Dick Hendrickson writes:
> I like the idea of some sort of READONLY attribute for module variables
> and even tried to slip it past J3 a couple of times. But, I think there
> are 2 serious problems with them that I haven't seen addressed here....
> I DON'T want Richard Maine to tell me what the answer is!).
The answer, of course, is 42. :-)
But I agree with what I think is your point. It doesn't really matter
what the answer is. The point (well, my version of it) is that there
are some questions that would need answering to do this. And some of
the questions are subtle, or at least less than perfectly obvious.
And we'll mess them up if we do a rush job. I'd forgotten to think
about the pointer and target questions, but then I didn't spend much
time thinking about it at all.... (you'll note that doesn't keep me
from talking about it, alas...).
--
Richard Maine
[log in to unmask]
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|