For your interest...kris
***************************************
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [asia-apec 439] The Asia-Pacific Peoples' Assembly
From: [log in to unmask] (PAN Asia Pacific)
Sender: [log in to unmask]
X-Sequence: asia-apec 439
Reply-To: [log in to unmask]
THE ASIA-PACIFIC PEOPLES' ASSEMBLY
November 10-15, 1998
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
CONFRONTING GLOBALIZATION: REASSERTING PEOPLES' RIGHTS
This year's Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Leaders'
Meeting will be held in November in Malaysia. Since the first
Leaders' Meeting in 1993, representatives of non-governmental
organisations (NGOs), people's organisations, and social movements
have met in parallel gatherings to highlight concerns about the
"free trade, free market" model of trade and investment
liberalisation that APEC promotes. Today, a strong global movement
continuously monitors, educates and mobilises people to fight the
neo liberal economic programmes causing untold hardship to workers,
women and peoples the world over. More than 300 participants from
the Asia-Pacific region are expected to attend the Peoples' Assembly
in Kuala Lumpur. This year's assembly is of utmost importance given
the current financial crisis in Asia, the 50th anniversary of the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and the upcoming negotiations
at the WTO.
Issues and sector forums, some of which may take place outside of
Malaysi a prior to the Peoples' Assembly, will feed into a two-day
plenary session on November 13-14 in Kuala Lumpur. Each Forum will
be required to commit to at least two specific actions that it can
present at the plenary session. The plenary will build a common
analysis and a plan of action with the overall objective to
strengthen the peoples' movement against globalisation.
In Malaysia, preparations for the summit have begun. In February,
over 20 organisations attended a workshop on APEC in Kuala Lumpur. A
Secretariat and a Working Committee have been formed and local
organisations have committed to hosting various issue and sector
forums. A national process of events, seminars, and workshops prior
to the summit will raise awareness about APEC and globalisation and
increase local participation in the summit activities.
WHAT IS APEC?
APEC is a regional consultative forum that includes Australia,
Brunei, Canada, Chile, China, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Japan, the
Republic of Korea, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea,
the Philippines, Singapore, Taiwan, Thailand, and the United States,
with Peru, Russia, and Vietnam as new members this year. APEC aims
for regional free trade by the year 2010 for developed countries and
2020 for developing countries.
"Through APEC, we aim to get governments out of the way, opening the
way for business to do business."- US Assistant Secretary of State
for Econom ic Affairs Joan Spero
APEC is a non-accountable body in which heads-of-state meet behind
closed doors as "Economic Leaders": representatives of economies not
countries. Participation is limited to government, business, and
academia, and, as a result, APEC fails to address the impact of
globalisation on workers, the environment, human rights, women,
indigenous peoples, farmers, and the poor. The Asia-Pacific
Peoples' Assembly refuses to let APEC ignore these issues.
WHY A PEOPLES' ASSEMBLY?
There is a rush to globalise. All over the world, governments are
racing to negotiating tables, eager to sign their sovereignty away
for pieces of the economic miracle that globalisation promises. The
supposed miracle is tempting: rapid economic growth, rapid
development-a gateway to the good life. It is also threatening:
those who do not join will surely perish in poverty, isolation, and
backwardness. But the simplicity of its message masks the enormity
of its effect: globalisation may be the most fundamental redesign of
the world's economic, political, and cultural systems ever to take
place.
Globalisation, through modern communications and through free
trade blocks, multilateral agreements such as the WTO, and global
financial institutions such as the World Bank and the IMF, has
produced an unprecedented integration of the world economy. Money,
as those in Mexico and Southeast Asia certainly understand, can now
travel the world in seconds. Proponents of globalisation argue that
this integration strengthens competition and ensures the optimum
distribution of resources. They claim it will bring rapid economic
growth and prosperity for all.
But, behind the promises of prosperity there exists a grim reality:
the disintegration of the social order, increasing inequality and
squalor, displacement and landlessness, violence and homelessness,
alienation and growing fear of the future. Globalisation has also
brought massive damage to the natural world as evidenced by global
climate change, ozone depletion, widespread species loss, water
crises, and numerous forms of pollution.
Globalisation has not even managed to create the so-called
level-playing field that it promises; multilateral agreements
continue to reflect power imbalances between the north and the
south. Few southern countries possess the technological know-how
and capital to compete within the global economy, and multilateral
agreements on investments and intellectual property only exacerbate
the inequalities between nations. Consequently, competition to
attract capital invariably depends on the "environment" for
investment; in other words, the cost of labour, the degree of
environmental and safety regulations, and the level of taxation.
This is not development but a race to the bottom.
