The following is a message I received from Bob Murphy in Australia.
-DC
>The 1999 Technical and Maintenance Conference of the Australian Trucking
>Association and Australian Road Transport Suppliers Association ended
>yesterday. One of the most important developments in the entire
>"road-friendly" suspension issue was unveiled at that Conference. It has
>wide reaching implications for heavy truck productivity, transport cost
>reduction, and road wear reduction. That development is the "Road
>Friendly Suspension Analyzer" by Roaduser International and displayed for
>the first time at the Conference. It is now possible to precisely and
>quickly test whether a suspension on a truck is actually road-friendly or
>not. The device is accurate enough to use for suspension development,
>suspension tuning, dialling in the best dampers with the biggest
>road-friendly reserve built in to increase longevity, and ADR
>certification. The RFS Analyzer is also simple enough and fast enough to
>use for roadside enforcement.
I was on the NRTC Mass Limits Review Steering Committee for two years and
the RFS Analyzer has filled in the missing link in the whole Road-Friendly
debate. The missing link was verification of damper performance. Damper
performance was the main difference between the best and worst performing
heavy vehicle suspensions tested during the Mass Limits Review. The best
and the worst (lowest and highest peak dynamic loads) performing
suspensions were both air. They were, in fact, the same air suspension,
with and without shock absorbers. The state road authorities quite
rightly reticent about the new mass limits because there was no practical
way for them to ensure claimed road-friendly suspension types were
actually road-friendly in-service. It appears to be possible and
practical to ensure suspensions are road-friendly. Given the short lead
up to the January 1 requirement for suspension certification, the concerns
of the state road authorities, and the release of the new Analyzer at the
Technical and Maintenance Conference, I thought it appropriate to
forward this information directly to people I know who might be
interested. The information and photos will most probably appear in the
trade media in due course. If anyone wants a pic, I took some at the
Conference. Let me know. The attachment is in Word 7. I did a cut and
paste below my signature block for those with firewalls and other such
things who cannot open attachments.
Regards, Bob Murphy
>IS Edit Transport & Technical Communications
>PO Box 111
>Campbells Creek VIC 3451
>AUSTRALIA Tel: +61 3 5476 4408
>Fax: +61 3 5476 4474
>Mob: 0418 312 116 [log in to unmask]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Dr David Cebon
Cambridge University Engineering Department
Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK
Tel +44 1223 332665 Email: [log in to unmask]
Fax +44 1223 332662 URL: http://www2.eng.cam.ac.uk/~dc
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
|