|
|
|
Size
|
"Hospital Without Walls" Conference - 24 - 26 March 1999
|
Fri, 15 Jan 1999 09:48:22 -0000 |
1147 lines |
'Seprafilm' bioreabsorbable membrane
|
Fri, 8 Jan 1999 10:13:30 -0800 (PST) |
36 lines |
Re: 'Seprafilm' bioreabsorbable membrane
|
Wed, 13 Jan 1999 15:27:15 -0500 (EST) |
73 lines |
(Fwd) examples - evidence and nursing
|
Thu, 21 Jan 1999 16:08:51 +0000 (GMT) |
70 lines |
(Fwd) TISS, MODS
|
Fri, 8 Jan 1999 08:56:05 +0000 |
44 lines |
|
04 Jan 1999 10:06:52 +0000 |
9 lines |
|
Tue, 5 Jan 1999 16:40:44 +0000 |
13 lines |
a bit more re: JAMA
|
Tue, 26 Jan 1999 17:35:48 -0600 |
36 lines |
adjusting for statification
|
Thu, 14 Jan 1999 18:52:16 PST |
47 lines |
anthelmintic drugs
|
Tue, 12 Jan 1999 21:34:41 +0100 |
48 lines |
antibiotic treatment short courses UTI
|
Fri, 8 Jan 1999 11:59:55 +0100 |
56 lines |
Any information on EBM for Ob&G folk
|
Fri, 29 Jan 1999 02:18:16 PST |
41 lines |
Re: RE: RE: Bibliographic software
|
Tue, 5 Jan 1999 14:54:01 -0000 |
24 lines |
Bibliographic software and the EBH mailbase
|
Mon, 11 Jan 1999 18:01:40 +0000 |
17 lines |
Can we get high powers?
|
Wed, 20 Jan 1999 08:41:35 GMT+1200 |
30 lines |
CASP conference announcement (fwd)
|
Fri, 29 Jan 1999 17:03:32 +0000 (GMT Standard Time) |
78 lines |
FW: Change in Leadership at JAMA (fwd)
|
Sun, 24 Jan 1999 21:45:25 +0000 (GMT) |
376 lines |
clinical relevance and presentation of differences ordinal scale
|
Tue, 5 Jan 1999 15:12:36 +0100 |
53 lines |
CRitical appraisal guidelines for qualitative research
|
Wed, 27 Jan 1999 11:40:44 +0000 (GMT) |
48 lines |
critical appraisal guidelines qualitative research
|
Wed, 27 Jan 1999 13:04:22 +0000 (GMT) |
35 lines |
Critical appraisal of Qualitative research for Evidence based pr
|
Tue, 26 Jan 1999 12:42:10 +0000 (GMT) |
29 lines |
FW: Delivery failure!
|
Mon, 11 Jan 1999 14:23:57 +0000 |
59 lines |
Does CQI effectively change prescribing practice?
|
Wed, 27 Jan 1999 17:54:35 -0500 |
61 lines |
EBM
|
Thu, 14 Jan 1999 09:16:50 +1100 |
25 lines |
Re: EBM
|
Thu, 14 Jan 1999 09:18:24 +0000 (GMT Standard Time) |
46 lines |
RE: EBM
|
Thu, 14 Jan 1999 08:37:33 -0500 |
62 lines |
Re: EBM
|
Mon, 18 Jan 1999 21:34:39 -0000 |
40 lines |
Re: EBM
|
Mon, 18 Jan 1999 23:14:01 +0000 |
58 lines |
Re: EBM
|
Tue, 19 Jan 1999 12:12:33 +0000 |
50 lines |
Re: EBM
|
Tue, 19 Jan 1999 12:53:51 +0000 (GMT) |
587 lines |
Re: EBM
|
Tue, 19 Jan 1999 18:17:22 +0000 (GMT Standard Time) |
66 lines |
Re: EBM
|
Tue, 19 Jan 1999 22:06:31 +0000 |
28 lines |
EBM & Mental Health Nursing
|
Wed, 20 Jan 1999 00:58:31 -0000 |
118 lines |
Re:EBM & Mental Health Nursing
|
Thu, 21 Jan 1999 09:58:42 +0000 |
61 lines |
Re: EBM + mental health nursing
|
Tue, 19 Jan 1999 12:52:14 +0000 (GMT) |
60 lines |
EBM cardiology
|
