JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH Archives


EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH Archives

EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH Archives


August 2011


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH Home

EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

2-for-1 offer for online R courses for August 2011 through June 2012

Geoffrey Hubona <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Aug 2011 16:10:37 -0400

216 lines

95% CIs from p values

Dr. Carlos Cuello <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Aug 2011 11:01:07 -0500

99 lines

Re: 95% CIs from p values

Mayer, Dan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Aug 2011 13:28:22 -0400

288 lines

Re: 95% CIs from p values

Karla Soares-Weiser <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Aug 2011 13:52:42 -0400

431 lines

Re: 95% CIs from p values

Dr. Carlos Cuello <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Aug 2011 16:10:53 -0500

261 lines

Academic Clinical Lecturer in Public Health

Richard Thomson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Aug 2011 17:07:16 +0100

382 lines

Re: Another EBCPGs Resources List

Bill Cayley, Jr <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Aug 2011 14:51:54 -0700

181 lines

Re: Another EBCPGs Resources List

Mayer, Dan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Aug 2011 17:56:53 -0400

236 lines

Re: Another EBCPGs Resources List

joseph ana <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Aug 2011 00:33:48 +0100

180 lines

Re: Another EBCPGs Resources List

Craig Lockwood <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Aug 2011 09:38:41 +0930

311 lines

Re: Another EBCPGs Resources List

jo kirkpatrick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Aug 2011 02:37:47 +0100

175 lines

Re: Another EBCPGs Resources List

manueli kavika <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Aug 2011 02:12:46 +0000

514 lines

Re: Another EBCPGs Resources List

Sue Lukersmith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Aug 2011 10:37:07 +1000

890 lines

Ben Djulblegovic's evidence can resolve the debate over declared conflicts of interest

Jeremy Howick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Aug 2011 10:38:41 +0100

1379 lines

Re: Ben Djulblegovic's evidence can resolve the debate over declared conflicts of interest

Trish Groves <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Aug 2011 10:55:48 +0100

862 lines

Re: Ben Djulblegovic's evidence can resolve the debate over declared conflicts of interest

Stephen Senn <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Aug 2011 11:07:36 +0100

400 lines

Re: Ben Djulblegovic's evidence can resolve the debate over declared conflicts of interest

Andreas Lundh <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Aug 2011 12:11:15 +0200

491 lines

Re: Ben Djulblegovic's evidence can resolve the debate over declared conflicts of interest

Ash Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Aug 2011 03:13:42 -0700

825 lines

Re: Ben Djulblegovic's evidence can resolve the debate over declared conflicts of interest

Paul Elias <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Aug 2011 08:27:44 -0700

612 lines

Cochrane Library: old reviews still there, just some...isues

Vonville, Helena M <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Aug 2011 11:39:21 -0500

223 lines

Cochrane Reviews published prior to 2005 have been pulled from the Cochrane database

Vonville, Helena M <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Aug 2011 14:11:25 -0500

137 lines

Re: Cochrane Reviews published prior to 2005 have been pulled from the Cochrane database

Dr. Amy Price <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Aug 2011 15:36:56 -0400

243 lines

Re: Cochrane Reviews published prior to 2005 have been pulled from the Cochrane database

Ahmed Abou-Setta <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Aug 2011 13:41:12 -0600

281 lines

Re: Cochrane Reviews published prior to 2005 have been pulled from the Cochrane database

Tudiver, Fraser G. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Aug 2011 19:48:04 +0000

271 lines

Re: Cochrane Reviews published prior to 2005 have been pulled from the Cochrane database

Bastian, Hilda (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Aug 2011 15:49:56 -0400

90 lines

Re: Cochrane Reviews published prior to 2005 have been pulled from the Cochrane database

Ahmed Abou-Setta <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Aug 2011 14:03:11 -0600

116 lines

Re: Cochrane Reviews published prior to 2005 have been pulled from the Cochrane database

John Hilton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Aug 2011 21:06:34 +0100

231 lines

Delfini DMARDS Comparative Safety Systematic Review & More

Michael Stuart <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Aug 2011 08:55:14 -0700

55 lines

DH Public Health Research Consortium - update

Sally Stephenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Aug 2011 17:20:37 +0100

209 lines

Evidence 2011 Effective, Affordable Healthcare ? book now to save £96

Kieran Walsh <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Aug 2011 12:10:00 +0100

144 lines

Ezetimibe/Simvastatin

Ahmed Abou-Setta <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Aug 2011 11:23:21 -0600

648 lines

Re: Ezetimibe/Simvastatin

Ash Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Aug 2011 13:34:51 -0700

537 lines

Re: Ezetimibe/Simvastatin

Jean Levasseur <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Aug 2011 17:49:08 -0400

