On 13 Jul 1999, Christopher Crockett wrote:
> Curious thing is that, as best I can see, the Southern Thesis, even if true
> in all particulars, detracts not a whit from the remarkable scholarship of
> Haering, whose editions and interpretations stand quite well on their own,
> thank you very much, from what little I can make out.
>
> Who needs the School of Chartres?
>
> Whence commeth this (one might say, blinding) attachment to such a construct?
Anybody here ever heard of feudalism?
Your observation on the relationship of Haering's work to "the School of
Chartres" is as worthwhile as anything ever could be.
Cheers,
John P.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|