55 EDT	40 lines
gnatcatcher update	Jim Tantillo	Tue, 3 Oct 2000 09:09:26 -0500	41 lines
Ethics as biocentric, and elections, and law	Maynard S. Clark	Tue, 03 Oct 2000 15:01:30 -0400	77 lines
Crops for Sustainable Enterprise - Free report	SD Online	Tue, 3 Oct 2000 14:26:08 -0700	99 lines
Equity and the Environment (Conference)	David Pearson	Wed, 04 Oct 2000 13:40:32 +0100	107 lines
Ecological Aesthetics Sources and Bibliography	Andrey PAVLOV	Wed, 04 Oct 2000 18:29:55 +0400	39 lines
Bat article update	Jim Tantillo	Wed, 4 Oct 2000 20:38:40 -0500	106 lines
More environmental good news	Jim Tantillo	Thu, 5 Oct 2000 22:13:23 -0500	21 lines
RE: National Parks in Scotland - Lessons from Elsewhere.	John Gray	Fri, 6 Oct 2000 12:25:51 +0100	52 lines
Fwd: JOB: Ethics & Agricultural Biotechnology	Jim Tantillo	Fri, 6 Oct 2000 08:07:09 -0500	137 lines
JOB: Ethics & Agricultural Biotechnology	Maynard S. Clark	Fri, 06 Oct 2000 13:53:27 -0400	143 lines
The Ethics of Primate Cannibalism [Fwd: African primate extinction]	Ted Mosquin	Sat, 07 Oct 2000 11:57:08 -0400	111 lines
Re: The Ethics of Primate Cannibalism	Paul Kirby	Mon, 09 Oct 2000 13:25:24 +0100	41 lines
Re: The Ethics of Primate Cannibalism	John Foster	Mon, 9 Oct 2000 08:09:48 -0700	73 lines
Re: The Ethics of Primate Cannibalism	Adam Gottschalk	Mon, 09 Oct 2000 11:22:31 -0400	41 lines
1000+ links available at SD ONLINE - Download free report	SD Online	Mon, 9 Oct 2000 09:34:52 -0700	117 lines
Re: The Ethics of Primate Cannibalism	Jim Tantillo	Mon, 9 Oct 2000 12:17:28 -0500	300 lines
Re: The Ethics of Primate Cannibalism	michael	Mon, 9 Oct 2000 19:50:59 -0500	38 lines
Re: The Ethics of Primate Cannibalism	John Foster	Mon, 9 Oct 2000 21:47:38 -0700	75 lines
US Presidential Candidate Ralph Nader VEGETARIAN	Vegetarian Resource Center	Tue, 10 Oct 2000 01:51:38 -0400	277 lines
Enviroethics - temporary list-owner wanted	David Pearson	Tue, 10 Oct 2000 13:49:14 +0100	45 lines
Re: The Ethics of Primate Cannibalism	Paul Kirby	Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:08:21 +0100	52 lines
[Fwd: Bushmeat Crisis Task Force Internship]	David Pearson	Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:37:17 +0100	72 lines
Bushmeat Crisis Article and Questions	John Foster	Mon, 10 Oct 2000 07:55:42 -0700	74 lines
Re: Bushmeat Crisis Article and Questions	Ronnie Hawkins	Tue, 10 Oct 2000 15:11:34 -0400 (EDT)	55 lines
Invitation	Brian Czech	Tue, 10 Oct 2000 21:07:20 -0700	26 lines
Re: Bushmeat Crisis Article and Questions	John Foster	Mon, 11 Oct 2000 08:08:58 -0700	86 lines
Conference Designed to Facilitate those attempting t oCarry out Overseas Research	David Pearson	Thu, 12 Oct 2000 14:30:44 +0100	132 lines
Re: European Environmental Education Newsletter	Prof. Walter Leal Filho	Thu, 12 Oct 2000 18:32:41 +0200	22 lines
FW: NSF Research Opportunities	Hollander, Rachelle	Thu, 12 Oct 2000 17:24:16 -0400	45 lines
Ethics and the species question	Steven Bissell	Fri, 13 Oct 2000 08:31:03 -0600	48 lines
FW: [ihea] Sharing of a Presentation at the 2000 Premier's Sympos ium on North America's Hunting Heritage.	Steven Bissell	Fri, 13 Oct 2000 08:53:58 -0600	638 lines
Re: Ethics and the species question	sarahshobrook	Fri, 13 Oct 2000 16:57:06 +0100	81 lines
Re: Ethics and the species question	Paul Kirby	Fri, 13 Oct 2000 16:58:28 +0100	46 lines
Re: Ethics and the species question	Adam Gottschalk	Fri, 13 Oct 2000 12:43:21 -0400	68 lines
RE: Ethics and the species question	Steven Bissell	Fri, 13 Oct 2000 10:46:06 -0600	101 lines
RE: Ethics and the species question	Steven Bissell	Fri, 13 Oct 2000 10:46:09 -0600	43 lines
Re: Ethics and the species question	David Pearson	Fri, 13 Oct 2000 17:52:51 +0100	45 lines
RE: Ethics and the species question	Steven Bissell	Fri, 13 Oct 2000 10:59:48 -0600	66 lines
Re: Ethics and the species question	David Pearson	Fri, 13 Oct 2000 18:18:11 +0100	51 lines
Re: Ethics and the species question	Adam Gottschalk	Fri, 13 Oct 2000 13:37:21 -0400	39 lines
Re: Ethics and the species question	David Pearson	Fri, 13 Oct 2000 18:55:56 +0100	65 lines
Re: Ethics and the species question	<>	Fri, 13 Oct 2000 14:57:09 EDT	66 lines
RE: Ethics and the species question	Steven Bissell	Fri, 13 Oct 2000 13:52:37 -0600	94 lines
Re: Ethics and the species question	Steve	Fri, 13 Oct 2000 14:52:40 -0700 (PDT)	63 lines
Re: Ethics and the species question	Steve	Fri, 13 Oct 2000 15:06:02 -0700 (PDT)	108 lines
Re: Ethics and the species question	Adam Gottschalk	Fri, 13 Oct 2000 18:25:10 -0400	56 lines
RE: Ethics and the species question	Steven Bissell	Fri, 13 Oct 2000 17:09:46 -0600	85 lines
Re: Ethics and the species question	Adam Gottschalk	Fri, 13 Oct 2000 19:54:15 -0400	50 lines
Invitation to join e-mail discussion lists	Ernest Rukangira	Sat, 14 Oct 2000 06:55:47 +0300	184 lines
Re: Ethics and the species question	Adam Gottschalk	Sat, 14 Oct 2000 00:16:34 -0400	70 lines
Re: Ethics and the species question	Maynard S. Clark	Sat, 14 Oct 2000 00:42:12 -0400	43 lines
RE: Ethics and the species question	Steven Bissell	Sat, 14 Oct 2000 07:24:48 -0600	78 lines
RE: Ethics and the species question	Steven Bissell	Sat, 14 Oct 2000 07:45:06 -0600	49 lines
Re: Ethics and the species question	Adam Gottschalk	Sat, 14 Oct 2000 19:14:43 -0400	93 lines
Re: Ethics and the species question	Steve	Sat, 14 Oct 2000 21:35:26 -0700 (PDT)	112 lines
Re: Ethics and the species question	Steve	Sat, 14 Oct 2000 21:40:40 -0700 (PDT)	119 lines
RE: Ethics and the species question	Steve	Sat, 14 Oct 2000 21:44:47 -0700 (PDT)	75 lines
Re: Ethics and the species question	Adam Gottschalk	Sun, 15 Oct 2000 01:09:52 -0400	52 lines
Re: Ethics and the species question	Adam Gottschalk	Sun, 15 Oct 2000 01:34:11 -0400	63 lines
