|
|
|
Size
|
Re: Diagnostic PICO question
|
Rod Jackson |
Mon, 28 Feb 2005 12:24:25 +1300 |
55 lines |
Re: Search strategies for qualitative research
|
Andrew Booth |
Mon, 28 Feb 2005 09:10:52 -0000 |
104 lines |
Re: Diagnostic PICO question
|
k.hopayian |
Sun, 27 Feb 2005 18:12:19 +0000 |
46 lines |
Summary: CINAHL Evidence-Based filters
|
Feddern, Tanya |
Thu, 24 Feb 2005 18:23:36 -0500 |
198 lines |
Where Good Evidence Exists
|
Mike/Linda Stuart |
Thu, 24 Feb 2005 14:55:25 -0800 |
98 lines |
Re: Impact of best practice Q
|
David Jobson |
Thu, 24 Feb 2005 22:39:51 -0000 |
197 lines |
Summary: EBM Calculators: Urgent EBM question--please help!
|
Feddern, Tanya |
Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:04:15 -0500 |
84 lines |
Re: Impact of best practice Q
|
Norman J Vetter |
Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:56:51 +0000 |
39 lines |
Impact of best practice Q
|
Jon Brassey |
Thu, 24 Feb 2005 05:53:13 +0000 |
33 lines |
Critical Appraisal Checklists
|
Mike/Linda Stuart |
Wed, 23 Feb 2005 10:20:14 -0800 |
105 lines |
agreement studies
|
FERNANDO GAMBOA |
Mon, 21 Feb 2005 01:18:03 +0000 |
44 lines |
Re: are older doctors dumber? a role of experts
|
Djulbegovic, Benjamin |
Thu, 17 Feb 2005 14:44:03 -0500 |
79 lines |
Re: are older doctors dumber?
|
Philip Hall |
Thu, 17 Feb 2005 11:24:34 -0600 |
41 lines |
Re: are older doctors dumber?
|
Roy Poses |
Thu, 17 Feb 2005 11:14:28 -0500 |
35 lines |
Re: are older doctors dumber?
|
Djulbegovic, Benjamin |
Wed, 16 Feb 2005 20:05:06 -0500 |
153 lines |
are older doctors dumber?
|
Poses, Roy |
Wed, 16 Feb 2005 17:31:24 -0500 |
107 lines |
Evidence from the past bearing on current debates about training and practice
|
<> |
Tue, 15 Feb 2005 11:59:26 EST |
383 lines |
Re: Innacurate EBM-labeled prediction dangers - Sackett said
|
Paul Glasziou |
Tue, 15 Feb 2005 07:30:07 +0000 |
181 lines |
Re: Advice re study design
|
Paul Glasziou |
Tue, 15 Feb 2005 07:08:39 +0000 |
50 lines |
Advice re study design
|
Lovarini |
Tue, 15 Feb 2005 14:08:50 +1100 |
73 lines |
On old experiences and current outcomes in the applications of EBM
|
<> |
Mon, 14 Feb 2005 21:24:04 EST |
215 lines |
Re: Innacurate EBM-labeled prediction dangers - Sackett said
|
Jim Walker |
Mon, 14 Feb 2005 20:35:10 -0500 |
102 lines |
Re: Semmelweis and consensus
|
Philip Hall |
Mon, 14 Feb 2005 10:19:51 -0600 |
80 lines |
Re: Innacurate EBM-labeled prediction dangers - Sackett said
|
Norman J Vetter |
Mon, 14 Feb 2005 10:29:56 +0000 |
135 lines |
Re: Innacurate EBM-labeled prediction dangers - Sackett said
|
Dan Mayer |
Sun, 13 Feb 2005 22:23:17 -0500 |
219 lines |
Re: Innacurate EBM-labeled prediction dangers - Sackett said
|
Poses, Roy |
Sun, 13 Feb 2005 17:00:19 -0500 |
328 lines |
CME International Conference at Harvard - Early Bird Registration Deadline Feb 15th
|
Jennifer Staple (Unite For Sight) |
Sun, 13 Feb 2005 12:37:09 -0500 |
339 lines |
How EBM has evolved
|
Mike/Linda Stuart |
Sun, 13 Feb 2005 08:14:55 -0800 |
153 lines |
Re: Innacurate EBM-labeled prediction dangers - Sackett said
|
Djulbegovic, Benjamin |
Sat, 12 Feb 2005 23:27:15 -0500 |
117 lines |
Re: Innacurate EBM-labeled prediction dangers - Sackett said
|
Poses, Roy |
Sat, 12 Feb 2005 18:31:22 -0500 |
168 lines |
Re: Innacurate EBM-labeled prediction dangers - Sackett said
|
Djulbegovic, Benjamin |
Sat, 12 Feb 2005 16:16:30 -0500 |
365 lines |
Re: How do surgeon's make decisions?
|
Arin Basu |
Fri, 11 Feb 2005 20:57:45 -0500 |
63 lines |
Fwd: Re: Innacurate EBM-labeled prediction dangers - Sackett said
|
Roy Poses |
Fri, 11 Feb 2005 18:38:00 -0500 |
178 lines |
How do surgeon's make decisions?
