JISCMail - COMP-FORTRAN-90 Archives

Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Subscriber's Corner

Email Lists

COMP-FORTRAN-90 Archives

1998

View:

Show Author | Hide Author

		LISTSERV Archives
		COMP-FORTRAN-90 Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Get Password

Subject	From	Date	Size
Comparison of C and Ada costs	Van Snyder	Wed, 07 Jan 1998 11:37:31 PST	59 lines
Re: Comparison of C and Ada costs	Roger Glover	Wed, 07 Jan 1998 17:22:46 -0600	106 lines
Errata: Re: Comparison of C and Ada costs	Roger Glover	Thu, 08 Jan 1998 13:13:54 -0600	78 lines
Errata: Re: Comparison of C and Ada costs (fwd)	Van Snyder	Thu, 08 Jan 1998 11:43:02 PST	40 lines
Re: Errata: Re: Comparison of C and Ada costs (fwd)	Alberto Fasso'	Thu, 08 Jan 1998 12:30:46 -0800 (PST)	48 lines
Re: Errata: Re: Comparison of C and Ada costs (fwd)	Roger Glover	Thu, 08 Jan 1998 17:55:49 -0600	146 lines
Re: Errata: Re: Comparison of C and Ada costs	W. J. Metzger	Fri, 9 Jan 1998 09:46:41 +0100 (MET)	30 lines
RE: Errata: Re: Comparison of C and Ada costs	Peter Jewell	Fri, 9 Jan 1998 10:07:14 -0000	60 lines
Re: Errata: Re: Comparison of C and Ada costs (fwd)	Dick Hendrickson	Fri, 09 Jan 1998 10:24:35 -0600	33 lines
Re: Errata: Re: Comparison of C and Ada costs	Roger Glover	Fri, 09 Jan 1998 10:40:35 -0600	34 lines
Re: Errata: Re: Comparison of C and Ada costs (fwd)	David B. Serafini	Fri, 9 Jan 1998 11:28:01 -0600 (CST)	39 lines
Re: Errata: Re: Comparison of C and Ada costs (fwd)	David B. Serafini	Fri, 9 Jan 1998 11:39:51 -0600 (CST)	43 lines
Re: Errata: Re: Comparison of C and Ada costs (fwd)	Dick Hendrickson	Fri, 09 Jan 1998 12:15:04 -0600	41 lines
executing shell commands within Fortran	Peter Bismuti	Mon, 12 Jan 1998 13:31:49 -0500 (EST)	29 lines
A paper on HPF...	Van Snyder	Mon, 12 Jan 1998 11:16:43 PST	18 lines
A dissertation that Fortran-9x vendors ought to read	Van Snyder	Mon, 12 Jan 1998 12:20:07 PST	48 lines
A paper on HPF... (fwd)	Van Snyder	Mon, 12 Jan 1998 13:46:54 PST	23 lines
Re: executing shell commands within Fortran	Jan van Oosterwijk	Tue, 13 Jan 1998 09:45:28 +0100	43 lines
Re: executing shell commands within Fortran	Harvey Richardson	Tue, 13 Jan 1998 08:47:21 GMT	23 lines
Re: executing shell commands within Fortran	<>	Tue, 13 Jan 1998 13:05:13 +0100	51 lines
Re: executing shell commands within Fortran	John Turner	Tue, 13 Jan 1998 10:08:08 -0500	39 lines
Difference between DIgital and Absoft compiler	Luigi Mazza	Thu, 15 Jan 1998 10:29:06 +0100	23 lines
Re: Difference between Digital and Absoft compiler	<>	Thu, 15 Jan 1998 10:22:14 GMT	92 lines
Re: Errata: Re: Comparison of C and Ada costs (fwd)	Dr W.W. Schulz	Fri, 16 Jan 1998 13:23:00 +0000 (GMT)	95 lines
derived type name scope	Laurent Hill	Mon, 19 Jan 1998 11:23:11 +0100	51 lines
Re: derived type name scope	Kevin Maguire	Mon, 19 Jan 1998 11:12:49 +0000 (GMT)	96 lines
Re: derived type name scope	Frederic PASCAL	Mon, 19 Jan 1998 12:26:00 +0100 (MET)	23 lines
Re: derived type name scope	Malcolm Cohen	Mon, 19 Jan 1998 11:35:12 +0000 (GMT)	78 lines
possible changes to the list	Ian Chivers	Mon, 19 Jan 1998 16:28:48 BST	25 lines
Re: possible changes to the list	Miles Ellis	Mon, 19 Jan 1998 18:16:49 GMT	51 lines
availability of a members list	Ian Chivers	Wed, 21 Jan 1998 11:13:01 BST	28 lines
Scope of Implicit typing	Jan van Oosterwijk	Thu, 22 Jan 1998 08:52:42 +0100	86 lines
Re: Scope of Implicit typing	Pierre Hugonnet	Thu, 22 Jan 1998 10:26:04 +0100	72 lines
Your evaluation of F90 compilers, please	Swietanowski Artur	Thu, 22 Jan 1998 10:53:33 +0100	77 lines
Re: Scope of Implicit typing	Malcolm Cohen	Thu, 22 Jan 1998 09:58:17 +0000 (GMT)	57 lines
Re: Your evaluation of F90 compilers, please	<>	Thu, 22 Jan 1998 10:08:53 GMT	71 lines
Re: Your evaluation of F90 compilers, please	Mark Stevens	Thu, 22 Jan 1998 14:23:39 +0000	28 lines
Re: Your evaluation of F90 compilers, please	Mark Stevens	Thu, 22 Jan 1998 16:02:09 +0000	26 lines
Re: Your evaluation of F90 compilers, please (fwd)	Paul Hatton	Thu, 22 Jan 1998 16:42:32 +0000 (GMT)	64 lines
Re: Your evaluation of F90 compilers, please	Bob Runyan	Thu, 22 Jan 1998 09:28:48 -0800	60 lines
Re: Your evaluation of F90 compilers, please	Jean Vezina	Thu, 22 Jan 1998 19:19:50 -0500	36 lines
Determine buffer sizes	Eildert Groeneveld	Fri, 23 Jan 1998 09:11:57 +0100	43 lines
buffer size	Eildert Groeneveld	Fri, 23 Jan 1998 09:20:28 +0100	45 lines
Re: Scope of Implicit typing	Mark Stevens	Fri, 23 Jan 1998 14:11:11 +0000	54 lines
`-r8' switch equivalent for f90	Mark Borges	23 Jan 1998 14:17:24 -0700	58 lines
EQUIVALENCE question	Anthony Stone	Fri, 23 Jan 1998 17:27:49 +0000	55 lines
EQUIVALENCE question	Richard Maine	Fri, 23 Jan 1998 09:55:27 -0800 (PST)	62 lines
Re: EQUIVALENCE question	Richard Shapiro	Fri, 23 Jan 1998 13:07:49 -0500	44 lines
Re: EQUIVALENCE question	Malcolm Cohen	Fri, 23 Jan 1998 18:22:19 +0000 (GMT)	93 lines
`-r8' switch equivalent for f90	Richard Maine	Fri, 23 Jan 1998 13:32:15 -0800 (PST)	44 lines
Re: `-r8' switch equivalent for f90	Jing Guo	Fri, 23 Jan 1998 17:30:45 -0500	42 lines
Re: `-r8' switch equivalent for f90	Richard Maine	Fri, 23 Jan 1998 14:57:34 -0800 (PST)	60 lines
Re: EQUIVALENCE question	Anthony Stone	Mon, 26 Jan 1998 15:14:57 +0000	41 lines
Alternatives to ASSIGN?	Anthony Stone	Mon, 26 Jan 1998 17:25:39 +0000	55 lines
AINT and ANINT	Van Snyder	Mon, 26 Jan 1998 15:50:17 PST	24 lines
HUG'98: 2nd HPF User Group conference	John Merlin	Tue, 27 Jan 1998 16:45:15 +0100 (MET)	114 lines
Re: Alternatives to ASSIGN?	Anthony Stone	Tue, 27 Jan 1998 15:52:23 +0000	39 lines
Re: Alternatives to ASSIGN?	David Hitchin	Tue, 27 Jan 1998 16:17:56 GMT	35 lines
Re: Alternatives to ASSIGN?	Dick Hendrickson	Tue, 27 Jan 1998 10:21:06 -0600	78 lines
Re: Alternatives to ASSIGN?	Richard Maine	Tue, 27 Jan 1998 08:42:23 -0800 (PST)	49 lines
SELECT-CASE, computed GOTO, and efficiency	Malcolm Cohen	Tue, 27 Jan 1998 16:59:50 +0000 (GMT)	45 lines
Re: Alternatives to ASSIGN?	Jean Vezina	Tue, 27 Jan 1998 21:27:19 -0500	25 lines
Problem with mailing list (NASA server)	Jean Vezina	Tue, 27 Jan 1998 21:45:02 -0500	24 lines
Re: Alternatives to ASSIGN?	Richard Maine	Wed, 28 Jan 1998 07:33:09 -0800 (PST)	36 lines
Re: `-r8' switch equivalent for f90	Malcolm Cohen	Wed, 28 Jan 1998 16:43:09 +0000 (GMT)	34 lines
Interoperability with C	William F Mitchell	Thu, 29 Jan 1998 14:55:06 -0500	22 lines
calling F90 from C	<>	Thu, 29 Jan 1998 15:23:55 -0500	42 lines
calling F90 from C	Adriaan Joubert	Fri, 30 Jan 1998 08:41:41 GMT	78 lines
Re: Interoperability with C	Michael Hennecke	Fri, 30 Jan 1998 09:58:31 +0100 (CET)	44 lines
NAG f90 on RH Linux 5.0	Neil Carlson	Fri, 30 Jan 1998 09:29:57 -0500	22 lines
NAG f90 on RH Linux 5.0	Richard Maine	Fri, 30 Jan 1998 11:04:26 -0800 (PST)	30 lines
	Darrin York	Sat, 31 Jan 1998 04:08:21 GMT	82 lines
Re: Pointers, allocatables and static arrays and performance	Swietanowski Artur	Sat, 31 Jan 1998 10:55:45 +0100	57 lines
NUMERICAL RECIPES and Digital Fortran90	Phillip Helbig	Sat, 31 Jan 1998 16:06:57 GMT	463 lines
Re: NUMERICAL RECIPES and Digital Fortran90	Steve Lionel	Sat, 31 Jan 1998 14:08:24 -0500	46 lines
NAG f90 on RH Linux 5.0	Richard Maine	Sat, 31 Jan 1998 14:23:22 -0800 (PST)	28 lines
MODULE and naming strategies	Phillip Helbig	Sun, 1 Feb 1998 11:05:49 GMT	124 lines
Re: MODULE and naming strategies	Swietanowski Artur	Sun, 01 Feb 1998 17:05:50 +0100	98 lines
Re: MODULE and naming strategies	Phillip Helbig	Sun, 1 Feb 1998 16:20:13 GMT	81 lines
Re: MODULE and naming strategies	Swietanowski Artur	Sun, 01 Feb 1998 18:26:16 +0100	111 lines
Re: MODULE and naming strategies	Phillip Helbig	Sun, 1 Feb 1998 17:53:58 GMT	43 lines
Re: MODULE and naming strategies	Swietanowski Artur	Sun, 01 Feb 1998 19:52:44 +0100	55 lines
Re: MODULE and naming strategies	Phillip Helbig	Mon, 2 Feb 1998 06:08:06 GMT	72 lines
Re: MODULE and naming strategies	Dr W.W. Schulz	Mon, 2 Feb 1998 13:09:33 +0000 (GMT)	98 lines
Re: MODULE and naming strategies	Phillip Helbig	Mon, 2 Feb 1998 13:35:44 GMT	74 lines
Re: MODULE and naming strategies	Swietanowski Artur	Mon, 02 Feb 1998 15:15:18 +0100	104 lines
Re: MODULE and naming strategies	John Bray	Mon, 02 Feb 1998 14:23:12 +0000	44 lines
Re: MODULE and naming strategies	Phillip Helbig	Mon, 2 Feb 1998 14:29:59 GMT	27 lines
Re: MODULE and naming strategies	Swietanowski Artur	Mon, 02 Feb 1998 15:37:41 +0100	65 lines
Re: Pointers, allocatables and static arrays and performance	Richard Shapiro	Mon, 2 Feb 1998 10:48:49 -0500	27 lines
Re: MODULE and naming strategies	Dr W.W. Schulz	Mon, 2 Feb 1998 17:58:56 +0000 (GMT)	91 lines
Re: MODULE and naming strategies	<>	Mon, 2 Feb 1998 14:59:48 -0500 (EST)	73 lines
Re: MODULE and naming strategies	Richard Maine	Mon, 2 Feb 1998 16:08:54 -0800 (PST)	23 lines
Re: MODULE and naming strategies	Phillip Helbig	Tue, 3 Feb 1998 06:00:21 GMT	38 lines
Re: MODULE and naming strategies	Dr W.W. Schulz	Tue, 3 Feb 1998 13:17:55 +0000 (GMT)	71 lines
Access protection granularity (was: MODULE and naming strategies)	Swietanowski Artur	Tue, 03 Feb 1998 14:36:05 +0100	176 lines
Re: MODULE and naming strategies	Swietanowski Artur	Tue, 03 Feb 1998 14:55:21 +0100	65 lines
Re: MODULE and naming strategies	Phillip Helbig	Tue, 3 Feb 1998 15:21:58 GMT	63 lines