Sun, 24 Jan 1999 08:25:15 -0600 |
44 lines |
Re: EBM cardiology
|
Wed, 27 Jan 1999 22:11:03 -0500 |
35 lines |
Re:EBM reply
|
Tue, 19 Jan 1999 10:54:38 -0000 |
68 lines |
RE: EBM, Mental Health Nursing and peer reviewed journals
|
20 Jan 1999 10:13:25 +0000 |
480 lines |
epid_shift: New subscription address
|
Wed, 13 Jan 1999 20:09:31 +0530 |
45 lines |
European MSc in Health Informatics
|
Wed, 20 Jan 1999 16:46:19 +0000 |
49 lines |
Evidence & Mental health nursing
|
Wed, 20 Jan 1999 11:00:07 -0000 |
33 lines |
EVIDENCE BASED MANAGEMENT
|
Wed, 13 Jan 1999 12:54:47 +0000 |
43 lines |
Evidence based practice - distance learning course
|
Mon, 25 Jan 1999 16:36:43 +0000 (GMT Standard Time) |
114 lines |
Re: evidence based searching
|
Fri, 29 Jan 1999 08:50:30 +0100 |
58 lines |
Re: evidence based searching
|
Fri, 29 Jan 1999 09:00:43 +0100 |
59 lines |
Evidence based teaching of EBM/EBHC
|
Sat, 16 Jan 1999 12:15:26 -0000 |
38 lines |
examples - evidence and nursing
|
Thu, 21 Jan 1999 12:13:49 +0000 (GMT) |
48 lines |
Freedom of speech
|
Wed, 20 Jan 1999 10:43:31 +0100 |
33 lines |
Guidelines to help report studies evaluating health prom
|
Mon, 11 Jan 1999 15:47:26 GMT0BST |
68 lines |
Head Lice
|
Sat, 02 Jan 1999 18:26:26 -0800 |
28 lines |
re: Head Lice
|
Mon, 4 Jan 1999 10:52:04 +0000 |
20 lines |
Re: Head Lice
|
Mon, 4 Jan 1999 10:21:04 -0600 |
53 lines |
Health Statistics Users Group
|
Fri, 15 Jan 1999 14:36:03 +0000 (GMT) |
109 lines |
Re: helping our friends at JAMA
|
Wed, 20 Jan 1999 09:26:51 +0000 (GMT Standard Time) |
43 lines |
hould we boycott JAMA?
|
Fri, 22 Jan 1999 08:30:43 -0600 |
34 lines |
I recommend Medscape, http://www.medscape.com.
|
Sun, 24 Jan 1999 12:26:50 -0500 |
58 lines |
if you want to keep abreast of reactions to AMA's sacking of george lundberg
|
Wed, 20 Jan 1999 11:49:46 +0000 (GMT Standard Time) |
32 lines |
Inconsistent presentation within a journal article
|
Fri, 22 Jan 1999 13:54:12 -0600 |
59 lines |
Re: Inconsistent presentation within a journal article
|
Sun, 24 Jan 1999 12:38:07 +0000 |
59 lines |
RE: Inconsistent presentation within a journal article
|
Mon, 25 Jan 1999 07:13:56 -0700 |
76 lines |
Re: Inconsistent presentation within a journal article
|
Tue, 26 Jan 1999 09:15:27 +0000 |
51 lines |
Re: Inconsistent presentation within a journal article -Reply -Forwarded
|
Tue, 26 Jan 1999 19:15:05 -0500 |
74 lines |
Indexed Journals
|
Sat, 23 Jan 1999 10:28:18 +0200 |
23 lines |
RE: indexed journals
|
Mon, 25 Jan 1999 10:01:07 -0400 |
29 lines |
RE: indexed journals
|
Mon, 25 Jan 1999 16:27:19 +0100 |
46 lines |
Indexed Journals
|
Wed, 27 Jan 1999 07:29:53 +0200 |
28 lines |
Re: Indexed Journals
|
Wed, 27 Jan 1999 09:18:42 -0600 |
73 lines |
interesting quote found this week in JAMA.....