Re: Ethics and the species question	Adam Gottschalk	Sun, 15 Oct 2000 01:59:47 -0400	35 lines
Re: Ethics and the species question	spiritwear	Sun, 15 Oct 2000 00:37:59 -0700	25 lines
Re: Ethics and the species question	spiritwear	Sun, 15 Oct 2000 01:49:42 -0700	112 lines
Re: Ethics and the species question	spiritwear	Sun, 15 Oct 2000 02:25:03 -0700	61 lines
RE: Ethics and the species question	Steven Bissell	Sun, 15 Oct 2000 07:26:43 -0600	91 lines
RE: Ethics and the species question	Steven Bissell	Sun, 15 Oct 2000 07:36:52 -0600	43 lines
RE: Ethics and the species question	Steven Bissell	Sun, 15 Oct 2000 07:41:22 -0600	49 lines
Re: Ethics and the species question	Adam Gottschalk	Sun, 15 Oct 2000 18:12:56 -0400	78 lines
Re: Ethics and the species question	Adam Gottschalk	Sun, 15 Oct 2000 18:20:01 -0400	37 lines
RE: Ethics and the species question	Steven Bissell	Sun, 15 Oct 2000 16:59:49 -0600	58 lines
Re: Ethics and the species question	Steve	Sun, 15 Oct 2000 18:19:22 -0700 (PDT)	135 lines
Re: Ethics and the species question	Steve	Sun, 15 Oct 2000 18:20:19 -0700 (PDT)	35 lines
Re: Ethics and the species question	Steve	Sun, 15 Oct 2000 18:28:47 -0700 (PDT)	107 lines
Re: Ethics and the species question	spiritwear	Sun, 15 Oct 2000 18:43:49 -0700	107 lines
Re: Ethics and the species question	<>	Sun, 15 Oct 2000 22:04:28 EDT	52 lines
RE: Ethics and the species question	Maynard S. Clark	Mon, 16 Oct 2000 01:23:13 -0400	127 lines
RE: Ethics and the species question	Steven Bissell	Mon, 16 Oct 2000 06:13:33 -0600	171 lines
RE: Ethics and the species question	Paul Kirby	Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:10:11 +0100	59 lines
RE: Ethics and the species question	John Foster	Mon, 16 Oct 2000 07:33:55 -0700	38 lines
Re: Ethics and the species question	spiritwear	Mon, 16 Oct 2000 09:10:59 -0700	41 lines
RE: Ethics and the species question	Steve	Mon, 16 Oct 2000 09:43:55 -0700 (PDT)	107 lines
RE: Ethics and the species question	Steve	Mon, 16 Oct 2000 09:47:03 -0700 (PDT)	77 lines
Environmental Virtue Ethics - cfp (fwd)	Maynard S. Clark	Tue, 17 Oct 2000 12:32:13 -0400	98 lines
National Ethics Forum, Nov 9-10	Hollander, Rachelle	Wed, 18 Oct 2000 08:32:52 -0400	50 lines
Biotech Kills	Steven Bissell	Sat, 21 Oct 2000 17:09:19 -0600	35 lines
Autopoesis	Steven Bissell	Sat, 21 Oct 2000 17:18:05 -0600	61 lines
Re: Autopoesis	<>	Sun, 22 Oct 2000 11:07:10 +0300 (EET DST)	32 lines
RE: Autopoesis	Steven Bissell	Sun, 22 Oct 2000 08:41:05 -0600	65 lines
RE: Autopoesis	Steven Bissell	Mon, 23 Oct 2000 07:59:03 -0600	100 lines
RE: Autopoesis	Steven Bissell	Mon, 23 Oct 2000 09:01:24 -0600	108 lines
RE: Autopoesis	Jim Tantillo	Mon, 23 Oct 2000 10:45:27 -0500	63 lines
Fwd: Animal Emotions make US News & World Report	Jim Tantillo	Tue, 24 Oct 2000 10:05:14 -0500	15 lines
Fwd: Funded PhD opportunity - extended closing date	Jim Tantillo	Tue, 24 Oct 2000 13:44:35 -0500	53 lines
It's a matter of Potato's	<>	Tue, 24 Oct 2000 20:18:53 EDT	106 lines
Re: Autopoesis	Adam Gottschalk	Wed, 25 Oct 2000 00:44:07 -0400	51 lines
RE: Autopoesis	Steven Bissell	Wed, 25 Oct 2000 12:16:57 -0600	82 lines
Re: Autopoesis	Adam Gottschalk	Wed, 25 Oct 2000 16:42:12 -0400	31 lines
RE: Autopoesis	Steven Bissell	Wed, 25 Oct 2000 15:17:48 -0600	60 lines
RE: Autopoesis	Steven Bissell	Thu, 26 Oct 2000 07:35:07 -0600	72 lines
Re: Autopoesis	Adam Gottschalk	Fri, 27 Oct 2000 11:46:56 -0400	61 lines
Don't eat the corn.	<>	Fri, 27 Oct 2000 13:46:35 EDT	17 lines
RE: Autopoesis	Steven Bissell	Sat, 28 Oct 2000 11:53:52 -0600	98 lines
Re: Autopoesis	Adam Gottschalk	Sun, 29 Oct 2000 11:40:38 -0500	83 lines
RE: Autopoesis	Steven Bissell	Sun, 29 Oct 2000 13:41:08 -0700	146 lines
RE: Entropy as a moral foundation (was Autopoesis)	Steven Bissell	Mon, 30 Oct 2000 09:02:25 -0700	213 lines
Re: Entropy as a moral foundation (was Autopoesis)	Adam Gottschalk	Mon, 30 Oct 2000 12:13:06 -0500	64 lines
RE: Entropy as a moral foundation (was Autopoesis)	Steve	Mon, 30 Oct 2000 15:38:32 -0800 (PST)	37 lines
Re: Entropy as a moral foundation (was Autopoesis)	Steve	Tue, 31 Oct 2000 12:46:54 -0800 (PST)	106 lines
RE: Entropy as a moral foundation (was Autopoesis)	John Foster	Mon, 1 Nov 2000 21:28:07 -0800	254 lines
Graduate Research in Japan, Korea, Taiwan	Hollander, Rachelle	Thu, 2 Nov 2000 14:01:34 -0500	53 lines
CFP and New Journal Announcement	Nigel Laurie	Sat, 4 Nov 2000 16:46:59 -0000	253 lines
CFP New Journal	Nigel Laurie	Mon, 6 Nov 2000 11:01:33 -0000	256 lines
David Brower passed away - 5 November	Maynard S. Clark	Tue, 07 Nov 2000 00:43:35 -0500	125 lines
Too large	Paul Kirby	Tue, 07 Nov 2000 16:07:22 +0000	24 lines
RE: Too large	Ramsy Ayoub	Wed, 8 Nov 2000 13:07:51 +0400	37 lines
Commentary on _Green Political Thought_	Helga Hoffmann	Thu, 09 Nov 2000 13:59:15 -0800	84 lines
Re: What the Internet is for	<>	Sat, 11 Nov 2000 00:17:04 EST	137 lines
Delete Bush as President, let him run Enron, not the US	John Foster	Mon, 10 Nov 2000 23:08:23 -0800	166 lines
Sign International Meatless Day pledge - 11/25/2000	Maynard S. Clark	Sun, 12 Nov 2000 08:35:14 -0500	187 lines
Fwd: 'Striptease for the trees' - USATODAY.com Discussion	Jim Tantillo	Tue, 14 Nov 2000 10:03:38 -0500	299 lines
Re: Fwd: 'Striptease for the trees' - USATODAY.com Discussion	emma fieldhouse	Tue, 14 Nov 2000 15:41:14 GMT	151 lines
Re: Fwd: 'Striptease for the trees' - USATODAY.com Discussion	John Foster	Mon, 14 Nov 2000 16:20:08 -0800	173 lines
Re: Fwd: 'Striptease for the trees' - USATODAY.com Discussion	John Foster	Mon, 14 Nov 2000 16:20:30 -0800	173 lines
Re: Fwd: 'Striptease for the trees' - USATODAY.com Discussion	John Foster	Mon, 14 Nov 2000 16:20:56 -0800	173 lines
RE: 'Striptease for the trees' - USATODAY.com Discussion	Steven Bissell	Wed, 15 Nov 2000 07:48:18 -0700	352 lines