Re: MODULE and naming strategies	<>	Tue, 3 Feb 1998 11:38:21 -0500 (EST)	85 lines
Re: MODULE and naming strategies	Dr W.W. Schulz	Tue, 3 Feb 1998 17:25:53 +0000 (GMT)	84 lines
Re: MODULE and naming strategies	<>	Tue, 3 Feb 1998 17:59:36 -0500 (EST)	119 lines
memory error	Peter Bismuti	Tue, 3 Feb 1998 21:11:33 -0500 (EST)	32 lines
Re: memory error	Ralph Frisbie	Tue, 03 Feb 1998 22:00:29 -0800	39 lines
Privacy within modules	<>	Wed, 4 Feb 1998 12:08:50 +1300 (NZDT)	34 lines
modules and makefiles	Dr W.W. Schulz	Thu, 5 Feb 1998 11:53:21 +0000 (GMT)	111 lines
Re: modules and makefiles	Malcolm Cohen	Thu, 5 Feb 1998 14:06:08 +0000 (GMT)	144 lines
complex matrix inversion routine anyone?	Peter Bismuti	Thu, 5 Feb 1998 12:31:21 -0500 (EST)	23 lines
Re: complex matrix inversion routine anyone?	David Vowles	Fri, 6 Feb 1998 15:53:28 +0930	68 lines
Re: complex matrix inversion routine anyone?	Phillip Helbig	Fri, 6 Feb 1998 08:14:03 GMT	27 lines
Compiler Internal Error	Ower Villegas Gonzalez	Fri, 6 Feb 1998 15:09:20 +0100	84 lines
Re: Compiler Internal Error	Neil Carlson	Fri, 06 Feb 1998 10:32:16 -0500	32 lines
Re: modules and makefiles	<>	Fri, 6 Feb 1998 11:16:49 -0500 (EST)	45 lines
Re: modules and makefiles	Dr W.W. Schulz	Fri, 6 Feb 1998 17:16:48 +0000 (GMT)	73 lines
Re: modules and makefiles	stringfellow.n.d	Fri, 06 Feb 1998 20:10:24 +0000	54 lines
Re: modules and makefiles	<>	Fri, 6 Feb 1998 16:53:35 -0500 (EST)	63 lines
Re: complex matrix inversion routine anyone?	David Vowles	Mon, 9 Feb 1998 09:35:24 +0930	61 lines
Re: complex matrix inversion routine anyone?	Richard Maine	Sun, 8 Feb 1998 16:35:46 -0800 (PST)	77 lines
Re: modules and makefiles	Malcolm Cohen	Mon, 9 Feb 1998 17:04:04 +0000 (GMT)	29 lines
migration to f90	Eildert Groeneveld	Tue, 10 Feb 1998 08:31:01 +0100	83 lines
migration	Eildert Groeneveld	Tue, 10 Feb 1998 09:08:46 +0100	83 lines
Re: migration	Malcolm Cohen	Tue, 10 Feb 1998 09:31:42 +0000 (GMT)	49 lines
Re: complex matrix inversion routine anyone?	Jan van Oosterwijk	Wed, 11 Feb 1998 11:14:51 +0100	51 lines
derived type problem	Hassan Mehrabani-Yeganeh	Wed, 11 Feb 1998 09:03:02 -0500 (EST)	58 lines
Re: derived type problem	Richard Shapiro	Wed, 11 Feb 1998 10:14:32 -0500	65 lines
Re: derived type problem	Jack Scheible	Wed, 11 Feb 1998 10:15:43 -0500 (EST)	70 lines
Re: derived type problem	Walt Brainerd	Wed, 11 Feb 1998 09:06:37 -0700 (MST)	117 lines
Re: derived type problem	Dr W.W. Schulz	Wed, 11 Feb 1998 16:14:39 +0000 (GMT)	104 lines
C Interface	Jack Hatfield	Wed, 11 Feb 1998 09:30:56 -0700	31 lines
"casting" pointers	Jason Abate	Wed, 11 Feb 98 10:34:18 -0600	32 lines
Re: "casting" pointers	<>	Wed, 11 Feb 98 18:07:23 +0100	34 lines
Re: C Interface	Mark Stevens	Wed, 11 Feb 1998 17:55:30 +0000	20 lines
i couldn't resist. :-) it is friday.....	Ian Chivers	Fri, 13 Feb 1998 15:26:19 BST	223 lines
[Q] Pointer association with dummy arguments	Neil N. Carlson	Sat, 14 Feb 1998 01:01:52 -0500	53 lines
Re: [Q] Pointer association with dummy arguments	John Reid	Mon, 16 Feb 1998 10:37:46 GMT	95 lines
NAG dbx90 can't find private variables	Jack Scheible	Wed, 18 Feb 1998 16:57:23 -0500 (EST)	54 lines
NAG GRAPHICS for circles	Abdul Ghani	Thu, 19 Feb 1998 19:23:28 GMT0BST	16 lines
RE: NAG GRAPHICS for circles	Peter Jewell	Fri, 20 Feb 1998 16:45:28 -0000	84 lines
share memory	Yong Chang	Fri, 20 Feb 1998 16:00:29 -0600 (CST)	22 lines
Why not second time?	Seong Gon Kim	Mon, 23 Feb 1998 17:00:19 -0400 (EDT)	111 lines
Re: Why not second time?	<>	Mon, 23 Feb 1998 18:21:05 -0500	48 lines
Re: Why not second time?	David Vowles	Tue, 24 Feb 1998 09:13:53 +0930	147 lines
Re: Why not second time?	Kurt W. Hirchert	Tue, 24 Feb 1998 10:28:19 -0600	69 lines
Question on INTERFACE OPERATOR	Dr W.W. Schulz	Tue, 24 Feb 1998 19:01:32 +0000 (GMT)	74 lines
Re: Question on INTERFACE OPERATOR	Michael Hennecke	Tue, 24 Feb 1998 20:23:13 +0100 (CET)	47 lines
Re: Question on INTERFACE OPERATOR	Neil N. Carlson	Tue, 24 Feb 1998 14:48:14 -0500	41 lines
ALLOCATABLE cannot be LOCAL	Mr. Sanjay P. Joshi	Wed, 25 Feb 1998 18:40:37 +0530 (IST)	25 lines
Portability to Sun Ultra from Sun Sparc 20	lassamoi	Wed, 25 Feb 98 17:10:00 EDT	33 lines
Re: Portability to Sun Ultra from Sun Sparc 20	Prakash Narayan	Wed, 25 Feb 1998 16:56:46 -0800 (PST)	31 lines
Re: Portability to Sun Ultra from Sun Sparc 20	David B. Serafini	Wed, 25 Feb 1998 19:18:59 -0600 (CST)	35 lines
fortran beautifier	Sirish	Thu, 26 Feb 1998 09:29:02 +0530	19 lines
Final call: HUG'98 -- 2nd HPF User Group meeting	John Merlin	Sat, 28 Feb 1998 15:45:59 +0100 (MET)	141 lines
Recursion through the back door	Thorsten Ohl	Mon, 2 Mar 1998 18:06:48 +0100	64 lines
Re: Recursion through the back door	Steve Lionel	Mon, 2 Mar 1998 12:51:43 -0500	42 lines
Re: Recursion through the back door	John Reid	Mon, 2 Mar 1998 17:53:31 GMT	46 lines
Re: Recursion through the back door	Richard Maine	Mon, 2 Mar 1998 12:30:55 -0800 (PST)	75 lines
Open statement and permission to write	lassamoi	Wed, 04 Mar 98 10:06:27 EDT	40 lines
Re: Recursion through the back door	John Reid	Wed, 4 Mar 1998 15:44:45 GMT	106 lines
Re: Open statement and permission to write	Ralph Frisbie	Wed, 04 Mar 1998 08:14:18 -0800	57 lines
Re: Recursion through the back door	Steve Lionel	Wed, 4 Mar 1998 16:10:04 -0500	27 lines
Problem using same argument twice in calling subroutine	Alan.Miller @ vic.cmis.CSIRO.AU = Alan Miller, Honorary Research Fellow (Retired)	Thu, 05 Mar 1998 17:01:38 +1100	34 lines
Re: Problem using same argument twice in calling subroutine	<>	Thu, 5 Mar 1998 01:43:25 -0500 (EST)	40 lines
Same argument passed twice to subroutine	Alan.Miller @ vic.cmis.CSIRO.AU = Alan Miller, Honorary Research Fellow (Retired)	Fri, 06 Mar 1998 00:08:10 +1100	22 lines
Re: Open statement and permission to write	Jan van Oosterwijk	Thu, 05 Mar 1998 14:57:10 +0100	93 lines
RE: Recursion through the back door	<>	Thu, 05 Mar 1998 14:27:36 MET	71 lines
Re: Problem using same argument twice in calling subroutine	Tony T. Warnock	Thu, 05 Mar 1998 08:23:48 -0700	31 lines
Re: Problem using same argument twice in calling subroutine	Stu Anderson 425-865-3595	Thu, 5 Mar 1998 09:58:04 -0800 (PST)	26 lines
Re: Problem using same argument twice in calling subroutine	<>	Fri, 6 Mar 1998 01:01:20 -0500 (EST)	72 lines
Fortran 95/HPF: PURE/ELEMENTAL vs. PRINT and WRITE(UNIT=*)	Thorsten Ohl	Fri, 6 Mar 1998 14:32:20 +0100	37 lines
Re: Fortran 95/HPF: PURE/ELEMENTAL vs. PRINT and WRITE(UNIT=*)	John Blair-Fish	Fri, 6 Mar 1998 14:10:34 +0000 (GMT)	65 lines
Re: Fortran 95/HPF: PURE/ELEMENTAL vs. PRINT and WRITE(UNIT=*)	Phillip Helbig	Fri, 6 Mar 1998 14:18:49 GMT	57 lines
speed of Digital Visual Fortran on Alpha and Intel	Rao, Vivek	Fri, 6 Mar 1998 09:33:07 -0500	26 lines
Re: Fortran 95/HPF: PURE/ELEMENTAL vs. PRINT and WRITE(UNIT=*)	Jack Scheible	Fri, 6 Mar 1998 09:35:08 -0500 (EST)	19 lines
Re: Problem using same argument twice in calling subroutine	Jack Scheible	Fri, 6 Mar 1998 09:39:20 -0500 (EST)	49 lines
Re: Fortran 95/HPF: PURE/ELEMENTAL vs. PRINT and WRITE(UNIT=*) (fwd)	Clive Page	Fri, 6 Mar 1998 14:50:07 +0000 (GMT)	40 lines
Re: Fortran 95/HPF: PURE/ELEMENTAL vs. PRINT and WRITE(UNIT=*)	Phillip Helbig	Fri, 6 Mar 1998 15:14:13 GMT	32 lines
Re: Fortran 95/HPF: PURE/ELEMENTAL vs. PRINT and WRITE(UNIT=*)	Thorsten Ohl	Fri, 6 Mar 1998 16:15:34 +0100	78 lines
Re: Fortran 95/HPF: PURE/ELEMENTAL vs. PRINT and WRITE(UNIT=*) (fwd)	Jack Scheible	Fri, 6 Mar 1998 10:37:43 -0500 (EST)	23 lines
Re: speed of Digital Visual Fortran on Alpha and Intel	Steve Lionel	Fri, 6 Mar 1998 10:38:04 -0500	30 lines
Re: Fortran 95/HPF: PURE/ELEMENTAL vs. PRINT and WRITE(UNIT=*)	Thorsten Ohl	Fri, 6 Mar 1998 17:48:00 +0100	102 lines
Bounds of array and stride?	Van Snyder	Fri, 06 Mar 1998 10:01:06 PST	26 lines
Re: Bounds of array and stride?	<>	Fri, 6 Mar 1998 13:22:26 -0500	19 lines
unsubscribe	Woo Chat Ming	Sat, 7 Mar 1998 09:23:16 +0800 (HKT)	12 lines
Re: Problem using same argument twice in calling subroutine	<>	Sat, 7 Mar 1998 18:05:52 -0500 (EST)	78 lines
Re: Problem using same argument twice in calling subroutine	Dick Hendrickson	Sun, 08 Mar 1998 13:38:18 -0600	105 lines
Re: Open statement and permission to write	Mark Stevens	Mon, 9 Mar 1998 10:35:49 +0000	40 lines
Re: Bounds of array and stride?	John Reid	Mon, 9 Mar 1998 15:35:53 GMT	31 lines
Re: Same argument passed twice	Alan.Miller @ vic.cmis.CSIRO.AU = Alan Miller, Honorary Research Fellow (Retired)	Tue, 10 Mar 1998 14:57:11 +1100	16 lines
Object-oriented programming in Fortran 2000	Dr W.W. Schulz	Tue, 10 Mar 1998 10:52:21 +0000 (GMT)	238 lines
Re: Bounds of array and stride?	Richard Weaver	Tue, 10 Mar 1998 09:36:45 -0600 (CST)	23 lines
Re: Bounds of array and stride?	Richard Maine	Tue, 10 Mar 1998 07:57:02 -0800 (PST)	35 lines
Re: Same argument passed twice	Steve Lionel	Tue, 10 Mar 1998 15:44:02 -0500	49 lines
Re: Same argument passed twice	Bill Ridgway	Tue, 10 Mar 1998 16:41:30 -0500	58 lines
Function pointers?	Adriaan Joubert	Wed, 11 Mar 1998 11:21:15 GMT	52 lines
Function pointers?	Adriaan Joubert	Wed, 11 Mar 1998 13:47:17 GMT	78 lines
Re: Function pointers?	<>	11 Mar 1998 14:27:46 +0100	24 lines
Fortran 95/HPF: ALLOCATE for INTENT(OUT) dummy arguments?	Thorsten Ohl	Wed, 11 Mar 1998 16:15:21 +0100	60 lines