|
Tue, 26 Jan 1999 16:39:19 -0000 |
108 lines |
JAMA
|
Wed, 20 Jan 1999 13:26:14 -0500 |
63 lines |
Re: JAMA
|
Thu, 21 Jan 1999 17:04:06 +0000 (GMT Standard Time) |
59 lines |
Re: JAMA
|
Thu, 21 Jan 99 16:08:47 EST |
55 lines |
Re: JAMA
|
Sat, 23 Jan 1999 16:33:24 +0800 |
112 lines |
Re: JAMA
|
Sat, 23 Jan 1999 09:52:51 -0600 |
338 lines |
Re: JAMA
|
Sun, 24 Jan 1999 11:52:56 |
72 lines |
Re: JAMA
|
Sun, 24 Jan 1999 12:57:54 -0600 |
149 lines |
Re: JAMA
|
Sun, 24 Jan 1999 15:08:37 |
104 lines |
Re: JAMA
|
Sun, 24 Jan 1999 21:59:27 +0000 (GMT) |
45 lines |
Re: JAMA
|
Sun, 24 Jan 1999 20:22:06 -0600 |
78 lines |
Re: JAMA
|
Sun, 24 Jan 1999 15:22:39 -1000 |
40 lines |
Re: JAMA
|
Sun, 24 Jan 1999 20:44:06 -0600 |
214 lines |
Re: JAMA
|
Sun, 24 Jan 1999 21:10:02 -0600 |
99 lines |
Re: JAMA
|
Mon, 25 Jan 1999 11:47:43 +0000 (GMT Standard Time) |
29 lines |
Re: JAMA
|
Mon, 25 Jan 1999 13:23:30 -0500 |
136 lines |
RE: JAMA
|
Mon, 25 Jan 1999 18:24:41 -0500 |
42 lines |
Re: JAMA
|
Mon, 25 Jan 1999 21:04:23 |
234 lines |
RE: JAMA
|
Tue, 26 Jan 1999 22:45:48 -0000 |
49 lines |
RE: JAMA --Publisher's BIAS is the issue for EBH!
|
Tue, 26 Jan 1999 06:50:29 |
69 lines |
RE: JAMA --Publisher's BIAS is the issue for EBH!
|
Tue, 26 Jan 1999 13:08:10 -0000 (GMT) |
58 lines |
RE: JAMA --Publisher's BIAS is the issue for EBH!
|
Tue, 7 Jan 1997 09:12:59 +0200 |
70 lines |
RE: JAMA --Publisher's BIAS is the issue for EBH!
|
Tue, 26 Jan 1999 14:08:21 -0600 |
135 lines |
RE: JAMA --Publisher's BIAS is the issue for EBH! (fwd)
|
Wed, 27 Jan 1999 11:26:55 +0000 (GMT Standard Time) |
59 lines |
RE: JAMA --Publisher's BIAS is the issue for EBH! (fwd)
|
Wed, 27 Jan 1999 14:15:22 GMT0BST |
39 lines |
JAMA editorial from this week
|
Tue, 26 Jan 1999 16:45:24 -0600 |
258 lines |
JAMA issue
|
Fri, 22 Jan 1999 13:40:08 -0500 |
242 lines |
RE: JAMA issue
|
Fri, 22 Jan 1999 13:41:53 -0600 |
135 lines |
RE: JAMA issue
|
Sat, 4 Jan 1997 00:43:48 +0200 |
125 lines |
Re: JAMA issue
|
Sat, 23 Jan 1999 16:02:16 +0000 (GMT) |
48 lines |
Re: JAMA issue
|
Sun, 24 Jan 1999 02:42:16 -0600 |
92 lines |
Re: JAMA issue
|
Sun, 24 Jan 1999 13:31:39 +0000 |
69 lines |
Re: JAMA issue
|
Sun, 24 Jan 1999 13:34:16 +0000 |
28 lines |
Re: JAMA issue
|
Sun, 24 Jan 1999 14:03:30 +0000 (GMT) |
87 lines |
Re: JAMA issue
|
Mon, 25 Jan 1999 15:16:56 +0800 |
104 lines |
Re: JAMA issue
|
Wed, 27 Jan 1999 16:00:03 -0000 |
21 lines |
JAMA search
|
Thu, 28 Jan 1999 00:30:34 -0600 |
685 lines |
Re: JAMA search
|
Thu, 28 Jan 1999 08:39:16 -0500 |
28 lines |
Re: JAMA search
|
Thu, 28 Jan 1999 17:55:37 +0000 |