725 lines

Re: Ezetimibe/Simvastatin

Ahmed M. Abou-Setta, MD <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Aug 2011 16:30:48 -0600

1036 lines

Re: Ezetimibe/Simvastatin

Michael Power <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Aug 2011 06:20:14 +0100

1213 lines

Re: Ezetimibe/Simvastatin

Stephen Senn <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Aug 2011 09:35:25 +0100

292 lines

Re: Ezetimibe/Simvastatin

Ash Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Aug 2011 10:28:08 -0700

441 lines

Re: Ezetimibe/Simvastatin

Piersante Sestini <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Aug 2011 04:36:20 +0200

71 lines

Re: Ezetimibe/Simvastatin

Stephen Senn <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Aug 2011 11:37:50 +0100

118 lines

Re: Ezetimibe/Simvastatin

Ash Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Aug 2011 04:28:13 -0700

224 lines

Re: Ezetimibe/Simvastatin

Piersante Sestini <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Aug 2011 19:43:42 +0200

68 lines

Re: Ezetimibe/Simvastatin

Ash Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Aug 2011 11:09:22 -0700

131 lines

Re: Ezetimibe/Simvastatin

Ash Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Aug 2011 11:28:53 -0700

190 lines

Re: Ezetimibe/Simvastatin

Stephen Senn <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Aug 2011 19:39:51 +0100

140 lines

Re: Ezetimibe/Simvastatin

Ash Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Aug 2011 14:19:08 -0700

101 lines

Re: Ezetimibe/Simvastatin

Dr. Amy Price <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Aug 2011 17:59:12 -0400

306 lines

Re: Ezetimibe/Simvastatin

Piersante Sestini <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Aug 2011 02:05:16 +0200

232 lines

Re: Ezetimibe/Simvastatin

Piersante Sestini <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Aug 2011 03:40:34 +0200

35 lines

Re: Ezetimibe/Simvastatin

Stephen Senn <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Aug 2011 03:59:22 +0100

74 lines

Re: Ezetimibe/Simvastatin

Piersante Sestini <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Aug 2011 06:14:35 +0200

89 lines

Re: Ezetimibe/Simvastatin

Michael Power <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Aug 2011 15:40:27 +0100

71 lines

Re: Ezetimibe/Simvastatin

Michael Power <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Aug 2011 11:27:38 +0100

137 lines

Ezetimibe/Simvastatin and clinical outcomes

Brian Alper MD <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Aug 2011 07:57:59 -0400

256 lines

Re: Ezetimibe/Simvastatin and clinical outcomes

Ash Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Aug 2011 05:24:03 -0700

194 lines

Re: Ezetimibe/Simvastatin and clinical outcomes

Brian Alper MD <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Aug 2011 09:06:11 -0400

378 lines

Re: Ezetimibe/Simvastatin Bad design helps

Dr. Amy Price <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Aug 2011 12:01:40 -0400

345 lines

Re: Ezetimibe/Simvastatin Bad design helps

Ash Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Aug 2011 10:18:27 -0700

226 lines

Re: Ezetimibe/Simvastatin Bad design helps

Dr. Amy Price <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Aug 2011 18:09:45 -0400

459 lines

Final Reminder - ESQUIRE Qualitative Evidence Synthesis Course 6th to 8th September 2011

Andrew Booth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Aug 2011 09:31:19 +0100

974 lines

Follow-up: Cochrane Reviews-- yes, reviews before 2005 are available

Vonville, Helena M <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Aug 2011 09:26:40 -0500

135 lines

FW: Save £96 - book your place at Evidence 2011 - apologies for cross-postings

Olive Goddard <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Aug 2011 09:26:22 +0100

521 lines

How to Practice Evidence-Based Child Health course, 19-21 October 2011, London

Ruth Gilbert <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Aug 2011 17:18:01 +0100

260 lines

Improving quality in the marking of student research reports

Margaret MacDougall <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 Aug 2011 11:12:43 +0100

85 lines

Invitation as a Reviewer

FABRICIO RIOS-SANTOS <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Aug 2011 02:30:59 -0300

159 lines

July 2011 newsletter of the International Society for Evidence-based Health Care

Paul Glasziou <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Aug 2011 15:31:43 +1000

223 lines

Just Published - Psychiatric Disorder impact on Health Status

David Cawthorpe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Aug 2011 01:34:38 -0600

50 lines

Latest version of the TRIP Database

Jon Brassey <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Aug 2011 13:01:12 +0100

84 lines

Re: Latest version of the TRIP Database

Dr. Amy Price <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Aug 2011 22:57:23 -0400