Re: Function pointers?	Van Snyder	Wed, 11 Mar 1998 9:53:07 PST	32 lines
Re: Same argument passed twice	Otto Stolz	Thu, 12 Mar 1998 11:02:41 +0100	80 lines
Max size of array	Yongxing Liu	Thu, 12 Mar 1998 08:33:45 -0500 (EST)	23 lines
Re: Max size of array	<>	Thu, 12 Mar 1998 08:54:01 -0500 (EST)	27 lines
Re: Max size of array	Jan van Oosterwijk	Thu, 12 Mar 1998 15:47:16 +0100	45 lines
Re: Max size of array	Richard Maine	Thu, 12 Mar 1998 07:34:57 -0800 (PST)	32 lines
Re: Same argument passed twice	<>	Thu, 12 Mar 1998 10:43:47 -0500	54 lines
Re: Same argument passed twice	Richard Maine	Thu, 12 Mar 1998 09:08:03 -0800 (PST)	60 lines
Re: Same argument passed twice	Kurt W. Hirchert	Thu, 12 Mar 1998 11:10:46 -0600	59 lines
I think this is OK...	Van Snyder	Thu, 12 Mar 1998 10:46:51 PST	47 lines
Namelist Problem	Ower Villegas Gonzalez	Thu, 12 Mar 1998 20:14:52 +0100	56 lines
Re: Fortran 95/HPF: PURE/ELEMENTAL vs. PRINT and WRITE(UNIT=*)	Chuck Koelbel	Thu, 12 Mar 1998 16:35:21 -0600	98 lines
Re: Fortran 95/HPF: PURE/ELEMENTAL vs. PRINT and WRITE(UNIT=*)	Thorsten Ohl	Fri, 13 Mar 1998 16:33:19 +0100	52 lines
take up of f90	Ian Chivers	Sun, 15 Mar 1998 12:09:44 BST	49 lines
Parsing Fortran 95	Wclodius	Sun, 15 Mar 1998 19:50:47 EST	21 lines
Re: take up of f90	John Bray	Mon, 16 Mar 1998 10:02:13 +0000	25 lines
Re: take up of f90	John Blair-Fish	Mon, 16 Mar 1998 10:15:18 +0000 (GMT)	97 lines
Re: take up of f90	Steve Morgan	Mon, 16 Mar 1998 12:10:32 +0000 (GMT)	63 lines
re takeup of F90	Don Shirer	Mon, 16 Mar 1998 09:51:53 -0500 (EST)	29 lines
Re: take up of f90	David Vowles	Tue, 17 Mar 1998 09:59:08 +0930	63 lines
Re: take up of f90	forth.s.a	Tue, 17 Mar 1998 09:07:50 +0000	85 lines
Q; Why is complex/real division slow	Olaf Michelsson	Tue, 17 Mar 1998 10:50:47 +0100 (MET)	56 lines
generic with dummy procedure	William F Mitchell	Tue, 17 Mar 1998 13:34:32 -0500	60 lines
generic with dummy procedure	Richard Maine	Tue, 17 Mar 1998 11:16:58 -0800 (PST)	74 lines
Re: generic with dummy procedure	William F Mitchell	Tue, 17 Mar 1998 14:55:36 -0500	31 lines
need your advice	Hassan Mehrabani-Yeganeh	Tue, 17 Mar 1998 22:16:17 -0500 (EST)	16 lines
Re: need your advice	Phillip Helbig	Wed, 18 Mar 1998 06:38:26 GMT	29 lines
F90 compilers for Linux	Anthony Stone	Wed, 18 Mar 1998 08:51:19 +0000	18 lines
Re: F90 compilers for Linux	<>	18 Mar 1998 10:02:08 +0100	20 lines
Re: F90 compilers for Linux	Harry Bingham	Wed, 18 Mar 1998 12:06:00 +0000	41 lines
Re: generic with dummy procedure	Jan van Oosterwijk	Wed, 18 Mar 1998 13:39:57 +0100	132 lines
Re: F90 compilers for Linux	William F Mitchell	Wed, 18 Mar 1998 08:02:32 -0500	26 lines
Re: F90 compilers for Linux	Phillip Helbig	Wed, 18 Mar 1998 13:03:43 GMT	33 lines
Re: generic with dummy procedure	<>	Wed, 18 Mar 1998 14:14:16 +0100	57 lines
Re: F90 compilers for Linux	Thorsten Ohl	Wed, 18 Mar 1998 14:42:00 +0100	48 lines
Re: F90 compilers for Linux	Neil N. Carlson	Wed, 18 Mar 1998 09:19:46 -0500	31 lines
Re: F90 compilers for Linux	Phillip Helbig	Wed, 18 Mar 1998 14:33:06 GMT	64 lines
Re: F90 compilers for Linux	Phillip Helbig	Wed, 18 Mar 1998 14:43:54 GMT	28 lines
Re: F90 compilers for Linux	Douglas Johnson	Wed, 18 Mar 1998 10:10:49 -0500 (EST)	43 lines
Re: F90 compilers for Linux	Eildert Groeneveld	Wed, 18 Mar 1998 16:17:41 +0100	36 lines
LINUX	Paul Hatton	Wed, 18 Mar 1998 15:27:58 +0000 (GMT)	25 lines
Fortran compilers for Linux	Phillip Helbig	Wed, 18 Mar 1998 16:09:33 GMT	27 lines
Re: F90 compilers for Linux	Richard Maine	Wed, 18 Mar 1998 08:25:59 -0800 (PST)	81 lines
Re: Fortran compilers for Linux	Jack Scheible	Wed, 18 Mar 1998 11:42:18 -0500 (EST)	18 lines
Re: F90 compilers for Linux	<>	18 Mar 1998 16:43:48 +0100	89 lines
Re: F90 compilers for Linux	Thorsten Ohl	Wed, 18 Mar 1998 17:51:26 +0100	30 lines
F90 compilers for Linux	Thorsten Ohl	Wed, 18 Mar 1998 17:54:06 +0100	52 lines
Re: I think this is OK...	John Reid	Thu, 19 Mar 1998 09:52:47 GMT	66 lines
initial values and SAVE	Dr W.W. Schulz	Thu, 19 Mar 1998 10:14:31 +0000 (GMT)	44 lines
Re: initial values and SAVE	Adriaan Joubert	Thu, 19 Mar 1998 10:58:55 GMT	34 lines
Is there a mem limit for DVF + Win95 + Pentium motherboards	Petros Dafniotis, DuPont Central R & D	Thu, 19 Mar 1998 13:33:47 +0200	23 lines
Re: initial values and SAVE	Phillip Helbig	Thu, 19 Mar 1998 11:44:03 GMT	34 lines
Re: initial values and SAVE	Clive Page	Thu, 19 Mar 1998 12:03:35 +0000 (GMT)	43 lines
Re: initial values and SAVE	I.J.Bush	Thu, 19 Mar 1998 12:20:23 GMT	45 lines
Re: initial values and SAVE	Dr W.W. Schulz	Thu, 19 Mar 1998 12:30:34 +0000 (GMT)	59 lines
Re: initial values and SAVE	Dr W.W. Schulz	Thu, 19 Mar 1998 12:34:51 +0000 (GMT)	39 lines
Re: initial values and SAVE	Pierre Hugonnet	Thu, 19 Mar 1998 13:41:10 +0100	60 lines
Re: Is there a mem limit for DVF + Win95 + Pentium motherboards	<>	Thu, 19 Mar 1998 08:31:07 -0500 (EST)	23 lines
Re: initial values and SAVE	Lawrie Schonfelder	Thu, 19 Mar 1998 13:46:39 +0000 (GMT)	32 lines
Re: Is there a mem limit for DVF + Win95 + Pentium motherboards	Steve Lionel	Thu, 19 Mar 1998 09:25:51 -0500	36 lines
Re: initial values and SAVE	Jack Scheible	Thu, 19 Mar 1998 09:42:42 -0500 (EST)	17 lines
Re: initial values and SAVE	Dr W.W. Schulz	Thu, 19 Mar 1998 14:53:36 +0000 (GMT)	58 lines
Re: initial values and SAVE	I.J.Bush	Thu, 19 Mar 1998 14:57:51 GMT	34 lines
Re: initial values and SAVE	<>	Thu, 19 Mar 1998 10:03:33 -0500 (EST)	27 lines
Re: initial values and SAVE	Thorsten Ohl	Thu, 19 Mar 1998 16:04:54 +0100	41 lines
Re: initial values and SAVE	Phillip Helbig	Thu, 19 Mar 1998 15:05:52 GMT	26 lines
Re: initial values and SAVE	Jack Scheible	Thu, 19 Mar 1998 10:11:01 -0500 (EST)	18 lines
Re: initial values and SAVE	Pierre Hugonnet	Thu, 19 Mar 1998 16:16:40 +0100	35 lines
Re: initial values and SAVE	Phillip Helbig	Thu, 19 Mar 1998 15:21:14 GMT	29 lines
Re: initial values and SAVE	Jack Scheible	Thu, 19 Mar 1998 10:56:58 -0500 (EST)	52 lines
Re: initial values and SAVE	Walt Brainerd	Thu, 19 Mar 1998 09:03:24 -0700 (MST)	17 lines
Re: initial values and SAVE	Phillip Helbig	Thu, 19 Mar 1998 16:06:45 GMT	34 lines
Re: initial values and SAVE	Walt Brainerd	Thu, 19 Mar 1998 09:20:03 -0700 (MST)	17 lines
initial values and SAVE	Richard Maine	Thu, 19 Mar 1998 08:22:21 -0800 (PST)	74 lines
Re: initial values and SAVE	John Lindsay	Thu, 19 Mar 1998 11:32:39 -0500	65 lines
Re: initial values and SAVE	Jack Scheible	Thu, 19 Mar 1998 11:35:48 -0500 (EST)	23 lines
Re: initial values and SAVE	Pierre Hugonnet	Thu, 19 Mar 1998 17:36:04 +0100	65 lines
Re: initial values and SAVE	I.J.Bush	Thu, 19 Mar 1998 16:49:15 GMT	50 lines
Re: initial values and SAVE	Richard Maine	Thu, 19 Mar 1998 09:00:02 -0800 (PST)	44 lines
Re: initial values and SAVE	Alberto Fasso'	Thu, 19 Mar 1998 09:04:00 -0800 (PST)	56 lines
Re: initial values and SAVE	Jack Scheible	Thu, 19 Mar 1998 12:25:14 -0500 (EST)	65 lines
Re: initial values and SAVE	Clive Page	Thu, 19 Mar 1998 17:26:37 +0000 (GMT)	63 lines
Re: initial values and SAVE	Dick Hendrickson	Thu, 19 Mar 1998 11:30:45 -0600	43 lines
Re: initial values and SAVE	Larry E. Bright	Thu, 19 Mar 1998 10:05:08 -0800	37 lines
Re: initial values and SAVE	Tony T. Warnock	Thu, 19 Mar 1998 12:13:41 -0700	26 lines
Re: initial values and SAVE	Walt Brainerd	Thu, 19 Mar 1998 15:48:36 -0700 (MST)	22 lines
Re: initial values and SAVE	Jack Scheible	Thu, 19 Mar 1998 18:31:44 -0500 (EST)	27 lines
Summary: initial values and SAVE	Dr W.W. Schulz	Fri, 20 Mar 1998 10:24:07 +0000 (GMT)	99 lines
Re: Fortran compilers for Linux	<>	Fri, 20 Mar 1998 10:51:07 GMT	38 lines
Re: initial values and SAVE	<>	Fri, 20 Mar 1998 11:06:42 GMT	60 lines
Suggestion: (1/2) subobjects of optional dummy args	Thorsten Ohl	Fri, 20 Mar 1998 14:02:07 +0100	52 lines
Suggestions: (2/2) impure elemental procedures	Thorsten Ohl	Fri, 20 Mar 1998 14:02:57 +0100	25 lines
Re: Suggestion: (1/2) subobjects of optional dummy args	<>	Fri, 20 Mar 1998 08:56:57 -0500 (EST)	54 lines
Re: Suggestion: (1/2) subobjects of optional dummy args	Thorsten Ohl	Fri, 20 Mar 1998 15:25:43 +0100	135 lines
Re: Suggestion: (1/2) subobjects of optional dummy args	<>	Fri, 20 Mar 1998 09:44:12 -0500 (EST)	41 lines
Re: Summary: initial values and SAVE	Neil Carlson	Fri, 20 Mar 1998 09:51:58 -0500	26 lines
Re: Suggestion: (1/2) subobjects of optional dummy args	Thorsten Ohl	Fri, 20 Mar 1998 16:00:17 +0100	40 lines
Re: Summary: initial values and SAVE	Walt Brainerd	Fri, 20 Mar 1998 08:31:14 -0700 (MST)	29 lines
Re: Suggestion: (1/2) subobjects of optional dummy args	Van Snyder	Fri, 20 Mar 1998 11:34:30 PST	51 lines
Re: Suggestion: (1/2) subobjects of optional dummy args	Jing Guo	Fri, 20 Mar 1998 16:00:58 -0500	92 lines
Free book for lecturers	<>	Mon, 23 Mar 1998 14:09:50 +0000	39 lines
automaticc arrays	Pierre Hugonnet	Mon, 23 Mar 1998 16:32:20 +0100	34 lines
Re: automatic arrays	Adriaan Joubert	Mon, 23 Mar 1998 15:51:35 GMT	37 lines
NAG graphic	ABBASPOUR-FARD	Mon, 23 Mar 1998 16:06:28 GMT0BST	17 lines
Re: Suggestions: (2/2) impure elemental procedures	Chuck Koelbel	Mon, 23 Mar 1998 10:27:11 -0600	62 lines
A more regular syntax	Dr W.W. Schulz	Tue, 24 Mar 1998 10:34:12 +0000 (GMT)	174 lines