43 lines |
RE: JAMA search
|
Thu, 28 Jan 1999 16:01:03 -0600 |
22 lines |
JOB: Research fellow at the University of York, UK
|
Fri, 15 Jan 1999 15:52:43 +0000 |
28 lines |
Journal of Informatics in Primary Care
|
Sat, 2 Jan 1999 22:07:07 -0000 |
42 lines |
Klebsiella and ankylosing spondylitis
|
Tue, 19 Jan 1999 18:27:18 +0000 |
25 lines |
Re: Klebsiella and ankylosing spondylitis
|
Wed, 20 Jan 1999 20:54:47 +1000 |
63 lines |
Lecturer post in Social Science and Medicine (clinical or non-clinical)
|
Thu, 14 Jan 1999 12:35:07 +0000 |
62 lines |
Meeting on food safety
|
Sun, 17 Jan 1999 10:27:36 +0100 |
48 lines |
MetaMaps
|
Wed, 27 Jan 1999 10:36:01 -0500 |
72 lines |
MS and Beta interferon enquiry
|
Fri, 08 Jan 1999 11:58:34 +0000 |
29 lines |
MS and Beta interferon enquiry
|
Fri, 08 Jan 1999 20:27:32 PST |
47 lines |
negative results
|
Thu, 14 Jan 1999 17:33:46 +0000 |
64 lines |
RE: negative results
|
Thu, 14 Jan 1999 14:35:24 -0600 |
72 lines |
Re: negative results
|
Fri, 15 Jan 1999 09:05:33 +0000 |
55 lines |
RE: negative results
|
Fri, 15 Jan 1999 23:30:32 +1100 |
69 lines |
Re: negative results
|
Fri, 15 Jan 1999 13:52:23 +0000 |
47 lines |
RE: negative results
|
Fri, 15 Jan 1999 15:16:43 +0100 |
75 lines |
Re: negative results
|
Fri, 15 Jan 1999 14:38:27 +0000 (GMT Standard Time) |
127 lines |
Re: negative results
|
Fri, 15 Jan 1999 15:22:31 -0000 (GMT) |
178 lines |
Negative Results
|
Sat, 16 Jan 1999 13:30:04 -0400 |
37 lines |
Re: negative results
|
Tue, 19 Jan 1999 09:35:46 +0100 |
224 lines |
Re: negative results
|
Tue, 19 Jan 1999 13:40:17 -0000 (GMT) |
57 lines |
Negative Results
|
Tue, 19 Jan 1999 13:50:41 -0400 |
20 lines |
Re: Negative Results
|
Tue, 19 Jan 1999 18:02:21 +0000 (GMT Standard Time) |
49 lines |
RE: Negative Results
|
Tue, 19 Jan 1999 14:24:59 -0500 |
67 lines |
Re: negative results
|
Wed, 20 Jan 1999 10:27:22 +1000 |
48 lines |
RE: Negative Results for meta-analysis
|
Thu, 14 Jan 1999 11:29:38 -0600 |
70 lines |
Re: Negative Results for meta-analysis
|
Thu, 14 Jan 1999 18:08:36 +0000 |
50 lines |
Negative results in observational studies
|
Tue, 12 Jan 1999 20:25:38 PST |
84 lines |
Re: Negative results in observational studies
|
Wed, 13 Jan 1999 06:10:36 -0400 |
100 lines |
Re: Negative results in observational studies
|
Wed, 13 Jan 1999 11:27:24 +0000 |
129 lines |
negative results response to 'Arturo Marti-Carvajal'
|
Wed, 20 Jan 1999 13:16:12 -0500 |
53 lines |
Re: Negative Results.
|
Tue, 5 Jan 1999 09:54:26 GMT |
58 lines |
Negative Results.
|
Sun, 10 Jan 1999 13:11:26 -0400 |
31 lines |
RE: Negative Results.
