Hi there!
Just a short response to Annette's email to the list:
> Finding it curious that there seems to be more interest in quant. analysis
> than s/w to support qual. methods . . . especially given it's a qual-s/w
> group. But then some talk is better than no talk! So no objections -
just
> voicing a curiosity . . .
I am new to this list, and I am a strong advocate of qualitative research
and definitly very interested in applying s/w that could assist in analysing
data. I would appreciate discussions around qualitative s/w!! :-)
> If anyone has had experience introducing groups of researchers to qual s/w
> that they'd be happy to share - I'd be interested in hearing about this:
> what people found interesting, difficult, useful, annoying etc. about the
> sofware. Where the learning curves were steepest, ways to diminish
> difficulty factors and 'get straight in'. Where researchers derived real
> benefit from using software - and which products. . . etc.
We are starting an integrated research project in South Africa, with a
qualitative component focusing on rural livelihoods. We are thinking of
using NUD*IST, but are inexperienced so far. So if anybody is out there who
has experience in this field it would be great if you could share this with
us!
We will share our experiences once we got started.
Kind regards,
Bettina
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Bettina Koelle
South Africa
email: [log in to unmask]
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|