Re: Suggestions: (2/2) impure elemental procedures	Thorsten Ohl	Tue, 24 Mar 1998 15:58:26 +0100	87 lines
arrays and strings question	Kevin Maguire	Tue, 24 Mar 1998 16:06:28 +0000 (GMT)	149 lines
Re: arrays and strings question	Petros Dafniotis, DuPont Central R & D	Tue, 24 Mar 1998 18:09:10 +0200	63 lines
Re: A more regular syntax	Malcolm Cohen	Tue, 24 Mar 1998 16:48:12 +0000 (GMT)	85 lines
Re: A more regular syntax	Walt Brainerd	Tue, 24 Mar 1998 10:44:30 -0700 (MST)	31 lines
Re: A more regular syntax	Adriaan Joubert	Tue, 24 Mar 1998 18:01:44 GMT	71 lines
Re: arrays and strings question	Richard Maine	Tue, 24 Mar 1998 10:07:27 -0800 (PST)	53 lines
Re: arrays and strings question	Steve Lionel	Tue, 24 Mar 1998 13:21:54 -0500	29 lines
Re: arrays and strings question	Petros Dafniotis, DuPont Central R & D	Wed, 25 Mar 1998 08:46:37 +0200	49 lines
Re: arrays and strings question	John Reid	Wed, 25 Mar 1998 09:36:54 GMT	21 lines
arrays and strings question	Otto Stolz	Wed, 25 Mar 1998 12:57:05 +0100	76 lines
Re: arrays and strings question	Neil Carlson	Wed, 25 Mar 1998 08:52:05 -0500	28 lines
Re: A more regular syntax	Dr W.W. Schulz	Wed, 25 Mar 1998 13:56:45 +0000 (GMT)	143 lines
Re: A more regular syntax	Malcolm Cohen	Wed, 25 Mar 1998 15:40:07 +0000 (GMT)	77 lines
Re: A more regular syntax	Richard Maine	Wed, 25 Mar 1998 08:23:44 -0800 (PST)	78 lines
A more regular syntax	Van Snyder	Wed, 25 Mar 1998 10:12:52 PST	76 lines
Re: A more regular syntax	Walt Brainerd	Wed, 25 Mar 1998 14:04:16 -0700 (MST)	27 lines
Re: A more regular syntax	Walt Brainerd	Wed, 25 Mar 1998 14:11:12 -0700 (MST)	26 lines
entities	Walt Brainerd	Wed, 25 Mar 1998 15:13:37 -0700 (MST)	20 lines
Re: A more regular syntax (sic)	Malcolm Cohen	Thu, 26 Mar 1998 09:05:56 +0000 (GMT)	37 lines
Re: A more regular syntax	Dr W.W. Schulz	Thu, 26 Mar 1998 10:42:47 +0000 (GMT)	105 lines
Re: A more regular syntax	Swietanowski Artur	Thu, 26 Mar 1998 13:59:52 +0100	98 lines
Re: A more regular syntax	Lawrie Schonfelder	Thu, 26 Mar 1998 14:09:03 +0000 (GMT)	56 lines
regularise syntax	Phillip Helbig	Thu, 26 Mar 1998 14:16:45 GMT	33 lines
Re: A more regular syntax	Walt Brainerd	Thu, 26 Mar 1998 08:06:15 -0700 (MST)	22 lines
RE: NAG graphic	Peter Jewell	Thu, 26 Mar 1998 15:26:17 -0000	96 lines
RE: NAG graphic	Malcolm Cohen	Thu, 26 Mar 1998 16:49:52 +0000 (GMT)	29 lines
bit size for REAL	<>	Thu, 26 Mar 1998 13:14:44 -0500	15 lines
Re: bit size for REAL	<>	Thu, 26 Mar 1998 14:10:48 -0500 (EST)	42 lines
Re: Re: A more regular syntax	Wclodius	Thu, 26 Mar 1998 23:04:08 EST	32 lines
Re: A more regular syntax	Wclodius	Thu, 26 Mar 1998 23:57:30 EST	43 lines
Re: A more regular syntax	Dr W.W. Schulz	Fri, 27 Mar 1998 12:09:45 +0000 (GMT)	127 lines
fortran futures	Ian Chivers	Fri, 27 Mar 1998 15:52:28 BST	26 lines
Re: A more regular syntax	Richard Maine	Fri, 27 Mar 1998 09:16:27 -0800 (PST)	122 lines
Re: A more regular syntax	Dr W.W. Schulz	Fri, 27 Mar 1998 18:44:30 +0000 (GMT)	142 lines
A more regular syntax	Van Snyder	Fri, 27 Mar 1998 12:49:14 PST	75 lines
A more regular syntax	Richard Maine	Fri, 27 Mar 1998 13:50:38 -0800 (PST)	73 lines
Re: A more regular syntax	Walt Brainerd	Fri, 27 Mar 1998 16:29:03 -0700 (MST)	44 lines
Re: A more regular syntax	Van Snyder	Fri, 27 Mar 1998 19:12:19 PST	58 lines
Re: A more regular syntax	Fred Marton	Sat, 28 Mar 1998 17:37:39 +0800	61 lines
Re: A more regular syntax	Fred Marton	Sat, 28 Mar 1998 18:03:19 +0800	49 lines
Polymorphic variables (97-183r2, 97-196r2)	Helmers, Jens Bloch	28 Mar 1998 11:01:14 +0200	40 lines
Re: A more regular syntax	Wclodius	Sat, 28 Mar 1998 13:09:12 EST	85 lines
History	Walt Brainerd	Sun, 29 Mar 1998 10:35:17 -0700 (MST)	26 lines
Re: Polymorphic variables (97-183r2, 97-196r2)	Malcolm Cohen	Mon, 30 Mar 1998 09:01:32 +0000 (GMT)	68 lines
Re: A more regular syntax	Richard Maine	Mon, 30 Mar 1998 09:25:02 -0800 (PST)	57 lines
Re: A more regular syntax	Dr W.W. Schulz	Mon, 30 Mar 1998 18:47:47 +0100 (BST)	61 lines
Arrays of arrays ...	Thorsten Ohl	Tue, 31 Mar 1998 16:59:08 +0200	63 lines
temporary objects	Roman Putanowicz	Thu, 2 Apr 1998 18:18:11 +0200 (CEST)	34 lines
Formal and Actual Parameters in Fortran 90	Dirk Thorsten Vogel	Fri, 03 Apr 1998 08:26:13 +0200	71 lines
Re: Formal and Actual Parameters in Fortran 90	Dr W.W. Schulz	Fri, 3 Apr 1998 09:30:25 +0100 (BST)	78 lines
Re: Formal and Actual Parameters in Fortran 90	<>	Fri, 3 Apr 1998 09:35:15 GMT	42 lines
New ideas (was Re: A more regular syntax and subset)	Dr W.W. Schulz	Fri, 3 Apr 1998 11:02:39 +0100 (BST)	201 lines
Re: New ideas (was Re: A more regular syntax and subset)	Clive Page	Fri, 3 Apr 1998 12:23:45 +0100 (BST)	53 lines
Re: New ideas (was Re: A more regular syntax and subset)	<>	Fri, 3 Apr 1998 11:42:58 GMT	43 lines
Re: New ideas (was Re: A more regular syntax and subset)	Peter Shenkin	Fri, 3 Apr 1998 10:59:28 -0500	81 lines
Re: New ideas (was Re: A more regular syntax and subset)	Clive Page	Fri, 3 Apr 1998 17:10:16 +0100 (BST)	34 lines
Re: New ideas (was Re: A more regular syntax and subset)	Alberto Fasso'	Fri, 03 Apr 1998 08:14:05 -0800 (PST)	41 lines
Re: New ideas (was Re: A more regular syntax and subset)	Peter Shenkin	Fri, 3 Apr 1998 12:07:07 -0500	57 lines
Re: more ideas	Dr W.W. Schulz	Fri, 3 Apr 1998 18:35:48 +0100 (BST)	59 lines
Re: New ideas (was Re: A more regular syntax and subset)	Malcolm Cohen	Fri, 3 Apr 1998 17:39:03 +0000 (BST)	39 lines
Re: New ideas (was Re: A more regular syntax and subset)	Van Snyder	Fri, 03 Apr 1998 10:30:09 PST	32 lines
Re: more ideas	Van Snyder	Fri, 03 Apr 1998 10:37:47 PST	50 lines
off-topic question triggered by new ideas	Dick Hendrickson	Fri, 03 Apr 1998 14:06:38 -0600	31 lines
Reserved words and parsing	Mark Dewing	Fri, 3 Apr 1998 15:20:20 -0600	34 lines
Re: Reserved words and parsing	David B. Serafini	Fri, 3 Apr 1998 16:04:34 -0600 (CST)	22 lines
Re: off-topic question triggered by new ideas	Van Snyder	Fri, 03 Apr 1998 15:18:12 PST	38 lines
Reserved words and parsing	Van Snyder	Fri, 03 Apr 1998 15:32:00 PST	59 lines
Re: Re: New ideas (was Re: A more regular syntax and subset)	Wclodius	Sat, 4 Apr 1998 13:08:06 EST	51 lines
Re: Polymorphic variables (97-183r2, 97-196r2)	Roger Glover	Sun, 05 Apr 1998 03:45:04 -0500	125 lines
Re: temporary objects	Roger Glover	Sun, 05 Apr 1998 04:00:52 -0500	47 lines
Question on F2000: typ change under inheritance (was Re: more ideas)	Dr W.W. Schulz	Mon, 6 Apr 1998 12:52:10 +0100 (BST)	112 lines
Standard subset?	Loren P. Meissner	Mon, 6 Apr 1998 16:55:42 -0700	29 lines
compiler	Huang Chun	Wed, 08 Apr 1998 15:34:06 +0800	18 lines
Re: compiler	Dirk Thorsten Vogel	Wed, 08 Apr 1998 10:49:05 +0200	57 lines
Fortran 90/95/HPF Information (April)	Michael Metcalf	Thu, 9 Apr 1998 03:45:32 -0400	731 lines
Re: Question on F2000: typ change under inheritance (was Re: more ideas)	Kurt W. Hirchert	Thu, 9 Apr 1998 12:08:38 -0500	93 lines
Re: Standard subset?	Larry E. Bright	Thu, 9 Apr 1998 14:31:35 -0700	42 lines
Re: Standard subset?	Phillip Helbig	Thu, 9 Apr 1998 21:32:56 GMT	60 lines
Re: Standardised subset	Bob Runyan	Thu, 09 Apr 1998 15:20:07 -0700	59 lines
Re: Standardised subset	Phillip Helbig	Thu, 9 Apr 1998 22:32:06 GMT	28 lines
Re: standardised subset	Bob Runyan	Thu, 09 Apr 1998 16:26:42 -0700	33 lines
Re: standardised subset	Phillip Helbig	Thu, 9 Apr 1998 23:51:56 GMT	48 lines
Re: standardised subset	Dick Hendrickson	Mon, 13 Apr 1998 09:41:08 -0500	47 lines
Re: standardised subset	Peter Shenkin	Mon, 13 Apr 1998 11:09:42 -0400	34 lines
makemake.pl und NAG-F90-LIB	Andreas Blase	Tue, 14 Apr 1998 12:14:36 +0200 (MET DST)	44 lines
Re: compiler	Mark Stevens	Tue, 14 Apr 1998 15:57:23 +0000	23 lines
Unit stride	Van Snyder	Tue, 14 Apr 1998 16:49:03 PDT	71 lines
Re: Unit stride	Pierre Hugonnet	Wed, 15 Apr 1998 09:30:27 +0200	81 lines
Re: standardised subset	Clive Page	Wed, 15 Apr 1998 10:13:32 +0100 (BST)	43 lines
Re: Unit stride	Thorsten Ohl	Wed, 15 Apr 1998 14:16:54 +0200	47 lines
Re: Standardized Subset	Dan Nagle	Wed, 15 Apr 1998 08:19:52 -0400	37 lines
Re: Unit stride	Malcolm Cohen	Wed, 15 Apr 1998 12:40:12 +0000 (BST)	57 lines
Re: Unit stride	Dick Hendrickson	Wed, 15 Apr 1998 10:13:17 -0500	88 lines
Re: standardised subset	Richard Maine	Wed, 15 Apr 1998 09:46:22 -0700 (PDT)	125 lines
Re: Question on F2000: typ change under inheritance (was Re: more ideas)	Dr W.W. Schulz	Wed, 15 Apr 1998 19:07:17 +0100 (BST)	141 lines
Re: standardised subset	Loren P. Meissner	Wed, 15 Apr 1998 11:22:06 -0700	26 lines
Re: standardised subset	Peter Shenkin	Wed, 15 Apr 1998 14:42:33 -0400	46 lines
Re: Question on F2000: typ change under inheritance (was Re: more ideas)	Richard Maine	Wed, 15 Apr 1998 11:52:02 -0700 (PDT)	33 lines
Re: standardised subset	Peter Shenkin	Wed, 15 Apr 1998 14:58:32 -0400	67 lines
Unit stride (again)	Van Snyder	Wed, 15 Apr 1998 12:24:46 PDT	70 lines
Re: standardised subset	Peter Shenkin	Wed, 15 Apr 1998 15:25:46 -0400	32 lines
Re: standardised subset	Mark Dewing	Wed, 15 Apr 1998 14:26:43 -0500	40 lines
Re: standardised subset	Phillip Helbig	Wed, 15 Apr 1998 19:38:02 GMT	69 lines
Re: standardised subset	Phillip Helbig	Wed, 15 Apr 1998 19:49:02 GMT	41 lines
Re: standardised subset	Phillip Helbig	Wed, 15 Apr 1998 20:04:37 GMT	44 lines