RE: 'Striptease for the trees' - USATODAY.com Discussion	Benjamin S Hale	Wed, 15 Nov 2000 10:18:49 -0500 (EST)	39 lines
RE: 'Striptease for the trees' - USATODAY.com Discussion	Steven Bissell	Wed, 15 Nov 2000 08:33:46 -0700	78 lines
RE: 'Striptease for the trees' - USATODAY.com Discussion	Jim Tantillo	Wed, 15 Nov 2000 10:34:59 -0500	236 lines
RE: 'Striptease for the trees' - USATODAY.com Discussion	John Foster	Tue, 15 Nov 2000 08:54:21 -0800	37 lines
RE: 'Striptease for the trees' - USATODAY.com Discussion	John Foster	Tue, 15 Nov 2000 09:02:17 -0800	32 lines
Re: 'Striptease for the trees' - USATODAY.com Discussion	spiritwear	Wed, 15 Nov 2000 09:52:48 -0800	60 lines
RE: 'Striptease for the trees' - USATODAY.com Discussion	Jim Tantillo	Wed, 15 Nov 2000 12:59:17 -0500	54 lines
RE: 'Striptease for the trees' - USATODAY.com Discussion	Benjamin S Hale	Wed, 15 Nov 2000 14:06:34 -0500 (EST)	38 lines
RE: 'Striptease for the trees' - USATODAY.com Discussion	Jim Tantillo	Wed, 15 Nov 2000 14:37:52 -0500	76 lines
Suspect motivations, was RE: 'Striptease for the trees'	Jim Tantillo	Wed, 15 Nov 2000 15:07:24 -0500	89 lines
RE: 'Striptease for the trees' - USATODAY.com Discussion	Steven Bissell	Wed, 15 Nov 2000 13:56:47 -0700	55 lines
RE: 'Striptease for the trees' - ad hominen counter	John Foster	Tue, 15 Nov 2000 15:04:59 -0800	96 lines
SD ONLINE, Extensive free resources in support of Sustainable Development	SD Online	Wed, 15 Nov 2000 16:24:23 -0800	54 lines
RE: 'Striptease for the trees' - USATODAY.com Discussion	emma fieldhouse	Thu, 16 Nov 2000 14:32:45 GMT	97 lines
NSF Research Opportunity	Hollander, Rachelle	Fri, 17 Nov 2000 09:38:12 -0500	104 lines
The Soul Solution	John Foster	Fri, 17 Nov 2000 09:30:39 -0800	73 lines
The Dalmation and the firetruck	John Foster	Fri, 17 Nov 2000 11:01:56 -0800	30 lines
RE: The Soul Solution	Jeri Pollock	Sun, 19 Nov 2000 06:55:53 -0800	93 lines
Re: Too large	Andrew Jameton	Sun, 19 Nov 2000 09:57:05 -0600	48 lines
help me	<>	Sun, 19 Nov 2000 23:53:14 EST	17 lines
Enviroethics - how to unsubscribe, etc.	David Pearson	Mon, 20 Nov 2000 13:10:28 +0000	40 lines
FW: GE 2 - chickens run amok	Steven Bissell	Mon, 20 Nov 2000 08:42:31 -0700	177 lines
RE: The Soul Solution	John Foster	Mon, 20 Nov 2000 12:53:18 -0800	107 lines
Re: GE 2 - chickens run amok	John Foster	Mon, 20 Nov 2000 12:53:28 -0800	217 lines
RE: GE 2 - chickens run amok	Steven Bissell	Mon, 20 Nov 2000 14:17:46 -0700	258 lines
RE: GE 2 - chickens run amok	John Foster	Mon, 20 Nov 2000 14:23:56 -0800	296 lines
Ethical grounds for concern over Bt use {GE Chickens Run Amuk}	John Foster	Mon, 20 Nov 2000 15:16:05 -0800	385 lines
RE: GE 2 - chickens run amok	Chiaviello, Anthony	Mon, 20 Nov 2000 17:16:52 -0600	248 lines
RE: GE 2 - chickens run amok	John Foster	Mon, 20 Nov 2000 15:22:07 -0800	280 lines
RE: GE 2 - chickens run amok	John Foster	Mon, 20 Nov 2000 16:25:15 -0800	257 lines
Publication available re: Earth Summit 2002	David Pearson	Tue, 21 Nov 2000 12:27:13 +0000	46 lines
RE: GE 2 - chickens run amok	Steven Bissell	Tue, 21 Nov 2000 07:13:00 -0700	273 lines
RE: GE 2 - chickens run amok	Chiaviello, Anthony	Tue, 21 Nov 2000 09:32:16 -0600	338 lines
RE: GE 2 - chickens run amok	John Foster	Tue, 21 Nov 2000 11:42:58 -0800	203 lines
Panelists Needed for NSF Information Technology Research Program! !!	Hollander, Rachelle	Tue, 21 Nov 2000 16:17:43 -0500	54 lines
Shaw On Life	<>	Tue, 21 Nov 2000 14:20:21 -0800	34 lines
Life: Studies in Words	<>	Tue, 21 Nov 2000 14:20:25 -0800	180 lines
Re: Shaw On Life	<>	Tue, 21 Nov 2000 19:41:34 EST	44 lines
Re: Shaw On Life	John Foster	Tue, 21 Nov 2000 17:47:28 -0800	67 lines
Re: Shaw On Life	<>	Tue, 21 Nov 2000 22:44:18 EST	107 lines
Ethical Energy Investing Article {was Shaw On Life}	John Foster	Tue, 21 Nov 2000 20:46:11 -0800	267 lines
RE: Ethical Energy Investing Article {was Shaw On Life}	Ramsy Ayoub	Wed, 22 Nov 2000 11:57:20 +0400	324 lines
Re: Ethical Investing article.	<>	Wed, 22 Nov 2000 08:42:54 EST	413 lines
RE: Shaw On Life	Steven Bissell	Wed, 22 Nov 2000 07:45:49 -0700	57 lines
carbon sinks re: Kyoto talks	Steven Bissell	Wed, 22 Nov 2000 07:55:57 -0700	17 lines
Re: carbon sinks re: Kyoto talks	<>	Wed, 22 Nov 2000 12:22:47 EST	29 lines
US & Canada Win "Fossil" Award at UN Climate Summit	John Foster	Wed, 22 Nov 2000 10:02:50 -0800	80 lines
re: Carbon Sinks re: Kyoto talks	<>	Wed, 22 Nov 2000 13:16:58 EST	14 lines
Re: US & Canada Win "Fossil" Award at UN Climate Summit	<>	Wed, 22 Nov 2000 13:44:26 EST	85 lines
Re: US & Canada Win "Fossil" Award at UN Climate Summit	John Foster	Wed, 22 Nov 2000 11:09:08 -0800	67 lines
Kyoto and Carbon	<>	Wed, 22 Nov 2000 14:18:11 EST	16 lines
Global Warming	Steve	Sat, 25 Nov 2000 00:41:41 -0800	36 lines
Kyoto Delagations.	<>	Sat, 25 Nov 2000 15:42:47 EST	39 lines
Kyoto Delegations.	<>	Sat, 25 Nov 2000 15:52:10 EST	45 lines
Enviroethics: changes in list operation (KEEP THIS EMAIL!)	David Pearson	Mon, 27 Nov 2000 14:41:02 +0000	76 lines
Starlink Corn Comments	Michael Meuser	Mon, 27 Nov 2000 19:25:33 -0000	45 lines
Global Warming Article	Steve	Mon, 27 Nov 2000 11:50:19 -0800	74 lines
Re: Global Warming Article	<>	Mon, 27 Nov 2000 18:46:48 EST	23 lines
Re: Global Warming	John Foster	Mon, 27 Nov 2000 16:45:33 -0800	95 lines
Re: Global Warming	John Foster	Mon, 27 Nov 2000 16:59:47 -0800	70 lines
Re: Global Warming	Steve	Tue, 28 Nov 2000 09:47:11 -0800	146 lines
Re: Global Warming	Steve	Tue, 28 Nov 2000 09:58:41 -0800	131 lines
Re: Global Warming	John Foster	Tue, 28 Nov 2000 12:12:06 -0800	32 lines
Re: Global Warming	John Foster	Tue, 28 Nov 2000 12:19:42 -0800	151 lines
NOAA global warming report	Michael Meuser	Tue, 28 Nov 2000 23:55:37 -0000	38 lines