256 lines

List etiquette

Douglas Badenoch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Aug 2011 12:26:09 +0100

595 lines

Re: Lung cancer screening trial

Ash Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 Aug 2011 02:47:47 -0700

398 lines

Re: Medtronic's Yale project and EBM

Ash Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Aug 2011 09:05:44 -0700

418 lines

ONLINE COURSE: Fundamentals of Using R

Geoffrey Hubona <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Aug 2011 22:18:33 -0400

139 lines

Opportunity to become Editor & Peer Reviewer

Angel Magar <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Aug 2011 08:18:22 +0545

81 lines

Paul Meier, Revolutionary Medical Statistician, Dies at 87 - NYTimes.com

Richard Hockey <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Aug 2011 10:05:38 +1000

87 lines

PhD studentships available at Peninsula Medical School, University of Exeter

Mark Pearson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Aug 2011 10:26:31 +0100

37 lines

Qualitative Research Methods courses at University of Oxford

Jenny Hislop <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Aug 2011 11:53:24 +0100

367 lines

Regulation, publication and pre-specification

Stephen Senn <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Aug 2011 12:56:01 +0100

178 lines

Re: Regulation, publication and pre-specification

Michael Power <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Aug 2011 14:54:01 +0100

147 lines

Re: Regulation, publication and pre-specification

Stephen Senn <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Aug 2011 16:20:52 +0100

240 lines

Re: Regulation, publication and pre-specification

Paul Elias <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Aug 2011 09:08:12 -0700

289 lines

Reports > Communicating Risks and Benefits: An Evidence-Based User's Guide

Richard Hockey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Aug 2011 17:11:53 +1000

84 lines

Researcher Post at German Cochrane Centre

Britta Lang <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Aug 2011 10:30:36 +0200

647 lines

Researchers don't mean to exaggerate, but lots of things can distort findings | Ben Goldacre | Comment is free | The Guardian

Richard Hockey <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Aug 2011 10:09:22 +1000

85 lines

Re: Researchers don't mean to exaggerate, but lots of things can distort findings | Ben Goldacre | Comment is free | The Guardian

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 Aug 2011 22:53:27 -0400

78 lines

Re: Researchers don't mean to exaggerate, but lots of things can distort findings | Ben Goldacre | Comment is free | The Guardian

Ronan Conroy <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Aug 2011 11:02:53 +0100

118 lines

Re: Sample Size Question

Mark V. Johnston <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Aug 2011 16:43:32 -0500

790 lines

Re: Sample Size Question

jo kirkpatrick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Aug 2011 02:25:54 +0100

255 lines

Re: Sample Size Question

Ted Harding <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Aug 2011 08:26:23 +0100

88 lines

Re: Sample Size Question

Klim McPherson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Aug 2011 09:19:49 +0100

112 lines

Re: Sample Size Question

Dr. Amy Price <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Aug 2011 04:30:31 -0400

141 lines

Re: Sample Size Question

Klim McPherson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Aug 2011 09:48:14 +0100

163 lines

Re: Sample Size Question

jo kirkpatrick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Aug 2011 16:26:14 +0100

182 lines

Re: Sample Size Question

jo kirkpatrick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Aug 2011 18:35:43 +0100

328 lines

Re: Sample Size Question

Klim McPherson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Aug 2011 20:14:47 +0100

469 lines

Re: Sample Size Question

Stephen Senn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Aug 2011 20:28:14 +0100

281 lines

Re: Sample Size Question

jo kirkpatrick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Aug 2011 23:04:44 +0100

444 lines

Re: Sample Size Question

Ahmed Abou-Setta <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Aug 2011 16:33:02 -0600

776 lines

Re: Sample Size Question

Stephen Senn <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Aug 2011 00:33:09 +0100

354 lines

Re: Sample Size Question

jo kirkpatrick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Aug 2011 08:11:44 +0100

593 lines

Re: Sample Size Question

jo kirkpatrick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Aug 2011 11:32:37 +0100

97 lines

Re: Sample Size Question

Paul Elias <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Aug 2011 06:36:49 -0700

728 lines

Re: Sample Size Question

brnbaum <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Aug 2011 08:56:08 -0700

25 lines

Sample Size Question

Stephen Senn <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Aug 2011 17:20:36 +0100

54 lines

Re: Sample Size Question

jo kirkpatrick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Aug 2011 20:53:37 +0100

97 lines

Senn's further fallacy

Jeremy Howick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Aug 2011 11:33:52 +0100

460 lines

Senn's further remarks

Dr. Amy Price <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Aug 2011 10:10:25 -0400

