The subject of the NISO standard will be DC-simple. I think there is
quite a good deal of work yet to do on qualified DC.
On Wednesday, January 14, 1998 11:27 AM, Jon Knight
[SMTP:[log in to unmask]] wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jan 1998, Nancy Morgan wrote:
> > Whether it's true or not, there is a perception of instability.
> > Niso standardization will help.
>
> Well seeing as I seem to be in a minority of one on this one, fair
enough.
> I find the thought of people using DC (or anything) just because its
been
> rubber stamped by a standards body rather than proved in the field
rather
> frightening. However, that's their problem. More of a problem for me
is
> how will a standardised DC impact our community ability to modify DC
in
> the future? Or are we aiming for a point when we can finally say,
"Right
> DC is done, it works, its standardised, we can get on with the rest of
our
> lives."?
>
> Tatty bye,
>
> Jim'll
>
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-
> Jon "Jim'll" Knight, Researcher, Sysop and General Dogsbody, Dept.
Computer
> Studies, Loughborough University of Technology, Leics., ENGLAND. LE11
3TU.
> * I've found I now dream in Perl. More worryingly, I enjoy those
dreams. *
|