Ethical Credits?	Michael Meuser	Wed, 29 Nov 2000 00:06:14 -0000	142 lines
Re: Global Warming	Steve	Tue, 28 Nov 2000 22:53:18 -0800	67 lines
Re: Global Warming	Steve	Tue, 28 Nov 2000 23:37:54 -0800	90 lines
biotecheffect	Michael Meuser	Wed, 29 Nov 2000 15:54:00 -0000	50 lines
Re: Global Warming	John Foster	Wed, 29 Nov 2000 09:28:05 -0800	123 lines
Monsanto Promises to back off GE foods	John Foster	Wed, 29 Nov 2000 11:08:14 -0800	959 lines
Re: Global Warming	Steve	Wed, 29 Nov 2000 13:19:16 -0800	51 lines
Re: Global Warming	John Foster	Wed, 29 Nov 2000 15:25:08 -0800	57 lines
Re: Global Warming	John Foster	Wed, 29 Nov 2000 16:08:06 -0800	51 lines
Re: Global Warming	Steve	Thu, 30 Nov 2000 07:40:31 -0800	63 lines
Re: Global Warming	John Foster	Thu, 30 Nov 2000 08:27:00 -0800	23 lines
Re: Global Warming	<>	Thu, 30 Nov 2000 12:56:33 EST	41 lines
Re: Global Warming	Michael Meuser	Thu, 30 Nov 2000 19:07:28 -0000	51 lines
Re: Global Warming	John Foster	Thu, 30 Nov 2000 12:24:10 -0800	114 lines
Re: Global Warming	Steve	Thu, 30 Nov 2000 12:26:01 -0800	103 lines
Re: Branding seal pups for research	Steve	Thu, 30 Nov 2000 12:28:27 -0800	27 lines
Re: Global Warming	Steve	Thu, 30 Nov 2000 12:29:49 -0800	35 lines
Re: Global Warming	Steve	Thu, 30 Nov 2000 12:30:57 -0800	34 lines
Re: Global Warming	John Foster	Thu, 30 Nov 2000 13:27:30 -0800	25 lines
Unsubscribe	Jamie Porras	Thu, 30 Nov 2000 17:28:48 -0600	13 lines
Re: Global Warming	Steve	Thu, 30 Nov 2000 15:49:25 -0800	183 lines
Re: Global Warming	Steve	Thu, 30 Nov 2000 15:51:45 -0800	34 lines
Re: Global Warming	John Foster	Thu, 30 Nov 2000 17:45:26 -0800	92 lines
Old Forests Needed for Carbon Storage	John Foster	Thu, 30 Nov 2000 22:12:48 -0800	36 lines
Re: Global Warming	John Foster	Thu, 30 Nov 2000 22:20:34 -0800	117 lines
Branding seal pups for research	Chris Perley	Fri, 1 Dec 2000 09:08:23 +1300	37 lines
Re: Global Warming	Michael Meuser	Fri, 1 Dec 2000 14:30:40 -0000	117 lines
Re: Global Warming	Michael Meuser	Fri, 1 Dec 2000 14:39:51 -0000	75 lines
Re: Global Warming	Michael Meuser	Fri, 1 Dec 2000 15:30:10 -0000	23 lines
Re: Global Warming	Steve	Fri, 1 Dec 2000 09:35:15 -0800	103 lines
Re: Global Warming	Steve	Fri, 1 Dec 2000 10:46:04 -0800	100 lines
Re: Global Warming	Michael Meuser	Fri, 1 Dec 2000 19:13:29 -0000	143 lines
Arctic Warming	John Foster	Fri, 1 Dec 2000 11:33:27 -0800	89 lines
Re: Global Warming	John Foster	Fri, 1 Dec 2000 11:33:40 -0800	147 lines
Re: Global Warming	John Foster	Fri, 1 Dec 2000 14:58:46 -0800	21 lines
Re: Global Warming	Steve	Fri, 1 Dec 2000 16:04:54 -0800	161 lines
Re: Arctic Warming	Steve	Fri, 1 Dec 2000 16:32:22 -0800	149 lines
Re: Global Warming	Steve	Fri, 1 Dec 2000 16:50:03 -0800	147 lines
This is what democracy looks like!	Michael Meuser	Sat, 2 Dec 2000 01:10:57 -0000	20 lines
Re: Global Warming	Michael Meuser	Sat, 2 Dec 2000 01:28:52 -0000	64 lines
Re: Old Forests Needed for Carbon Storage	<>	Fri, 1 Dec 2000 20:34:50 EST	165 lines
Re: Global Warming	John Foster	Fri, 1 Dec 2000 22:03:47 -0800	146 lines
Re: Old Forests Needed for Carbon Storage	John Foster	Fri, 1 Dec 2000 22:07:07 -0800	62 lines
Re: Global Warming	John Foster	Fri, 1 Dec 2000 23:19:46 -0800	52 lines
Arctic Warming in Churchill	John Foster	Sat, 2 Dec 2000 00:59:17 -0800	58 lines
Re: Global Warming	John Foster	Sat, 2 Dec 2000 01:31:02 -0800	71 lines
APA in New York	Benjamin S Hale	Sat, 2 Dec 2000 05:30:13 -0500	28 lines
Re: Global Warming	Paul Kirby	Sat, 2 Dec 2000 13:21:33 +0000	25 lines
Re: Old Forests Needed for Carbon Storage	Chris Perley	Sat, 2 Dec 2000 13:32:13 +1300	136 lines
Re: Global Warming	Ted Mosquin	Sat, 2 Dec 2000 08:37:10 -0500	22 lines
Re: Old Forests Needed for Carbon Storage	Chris Perley	Sat, 2 Dec 2000 15:42:03 +1300	65 lines
Arctic Warming	John Foster	Sat, 2 Dec 2000 12:20:04 -0800	89 lines
Re: Old Forests Needed for Carbon Storage	John Foster	Sat, 2 Dec 2000 18:10:57 -0800	87 lines
Re: Old Forests Needed for Carbon Storage	John Foster	Sat, 2 Dec 2000 18:11:02 -0800	65 lines
Re: Old Forests Needed for Carbon Storage	John Foster	Sat, 2 Dec 2000 18:26:23 -0800	46 lines
Re: Old Forests Needed for Carbon Storage	John Foster	Sat, 2 Dec 2000 23:52:52 -0800	59 lines
Re: Old Forests Needed for Carbon Storage	John Foster	Sun, 3 Dec 2000 00:06:06 -0800	33 lines
Re: Old Forests Needed for Carbon Storage	Chris Perley	Sun, 3 Dec 2000 12:14:45 +1300	250 lines
A cheerier line of thought on GW	Andrew Jameton	Sun, 3 Dec 2000 09:35:06 -0600	58 lines
Re: Old Forests Needed for Carbon Storage	John Foster	Sun, 3 Dec 2000 09:02:23 -0800	57 lines
Re: Old Forests Needed for Carbon Storage	John Foster	Sun, 3 Dec 2000 10:05:31 -0800	88 lines
Non-wood homes	John Foster	Sun, 3 Dec 2000 11:48:01 -0800	202 lines
Re: Old Forests Needed for Carbon Storage	John Foster	Sun, 3 Dec 2000 11:48:10 -0800	44 lines
Re: Old Forests Needed for Carbon Storage	John Foster	Sun, 3 Dec 2000 12:13:17 -0800	31 lines
Re: Old Forests Needed for Carbon Storage	Chris Perley	Sun, 3 Dec 2000 20:18:18 +1300	53 lines
Re: Old Forests Needed for Carbon Storage	Chris Perley	Sun, 3 Dec 2000 20:37:59 +1300	141 lines
Re: Non-wood homes	John Foster	Sun, 3 Dec 2000 15:00:55 -0800	200 lines
Re: Old Forests Needed for Carbon Storage	Chris Perley	Mon, 4 Dec 2000 02:24:04 +1300	98 lines
Re: Old Forests Needed for Carbon Storage	Chris Perley	Mon, 4 Dec 2000 08:28:50 +1300	84 lines
Re: Non-wood homes	Chris Perley	Mon, 4 Dec 2000 10:30:43 +1300	225 lines
Enviroethics list - possible problems and errors	David Pearson	Mon, 4 Dec 2000 17:08:44 +0000	34 lines
Re: Global Warming	Steve	Mon, 4 Dec 2000 09:17:24 -0800	104 lines
Re: Global Warming	Steve	Mon, 4 Dec 2000 09:26:57 -0800	79 lines
Re: Arctic Warming in Churchill	Steve	Mon, 4 Dec 2000 09:41:33 -0800	107 lines