|
Mon, 11 Jan 1999 12:23:59 -0600 |
87 lines |
Re: Negative Results.
|
Tue, 12 Jan 1999 09:23:40 +0100 |
62 lines |
Re: Negative Results.
|
Tue, 12 Jan 1999 12:07:36 +0000 |
72 lines |
Re: Negative Results.
|
Thu, 14 Jan 1999 16:00:04 +0000 (GMT Standard Time) |
47 lines |
Re: Negative Results.
|
Thu, 14 Jan 1999 16:59:41 +0000 |
37 lines |
Re: Negative Results.
|
Thu, 14 Jan 1999 18:15:57 +0000 |
56 lines |
Re: Negative Results.
|
Fri, 15 Jan 1999 09:52:12 +1300 |
39 lines |
Re: Negative Results.
|
Fri, 15 Jan 1999 09:36:59 -0000 |
92 lines |
Negative vs. inconclusive results
|
Tue, 19 Jan 1999 11:34:52 -0500 |
106 lines |
Neonatal hyperbilirubinemia
|
Wed, 13 Jan 1999 10:38:58 -0500 (EST) |
48 lines |
New discussion list epi_shift
|
Sun, 10 Jan 1999 13:07:39 +0530 |
44 lines |
New JAMA scandal comes to light.....
|
Tue, 26 Jan 1999 15:35:17 -0000 |
145 lines |
New link for best evidence
|
Wed, 06 Jan 1999 15:25:08 +1100 |
46 lines |
NNT or NNH
|
Tue, 26 Jan 1999 09:30:20 +1300 |
36 lines |
RE: NNT or NNH
|
Mon, 25 Jan 1999 16:00:44 -0500 |
80 lines |
RE: NNT or NNH
|
Mon, 25 Jan 1999 23:40:31 -0000 |
94 lines |
Re: NNT or NNH
|
Tue, 26 Jan 1999 10:54:30 +1100 |
104 lines |
RE: NNT or NNH
|
Mon, 25 Jan 1999 21:50:50 -0500 |
126 lines |
Re: NNT or NNH
|
Tue, 26 Jan 1999 23:49:35 -0800 |
41 lines |
RE: NNT or NNH
|
Wed, 27 Jan 1999 12:40:08 -0500 |
35 lines |
NNT or NNH
|
Wed, 27 Jan 1999 17:50:35 +0000 (GMT Standard Time) |
36 lines |
RE: NNT or NNH
|
Wed, 27 Jan 1999 15:50:49 -0500 |
96 lines |
Re: NNT or NNH
|
Thu, 28 Jan 1999 17:56:54 -0500 |
29 lines |
RE: NNT or NNH
|
Fri, 29 Jan 1999 14:38:15 -0500 |
54 lines |
RE: NNT or NNH
|
Fri, 29 Jan 1999 16:24:36 -0600 |
62 lines |
Nursing diagnostic papers
|
Tue, 26 Jan 1999 10:21:52 GMT0BST |
35 lines |
Re: Nursing diagnostic papers
|
Tue, 26 Jan 1999 09:45:27 -0600 |
62 lines |
RE: Nursing diagnostic papers
|
Wed, 27 Jan 1999 07:56:26 +1300 |
91 lines |
Octreotide: Do you use it?
|
Wed, 27 Jan 1999 18:11:03 -0500 |
40 lines |
Re: Octreotide: Do you use it?
|
Wed, 27 Jan 1999 19:26:26 -1000 |
62 lines |
Organisational culture and EBM
|
Mon, 11 Jan 1999 12:36:02 -0800 |
52 lines |
osteoporosis bulletin
|
Tue, 12 Jan 1999 09:39:34 +0000 |
32 lines |
Other straws?