Re: standardised subset	Phillip Helbig	Wed, 15 Apr 1998 20:09:55 GMT	24 lines
Re: Unit stride (again)	N8TM	Wed, 15 Apr 1998 22:59:06 EDT	33 lines
Re: standardised subset	Ralph and Wendy	Wed, 15 Apr 1998 22:46:36 -0700	42 lines
Re: Unit stride	Thorsten Ohl	Fri, 17 Apr 1998 11:56:55 +0200	31 lines
vendor-dependent treatment of 0-sized arrays in MATMUL	N8TM	Fri, 17 Apr 1998 09:07:25 EDT	30 lines
Re: vendor-dependent treatment of 0-sized arrays in MATMUL	Kurt W. Hirchert	Fri, 17 Apr 1998 10:14:46 -0500	51 lines
Re: vendor-dependent treatment of 0-sized arrays in MATMUL	Jing Guo	Fri, 17 Apr 1998 12:53:10 -0400	65 lines
Re: vendor-dependent treatment of 0-sized arrays in MATMUL	Kurt W. Hirchert	Fri, 17 Apr 1998 12:30:43 -0500	53 lines
Re: vendor-dependent treatment of 0-sized arrays in MATMUL	Richard Maine	Fri, 17 Apr 1998 11:57:26 -0700 (PDT)	85 lines
Re: vendor-dependent treatment of 0-sized arrays in MATMUL	Jing Guo	Fri, 17 Apr 1998 17:51:07 -0400 (EDT)	66 lines
Re: vendor-dependent treatment of 0-sized arrays in MATMUL	N8TM	Fri, 17 Apr 1998 21:54:00 EDT	22 lines
Re: vendor-dependent treatment of 0-sized arrays in MATMUL	Loren P. Meissner	Sat, 18 Apr 1998 09:08:16 -0700	63 lines
About format	David R. Leal Valmana	Mon, 20 Apr 1998 12:47:22 +0100	74 lines
Re: vendor-dependent treatment of 0-sized arrays in MATMUL	Jing Guo	Mon, 20 Apr 1998 11:34:30 -0400	49 lines
Re: vendor-dependent treatment of 0-sized arrays in MATMUL	Peter Shenkin	Mon, 20 Apr 1998 12:33:21 -0400	32 lines
Re: vendor-dependent treatment of 0-sized arrays in MATMUL	Richard Maine	Mon, 20 Apr 1998 09:48:52 -0700 (PDT)	55 lines
Re: zero-length strings	Loren P. Meissner	Mon, 20 Apr 1998 15:22:51 -0700	26 lines
Re: vendor-dependent treatment of 0-sized arrays in MATMUL	Richard Shapiro	Mon, 20 Apr 1998 18:39:45 -0400 (EDT)	38 lines
Re: vendor-dependent treatment of 0-sized arrays in MATMUL	N8TM	Mon, 20 Apr 1998 21:36:01 EDT	25 lines
Re: problem with optional arguments	Olaf Michelsson	Tue, 21 Apr 1998 13:13:10 +0200 (METDST)	97 lines
problem with optional arguments	Olaf Michelsson	Tue, 21 Apr 1998 12:14:43 +0100 (METDST)	73 lines
Re: problem with optional arguments	Dr W.W. Schulz	Tue, 21 Apr 1998 12:23:31 +0100 (BST)	163 lines
Re: problem with optional arguments	Malcolm Cohen	Tue, 21 Apr 1998 11:46:05 +0000 (BST)	69 lines
Re: problem with optional arguments	Thorsten Ohl	Tue, 21 Apr 1998 13:59:29 +0200	35 lines
Re: problem with optional arguments	Malcolm Cohen	Tue, 21 Apr 1998 12:52:06 +0000 (BST)	39 lines
Re: problem with optional arguments	Glenn Carver	Tue, 21 Apr 1998 16:16:04 +0100	59 lines
Array valued functions	<>	Tue, 21 Apr 1998 10:55:04 -0600 (MDT)	60 lines
Re: Array valued functions	John Reid	Tue, 21 Apr 1998 18:21:39 +0100 (BST)	24 lines
Re: Array valued functions	<>	Tue, 21 Apr 1998 14:06:20 -0400 (EDT)	82 lines
Problems with Suns	lassamoi	Tue, 21 Apr 98 14:10:07 EDT	130 lines
Re: Array valued functions	Jean Vezina	Tue, 21 Apr 1998 20:39:41 -0400	99 lines
Re: About format	Roger Glover	Tue, 21 Apr 1998 23:11:06 -0500	90 lines
Re: Problems with Suns	John Reid	Wed, 22 Apr 1998 09:15:11 +0100 (BST)	16 lines
Re: Array valued functions	John Reid	Wed, 22 Apr 1998 09:32:24 +0100 (BST)	87 lines
4-tensor as a matrix	<>	Wed, 22 Apr 1998 22:29:25 +1200 (NZST)	46 lines
Re: Problems with Suns	Jan van Oosterwijk	Wed, 22 Apr 1998 13:19:18 +0200	48 lines
Re: problem with optional arguments	John Reid	Wed, 22 Apr 1998 13:50:33 +0100 (BST)	27 lines
Re: problem with optional arguments	Malcolm Cohen	Wed, 22 Apr 1998 13:12:09 +0000 (BST)	38 lines
Re: About format	Steve Lionel	Wed, 22 Apr 1998 10:07:04 -0400	41 lines
Re: About format	Jack Scheible	Wed, 22 Apr 1998 10:28:36 -0400 (EDT)	37 lines
Re: problem with optional arguments	Peter Shenkin	Wed, 22 Apr 1998 10:31:01 -0400	29 lines
Re: problem with optional arguments	Olaf Michelsson	Wed, 22 Apr 1998 16:38:00 +0200 (METDST)	54 lines
Re: Array valued functions	Jing Guo	Wed, 22 Apr 1998 11:13:54 -0400	63 lines
Re: problem with optional arguments	Glenn Carver	Wed, 22 Apr 1998 22:58:54 +0100	31 lines
Weird binary I/O problem with Sun compiler	Glenn Carver	Wed, 22 Apr 1998 23:05:29 +0100	56 lines
Re: Weird binary I/O problem with Sun compiler	Prakash Narayan	Wed, 22 Apr 1998 18:55:21 -0700 (PDT)	60 lines
Re: Problems with Suns	Dr. Volker Typke	Thu, 23 Apr 1998 14:55:45 +0200	57 lines
Re: Array valued functions	Jing Guo	Thu, 23 Apr 1998 17:19:18 -0400	71 lines
Re: Weird binary I/O problem with Sun compiler	Glenn Carver	Fri, 24 Apr 1998 00:13:11 +0100	119 lines
Re: Array valued functions	Steve Lionel	Fri, 24 Apr 1998 09:17:46 -0400	73 lines
What am I doing wrong?	Hassan Mehrabani-Yeganeh	Fri, 24 Apr 1998 10:09:52 -0500 (EDT)	39 lines
Re: What am I doing wrong?	Malcolm Cohen	Fri, 24 Apr 1998 15:49:28 +0000 (BST)	27 lines
Re: What am I doing wrong?	Daniel CHARPIN	Fri, 24 Apr 1998 16:56:31 -0600	38 lines
ISO_VARYING_STRING and memory leaks	Kevin Maguire	Mon, 27 Apr 1998 15:36:48 +0100 (BST)	111 lines
Re: ISO_VARYING_STRING and memory leaks	Steve Morgan	Mon, 27 Apr 1998 16:47:30 +0100 (British Summer Time)	140 lines
Re: ISO_VARYING_STRING and memory leaks	Malcolm Cohen	Mon, 27 Apr 1998 17:05:10 +0000 (BST)	95 lines
Re: ISO_VARYING_STRING and memory leaks	Phillip Helbig	Mon, 27 Apr 1998 18:36:55 GMT	34 lines
Help! please	Jimmy E. Touma	Mon, 27 Apr 1998 15:13:36 -0500	80 lines
Help	Jimmy E. Touma	Mon, 27 Apr 1998 18:38:52 -0500	82 lines
Re: Help! please	Steve Lionel	Mon, 27 Apr 1998 20:40:43 -0400	42 lines
Diff. between F77 and F90	Pravin Chavan	Tue, 28 Apr 1998 10:12:22 +0530	17 lines
Diff. between F77 and F90	Michael Metcalf	Tue, 28 Apr 1998 03:37:39 -0400	18 lines
Re: ISO_VARYING_STRING and memory leaks	David Vowles	Tue, 28 Apr 1998 17:40:06 +0930	77 lines
Re: ISO_VARYING_STRING and memory leaks	Malcolm Cohen	Tue, 28 Apr 1998 08:53:20 +0000 (BST)	44 lines
Re: ISO_VARYING_STRING and memory leaks	Clive Page	Tue, 28 Apr 1998 09:53:34 +0100 (BST)	31 lines
Names in OOP (was Re: Polymorphic variables (97-183r2, 97-196r2))	Dr W.W. Schulz	Tue, 28 Apr 1998 18:22:49 +0100 (BST)	206 lines
Re: Names in OOP (was Re: Polymorphic variables (97-183r2, 97-196r2))	Jack Scheible	Tue, 28 Apr 1998 14:20:13 -0400 (EDT)	20 lines
Re: Names in OOP	Dr W.W. Schulz	Wed, 29 Apr 1998 10:10:02 +0100 (BST)	42 lines
HPF vs. arrays of pointers	Thorsten Ohl	Wed, 29 Apr 1998 16:01:09 +0200	61 lines
Re: HPF vs. arrays of pointers	Carl Offner	Wed, 29 Apr 1998 11:37:43 -0400	165 lines
Re: HPF vs. arrays of pointers	Thorsten Ohl	Wed, 29 Apr 1998 19:06:52 +0200	96 lines
Re: HPF vs. arrays of pointers	Carl Offner	Wed, 29 Apr 1998 13:55:18 -0400	161 lines
Re: HPF vs. arrays of pointers	Thorsten Ohl	Wed, 29 Apr 1998 20:06:26 +0200	40 lines
Re: HPF vs. arrays of pointers	Carl Offner	Wed, 29 Apr 1998 14:34:22 -0400	74 lines
Re: HPF vs. arrays of pointers	Phillip Helbig	Wed, 29 Apr 1998 20:31:32 GMT	24 lines
Re: Format again,etc	Harvey Richardson - Sun UK Principal Systems Engineer	Thu, 30 Apr 1998 11:26:13 +0100 (BST)	38 lines
Format again,etc	David R. Leal Valmana	Thu, 30 Apr 1998 11:43:40 +0100	73 lines
Re: Format again,etc	<>	Thu, 30 Apr 1998 11:56:26 GMT	78 lines
helping to promote fortran 90	Ian Chivers	Thu, 30 Apr 1998 12:00:13 +0000 (GMT)	40 lines
Re: helping to promote fortran 90	Peter Shenkin	Thu, 30 Apr 1998 10:15:26 -0400	39 lines
Re: HPF vs. arrays of pointers	Thorsten Ohl	Thu, 30 Apr 1998 16:34:04 +0200	198 lines
RE: helping to promote fortran 90	Xinnian Li	Thu, 30 Apr 1998 11:11:27 -0400	62 lines
Re: helping to promote fortran 90	Phillip Helbig	Thu, 30 Apr 1998 15:37:05 GMT	38 lines
RE: Format again,etc	Loren P. Meissner	Thu, 30 Apr 1998 08:58:36 -0700	96 lines
Re: helping to promote fortran 90	Stu Anderson 425-865-3595	Thu, 30 Apr 1998 09:31:48 -0700 (PDT)	30 lines
Re: helping to promote fortran 90	Richard Maine	Thu, 30 Apr 1998 09:53:32 -0700 (PDT)	33 lines
Re: helping to promote Fortran 90	Richard Weaver	Thu, 30 Apr 1998 14:04:42 -0500 (CDT)	21 lines
Re: helping to promote fortran 90	Glenn Carver	Thu, 30 Apr 1998 22:40:54 +0100	58 lines
Re: helping to promote fortran 90	Alan.Miller @ vic.cmis.CSIRO.AU = Alan Miller, Honorary Research Fellow (Retired)	Fri, 01 May 1998 10:48:35 +1000	53 lines
Re: helping to promote fortran 90	Dick Hendrickson	Mon, 04 May 1998 12:10:45 -0500	39 lines
Re: f90 mode?(Emacs)	John Turner	Tue, 5 May 1998 10:44:27 -0400 (EDT)	36 lines
f90 mode?(Emacs)	David R. Leal Valmana	Tue, 05 May 1998 15:58:59 +0100	43 lines
RE: f90 mode?(Emacs)	Olaf Michelsson	Tue, 05 May 1998 17:48:07 +0200 (METDST)	79 lines
RE: helping to promote fortran 90	Loren P. Meissner	Tue, 5 May 1998 09:13:25 -0700	41 lines
OpenGL for Fortran 90	William F Mitchell	Tue, 5 May 1998 13:00:29 -0400	41 lines
Re: RE: helping to promote fortran 90	Ian Chivers	Tue, 5 May 1998 18:32:34 +0000 (GMT)	64 lines
Re: helping to promote fortran 90	Ian Chivers	Tue, 5 May 1998 15:35:31 -0700 (PDT)	68 lines
Response to my Fortran talk	Loren P. Meissner	Tue, 5 May 1998 16:55:02 -0700	100 lines
Thee volatile attribut proposal	Wclodius	Tue, 5 May 1998 21:24:43 EDT	19 lines
OPTIONAL function name	Alan.Miller @ vic.cmis.CSIRO.AU = Alan Miller, Honorary Research Fellow (Retired)	Wed, 06 May 1998 16:45:11 +1000	40 lines