Re: Global Warming	Steve	Mon, 4 Dec 2000 09:44:07 -0800	51 lines
Re: A cheerier line of thought on GW	Chiaviello, Anthony	Mon, 4 Dec 2000 13:07:15 -0600	43 lines
Re: Global Warming	<>	Mon, 4 Dec 2000 16:53:23 EST	22 lines
Fwd: Fw: 2nd Global Conference 0n Evil and Human Wickedness - Call for Papers	Jim Tantillo	Tue, 5 Dec 2000 13:43:35 -0500	89 lines
Re: Arctic Warming in Churchill	John Foster	Tue, 5 Dec 2000 21:41:38 -0800	41 lines
Fear In the Fields: Seattle Times	John Foster	Tue, 5 Dec 2000 21:57:41 -0800	20 lines
Re: Arctic Warming in Churchill	John Foster	Tue, 5 Dec 2000 22:20:22 -0800	50 lines
Re: Arctic Warming in Churchill	Steve	Wed, 6 Dec 2000 09:46:19 -0800	61 lines
Re: Arctic Warming in Churchill	John Foster	Wed, 6 Dec 2000 10:06:26 -0800	17 lines
Re: Arctic Warming in Churchill	Steve	Wed, 6 Dec 2000 10:35:04 -0800	107 lines
Re: Arctic Warming in Churchill	John Foster	Wed, 6 Dec 2000 11:37:26 -0800	50 lines
Re: Arctic Warming in Churchill	Steve	Wed, 6 Dec 2000 21:48:11 -0800	124 lines
Re: For the curiosity bound in theories of global warming.	<>	Thu, 7 Dec 2000 11:59:50 EST	73 lines
Chaos	John Foster	Thu, 7 Dec 2000 09:26:28 -0800	127 lines
Re: Renewable Energy	Michael Meuser	Thu, 7 Dec 2000 19:48:16 -0000	64 lines
Re: Renewable Energy - oops	Michael Meuser	Thu, 7 Dec 2000 19:56:11 -0000	17 lines
Renewable Energy	John Foster	Thu, 7 Dec 2000 12:04:04 -0800	60 lines
Re: Renewable Energy	John Foster	Thu, 7 Dec 2000 13:47:02 -0800	46 lines
Re: Renewable Energy	Chris Perley	Fri, 8 Dec 2000 09:30:35 +1300	26 lines
fwd: ECOTERRORISTS STRIKE LONG ISLAND CONSTRUCTION SITE	Jim Tantillo	Fri, 8 Dec 2000 08:26:30 -0500	52 lines
Re: fwd: ECOTERRORISTS STRIKE LONG ISLAND CONSTRUCTION SITE	emma fieldhouse	Fri, 8 Dec 2000 13:52:45 -0000	70 lines
Re: Renewable Energy	Michael Meuser	Fri, 8 Dec 2000 14:41:08 -0000	69 lines
Re: ECOTERRORISTS STRIKE LONG ISLAND CONSTRUCTION SITE	Steven Bissell	Fri, 8 Dec 2000 08:26:25 -0700	83 lines
FW: global warming, energy, ethics	Steven Bissell	Fri, 8 Dec 2000 08:43:14 -0700	73 lines
global warming, energy, ethics	John Foster	Fri, 8 Dec 2000 08:14:26 -0800	129 lines
Re: Arctic Warming in Churchill	Steve	Fri, 8 Dec 2000 09:27:49 -0800	33 lines
Re: Renewable Energy	Steve	Fri, 8 Dec 2000 09:37:23 -0800	66 lines
Re: Renewable Energy	Steve	Fri, 8 Dec 2000 09:44:57 -0800	54 lines
Re: Arctic Warming in Churchill	John Foster	Fri, 8 Dec 2000 09:51:01 -0800	38 lines
Fwd: Hunt ban within a year - Telegraph latest	Jim Tantillo	Fri, 8 Dec 2000 13:46:11 -0500	86 lines
Re: Renewable Energy	John Foster	Fri, 8 Dec 2000 11:03:50 -0800	99 lines
Re: Renewable Energy	John Foster	Fri, 8 Dec 2000 11:03:55 -0800	50 lines
Re: Renewable Energy	John Foster	Fri, 8 Dec 2000 11:33:14 -0800	92 lines
Re: Renewable Energy	Steve	Fri, 8 Dec 2000 13:41:47 -0800	160 lines
Re: ECOTERRORISTS STRIKE LONG ISLAND CONSTRUCTION SITE	Chiaviello, Anthony	Fri, 8 Dec 2000 15:52:10 -0600	77 lines
Re: Renewable Energy	Steve	Fri, 8 Dec 2000 13:54:10 -0800	104 lines
Re: ECOTERRORISTS STRIKE LONG ISLAND CONSTRUCTION SITE	Chiaviello, Anthony	Fri, 8 Dec 2000 16:00:50 -0600	121 lines
Re: Renewable Energy	Steve	Fri, 8 Dec 2000 15:07:38 -0800	137 lines
Re: ECOTERRORISTS STRIKE LONG ISLAND CONSTRUCTION SITE	Steven Bissell	Fri, 8 Dec 2000 16:10:18 -0700	140 lines
Re: ECOTERRORISTS STRIKE LONG ISLAND CONSTRUCTION SITE	Chiaviello, Anthony	Fri, 8 Dec 2000 17:18:31 -0600	177 lines
Direct Action and violence	Steven Bissell	Fri, 8 Dec 2000 16:25:20 -0700	32 lines
Re: ECOTERRORISTS STRIKE LONG ISLAND CONSTRUCTION SITE	Steven Bissell	Fri, 8 Dec 2000 16:25:21 -0700	192 lines
Dec. 8th Day-Ahead Electricity Prices for California	Steve	Fri, 8 Dec 2000 15:27:43 -0800	33 lines
Re: ECOTERRORISTS STRIKE LONG ISLAND CONSTRUCTION SITE	Chiaviello, Anthony	Fri, 8 Dec 2000 17:36:10 -0600	240 lines
Re: Renewable Energy	John Foster	Fri, 8 Dec 2000 16:24:52 -0800	61 lines
Re: ECOTERRORISTS STRIKE LONG ISLAND CONSTRUCTION SITE	Michael Meuser	Sat, 9 Dec 2000 00:48:04 -0000	85 lines
Re: ECOTERRORISTS STRIKE LONG ISLAND CONSTRUCTION SITE	<>	Fri, 8 Dec 2000 20:01:59 EST	91 lines
Re: ECOTERRORISTS STRIKE LONG ISLAND CONSTRUCTION SITE	John Foster	Fri, 8 Dec 2000 17:17:22 -0800	29 lines
Re: ECOTERRORISTS STRIKE LONG ISLAND CONSTRUCTION SITE	Jim Tantillo	Fri, 8 Dec 2000 20:49:14 -0500	123 lines
Re: Renewable Energy	John Foster	Fri, 8 Dec 2000 18:26:09 -0800	107 lines
Re: ECOTERRORISTS STRIKE LONG ISLAND CONSTRUCTION SITE	John Foster	Fri, 8 Dec 2000 19:44:46 -0800	138 lines
Re: ECOTERRORISTS STRIKE LONG ISLAND CONSTRUCTION SITE	<>	Sat, 9 Dec 2000 00:26:42 EST	172 lines
Re: Renewable Energy	Steve	Sat, 9 Dec 2000 00:04:48 -0800	181 lines
Re: Renewable Energy	Steve	Sat, 9 Dec 2000 00:11:10 -0800	94 lines
Re: Arctic Warming in Churchill	Steve	Sat, 9 Dec 2000 00:22:42 -0800	70 lines
Re: FW: global warming, energy, ethics	Steve	Sat, 9 Dec 2000 00:30:53 -0800	38 lines
Re: ECOTERRORISTS STRIKE LONG ISLAND CONSTRUCTION SITE	Steve	Sat, 9 Dec 2000 00:36:42 -0800	44 lines
Re: Renewable Energy	John Foster	Sat, 9 Dec 2000 04:37:21 -0800	88 lines
Re: Renewable Energy	Michael Meuser	Sat, 9 Dec 2000 14:44:26 -0000	67 lines
Re: ECOTERRORISTS STRIKE LONG ISLAND CONSTRUCTION SITE	Steven Bissell	Sat, 9 Dec 2000 08:13:24 -0700	266 lines
Re: FW: global warming, energy, ethics	Steven Bissell	Sat, 9 Dec 2000 08:33:46 -0700	51 lines
Re: FW: global warming, energy, ethics	John Foster	Sat, 9 Dec 2000 08:56:50 -0800	47 lines
	John Foster	Sat, 9 Dec 2000 10:07:12 -0800	50 lines
Re: Renewable Energy	Michael Meuser	Sat, 9 Dec 2000 20:54:59 -0000	44 lines
Re: FW: global warming, energy, ethics	spiritwear	Sat, 9 Dec 2000 13:05:28 -0800	19 lines
california deregulation	Michael Meuser	Sat, 9 Dec 2000 21:05:32 -0000	17 lines