The proponents of globalisation look beyond the current reality;
they speak about how all boats will eventually rise with the tide of
economic growth. In the meantime, they acknowledge that some people
will have to suffer and shoulder the risks. These people are
clearly not from transnational corporations, which now control more
than 60% of all global trade. And, they are certainly not the
wealthy, who can afford the imported food and the newly privatised
services such as health care. They are farmers forced off their
lands to make way for large-scale monoculture crops for export. They
are workers who have lost jobs to machines and corporate flight.
They are women forced to sell their bodies in the tourism industry .
They are indigenous peoples forced off their lands for short-term
mining profits. And, as they wait for globalisation's unseen
rewards, these people are rapidly losing any democratic space that
they may have had to voice their opposition to these policies and to
seek their rightful dues.
Globalisation has to be scrutinised and exposed. It is a process
that concentrates capital and political control in the hands of the
few, while offering nothing to those most in need. We must develop
a vision of a radically reshaped international economic and
financial order where economic power, wealth and income are more
equitably distributed and the environment is respected. This is our
challenge when we meet during the Peoples' Assembly.
CONFRONTING GLOBALIZATION: REASSERTING PEOPLES' RIGHTS
1998 marks the 50th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of
Human Rights. Yet, as we celebrate the recognition of our universal
rights, violations of these rights have increased dramatically this
year. The current regional crisis has upset economies, communities,
and environments, and has undermined the economic, social, and
cultural rights that we have struggled hard for. As past People's
Summits have warned, the crisis is the logical outcome of a model of
development that clearly fails to grasp what "human rights"
mean.
LABOUR
Globalisation was supposed to bring more jobs, at least that
was what was promised. Instead, workers everywhere are losing work
and settling for less as employers, armed with labour saving
technologies and open markets, surf the world picking the best bid
from countries desperate for investment. In the name of profit
maximisation and efficiency, workers are told to compete globally,
creating a vicious downward spiral as wages and benefits fall to the
lowest common denominator. Any opposition to these deteriorating
conditions is met by smug reminders that jobs can always go
elsewhere. And indeed they do.
While resistance to free trade is met with stiff punishments, the
demand for common labour standards is given nothing but lip service.
Workers are constantly denied the right of association and the right
to bargain collectively. Workers taking industrial action are met
with state repression as governments bend to the will of investors.
Globalisation binds the hands of labour as it frees the hands of
capital.
WOMEN
Women suffer most from globalisation. In Asia, where the
economic crisis has brought massive unemployment, 60% of those
retrenched have been women. Increasing poverty and a growing lack
of resources have forced women to migrate across borders only to
work in harsh and exploitative conditions without rights to
organise.
The New World Order has escalated the trade of women for sex and
bonded or forced labour. And the privatisation of basic services,
especially health care, is a further threat to women's health and
reproductive rights.
FOOD SECURITY
What do the promoters of globalisation envision for agriculture? They
see a world where nations produce what they can produce most
efficiently and trade those products for the goods that they need
from other nations. In this scenario, some nations may not even
need any agriculture, because they can trade industrial goods for
food. Small farmers may be forced off their lands, but this is part
of industrialisation. And if transnational corporations can bring
food to the table more cheaply, then so be it.
But what happens when your currency crashes and you are unable to
pay for the food or agricultural inputs that you have to import?
What happens to the millions whose only access to food comes from
their access to land? What happens when most of the world's food
system is controlled by a handful of transnational corporations?
What guarantees would there be that the food we eat and produce is
safe and sustainable? And, what kind of free market is there
anyway when the average annual subsidy to an American farmer is
nearly 8 times the annual income of the average Malaysian farmer?
Indeed, what happens to food security in the global economy?
PROPOSED PROGRAMME OF THE PEOPLES' ASSEMBLY
November 10: Opening Ceremonies
Discussion: "Trade and Investment Liberalisation"
November 11-12: Issue and Sector Forums
Human Rights and Democracy
Food Security and Agriculture
The Environment and Sustainability
Privatisation and Financial Deregulation
The Arms Trade and Militarization
The Rural and Urban Poor
The Media
Indigenous Peoples
US-Japan Security
Migrant Labour
Women
Youth and Students
November 13-14: Peoples' Assembly (Plenary)
November 15: Final Assembly
Closing Activity
Interested organisations and individuals from within and outside of
Malay sia are encouraged to join in hosting the Peoples' Assembly.
If you or your organisation are interested in hosting or assisting
with a Peoples' Assembly event, an issue or sector forum, or a
cultural activity, please contact the Secretariat for more
information. The intention is to create a genuine space to contest
crucial ideas and issues in an open and participatory way.
THE SECRETARIAT
57 Lorong Kurau
59100 Bansar,
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Tel: 603-283-6245
Email: [log in to unmask]
Website: www.vcn.bc.ca/summit
----- End Included Message -----
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