Re: OPTIONAL with function name	Alan.Miller @ vic.cmis.CSIRO.AU = Alan Miller, Honorary Research Fellow (Retired)	Wed, 06 May 1998 17:52:20 +1000	27 lines
Re:helping to promote fortran 90	venkat sastry	Wed, 06 May 1998 10:02:27 +0100	63 lines
Re: helping to promote fortran 90	Mark Stevens	Wed, 6 May 1998 09:22:29 +0000	32 lines
Re: helping to promote fortran 90	Peter Shenkin	Wed, 6 May 1998 09:34:45 -0400	29 lines
Re: helping to promote fortran 90	Dick Hendrickson	Wed, 06 May 1998 09:42:01 -0500	37 lines
Re:helping to promote fortran 90	Walt Brainerd	Wed, 6 May 1998 08:59:47 -0600 (MDT)	25 lines
Object Oriented Programming	Ray Horne	Wed, 06 May 1998 16:12:58 +0100	27 lines
Re: Object Oriented Programming	Peter Shenkin	Wed, 6 May 1998 11:31:23 -0400	51 lines
Object Oriented Programming	<>	Wed, 6 May 1998 11:32:56 -0400 (EDT)	61 lines
Re: f90 mode?(Emacs)	Ted Stern	Wed, 6 May 1998 09:06:41 -0700 (PDT)	69 lines
RE: Diff. between F77 and F90	<>	Wed, 06 May 1998 16:17:35 MET_DST	52 lines
Re: helping to promote fortran 90	N8TM	Thu, 7 May 1998 00:30:05 EDT	27 lines
Resolving generic procedures (was: OpenGL for Fortran 90)	Thorsten Ohl	Thu, 7 May 1998 15:29:19 +0200	60 lines
Integer to String	Vittorio G. Caffa <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 7 May 1998 13:45:26 +1	49 lines
Re: Integer to String	Jack Scheible	Thu, 7 May 1998 10:03:48 -0400 (EDT)	66 lines
Re: Integer to String	Jan van Oosterwijk	Thu, 07 May 1998 16:28:55 +0200	94 lines
Re: Resolving generic procedures	Malcolm Cohen	Thu, 7 May 1998 15:21:05 +0000 (BST)	58 lines
Re: Resolving generic procedures (was: OpenGL for Fortran 90)	William F Mitchell	Thu, 7 May 1998 11:35:09 -0400	104 lines
Re: Resolving generic procedures (was: OpenGL for Fortran 90)	Thorsten Ohl	Thu, 7 May 1998 18:15:33 +0200	57 lines
Dummy procedures and elemental	Thorsten Ohl	Thu, 7 May 1998 18:28:59 +0200	29 lines
Re: Integer to String	Alberto Fasso'	Thu, 07 May 1998 09:44:32 -0700 (PDT)	90 lines
Re: Resolving generic procedures (was: OpenGL for Fortran 90)	Richard Maine	Thu, 7 May 1998 10:08:43 -0700 (PDT)	49 lines
Re: Resolving generic procedures (was: OpenGL for Fortran 90)	William F Mitchell	Thu, 7 May 1998 13:18:01 -0400	92 lines
Re: Resolving generic procedures (was: OpenGL for Fortran 90)	John Lindsay	Thu, 07 May 1998 13:33:17 -0400	73 lines
Re: Resolving generic procedures (was: OpenGL for Fortran 90)	Dr W.W. Schulz	Fri, 8 May 1998 10:46:41 +0100 (BST)	101 lines
Re: Integer to String	Clive Page	Fri, 8 May 1998 15:42:10 +0100 (BST)	81 lines
Re: Resolving generic procedures (was: OpenGL for Fortran 90)	Peter Shenkin	Fri, 8 May 1998 11:13:56 -0400	65 lines
Re: Resolving generic procedures (was: OpenGL for Fortran 90)	Thorsten Ohl	Fri, 8 May 1998 17:16:58 +0200	43 lines
Re: Resolving generic procedures (was: OpenGL for Fortran 90)	Richard Maine	Fri, 8 May 1998 08:35:46 -0700 (PDT)	33 lines
Re: Integer to String, now in F95	Clive Page	Fri, 8 May 1998 17:00:11 +0100 (BST)	36 lines
Re: Integer to String, now in F95	Malcolm Cohen	Fri, 8 May 1998 16:40:39 +0000 (BST)	102 lines
Re: Integer to String	Kevin Maguire	Sat, 9 May 1998 14:58:53 +0100 (BST)	80 lines
RE: Integer to String	Loren P. Meissner	Sat, 9 May 1998 11:52:43 -0700	28 lines
Re: Integer to String	Jack Scheible	Sat, 9 May 1998 15:03:43 -0400 (EDT)	47 lines
Re: Integer to String, now in F95	Robin Vowels	Sat, 09 May 98 23:31:12 PDT	51 lines
Re: Integer to String	Richard Maine	Sun, 10 May 1998 08:46:42 -0700 (PDT)	47 lines
	Octavio Rodriguez Villar	Sun, 10 May 1998 21:55:13 -0500 (PDT)	12 lines
command line arguments?	Jack Saba	Mon, 11 May 1998 12:58:09 -0400 (EDT)	20 lines
Re: command line arguments?	Dan Nagle	Mon, 11 May 1998 12:36:10 -0500	47 lines
command line arguments?	Richard Maine	Mon, 11 May 1998 12:55:32 -0700 (PDT)	42 lines
Public instance of private derived type?	Bob Runyan	Mon, 11 May 1998 16:37:21 -0700	36 lines
Public instance of private derived type?	Richard Maine	Mon, 11 May 1998 19:32:37 -0700 (PDT)	39 lines
Re: command line arguments?	W. J. Metzger	Tue, 12 May 1998 08:20:04 +0200 (METDST)	35 lines
Re: command line arguments?	Jan van Oosterwijk	Tue, 12 May 1998 08:56:52 +0200	50 lines
Re: Integer to String	Vittorio G. Caffa <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 12 May 1998 07:14:21 +1	18 lines
Varying-length strings (was Re: Integer to String)	Malcolm Cohen	Tue, 12 May 1998 09:29:54 +0000 (BST)	35 lines
Re: command line arguments?	Peter Shenkin	Tue, 12 May 1998 08:50:37 -0400	23 lines
Re: Varying-length strings (was Re: Integer to String)	Jing Guo	Tue, 12 May 1998 10:30:53 -0400 (EDT)	45 lines
Co-Array Fortran?	Dan Nagle	Tue, 12 May 1998 10:23:40 -0500	29 lines
memory leak	Siamak Kaveh	Tue, 12 May 1998 11:29:59 -0400	24 lines
Re: memory leak	Peter Shenkin	Tue, 12 May 1998 11:44:42 -0400	37 lines
Re: Varying-length strings	Malcolm Cohen	Tue, 12 May 1998 15:45:26 +0000 (BST)	41 lines
Re: Co-Array Fortran?	John Reid	Tue, 12 May 1998 17:01:47 +0100 (BST)	43 lines
Re: Integer to String	Otto Stolz	Tue, 12 May 1998 10:57:54 -0600	45 lines
Re: Resolving generic procedures.	Wclodius	Wed, 13 May 1998 01:00:22 EDT	124 lines
Re: memory leak	Pierre Hugonnet	Wed, 13 May 1998 10:58:25 +0200	89 lines
Re: Resolving generic procedures.	Wclodius	Wed, 13 May 1998 08:33:53 EDT	14 lines
Re: memory leak	Jack Scheible	Wed, 13 May 1998 09:18:39 -0400 (EDT)	26 lines
Re: Co-Array Fortran?	Dan Nagle	Wed, 13 May 1998 09:08:06 -0500	21 lines
Re: Resolving generic procedures.	William F Mitchell	Wed, 13 May 1998 10:09:01 -0400	54 lines
Re: memory leak	Peter Shenkin	Wed, 13 May 1998 10:31:15 -0400	69 lines
Re: Resolving generic procedures.	Malcolm Cohen	Wed, 13 May 1998 14:33:32 +0000 (BST)	54 lines
Re: memory leak	Pierre Hugonnet	Wed, 13 May 1998 16:43:01 +0200	52 lines
Re: memory leak	Malcolm Cohen	Wed, 13 May 1998 14:59:52 +0000 (BST)	60 lines
Re: memory leak	Jack Scheible	Wed, 13 May 1998 11:07:10 -0400 (EDT)	29 lines
RE: Matrix-game	Peter Jewell	Wed, 13 May 1998 16:32:12 +0100	162 lines
Re: memory leak	Jack Scheible	Wed, 13 May 1998 12:21:13 -0400 (EDT)	64 lines
Re: memory leak	Pierre Hugonnet	Wed, 13 May 1998 18:29:14 +0200	36 lines
Re: Resolving generic procedures.	Malcolm Cohen	Wed, 13 May 1998 16:33:44 +0000 (BST)	76 lines
sun f90	Kevin Stratford	Wed, 13 May 1998 18:29:17 +0100	24 lines
Fragmentation; was Re: memory leak	Peter Shenkin	Wed, 13 May 1998 13:49:50 -0400	113 lines
Re: sun f90	Randy Baker	Wed, 13 May 1998 11:51:46 -0600	34 lines
Re: sun f90	Waveren, Matthijs van	Wed, 13 May 1998 20:08:24 +0100	36 lines
Matrix-game	Tobias Lindgren	Wed, 13 May 1998 13:48:34 -0700	29 lines
Re: Fragmentation; was Re: memory leak	Jack Scheible	Wed, 13 May 1998 17:11:49 -0400 (EDT)	125 lines
Re: Fragmentation; was Re: memory leak	Peter Shenkin	Wed, 13 May 1998 18:11:18 -0400	59 lines
Re: Resolving generic procedures.	Wclodius	Thu, 14 May 1998 00:30:17 EDT	51 lines
Extension of {MIN,MAX}{LOC,VAL} to LOGICAL arrays?	Peter Shenkin	Thu, 14 May 1998 00:59:26 -0400	22 lines
Re: sun f90	<>	Thu, 14 May 98 08:54:01 +0200	28 lines
Re: Fragmentation; was Re: memory leak	Pierre Hugonnet	Thu, 14 May 1998 09:59:43 +0200	90 lines
Re: sun f90	Clive Page	Thu, 14 May 1998 10:23:11 +0100 (BST)	29 lines
Re: Extension of {MIN,MAX}{LOC,VAL} to LOGICAL arrays?	Harvey Richardson - Sun UK Principal Systems Engineer	Thu, 14 May 1998 10:53:00 +0100 (BST)	29 lines
Re: sun f90	Jacek_Rokicki	Thu, 14 May 1998 12:03:25 +0200	36 lines
Re: sun f90	Glenn Carver	Thu, 14 May 1998 11:28:56 +0100	30 lines
Re: sun f90	Glenn Carver	Thu, 14 May 1998 11:30:27 +0100	20 lines
Re: sun f90	Clive Page	Thu, 14 May 1998 11:42:20 +0100 (BST)	33 lines
Re: Extension of {MIN,MAX}{LOC,VAL} to LOGICAL arrays?	William F Mitchell	Thu, 14 May 1998 07:41:54 -0400	30 lines
Re: sun f90	Luis Kornblueh	Thu, 14 May 1998 13:47:20 +0200 (MET DST)	43 lines
Appologies (was Re: Resolving generic procedures.)	Wclodius	Thu, 14 May 1998 08:14:29 EDT	16 lines
Re: sun f90	N8TM	Thu, 14 May 1998 09:16:58 EDT	25 lines
Re: Fragmentation; was Re: memory leak	Jack Scheible	Thu, 14 May 1998 09:24:04 -0400 (EDT)	51 lines
Re: Extension of {MIN,MAX}{LOC,VAL} to LOGICAL arrays?	Carol Munroe - SMCC High Performance Computing	Thu, 14 May 1998 09:52:00 -0400 (EDT)	50 lines
Re: Extension of {MIN,MAX}{LOC,VAL} to LOGICAL arrays?	Peter Shenkin	Thu, 14 May 1998 10:02:11 -0400	37 lines
Re: sun f90	Peter Shenkin	Thu, 14 May 1998 10:04:12 -0400	33 lines
Re: Extension of {MIN,MAX}{LOC,VAL} to LOGICAL arrays?	<>	Thu, 14 May 1998 10:20:52 -0400 (EDT)	46 lines
Re: Extension of {MIN,MAX}{LOC,VAL} to LOGICAL arrays?	Peter Shenkin	Thu, 14 May 1998 10:28:13 -0400	41 lines
Re: Fragmentation; was Re: memory leak	Peter Shenkin	Thu, 14 May 1998 10:46:12 -0400	75 lines
Re: Extension of {MIN,MAX}{LOC,VAL} to LOGICAL arrays?	<>	Thu, 14 May 1998 10:54:17 -0400 (EDT)	59 lines
Re: Extension of {MIN,MAX}{LOC,VAL} to LOGICAL arrays?	Peter Shenkin	Thu, 14 May 1998 11:36:38 -0400	59 lines
Re: Fragmentation; was Re: memory leak	Mike Lijewski	Thu, 14 May 1998 08:43:51 -0700	57 lines
Re: Integer to String	Clive Page	Thu, 14 May 1998 17:09:39 +0100 (BST)	97 lines
Re: Fragmentation; was Re: memory leak	Jack Scheible	Thu, 14 May 1998 13:30:54 -0400 (EDT)	41 lines
Re: sun f90	Prakash Narayan	Thu, 14 May 1998 12:22:08 -0700 (PDT)	36 lines