Re: FW: global warming, energy, ethics	Steve	Sat, 9 Dec 2000 13:09:52 -0800	67 lines
Re: ECOTERRORISTS STRIKE LONG ISLAND CONSTRUCTION SITE	Chiaviello, Anthony	Sat, 9 Dec 2000 15:14:35 -0600	160 lines
Re: ECOTERRORISTS STRIKE LONG ISLAND CONSTRUCTION SITE	Chiaviello, Anthony	Sat, 9 Dec 2000 15:18:38 -0600	192 lines
Renewable Energy	John Foster	Sat, 9 Dec 2000 13:18:54 -0800	117 lines
	Steve	Sat, 9 Dec 2000 13:19:54 -0800	89 lines
Re: FW: global warming, energy, ethics	<>	Sat, 9 Dec 2000 16:26:04 EST	28 lines
Re: Renewable Energy	Steve	Sat, 9 Dec 2000 13:28:31 -0800	75 lines
Re: Renewable Energy	John Foster	Sat, 9 Dec 2000 13:41:50 -0800	41 lines
Re: Renewable Energy	Michael Meuser	Sat, 9 Dec 2000 22:39:48 -0000	152 lines
Re: california deregulation	Michael Meuser	Sun, 10 Dec 2000 00:38:12 -0000	38 lines
bush administration	Michael Meuser	Sun, 10 Dec 2000 00:53:04 -0000	200 lines
Re: Renewable Energy(and birds)	<>	Sat, 9 Dec 2000 20:01:58 EST	120 lines
Re: Renewable Energy	John Foster	Sat, 9 Dec 2000 17:06:06 -0800	97 lines
Re: FW: global warming, energy, ethics	Steve	Sat, 9 Dec 2000 17:06:24 -0800	30 lines
Re: Renewable Energy	Steve	Sat, 9 Dec 2000 17:13:19 -0800	73 lines
Re: Renewable Energy(and birds)	John Foster	Sat, 9 Dec 2000 17:22:28 -0800	157 lines
Re: Renewable Energy	Steve	Sat, 9 Dec 2000 17:24:16 -0800	88 lines
Re: FW: global warming, energy, ethics	spiritwear	Sat, 9 Dec 2000 17:28:35 -0800	22 lines
Re: Renewable Energy	Steve	Sat, 9 Dec 2000 17:47:53 -0800	135 lines
Re: FW: global warming, energy, ethics	Steve	Sat, 9 Dec 2000 18:01:27 -0800	38 lines
Re: Renewable Energy	Steve	Sat, 9 Dec 2000 18:06:29 -0800	141 lines
Re: ECOTERRORISTS AND STEADY STATE REVOLUTION	Brian Czech	Sat, 9 Dec 2000 22:33:23 -0800	30 lines
Re: FW: global warming, energy, ethics	spiritwear	Sat, 9 Dec 2000 22:49:57 -0800	26 lines
unsuscribe	Kees Vromans	Sun, 10 Dec 2000 12:43:53 +0100	21 lines
Re: FW: global warming, energy, ethics	Steven Bissell	Sun, 10 Dec 2000 07:57:27 -0700	30 lines
Re: FW: global warming, energy, ethics	Steven Bissell	Sun, 10 Dec 2000 08:07:26 -0700	57 lines
Re: FW: global warming, energy, ethics	Steve	Sun, 10 Dec 2000 08:32:47 -0800	56 lines
Re: FW: global warming, energy, ethics	Steve	Sun, 10 Dec 2000 08:35:17 -0800	80 lines
Re: FW: global warming, energy, ethics	Steven Bissell	Sun, 10 Dec 2000 10:03:23 -0700	129 lines
Re: FW: global warming, energy, ethics	John Foster	Sun, 10 Dec 2000 10:54:55 -0800	218 lines
Re: FW: global warming, energy, ethics	<>	Sun, 10 Dec 2000 15:08:48 EST	58 lines
Re: FW: global warming, energy, ethics	John Foster	Sun, 10 Dec 2000 12:17:18 -0800	65 lines
Natural Gas Forecasting Model Wrong	John Foster	Sun, 10 Dec 2000 12:40:38 -0800	121 lines
Canadian Natural Gas Supply Report	John Foster	Sun, 10 Dec 2000 13:51:21 -0800	118 lines
Re: FW: global warming, energy, ethics	Michael Meuser	Sun, 10 Dec 2000 22:14:20 -0000	71 lines
Re: california deregulation	Michael Meuser	Sun, 10 Dec 2000 22:29:39 -0000	50 lines
Re: Renewable Energy	John Foster	Sun, 10 Dec 2000 15:25:05 -0800	124 lines
Re: Renewable Energy	Steve	Sun, 10 Dec 2000 16:53:50 -0800	91 lines
Re: california deregulation	Steve	Sun, 10 Dec 2000 17:08:05 -0800	41 lines
Re: Renewable Energy	Steve	Sun, 10 Dec 2000 17:09:13 -0800	33 lines
Re: Renewable Energy	Steve	Sun, 10 Dec 2000 17:10:11 -0800	198 lines
Re: california deregulation	Steve	Sun, 10 Dec 2000 17:14:32 -0800	49 lines
Re: FW: global warming, energy, ethics	Steve	Sun, 10 Dec 2000 17:20:00 -0800	168 lines
Re: california deregulation	Michael Meuser	Mon, 11 Dec 2000 02:33:10 -0000	53 lines
Re: Renewable Energy	Michael Meuser	Mon, 11 Dec 2000 02:34:13 -0000	21 lines
Re: Renewable Energy	Michael Meuser	Mon, 11 Dec 2000 02:40:55 -0000	63 lines
Re: Renewable Energy	John Foster	Sun, 10 Dec 2000 19:53:31 -0800	102 lines
Re: Renewable Energy	John Foster	Sun, 10 Dec 2000 20:27:56 -0800	114 lines
Re: Renewable Energy	John Foster	Sun, 10 Dec 2000 20:34:58 -0800	124 lines
Re: Renewable Energy	Chris Perley	Mon, 11 Dec 2000 11:16:30 +1300	67 lines
Re: Renewable Energy	Chris Perley	Mon, 11 Dec 2000 16:09:03 +1300	139 lines
Fwd: New International Journal of Philosophical Practice: Call for Papers	Jim Tantillo	Mon, 11 Dec 2000 11:09:59 -0500	47 lines
Re: ECOTERRORISTS AND STEADY STATE REVOLUTION	Chiaviello, Anthony	Mon, 11 Dec 2000 10:59:56 -0600	64 lines
Quality of debate	David Pearson	Mon, 11 Dec 2000 17:38:23 +0000	33 lines
Re: Quality of debate	John Foster	Mon, 11 Dec 2000 09:51:29 -0800	101 lines
Re: california deregulation	Steve	Mon, 11 Dec 2000 10:08:40 -0800	79 lines
Re: Renewable Energy	Steve	Mon, 11 Dec 2000 10:20:11 -0800	37 lines
Queen Charlotte's Old Growth	John Foster	Mon, 11 Dec 2000 10:30:06 -0800	117 lines
Re: ECOTERRORISTS AND STEADY STATE REVOLUTION	Jim Tantillo	Mon, 11 Dec 2000 14:23:48 -0500	132 lines
Re: Renewable Energy	<>	Mon, 11 Dec 2000 14:29:48 EST	18 lines
ithaca friend	Chiaviello, Anthony	Mon, 11 Dec 2000 13:37:26 -0600	88 lines
sorry, midaddressed	Chiaviello, Anthony	Mon, 11 Dec 2000 13:40:34 -0600	21 lines
Re: ECOTERRORISTS AND STEADY STATE REVOLUTION	Brian Czech	Mon, 11 Dec 2000 11:59:46 -0800	106 lines
Re: ECOTERRORISTS AND STEADY STATE REVOLUTION	John Foster	Mon, 11 Dec 2000 12:59:32 -0800	103 lines
Re: ECOTERRORISTS AND STEADY STATE REVOLUTION	John Foster	Mon, 11 Dec 2000 13:05:24 -0800	29 lines
Re: FW: global warming, energy, ethics	Steve	Mon, 11 Dec 2000 13:32:34 -0800	121 lines
STEADY STATE REVOLUTION NOT FOR SNAKES!	Brian Czech	Mon, 11 Dec 2000 16:16:04 -0800	128 lines
Re: ECOTERRORISTS AND STEADY STATE REVOLUTION	Steven Bissell	Mon, 11 Dec 2000 17:32:38 -0700	261 lines
Re: Fwd: Hunt ban within a year - Telegraph latest	Paul Kirby	Tue, 12 Dec 2000 11:37:43 +0000	40 lines