|
Mon, 25 Jan 1999 09:42:02 -0600 |
44 lines |
protocol for COAD#2 ready for review
|
Mon, 18 Jan 1999 13:06:43 +0000 (GMT Standard Time) |
43 lines |
Quantitative Research-short courses
|
Mon, 11 Jan 1999 10:27:00 +0000 |
21 lines |
Radical Statistics TWENTY-FIFTH ANNIVERSARY CONFERENCE (fwd)
|
Sun, 10 Jan 1999 17:32:09 +0000 (GMT) |
189 lines |
Re EBH
|
Thu, 14 Jan 1999 17:32:24 +0000 |
22 lines |
Registries for cardiac services
|
08 Jan 1999 14:24:37 +0000 |
23 lines |
Re: Registries for cardiac services
|
Fri, 8 Jan 1999 22:04:21 -0000 |
32 lines |
RE: Registries for cardiac services
|
Sat, 9 Jan 1999 14:47:58 -0000 |
93 lines |
Re: RE: Registries for cardiac services
|
Sat, 9 Jan 1999 19:31:29 -0000 |
75 lines |
Request for suggestions
|
Fri, 29 Jan 1999 08:05:42 -0600 |
52 lines |
Reviewers Sought for Positron Emission Tomography Report Update
|
Tue, 5 Jan 1999 07:16:52 -0500 (EST) |
52 lines |
Risk ranking of NSAID
|
Mon, 18 Jan 1999 18:18:45 +0000 |
28 lines |
Sacking of JAMA's editor (fwd)
|
Mon, 18 Jan 1999 11:45:20 +0000 (GMT Standard Time) |
83 lines |
RE: Sacking of JAMA's editor (fwd)
|
Mon, 18 Jan 1999 14:10:02 +0100 |
34 lines |
RE: Sacking of JAMA's editor (fwd)
|
Mon, 18 Jan 1999 14:59:58 -0000 |
32 lines |
Re: Sacking of JAMA's editor (fwd)
|
Mon, 18 Jan 1999 11:02:36 -1000 |
31 lines |
Re: Sacking of JAMA's editor (fwd)
|
Mon, 18 Jan 1999 21:43:48 -0000 |
54 lines |
Re: Sacking of JAMA's editor (fwd)
|
Mon, 18 Jan 1999 13:40:44 -0800 (PST) |
46 lines |
Re: Sacking of JAMA's editor; the irrelevance of the subject matter, and where do we go from here?
|
Tue, 19 Jan 1999 09:29:02 +0000 (GMT Standard Time) |
57 lines |
Re: Sacking of JAMA's editor; the irrelevance of the subject matter, and where do we go from here?
|
Tue, 19 Jan 1999 11:45:46 -0000 |
117 lines |
Re: Sacking of JAMA's editor; the irrelevance of the subject matter, and where do we go from here?
|
Tue, 19 Jan 1999 16:47:30 +0000 (GMT Standard Time) |
56 lines |
RE: Sacking of JAMA's editor; the irrelevance of the subject matter, and where do we go from here?
|
Thu, 21 Jan 1999 14:06:19 -0600 |
24 lines |
SHIMR 99 - Call for Papers
|
Mon, 4 Jan 1999 15:45:09 +0000 |
188 lines |
Short Course: Survey Data Analysis II 27-29 January 99
|
Fri, 15 Jan 1999 11:16:43 GMT |
105 lines |
Still places on 1st N+Y EBHC workshop
|
Wed, 20 Jan 1999 09:27:51 +0000 |
147 lines |
Suggestions from sackett and badenoch about further discussions of the JAMA affair
|
Tue, 26 Jan 1999 14:09:55 +0000 (GMT Standard Time) |
60 lines |
Re: Suggestions from sackett and badenoch about further discussions of the JAMA affair
|
Wed, 27 Jan 1999 06:59:05 +1300 |
95 lines |
RE: Suggestions from sackett and badenoch about further discussions of the JAMA affair
|
Tue, 26 Jan 1999 15:56:59 -0500 |
32 lines |
RE: Suggestions from sackett and badenoch about further discussions of the JAMA affair
|
Tue, 26 Jan 1999 17:11:44 -0500 |
29 lines |
Re: RE: Suggestions from sackett and badenoch about further discussions of the JAMA affair
|
Tue, 26 Jan 1999 22:52:39 -0500 |
44 lines |