1864 lines

Re: Senn's further remarks

Trish Groves <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Aug 2011 15:25:56 +0100

1281 lines

Something does indeed need to be done

Stephen Senn <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Aug 2011 13:23:22 +0100

1081 lines

Re: Something does indeed need to be done

Michael Power <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Aug 2011 13:43:00 +0100

1305 lines

Re: Something does indeed need to be done

Trish Groves <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Aug 2011 13:54:57 +0100

824 lines

Re: Something does indeed need to be done

Stephen Senn <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Aug 2011 14:16:48 +0100

1056 lines

Re: Something does indeed need to be done

Trish Groves <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Aug 2011 14:59:48 +0100

1115 lines

Re: Something does indeed need to be done

Paul Elias <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Aug 2011 07:48:17 -0700

883 lines

Re: Something does indeed need to be done

Tom Jefferson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Aug 2011 10:39:31 +0200

1784 lines

Re: Something does indeed need to be done

Rakesh Biswas <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Aug 2011 21:03:12 +0530

1883 lines

Re: Something does indeed need to be done

Tom Jefferson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Aug 2011 21:43:32 +0200

1954 lines

Re: Something does indeed need to be done

Paul Elias <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Aug 2011 19:27:05 -0700

958 lines

Re: Something does indeed need to be done

Dr. Amy Price <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Aug 2011 00:40:51 -0400

1627 lines

Re: Something does indeed need to be done

Tom Jefferson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Aug 2011 11:02:57 +0200

740 lines

Re: Something does indeed need to be done

Rakesh Biswas <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Aug 2011 14:43:38 +0530

1591 lines

Re: Something does indeed need to be done

Rakesh Biswas <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Aug 2011 14:54:16 +0530

1701 lines

Re: Something does indeed need to be done

Michael Power <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Aug 2011 12:23:23 +0100

2013 lines

Re: Something does indeed need to be done

Dr. Amy Price <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Aug 2011 17:44:11 -0400

1447 lines

Something else does indeed need to be done

Stephen Senn <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Aug 2011 13:02:17 +0100

391 lines

Re: Something else does indeed need to be done

Piersante Sestini <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 Aug 2011 05:34:52 +0200

119 lines

Re: Something else does indeed need to be done

Jeremy Howick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Aug 2011 11:18:22 +0100

68 lines

Re: Something else does indeed need to be done

Djulbegovic, Benjamin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Aug 2011 11:17:31 +0000

99 lines

Re: Something else does indeed need to be done

Douglas Badenoch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Aug 2011 12:37:14 +0100

111 lines

Re: Something else does indeed need to be done

Steve Simon, P.Mean Consulting <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Aug 2011 10:00:37 -0500

83 lines

Re: Something else does indeed need to be done

Ahmed Abou-Setta <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Aug 2011 09:44:50 -0600

131 lines

Re: Something else does indeed need to be done

Piersante Sestini <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Aug 2011 19:27:57 +0200

42 lines

Re: Something else does indeed need to be done

Bastian, Hilda (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Aug 2011 18:09:02 -0400

166 lines

Re: Something else does indeed need to be done

Dr. Amy Price <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Aug 2011 21:04:02 -0400

661 lines

Re: Something else does indeed need to be done

Douglas Badenoch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Aug 2011 09:27:28 +0100

92 lines

Re: Something else does indeed need to be done

Ronan Conroy <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Aug 2011 17:58:30 +0100

129 lines

Re: Something else does indeed need to be done

Ronan Conroy <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Aug 2011 18:03:02 +0100

100 lines

Re: Something else does indeed need to be done

Ahmed Abou-Setta <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Aug 2011 11:39:06 -0600

234 lines

Re: Something else does indeed need to be done

Ash Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Aug 2011 12:20:31 -0700

402 lines

Re: Something else does indeed need to be done

Dr. Amy Price <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Aug 2011 17:07:50 -0400

271 lines

Re: Something else does indeed need to be done

Dr. Amy Price <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Aug 2011 17:35:54 -0400

297 lines

Re: Something else does indeed need to be done

Tom Jefferson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Aug 2011 10:53:08 +0200

240 lines

Re: Something else does indeed need to be done

Trish Groves <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Aug 2011 09:58:43 +0100

305 lines

Re: Something else does indeed need to be done

Dr. Amy Price <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Aug 2011 07:34:03 -0400

424 lines

Re: Something else does indeed need to be done

Tom Jefferson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Aug 2011 14:06:38 +0200

359 lines

Re: Something else does indeed need to be done

Ahmed Abou-Setta <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Aug 2011 10:47:11 -0600

