Interesting to see all these responses about possession of ideas. I
believe there are people working on this, see the 'STS' list (Science
Studies). When I originally remarked on copyright, this was just what
I had in mind. What I really think is that increasing Fordization etc
of academe will in the long run prove very destructive especially now
in the time when one person can grasp so little of the enormous flood
of information and skills that can be put to use. Just when we most
need co-operation, we are forced into a war of all against all.
Of course individuals mostly have to toe the line to get the next
contract, which re-inforces it and so on (Is this 'emergence'?)
> I've got a few fairly original ideas of my own you know. I'm working on
> them right now. But I'm not posting them here. They are MY ideas, MINE do
> you hear me! I'm not sharing them in this email, copy righted or not. No,
> you can't have them for months yet, by which time I will have signed all
> rights and chance of profit over to some esteemed academic journal, thus
> hopefully helping me meet the internally imposed RAE type criteria that
> stand between me and continued employment. You want to talk
> commodification of knowledge? It's been made very clear to me that these
> ideas I'm having are all I have to sell/exchange in order to put food on
> the table of my young family. And you know the funny thing - guess what
> these ideas I am so possessive of are about. . . Participatory Rural
> Appraisal. Yes you got it, a field/action method that is all about the
> free sharing of ideas. . . Is there something bazaar about the
> Fordification of academic life, or is it just me ?
>
> Yours (cynically? Ironically?)
> Mike
>
>
>
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|