Generic disambiguation using procedures	Van Snyder	Thu, 14 May 1998 13:34:54 PDT	73 lines
Re: Matrix-game	<>	Thu, 14 May 1998 14:57:32 -0700	41 lines
Re: Generic disambiguation using procedures	Peter Shenkin	Thu, 14 May 1998 18:29:17 -0400	87 lines
Re: Generic disambiguation using procedures	Van Snyder	Thu, 14 May 1998 15:41:47 PDT	34 lines
Re: Generic disambiguation using procedures	Richard Maine	Thu, 14 May 1998 16:02:05 -0700 (PDT)	41 lines
Re: Generic disambiguation using procedures	Peter Shenkin	Thu, 14 May 1998 19:58:03 -0400	60 lines
Re: Extension of {MIN,MAX}{LOC,VAL} to LOGICAL arrays?	N8TM	Thu, 14 May 1998 22:10:43 EDT	28 lines
Re: Generic disambiguation using procedures	Richard Maine	Thu, 14 May 1998 19:20:45 -0700 (PDT)	85 lines
Open VMS Debug and PRIVATE variables	<>	Fri, 15 May 1998 09:22:02 +0200	74 lines
Re: Extension of {MIN,MAX}{LOC,VAL} to LOGICAL arrays?	Robin Vowels	Fri, 15 May 98 00:29:14 PDT	54 lines
Re: Fragmentation; was Re: memory leak	Pierre Hugonnet	Fri, 15 May 1998 10:14:03 +0200	157 lines
Re: Extension of {MIN,MAX}{LOC,VAL} to LOGICAL arrays?	Robin Vowels	Fri, 15 May 98 01:25:17 PDT	53 lines
Re: Fragmentation; was Re: memory leak	Pierre Hugonnet	Fri, 15 May 1998 14:33:12 +0200	45 lines
Re: Open VMS Debug and PRIVATE variables	Steve Lionel	Fri, 15 May 1998 08:41:39 -0400	33 lines
Re: Integer to String	Steve Lionel	Fri, 15 May 1998 09:11:12 -0400	30 lines
Re: Integer to String	Steve Lionel	Fri, 15 May 1998 09:27:12 -0400	27 lines
Re: Integer to String	Steve Lionel	Fri, 15 May 1998 09:28:51 -0400	24 lines
Re: Extension of {MIN,MAX}{LOC,VAL} to LOGICAL arrays?	Peter Shenkin	Fri, 15 May 1998 09:59:51 -0400	43 lines
Compilation of modules	jean-jacques wasbauer	Fri, 15 May 1998 16:16:34 +0200	72 lines
Compilation of modules	Thorsten Ohl	Fri, 15 May 1998 16:45:17 +0200	55 lines
Re: Compilation of modules	Glenn Carver	Fri, 15 May 1998 15:47:49 +0100	48 lines
Re: Compilation of modules	<>	Fri, 15 May 1998 10:52:09 -0400 (EDT)	140 lines
Makefile question	Hassan Mehrabani-Yeganeh	Fri, 15 May 1998 10:35:51 -0500 (EDT)	57 lines
Re: Compilation of modules	Peter Shenkin	Fri, 15 May 1998 11:58:12 -0400	49 lines
Re: Makefile question	Peter Shenkin	Fri, 15 May 1998 12:03:54 -0400	39 lines
Re: Extension of {MIN,MAX}{LOC,VAL} to LOGICAL arrays? (fwd)	Van Snyder	Fri, 15 May 1998 9:29:58 PDT	35 lines
Re: Compilation of modules (fwd)	Van Snyder	Fri, 15 May 1998 10:09:36 PDT	61 lines
Re: Compilation of modules (fwd)	Peter Shenkin	Fri, 15 May 1998 14:37:39 -0400	53 lines
Re: Extension of {MIN,MAX}{LOC,VAL} to LOGICAL arrays?	Robin Vowels	Fri, 15 May 98 23:41:33 PDT	62 lines
Re: Compilation of modules	Glenn Carver	Mon, 18 May 1998 10:38:46 +0100	28 lines
Re: Integer to String	Clive Page	Mon, 18 May 1998 10:45:46 +0100 (BST)	72 lines
Re: sun f90	<>	Mon, 18 May 1998 12:32:37 +0100 (GDT)	53 lines
Re: Integer to String	Kevin Maguire	Mon, 18 May 1998 17:21:54 +0100 (BST)	67 lines
Re: Integer to String	Steve Lionel	Mon, 18 May 1998 12:55:31 -0400	28 lines
Re: Integer to String	<>	Mon, 18 May 1998 14:14:13 -0400 (EDT)	60 lines
Formally undefined behavior?	Van Snyder	Mon, 18 May 1998 11:20:04 PDT	19 lines
f90 to f77 style converter ?	Jeffrey Augenbaum	Mon, 18 May 1998 14:34:51 -0400	24 lines
Re: sun f90	Prakash Narayan	Mon, 18 May 1998 19:32:06 -0700 (PDT)	36 lines
Re: Integer to String	Malcolm Cohen	Tue, 19 May 1998 09:32:08 +0000 (BST)	50 lines
Re: sun f90	Ian Chivers	Tue, 19 May 1998 11:14:53 +0000 (GMT)	62 lines
Re: ISO_VARYING_STRING and memory leaks	Lawrie Schonfelder	Tue, 19 May 1998 14:04:26 +0100 (British Summer Time)	75 lines
Re: Compilation of modules	Jack Scheible	Tue, 19 May 1998 09:49:36 -0400 (EDT)	332 lines
Re: ISO_VARYING_STRING and memory leaks	Peter Shenkin	Tue, 19 May 1998 10:09:09 -0400	32 lines
Interesting Statistics	Van Snyder	Tue, 19 May 1998 11:52:18 PDT	9 lines
Interesting Statistics	Van Snyder	Tue, 19 May 1998 12:01:31 PDT	31 lines
Fortran 90/95/HPF Information (May)	Michael Metcalf	Wed, 20 May 1998 05:04:46 -0400	728 lines
Free PSR f90 for Linux?	Jose Marin	Wed, 20 May 1998 12:18:02 +0100 (BST)	55 lines
Re: Free PSR f90 for Linux?	William F Mitchell	Wed, 20 May 1998 07:56:49 -0400	39 lines
Re: Free PSR f90 for Linux?	William F Mitchell	Wed, 20 May 1998 08:07:32 -0400	27 lines
Free PSR f90 for Linux?	Richard Maine	Wed, 20 May 1998 06:18:30 -0700 (PDT)	36 lines
Program efficiency & PARAMETERs	Glenn Carver	Wed, 20 May 1998 15:55:07 +0100	52 lines
Re: Program efficiency & PARAMETERs	forth.s.a	Wed, 20 May 1998 17:17:35 +0100	92 lines
Re: Program efficiency & PARAMETERs	Peter Shenkin	Wed, 20 May 1998 12:38:48 -0400	51 lines
Binary stream I/O in Fortran 2000	Jean Vezina	Wed, 20 May 1998 20:13:50 -0400	35 lines
Re: Free PSR f90 for Linux?	N8TM	Wed, 20 May 1998 21:38:30 EDT	21 lines
Re: Program efficiency & PARAMETERs	N8TM	Thu, 21 May 1998 00:10:43 EDT	27 lines
Macintosh/PPC LInux F95	Wclodius	Thu, 21 May 1998 01:08:34 EDT	19 lines
Re: Macintosh/PPC LInux F95	Jose Marin	Thu, 21 May 1998 10:36:55 +0100 (BST)	56 lines
i need help	ALEX KIRA	Thu, 21 May 1998 15:42:48 +0300	14 lines
fortran futures 98	Ian Chivers	Thu, 21 May 1998 15:19:14 BST	724 lines
Co-array Fortran	John Reid	Thu, 21 May 1998 17:29:10 +0100 (BST)	47 lines
Re: Co-array Fortran	Peter Shenkin	Thu, 21 May 1998 13:56:42 -0400	34 lines
ELEMENTAL and PURE	Clive Page	Fri, 22 May 1998 10:03:59 +0100 (BST)	114 lines
free VAST-f90 for Linux: libvast90 has undefined references	Jose Marin	Fri, 22 May 1998 15:42:24 +0100 (BST)	68 lines
F90 for SGI R10000?	Van Snyder	Fri, 22 May 1998 14:41:16 PDT	20 lines
Re: F90 for SGI R10000?	<>	Fri, 22 May 1998 21:37:31 -0400 (EDT)	48 lines
Re: F90 for SGI R10000?	Jack Scheible	Fri, 22 May 1998 21:47:30 -0400 (EDT)	24 lines
Re: ELEMENTAL and PURE	Robin Vowels	Fri, 22 May 98 19:09:28 PDT	47 lines
Re: F90 for SGI R10000?	Peter Shenkin	Fri, 22 May 1998 22:30:00 -0400	47 lines
Re: F90 for SGI R10000?	Peter Shenkin	Fri, 22 May 1998 22:35:43 -0400	22 lines
Re: F90 for SGI R10000?	Jack Scheible	Mon, 25 May 1998 08:31:23 -0400 (EDT)	19 lines
Re: F90 for SGI R10000?	Jack Scheible	Mon, 25 May 1998 08:33:20 -0400 (EDT)	18 lines
Re: free VAST-f90 for Linux: libvast90 has undefined references	Jose Marin	Mon, 25 May 1998 16:43:17 +0100 (BST)	74 lines
Sixteen compilers!	<>	25 May 1998 21:49:34 +0200	35 lines
SierraPacific f90	Eildert Groeneveld	Thu, 28 May 1998 09:13:23 +0200 (MEST)	37 lines
Re: SierraPacific f90	Jan van Oosterwijk	Thu, 28 May 1998 10:34:22 +0200	47 lines
HUG'98 Program and Call for Participation	John Merlin	Thu, 28 May 1998 15:13:13 +0200 (MET DST)	184 lines
VAST/f90, free f90 compiler for linux	David McNamara	Fri, 29 May 1998 11:07:41 -0700	57 lines
INTERFACE blocks for dummy procedures, derived TYPEs and SCOPE	Thorsten Ohl	Sat, 30 May 1998 17:24:03 +0200	224 lines
Re: INTERFACE blocks for dummy procedures, derived TYPEs and SCOPE	Dr W.W. Schulz	Mon, 1 Jun 1998 10:51:57 +0100 (BST)	113 lines
Re: Sixteen compilers!	<>	01 Jun 1998 16:08:20 +0200	22 lines
Re: INTERFACE blocks for dummy procedures, derived TYPEs and SCOPE (fwd)	Van Snyder	Mon, 01 Jun 1998 11:48:54 PDT	62 lines
Re: Fragmentation; was Re: memory leak	Jack Scheible	Mon, 1 Jun 1998 16:41:32 -0400 (EDT)	211 lines
Allocation/reallocation	Alan.Miller @ vic.cmis.CSIRO.AU = Alan Miller, Honorary Research Fellow (Retired)	Tue, 02 Jun 1998 11:15:56 +1000	53 lines
Matrix Operations	Vittorio G. Caffa <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 2 Jun 1998 09:24:20 +1	59 lines
Re: Allocation/reallocation	Pierre Hugonnet	Tue, 02 Jun 1998 11:37:57 +0200	147 lines
Re: Fragmentation; was Re: memory leak	Pierre Hugonnet	Tue, 02 Jun 1998 12:13:32 +0200	138 lines
INTERFACE block scoping	Malcolm Cohen	Tue, 2 Jun 1998 12:23:26 +0000 (BST)	93 lines
Debuggers and f90	Eildert Groeneveld	Tue, 2 Jun 1998 15:24:36 +0200 (MEST)	35 lines
Re: INTERFACE blocks for dummy procedures, derived TYPEs and SCOPE (fwd)	Thorsten Ohl	Tue, 2 Jun 1998 15:37:58 +0200	49 lines
Re: Debuggers and f90	Peter Shenkin	Tue, 2 Jun 1998 10:29:16 -0400	38 lines
Re: Fragmentation; was Re: memory leak	Jack Scheible	Tue, 2 Jun 1998 11:14:37 -0400 (EDT)	45 lines
test, please ignore	Ian Chivers	Thu, 4 Jun 1998 15:10:54 +0000 (GMT)	18 lines
selected real kinds	Neil Hamilton-Smith	Fri, 5 Jun 1998 14:59:24 +0100 (BST)	54 lines
selected real kinds	Neil Hamilton-Smith	Fri, 5 Jun 1998 16:01:15 +0100 (BST)	16 lines
Re: selected real kinds	<>	Fri, 5 Jun 1998 16:21:13 +0100	69 lines
Re: selected real kinds	Robin Vowels	Sat, 06 Jun 98 00:15:06 PDT	68 lines
MPI Module	Joerg Stiller	Sun, 07 Jun 1998 16:53:50 +0200	50 lines
g77	Jimmy E. Touma	Mon, 8 Jun 1998 00:43:58 -0500	65 lines
Re: Fragmentation; was Re: memory leak	Pierre Hugonnet	Mon, 08 Jun 1998 12:36:21 +0200	55 lines
questin, makefile	Jean-Yves Tillier	Mon, 8 Jun 1998 12:04:37 -0500	66 lines
Off the record answers	Pierre Hugonnet	Tue, 09 Jun 1998 09:25:25 +0200	42 lines
Re: Matrix Operations	Vittorio G. Caffa <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 9 Jun 1998 07:31:52 +1	16 lines
Profiling	Vittorio G. Caffa <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 9 Jun 1998 09:56:27 +1	33 lines
Re: Profiling	<>	Tue, 9 Jun 1998 08:55:07 EDT	27 lines
