I'm with Tim on this one. The default must be to reject unlabelled samples,
but as someone or other said rules are made for the obedience of fools and
the guidance of wise men (and women). Don't obey the rules and you need a
truly good reason that your peers would support.
Robert Forrest
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [log in to unmask]
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Tim
> Reynolds
> Sent: 22 March 1999 12:50
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: unlabelled specimens (again)
>
>
> WE have received legal advice from the Trust's solicitors, in
> respect of our
> CNST application (TRust indemnity insurance) And have been told in no
> uncertain terms that we are not allowed to analyse Any unlabelled
> sample and
> that samples must always be taken again. WE do very occasionally bend the
> rules but because of the negligence insurance rules we now insist on fresh
> samples in 99.99% of cases.
>
> TIM
>
>
>
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|