On Fri, 17 Dec 1999 11:52:07, Alex wrote:
>Just to muddy the waters further...
>[snip]
> But he wasn't "in his
>lunacy" at this date. All the evidence suggests that EP was sane and thus
>fit to stand trial, and, ironically enough, would have probably not been
>hanged...
Mild concern to express here: the learned gents on the Ezra Pound list
(where I spend short periods of time to aid my digestion) find this
question far from cut'n'dried and can keep on with it for months. It
all becomes very "is!" "isn't!" and some way below the high standards
of dialogue we set for ourselves on this list...
RC
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|