Re: Nothing On Day-TVs	Michael Meuser	Tue, 12 Dec 2000 14:22:45 -0000	73 lines
Nothing On Day-TVs	John Foster	Tue, 12 Dec 2000 06:22:51 -0800	51 lines
Re: Fwd: Hunt ban within a year - Telegraph latest	Jim Tantillo	Tue, 12 Dec 2000 09:25:39 -0500	285 lines
Re: Fwd: Hunt ban within a year - Telegraph latest	John Foster	Tue, 12 Dec 2000 06:38:59 -0800	48 lines
Re: STEADY STATE REVOLUTION NOT FOR SNAKES!	Jim Tantillo	Tue, 12 Dec 2000 10:03:31 -0500	77 lines
Re: Nothing On Day-TVs	Paul Kirby	Tue, 12 Dec 2000 15:22:44 +0000	16 lines
Re: STEADY STATE REVOLUTION NOT FOR SNAKES!	John Foster	Tue, 12 Dec 2000 07:25:52 -0800	57 lines
Re: Fwd: Hunt ban within a year - Telegraph latest	Paul Kirby	Tue, 12 Dec 2000 15:27:03 +0000	25 lines
Re: ECOTERRORISTS STRIKE LONG ISLAND CONSTRUCTION SITE	emma fieldhouse	Tue, 12 Dec 2000 15:43:46 -0000	311 lines
ECOTERRORISTS Rent a Hiab!	John Foster	Tue, 12 Dec 2000 07:58:51 -0800	26 lines
Re: Fwd: Hunt ban within a year - Telegraph latest	Jim Tantillo	Tue, 12 Dec 2000 11:47:45 -0500	180 lines
Re: Fwd: Hunt ban within a year - Telegraph latest	emma fieldhouse	Tue, 12 Dec 2000 17:10:21 -0000	77 lines
Re: STEADY STATE REVOLUTION NOT FOR SNAKES!	Steve	Tue, 12 Dec 2000 09:55:18 -0800	109 lines
Re: Fwd: Hunt ban within a year - Telegraph latest	John Foster	Tue, 12 Dec 2000 10:01:07 -0800	73 lines
Re: STEADY STATE REVOLUTION NOT FOR SNAKES!	John Foster	Tue, 12 Dec 2000 10:19:34 -0800	51 lines
UK Judge Comments on Direct Action	John Foster	Tue, 12 Dec 2000 14:25:46 -0800	52 lines
Re: Nothing On Day-TVs	John Foster	Tue, 12 Dec 2000 14:57:32 -0800	53 lines
Re: STEADY STATE REVOLUTION NOT FOR SNAKES!	Steve	Tue, 12 Dec 2000 15:41:01 -0800	86 lines
Re: STEADY STATE REVOLUTION NOT FOR SNAKES!	Steve	Tue, 12 Dec 2000 15:43:11 -0800	93 lines
Re: STEADY STATE REVOLUTION NOT FOR SNAKES!	John Foster	Tue, 12 Dec 2000 15:52:46 -0800	122 lines
EJ and EPA	Michael Meuser	Wed, 13 Dec 2000 00:33:31 -0000	27 lines
Ethics of (re)introducing life On Mars	John Foster	Tue, 12 Dec 2000 16:59:34 -0800	87 lines
Re: STEADY STATE REVOLUTION NOT FOR SNAKES!	Brian Czech	Tue, 12 Dec 2000 18:47:21 -0800	123 lines
Re: STEADY STATE REVOLUTION NOT FOR SNAKES!	Jim Tantillo	Tue, 12 Dec 2000 22:18:27 -0500	238 lines
LIQUIDATORS, NOT NEOCLASSICAL ECONOMISTS, THE FOCUS OF SSR	Brian Czech	Tue, 12 Dec 2000 19:21:03 -0800	24 lines
Fwd: Desert conference advert	Jim Tantillo	Tue, 12 Dec 2000 22:23:26 -0500	77 lines
Re: STEADY STATE REVOLUTION NOT FOR SNAKES!	Steve	Tue, 12 Dec 2000 21:39:18 -0800	198 lines
Re: STEADY STATE REVOLUTION NOT FOR SNAKES!	John Foster	Tue, 12 Dec 2000 21:42:54 -0800	173 lines
Re: STEADY STATE REVOLUTION NOT FOR SNAKES!	Steve	Tue, 12 Dec 2000 23:30:19 -0800	196 lines
Re: Nothing On Day-TVs	Paul Kirby	Wed, 13 Dec 2000 13:35:26 +0000	17 lines
Re: STEADY STATE REVOLUTION NOT FOR SNAKES!	John Foster	Wed, 13 Dec 2000 09:11:26 -0800	88 lines
Re: STEADY STATE REVOLUTION NOT FOR SNAKES!	John Foster	Wed, 13 Dec 2000 09:11:31 -0800	55 lines
New global warming research	Michael Meuser	Wed, 13 Dec 2000 17:54:23 -0000	92 lines
Re: STEADY STATE REVOLUTION NOT FOR SNAKES!	Steve	Wed, 13 Dec 2000 10:06:02 -0800	175 lines
Re: STEADY STATE REVOLUTION NOT FOR SNAKES!	Steve	Wed, 13 Dec 2000 10:15:12 -0800	104 lines
Re: STEADY STATE REVOLUTION NOT FOR SNAKES!	Jim Tantillo	Wed, 13 Dec 2000 13:30:19 -0500	49 lines
Re: STEADY STATE REVOLUTION NOT FOR SNAKES!	Steve	Wed, 13 Dec 2000 11:15:20 -0800	76 lines
Re: STEADY STATE REVOLUTION NOT FOR SNAKES!	<>	Wed, 13 Dec 2000 14:50:19 EST	57 lines
Re: STEADY STATE REVOLUTION NOT FOR SNAKES!	Steve	Wed, 13 Dec 2000 12:56:43 -0800	78 lines
STEADY STATE REVOLUTION AND CASTIGATION OF THE LIQUIDATING CLASS	Brian Czech	Wed, 13 Dec 2000 18:09:26 -0800	62 lines
Re: STEADY STATE REVOLUTION NOT FOR SNAKES!	Brian Czech	Wed, 13 Dec 2000 19:34:11 -0800	306 lines
Re: Autopoesis	Patrick Longfield	Wed, 13 Dec 2000 21:46:15 -0800	113 lines
Solow and "the wretched of the Earth"	Chris Hope	Thu, 14 Dec 2000 13:12:49 +0000	64 lines
Fwd: JOB: chaired professorship in ethics	Jim Tantillo	Thu, 14 Dec 2000 10:09:51 -0500	40 lines
Re: Solow and "the wretched of the Earth"	Steve	Thu, 14 Dec 2000 08:00:13 -0800	94 lines
Re: Solow and "the wretched of the Earth"	John Foster	Thu, 14 Dec 2000 09:30:23 -0800	83 lines
"the grandkids," was Re: STEADY STATE	Jim Tantillo	Thu, 14 Dec 2000 14:30:29 -0500	113 lines
Re: "the grandkids," was Re: STEADY STATE	<>	Thu, 14 Dec 2000 15:51:31 EST	31 lines
Re: "the grandkids," was Re: STEADY STATE	Steve	Thu, 14 Dec 2000 13:12:23 -0800	27 lines
warming again	John Foster	Thu, 14 Dec 2000 13:39:06 -0800	96 lines
Re: warming again	Steve	Thu, 14 Dec 2000 14:24:22 -0800	161 lines
Re: warming again	John Foster	Thu, 14 Dec 2000 17:22:43 -0800	41 lines
Stop Logging Old Growth	John Foster	Thu, 14 Dec 2000 19:18:03 -0800	210 lines
Re: Solow and "the wretched of the Earth"	Chris Hope	Fri, 15 Dec 2000 15:17:21 +0000	74 lines
gmo news	Steven Bissell	Fri, 15 Dec 2000 08:28:05 -0700	16 lines
Solow and "the grandkids"	Jim Tantillo	Fri, 15 Dec 2000 11:51:45 -0500	100 lines
Re: Solow and "the grandkids"	spiritwear	Fri, 15 Dec 2000 12:55:43 -0800	25 lines
This is what democracy...	Michael Meuser	Fri, 15 Dec 2000 23:38:37 -0000	52 lines
Caribou Commons	John Foster	Fri, 15 Dec 2000 15:40:06 -0800	31 lines
dollar trophics and the steady state revolution	Brian Czech	Fri, 15 Dec 2000 20:51:05 -0800	45 lines
This is beauty: GM Crops	<>	Sat, 16 Dec 2000 02:26:51 EST	345 lines
Re: Solow and "the wretched of the Earth"	Steve	Sat, 16 Dec 2000 00:58:56 -0800	118 lines
Re: dollar trophics and the steady state revolution	Steve	Sat, 16 Dec 2000 01:18:07 -0800	84 lines
What is "best for ourselves"?	Chris Perley	Sat, 16 Dec 2000 13:50:00 +1300	70 lines
