Stan Metheny wrote:
>...All Latin Rite Metropolitans are archbishops but not all Latin Rite
archbishops are Metropolitans.
Well, you lost me there (shucks, just when I thought I was making such nice
progress, too).
Seems to me that one could no more be an Archbishop without a metropolis than
a Bishop without a see. That's the *definition* of an Archbishop, ain't it?
After all, even virtual sees have Bishops:
http://www.partenia.org/eng/index1.htm
>Archbishops who are also Metropolitans wear their archbishop's hat as head of
the (arch)diocese AND as head of a province.
agreed.
no problem (I think).
Best,
cc
____________________________________________________________________
Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|