578 lines

Re: Something else does indeed need to be done

Djulbegovic, Benjamin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Aug 2011 18:12:46 +0000

434 lines

Re: Something else does indeed need to be done

Bastian, Hilda (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Aug 2011 15:09:38 -0400

218 lines

Re: Something else does indeed need to be done

Tom Jefferson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Aug 2011 21:35:40 +0200

566 lines

Re: Something else does indeed need to be done

Stephen Senn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Aug 2011 20:44:49 +0100

283 lines

Re: Something else does indeed need to be done

Rakesh Biswas <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Aug 2011 12:24:55 +0530

646 lines

Re: Something else does indeed need to be done

Michael Power <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Aug 2011 13:54:47 +0100

130 lines

Re: Something else does indeed need to be done

Ronan Conroy <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Aug 2011 15:05:54 +0100

114 lines

Re: Something else does indeed need to be done

Michael Power <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Aug 2011 15:59:37 +0100

220 lines

Re: Something else does indeed need to be done

Tom Jefferson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Aug 2011 21:50:38 +0200

174 lines

Re: Something else does indeed need to be done

Rakesh Biswas <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Aug 2011 10:58:10 +0530

659 lines

Re: Something else does indeed need to be done

Michael Power <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Aug 2011 08:39:29 +0100

419 lines

Re: Something else does indeed need to be done

Tom Jefferson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Aug 2011 10:15:56 +0200

483 lines

Re: Something else does indeed need to be done

Ash Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Aug 2011 04:24:09 -0700

398 lines

Re: Something else does indeed need to be done

Ronan Conroy <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Aug 2011 12:29:24 +0100

101 lines

Re: Something else does indeed need to be done

Ash Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Aug 2011 05:06:19 -0700

215 lines

Re: Something else does indeed need to be done

Michael Power <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Aug 2011 13:24:24 +0100

143 lines

Re: Something else does indeed need to be done

Ronan Conroy <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Aug 2011 14:30:54 +0100

141 lines

Re: Something else does indeed need to be done

Michael Power <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Aug 2011 15:38:54 +0100

278 lines

Re: Something else does indeed need to be done

Rakesh Biswas <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Aug 2011 22:57:33 +0530

561 lines

Statistics question

Cristian Baicus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Aug 2011 18:37:32 +0300

116 lines

Re: Statistics question

Ronan Conroy <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Aug 2011 17:15:24 +0100

34 lines

Re: Statistics question

Stephen Senn <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Aug 2011 17:20:36 +0100

72 lines

Re: Statistics question

Paul Elias <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Aug 2011 11:08:31 -0700

193 lines

Study questions important heart failure trials

Paul Elias <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Aug 2011 12:13:22 -0700

92 lines

Turning the tide on conflicts of interest

Ash Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Aug 2011 00:34:15 -0700

110 lines

Re: Turning the tide on conflicts of interest

jo kirkpatrick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Aug 2011 12:35:28 +0100

166 lines

Re: Turning the tide on conflicts of interest

Stephen Senn <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Aug 2011 13:07:48 +0100

379 lines

Re: Turning the tide on conflicts of interest

Michael Bennett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Aug 2011 10:10:11 +1000

453 lines

Re: Turning the tide on conflicts of interest

Dr. Amy Price <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Aug 2011 22:12:58 -0400

866 lines

Re: Turning the tide on conflicts of interest

Jacob Puliyel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Aug 2011 10:30:47 +0530

862 lines

Re: Turning the tide on conflicts of interest

Ash Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Aug 2011 00:28:42 -0700

726 lines

Re: Turning the tide on conflicts of interest

jo kirkpatrick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Aug 2011 11:43:29 +0100

338 lines

Re: Turning the tide on conflicts of interest

Stephen Senn <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Aug 2011 12:03:26 +0100

585 lines

Re: Turning the tide on conflicts of interest

Ronan Conroy <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Aug 2011 12:35:35 +0100

89 lines

Re: Turning the tide on conflicts of interest

Jeremy Howick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Aug 2011 12:40:01 +0100

700 lines

University of Oxford welcomes applications for Short Courses in Evidence-Based Health Care

CPD Health <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Aug 2011 16:48:51 +0100

186 lines

US Tightens Financial Conflict of Interest Rules for Researchers

Rakesh Biswas <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Aug 2011 22:27:48 +0530

191 lines

Re: US Tightens Financial Conflict of Interest Rules for Researchers

Dr. Amy Price <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Aug 2011 13:35:16 -0400

415 lines

xbb794eo 8nsin4fkr

Michelle Moran <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Aug 2011 01:50:53 +0100

15 lines

JISCMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


WWW.JISCMAIL.AC.UK

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager