IDW wrote:
>>Jonathan,
>> You seem to have rehersed the various camps points fairly well
>>each group can quote "horror" stories of misinterpretation. Presumably
>>good practice dictates reporting the result with the Reference Interval
>>to aid interpretation?
But routine **clinical practice** includes communicating results by word of
mouth, sometimes with intervening 'phones, and on scraps of paper, some of
which are on desks, and others in brown folders...
And with some computer technologies there is no guarantee that the report the
clinician sees is identical in either content or layout to what you
reported...
Jonathan
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|