Re: dollar trophics and the steady state revolution	John Foster	Sat, 16 Dec 2000 06:29:08 -0800	132 lines
Models of global warming	Steven Bissell	Sat, 16 Dec 2000 08:13:15 -0700	57 lines
Re: Models of global warming	Benjamin S Hale	Sat, 16 Dec 2000 12:02:22 -0500	70 lines
Re: Solow and "the wretched of the Earth"	John Foster	Sat, 16 Dec 2000 09:09:06 -0800	142 lines
Re: Models of global warming	Steven Bissell	Sat, 16 Dec 2000 11:20:29 -0700	111 lines
Re: dollar trophics and the steady state revolution	Brian Czech	Sat, 16 Dec 2000 13:47:28 -0800	147 lines
Solar Energy Update	John Foster	Sat, 16 Dec 2000 14:58:59 -0800	23 lines
Re: Life Cycle Analysis and the steady state revolution	John Foster	Sat, 16 Dec 2000 21:52:22 -0800	131 lines
Re: Life Cycle Analysis and the steady state revolution	Jim Tantillo	Sun, 17 Dec 2000 08:58:37 -0500	80 lines
Re: dollar trophics and the steady state revolution	Patrick Longfield	Sun, 17 Dec 2000 12:15:28 -0800	472 lines
Re: warming again	Steve	Sun, 17 Dec 2000 17:31:09 -0800	40 lines
Re: dollar trophics and the steady state revolution	Steve	Sun, 17 Dec 2000 17:43:40 -0800	67 lines
Re: Models of global warming	Steve	Sun, 17 Dec 2000 17:47:00 -0800	83 lines
Re: Models of global warming	Steve	Sun, 17 Dec 2000 17:53:57 -0800	43 lines
Re: Solow and "the wretched of the Earth"	Steve	Sun, 17 Dec 2000 18:05:25 -0800	106 lines
Re: Life Cycle Analysis and the steady state revolution	Steve	Sun, 17 Dec 2000 18:12:40 -0800	44 lines
Re: Life Cycle Analysis and the steady state revolution	Patrick Longfield	Sun, 17 Dec 2000 22:49:01 -0800	118 lines
Re: dollar trophics and the steady state revolution	John Foster	Sun, 17 Dec 2000 22:51:11 -0800	57 lines
Re: Models of global warming	John Foster	Sun, 17 Dec 2000 23:01:13 -0800	39 lines
Re: Life Cycle Analysis and the steady state revolution	John Foster	Sun, 17 Dec 2000 23:45:39 -0800	96 lines
Re: dollar trophics and the steady state revolution	Steve	Mon, 18 Dec 2000 09:30:09 -0800	99 lines
Re: Life Cycle Analysis and the steady state revolution	Steve	Mon, 18 Dec 2000 09:57:35 -0800	92 lines
Re: Models of global warming	Steve	Mon, 18 Dec 2000 10:05:22 -0800	50 lines
Re: Models of global warming	Benjamin S Hale	Mon, 18 Dec 2000 14:15:42 -0500	34 lines
Re: Models of global warming	Steven Bissell	Mon, 18 Dec 2000 12:44:02 -0700	62 lines
Unsubscribe	<>	Mon, 18 Dec 2000 22:03:42 +0200	19 lines
Re: Models of global warming	Steve	Mon, 18 Dec 2000 12:16:14 -0800	68 lines
Re: Models of global warming	Benjamin S Hale	Mon, 18 Dec 2000 18:25:37 -0500	52 lines
dealing with time wasters	Michael Meuser	Tue, 19 Dec 2000 00:18:36 -0000	69 lines
Re: Models of global warming	John Foster	Mon, 18 Dec 2000 17:18:20 -0800	197 lines
Re: dealing with time wasters	Michael Meuser	Tue, 19 Dec 2000 03:29:27 -0000	95 lines
Re: Models of global warming	Steve	Mon, 18 Dec 2000 22:59:08 -0800	203 lines
Re: Models of global warming	John Foster	Mon, 18 Dec 2000 23:35:29 -0800	25 lines
Re: Models of global warming	John Foster	Mon, 18 Dec 2000 23:59:14 -0800	53 lines
Re: dealing with time wasters	John Foster	Tue, 19 Dec 2000 02:11:05 -0800	80 lines
Enviroethics is now moderated	David Pearson	Tue, 19 Dec 2000 11:21:50 +0000	39 lines
Re: dealing with time wasters	Paul Kirby	Tue, 19 Dec 2000 12:09:10 +0000	74 lines
Re: Models of global warming	Steven Bissell	Tue, 19 Dec 2000 07:17:36 -0700	83 lines
List problems	David Pearson	Tue, 19 Dec 2000 16:24:48 +0000	41 lines
Re: Models of global warming	Steve	Tue, 19 Dec 2000 09:33:40 -0800	49 lines
Re: Models of global warming	Steve	Tue, 19 Dec 2000 09:37:17 -0800	87 lines
American Journal of Bioethics (AJOB) 1:1 Contents	Vanessa T. Kuhn	Tue, 19 Dec 2000 16:18:01 -0500	267 lines
Sun spots and global warming	Chris Perley	Wed, 20 Dec 2000 09:01:19 +1300	49 lines
Enviroethics - list problems	David Pearson	Wed, 20 Dec 2000 12:01:44 +0000	33 lines
Fwd: Easy reading: WSJ on Cali crisis	Steve	Wed, 20 Dec 2000 10:05:55 -0800	357 lines
precautionary principle	Michael R. Meuser	Thu, 21 Dec 2000 03:51:42 -0000	28 lines
Re: Highland Think Net - Electronic Discussion Forum for the High lands - (http://www.think-net.org/).	John Gray	Thu, 21 Dec 2000 11:32:48 -0000	69 lines
Enviroethics list: present status and announcement	David Pearson	Thu, 21 Dec 2000 11:45:02 +0000	65 lines
United Nations Environment & Development Forum newsletter	David Pearson	Thu, 21 Dec 2000 11:54:09 +0000	37 lines
Re: dealing with time wasters	Maria Stella	Thu, 21 Dec 2000 12:45:18 +0000	91 lines
Re: Genetically Modified Crop Trials - a Discussion Forum.	John Gray	Thu, 21 Dec 2000 14:32:48 -0000	41 lines
Re: dealing with time wasters	Steven Bissell	Thu, 21 Dec 2000 08:52:56 -0700	130 lines
Just when you thought it was OK...	Michael R. Meuser	Thu, 21 Dec 2000 20:14:06 -0000	59 lines
Re: dealing with time wasters	John Foster	Thu, 21 Dec 2000 13:32:22 -0800	93 lines
Slimplistic Models	John Foster	Thu, 21 Dec 2000 14:25:29 -0800	24 lines
Ecopsychology	John Foster	Thu, 21 Dec 2000 20:13:09 -0800	231 lines
Re: Models of global warming	Steve	Thu, 21 Dec 2000 23:54:29 -0800	116 lines
Re: precautionary principle	Steve	Fri, 22 Dec 2000 00:04:34 -0800	48 lines
California Renewable Energy Review	John Foster	Fri, 22 Dec 2000 13:26:06 -0800	158 lines
Re: California Renewable Energy Review	Steve	Sat, 23 Dec 2000 09:52:16 -0800	258 lines
Two NSF Grant Opportunities Announcements	Hollander, Rachelle	Tue, 26 Dec 2000 13:36:59 -0500	88 lines
MALARIA AND DDT	Johnny Holiday/John A. Taube	Wed, 27 Dec 2000 10:39:35 -0800	103 lines
Re: Thoreau and Wordsworth	School of Plant Sciences, PC Lab	Fri, 8 Aug 2008 16:13:46 -0400 ()	66 lines

ENVIROETHICS Archives

2000

Options

Subject

From

Date

Size

JiscMail Tools

RSS Feeds and Sharing

Search Archives

Archives