I think what I was trying to get at, is that when Deleuze talks
(Cinema 2) about how (tacit reference to Godard's "Deux ou Trois
Chose ....") in order to show a housing estate as metaphor for
prostitution, you now have to actually show a housing estate AS
prostitution, he was suggesting that there is an indiscernibility
between image and referent. This would suggest that his own use of
metaphor is enough to posit the image as the crystal, and the
crystal as the image. Not that you can see the two sides to the
crystal IN the image, but that the two sides of the crystal ARE the
image, his vocab. being the attempt at a minor discourse as a form of
becoming WITHIN the normative form of language .....
.... but then there was that magic bullet theory as well!!
david M-J.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|