|
Uribe, Jennifer |
Fri, 11 Feb 2005 15:46:38 -0500 |
196 lines |
Re: Innacurate EBM-labeled prediction dangers - Sackett said
|
Paul Glasziou |
Fri, 11 Feb 2005 16:54:29 +0000 |
57 lines |
Innacurate EBM-labeled prediction dangers - Sackett said
|
Alfredo y Mª Jesús |
Fri, 11 Feb 2005 16:11:59 +0100 |
35 lines |
NURSES RECONNECTED
|
june clarkson |
Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:21:19 +0100 |
35 lines |
Re: QoL (Follow-up)
|
Andrew Jull |
Fri, 11 Feb 2005 09:48:41 +1300 |
84 lines |
QoL (Follow-up)
|
Matt Williams |
Thu, 10 Feb 2005 14:23:27 +0000 |
49 lines |
Re: FW: BMI: the theory
|
Ronán Conroy |
Thu, 10 Feb 2005 12:35:36 +0000 |
82 lines |
Re: Quality of Life
|
Norman J Vetter |
Thu, 10 Feb 2005 10:06:01 +0000 |
95 lines |
FW: BMI: the theory
|
Gwyn Weatherburn |
Thu, 10 Feb 2005 08:16:18 -0000 |
184 lines |
Re: Quality of Life
|
Paul Glasziou |
Wed, 9 Feb 2005 16:39:31 +0000 |
74 lines |
Quality of Life
|
Matt Williams |
Wed, 9 Feb 2005 16:30:23 +0000 |
48 lines |
Re: BMI
|
Ted Harding |
Wed, 9 Feb 2005 15:53:35 -0000 |
89 lines |
Journal of Health Services Research and Policy Questions and Answers
|
Gillian Parker |
Wed, 9 Feb 2005 15:05:38 +0000 |
65 lines |
Re: BMI
|
David Ives |
Wed, 9 Feb 2005 13:35:42 -0000 |
26 lines |
ICHS Public seminar 24 Feb. Health care reform Chile
|
Patricia Crowley |
Wed, 9 Feb 2005 11:03:23 -0000 |
213 lines |
FW: BMI
|
Gwyn Weatherburn |
Tue, 8 Feb 2005 15:50:47 -0000 |
65 lines |
Supporting evidence-based health and social care management
|
Valerie Wildridge |
Tue, 8 Feb 2005 15:13:39 -0000 |
307 lines |
Re: BMI, the theory?
|
Doggett, David |
Tue, 8 Feb 2005 09:05:02 -0500 |
239 lines |
Re: BMI: the theory? [and some evidence]
|
Jaroslaw G. Wechowski |
Tue, 8 Feb 2005 10:21:02 +0100 |
84 lines |
Re: the theory?
|
Netuveli, Gopal |
Tue, 8 Feb 2005 09:12:35 -0000 |
86 lines |
Re: BMI: the theory? [and some evidence]
|
Ted Harding |
Tue, 8 Feb 2005 00:29:53 -0000 |
61 lines |
Re: BMI: the theory? [and some evidence]
|
Puliyel |
Mon, 7 Feb 2005 22:31:32 +0000 |
106 lines |
Re: the theory?
|
Jaroslaw G. Wechowski |
Mon, 7 Feb 2005 22:09:33 +0100 |
52 lines |
Re: BMI: the theory?
|
Ronán Conroy |
Mon, 7 Feb 2005 11:30:13 +0000 |
62 lines |
Re: BMI: the theory? [and some evidence]
|
Ted Harding |
Sun, 6 Feb 2005 16:56:07 -0000 |
79 lines |
BMI: the theory?
|
Ted Harding |
Sun, 6 Feb 2005 11:53:36 -0000 |
199 lines |
Re: Best EBP Paper 2004!
|
Paul Glasziou |
Thu, 3 Feb 2005 14:33:34 +0000 |
35 lines |
Re: Best EBP Paper 2004!
|
Ted Harding |
Thu, 3 Feb 2005 11:08:42 -0000 |
40 lines |
Best EBP Paper 2004!
|
Andrew Booth |
Wed, 2 Feb 2005 22:34:55 -0000 |
23 lines |
Course: Evidence Based Dentistry
|
Rachel Cox |
Wed, 2 Feb 2005 18:37:47 +0000 |
70 lines |
Urgent EBM question -- some info
|
badri badrinath |
Tue, 1 Feb 2005 13:58:23 +0000 |
36 lines |
Re: best EBM papers of 2004
|
Lubna A. Al-Ansary |
Tue, 1 Feb 2005 00:18:53 -0800 |
189 lines |
Re: Urgent EBM question--please help!
|
Paul Glasziou |
Tue, 1 Feb 2005 07:07:39 +0000 |
50 lines |
Urgent EBM question--please help!
|
Feddern, Tanya |
Mon, 31 Jan 2005 22:50:55 -0500 |
38 lines |