RE: Suggestions from sackett and badenoch about further discussions of the JAMA affair
|
Wed, 27 Jan 1999 09:43:53 +0200 |
26 lines |
Re: Suggestions from sackett and badenoch about further discussions of the JAMA affair
|
Wed, 27 Jan 1999 20:47:39 +0000 |
23 lines |
RE: Suggestions from sackett and badenoch about further discussions of the JAMAaffair
|
Tue, 26 Jan 1999 22:45:49 -0000 |
66 lines |
RE: Teaching EBM in real time: treatment UTI
|
Tue, 5 Jan 1999 11:29:09 +0100 |
44 lines |
Teniae
|
Tue, 12 Jan 1999 14:29:11 +0100 |
50 lines |
The WWW and patient recuitment for RCTs
|
Fri, 8 Jan 1999 13:50:57 -0500 (EST) |
58 lines |
RE: The WWW and patient recuitment for RCTs
|
Fri, 8 Jan 1999 19:16:33 -0000 |
83 lines |
Re: The WWW and patient recuitment for RCTs
|
Tue, 12 Jan 1999 11:47:27 -0000 |
96 lines |
Transference Factor
|
Wed, 20 Jan 1999 09:35:01 -0400 |
29 lines |
TV news and EBM
|
Thu, 14 Jan 1999 12:31:16 -0600 |
39 lines |
Re: TV news and EBM
|
Thu, 14 Jan 1999 14:50:40 -0500 |
90 lines |
Re: TV news and EBM
|
Thu, 14 Jan 1999 18:57:40 -0500 |
68 lines |
RE: TV news and EBM
|
Fri, 15 Jan 1999 09:37:31 +0100 |
43 lines |
Re: TV News and EBM
|
Sat, 16 Jan 1999 10:08:38 -0600 |
85 lines |
Re: TV news and EBM and brain tumors missed
|
Fri, 15 Jan 1999 08:29:07 +0100 |
131 lines |
Re: two questions
|
Sun, 3 Jan 1999 06:48:18 -0800 (PST) |
82 lines |
Re: two questions
|
Mon, 11 Jan 1999 08:29:34 -0500 (EST) |
42 lines |
Users' Guides
|
Fri, 29 Jan 1999 12:46:23 -0000 |
15 lines |
Where are the Users Guides?
|
Mon, 25 Jan 1999 22:52:13 -0600 (CST) |
22 lines |
Re: Where are the Users Guides?
|
Tue, 26 Jan 1999 09:05:23 +0100 |
31 lines |
Re: Where are the Users Guides?
|
Tue, 26 Jan 1999 13:11:49 -0500 |
34 lines |
Re: Where are the Users Guides?
|
Wed, 27 Jan 1999 09:29:14 +0100 |
59 lines |
Where is Sam Wiebe? (about presenting ordinal scales)
|
Fri, 15 Jan 1999 08:38:19 +0100 |
26 lines |
who wants articles against EBM?
|
Thu, 14 Jan 1999 14:18:23 -0800 |
41 lines |
RE: Why didn't the JAMA Editorial Board resign following the sacking of george lundberg?
|
Fri, 22 Jan 1999 10:39:14 +0000 (GMT Standard Time) |
56 lines |
RE: Why didn't the JAMA Editorial Board resign following the sacking of george lundberg?
|
Fri, 22 Jan 1999 07:23:57 -0600 |
106 lines |
RE: Why didn't the JAMA Editorial Board resign following the sacking of george lundberg? (fwd)
|
Fri, 22 Jan 1999 12:10:03 +0000 (GMT Standard Time) |
70 lines |
RE: Why didn't the JAMA Editorial Board resign following the sacking of george lundberg? (fwd)
|
Fri, 22 Jan 1999 10:53:12 -0600 |
92 lines |
Workshop about journal club
|
Wed, 27 Jan 1999 17:15:27 -0400 |
27 lines |
Re: Workshop about journal club
|
Fri, 29 Jan 1999 10:45:59 -0000 |
67 lines |
Workshops in software for qualitative analysis - NUDIST and ATLAS.ti
|
Tue, 12 Jan 1999 10:01:08 -0000 |
45 lines |
World Association of Medical Editors condemns sacking
|
Tue, 19 Jan 1999 10:03:21 +0000 (GMT Standard Time) |
56 lines |
Re: World Association of Medical Editors condemns sacking
|
Wed, 20 Jan 1999 21:04:45 EST |
50 lines |