Re: Off the record answers	Pierre Hugonnet	Tue, 09 Jun 1998 17:34:41 +0200	51 lines
Re: Off the record answers	Peter Shenkin	Tue, 9 Jun 1998 12:07:32 -0400	33 lines
Re: Off the record answers	Ian Chivers	Wed, 10 Jun 1998 13:40:49 +0000 (GMT)	56 lines
Re: questin, makefile	Petros Dafniotis, DuPont Central R & D	Wed, 10 Jun 1998 16:13:37 +0200	53 lines
Re: questin, makefile	Peter Shenkin	Wed, 10 Jun 1998 10:39:01 -0400	60 lines
Re: questin, makefile --- IMPORTANT CORRECTION	Petros Dafniotis, DuPont Central R & D	Wed, 10 Jun 1998 17:31:53 +0200	45 lines
Re: questin, makefile	<>	Wed, 10 Jun 1998 12:12:14 -0400 (EDT)	50 lines
Re: questin, makefile	Peter Shenkin	Wed, 10 Jun 1998 12:41:13 -0400	48 lines
Re: questin, makefile	<>	Wed, 10 Jun 1998 13:45:40 -0400 (EDT)	56 lines
Re: questin, makefile	Peter Shenkin	Wed, 10 Jun 1998 14:08:02 -0400	56 lines
Re: questin, makefile	William F Mitchell	Wed, 10 Jun 1998 14:11:39 -0400	30 lines
Re: questin, makefile	Vadim	Wed, 10 Jun 1998 12:36:32 -0600 (MDT)	18 lines
Re: questin, makefile	Jean-Yves Tillier	Wed, 10 Jun 1998 13:45:21 -0500	134 lines
Re: questin, makefile	Jennifer O'Connor	Wed, 10 Jun 1998 14:50:54 -0400	55 lines
Re: questin, makefile	Jean-Yves Tillier	Wed, 10 Jun 1998 13:52:03 -0500	43 lines
Re: questin, makefile	Jean-Yves Tillier	Wed, 10 Jun 1998 14:06:11 -0500	29 lines
Re: questin, makefile	Peter Shenkin	Wed, 10 Jun 1998 15:16:37 -0400	28 lines
Re: questin, makefile	Peter Shenkin	Wed, 10 Jun 1998 15:19:53 -0400	30 lines
Re: questin, makefile	Peter Shenkin	Wed, 10 Jun 1998 15:22:22 -0400	41 lines
Re: questin, makefile (with corrections)	Jean-Yves Tillier	Wed, 10 Jun 1998 14:32:41 -0500	25 lines
Re: questin, makefile (with corrections)	Jing Guo	Wed, 10 Jun 1998 15:50:42 -0400 (EDT)	36 lines
Re: questin, makefile (with corrections)	Jean-Yves Tillier	Wed, 10 Jun 1998 14:51:40 -0500	32 lines
Re: questin, makefile	Jean-Yves Tillier	Wed, 10 Jun 1998 14:53:43 -0500	19 lines
Re: questin, makefile (with corrections)	Jean-Yves Tillier	Wed, 10 Jun 1998 15:12:43 -0500	36 lines
unresolved	Jean-Yves Tillier	Wed, 10 Jun 1998 16:35:01 -0500	27 lines
Re: unresolved	<>	Wed, 10 Jun 1998 17:42:18 -0400 (EDT)	26 lines
unresoved	Jean-Yves Tillier	Wed, 10 Jun 1998 17:08:10 -0500	28 lines
Re: questin, makefile (with corrections)	Jing Guo	Wed, 10 Jun 1998 20:37:44 -0400 (EDT)	57 lines
Re: unresolved	Jan van Oosterwijk	Thu, 11 Jun 1998 09:02:27 +0200	51 lines
dot_product	Pierre Hugonnet	Thu, 11 Jun 1998 11:58:47 +0200	38 lines
very funny...	Pierre Hugonnet	Thu, 11 Jun 1998 12:13:38 +0200	57 lines
where structure	Yuan Si	Thu, 11 Jun 1998 19:42:29 +0800	39 lines
Re: where structure	<>	Thu, 11 Jun 1998 08:48:35 -0400 (EDT)	58 lines
Re: where structure	Jan van Oosterwijk	Thu, 11 Jun 1998 14:59:53 +0200	72 lines
Re: where structure	forth.s.a	Thu, 11 Jun 1998 14:02:17 +0100	67 lines
Re: where structure	<>	Thu, 11 Jun 1998 09:21:40 -0400 (EDT)	43 lines
Re: where structure	Carol Munroe - SMCC High Performance Computing	Thu, 11 Jun 1998 10:07:46 -0400 (EDT)	109 lines
Re: where structure	Carol Munroe - SMCC High Performance Computing	Thu, 11 Jun 1998 10:28:40 -0400 (EDT)	152 lines
Re: unresolved	Jean-Yves Tillier	Thu, 11 Jun 1998 09:37:55 -0500	24 lines
Re: unresolved	<>	Thu, 11 Jun 1998 10:45:54 -0400 (EDT)	41 lines
RE: where structure	Peter Jewell	Thu, 11 Jun 1998 15:51:10 +0100	76 lines
Re: unresoved	Jean-Yves Tillier	Thu, 11 Jun 1998 09:59:57 -0500	30 lines
Re: unresolved and makefile(F77+F90)	Jean-Yves Tillier	Thu, 11 Jun 1998 10:35:08 -0500	37 lines
Re: unresolved	Ralph and Wendy	Thu, 11 Jun 1998 09:54:49 -0700	31 lines
How to build libraries?	Joerg Strutwolf	Thu, 11 Jun 1998 19:26:45 +0100	33 lines
Re: How to build libraries?	Jack Scheible	Thu, 11 Jun 1998 15:33:18 -0400 (EDT)	26 lines
Re: where structure	Yuan Si	Fri, 12 Jun 1998 13:16:55 +0800	23 lines
Re: Off the record answers	Vittorio G. Caffa <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 12 Jun 1998 08:39:35 +1	53 lines
Re: Matrix Operations	Vittorio G. Caffa <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 12 Jun 1998 08:39:35 +1	158 lines
Re: How to build libraries?	Joerg Strutwolf	Fri, 12 Jun 1998 10:50:27 +0100	30 lines
Re: How to build libraries?	Dr. Dan Kidger	Fri, 12 Jun 1998 10:02:27 BST	55 lines
Re: INTERFACE blocks for dummy procedures, derived TYPEs and SCOPE (fwd)	Dr W.W. Schulz	Fri, 12 Jun 1998 16:17:54 +0100 (BST)	98 lines
Re: INTERFACE blocks for dummy procedures, derived TYPEs and SCOPE (fwd)	Jean-Yves Tillier	Fri, 12 Jun 1998 10:35:16 -0500	35 lines
C++ & Fortran 90	Jaehoon Seol	Fri, 12 Jun 1998 12:51:56 -0500 (CDT)	24 lines
Re: C++ & Fortran 90	Peter Shenkin	Fri, 12 Jun 1998 14:47:58 -0400	44 lines
Oops; was, Re: C++ & Fortran 90	Peter Shenkin	Fri, 12 Jun 1998 14:59:11 -0400	35 lines
Re: INTERFACE blocks for dummy procedures, derived TYPEs and SCOPE	William F Mitchell	Fri, 12 Jun 1998 15:01:04 -0400	41 lines
Re: INTERFACE blocks for dummy procedures, derived TYPEs and SCOPE	Robin Vowels	Sat, 13 Jun 98 12:37:32 PDT	21 lines
Re: Oops; was, Re: C++ & Fortran 90	<>	Mon, 15 Jun 1998 08:45:16 +0100	53 lines
Re: Profiling	John Reid	Mon, 15 Jun 1998 14:34:13 +0100 (BST)	42 lines
Re: Profiling	Ian Chivers	Mon, 15 Jun 1998 16:08:29 +0100 (GDT)	61 lines
Re: Profiling	Peter Shenkin	Mon, 15 Jun 1998 11:46:06 -0400	36 lines
Re: Profiling	Steve Lionel	Mon, 15 Jun 1998 11:58:37 -0400	33 lines
Re: Profiling	John Reid	Mon, 15 Jun 1998 17:26:51 +0100 (BST)	19 lines
Re: Profiling	Peter Shenkin	Mon, 15 Jun 1998 13:02:49 -0400	30 lines
RE: Profiling	Derick J.R. Qua	Mon, 15 Jun 1998 11:03:34 -0700	36 lines
Re: Profiling	<>	Tue, 16 Jun 1998 01:48:18 EDT	24 lines
Re: Profiling	Jose Marin	Tue, 16 Jun 1998 11:09:01 +0100 (BST)	55 lines
Re: INTERFACE blocks for dummy procedures, derived TYPEs and SCOPE (fwd)	Van Snyder	Tue, 16 Jun 1998 15:17:38 PDT	44 lines
RE: INTERFACE blocks for dummy procedures, derived TYPEs and SCOPE (fwd)	Loren P. Meissner	Tue, 16 Jun 1998 17:06:12 -0700	36 lines
Namelists - a question of style	Tom Clune	Wed, 17 Jun 1998 15:46:24 -0400	41 lines
generalisation of DPROD	Pierre Hugonnet	Thu, 18 Jun 1998 09:55:24 +0200	42 lines
Re: Namelists - a question of style	Dan Nagle	Thu, 18 Jun 1998 08:11:13 -0400	55 lines
Re: Extensions of DPROD	Dick Hendrickson	Thu, 18 Jun 1998 12:06:49 -0500	41 lines
Re: makefile	Jean-Yves Tillier	Thu, 18 Jun 1998 16:09:13 -0500	107 lines
Re: makefile	Jennifer O'Connor	Thu, 18 Jun 1998 18:14:22 -0400	57 lines
Re: Extensions of DPROD	Dick Hendrickson	Thu, 18 Jun 1998 21:18:17 -0500	47 lines
Extensions of DPROD	Pierre Hugonnet	Fri, 19 Jun 1998 09:11:08 +0200	45 lines
Re: Extensions of DPROD	<>	Fri, 19 Jun 1998 08:59:55 EDT	41 lines
Re: makefile	Jean-Yves Tillier	Fri, 19 Jun 1998 09:47:29 -0500	27 lines
Re: Extensions of DPROD	<>	Fri, 19 Jun 98 16:51:07 +0200	36 lines
Re: Extensions of DPROD	Peter Shenkin	Fri, 19 Jun 1998 10:56:40 -0400	30 lines
Re: Extensions of DPROD	Harvey Richardson - Sun UK Principal Systems Engineer	Fri, 19 Jun 1998 16:16:59 +0100 (BST)	28 lines
Re: Extensions of DPROD	<>	Fri, 19 Jun 98 17:30:38 +0200	28 lines
Re: Extensions of DPROD	Peter Shenkin	Fri, 19 Jun 1998 12:01:28 -0400	41 lines
Re: Extensions of DPROD	<>	Sat, 20 Jun 1998 01:36:35 EDT	27 lines
Re: Extensions of DPROD	Robin Vowels	Sat, 20 Jun 98 13:19:08 PDT	52 lines
Re: Extensions of DPROD	Dick Hendrickson	Sun, 21 Jun 1998 09:49:09 -0500	50 lines
Re: Extensions of DPROD	Pierre Hugonnet	Mon, 22 Jun 1998 09:19:52 +0200	52 lines
Re: Extensions of DPROD	Peter Shenkin	Mon, 22 Jun 1998 11:41:48 -0400	93 lines
Re: Extensions of DPROD	Pierre Hugonnet	Mon, 22 Jun 1998 18:05:18 +0200	71 lines
Re: Extensions of DPROD (fwd)	Van Snyder	Mon, 22 Jun 1998 11:35:33 PDT	26 lines
Re: Extensions of DPROD	<>	Tue, 23 Jun 1998 00:17:36 EDT	24 lines
Re: Extensions of DPROD	Robin Vowels	Tue, 23 Jun 98 00:05:01 PDT	63 lines
Re: Extensions of DPROD	Pierre Hugonnet	Tue, 23 Jun 1998 15:32:51 +0200	89 lines
Re: Extensions of DPROD	Pierre Hugonnet	Tue, 23 Jun 1998 15:37:42 +0200	39 lines
Re: Extensions of DPROD	Peter Shenkin	Tue, 23 Jun 1998 10:18:26 -0400	31 lines
Re: Extensions of DPROD	Peter Shenkin	Tue, 23 Jun 1998 10:20:00 -0400	33 lines
Re: Extensions of DPROD	Pierre Hugonnet	Tue, 23 Jun 1998 17:26:12 +0200	88 lines
Re: dprod	Dr W.W. Schulz	Tue, 23 Jun 1998 18:22:13 +0100 (BST)	102 lines
Re: (x3j3.1998-194) Re: personal notes from trollhatten	Van Snyder	Tue, 23 Jun 1998 10:29:48 PDT	32 lines
Re: dprod	Peter Shenkin	Tue, 23 Jun 1998 14:13:06 -0400	64 lines
dprod	Ian Chivers	Tue, 23 Jun 1998 18:19:31 +0000 (GMT)	29 lines
Re: dprod	<>	Tue, 23 Jun 1998 22:00:42 EDT	26 lines
Re: dprod	<>	Tue, 23 Jun 1998 22:21:04 EDT	33 lines
Re: Extensions of DPROD	Robin Vowels	Tue, 23 Jun 98 22:00:53 PDT	91 lines
Re: Extensions of DPROD	Robin Vowels	Tue, 23 Jun 98 22:06:28 PDT	106 lines
Re: Extensions of DPROD	Robin Vowels	Tue, 23 Jun 98 23:06:39 PDT	47 lines
Re: Extensions of DPROD	Robin Vowels	Tue, 23 Jun 98 23:44:32 PDT	103 lines
Complex numbers matrix	Levy, Yoram	Wed, 24 Jun 1998 08:14:38 +0100	32 lines
RE: dprod	Peter Jewell	Wed, 24 Jun 1998 09:45:00 +0100	118 lines
Re: dprod	Pierre Hugonnet	Wed, 24 Jun 1998 11:03:13 +0200	44 lines
Re: dprod	Dr W.W. Schulz	Wed, 24 Jun 1998 11:14:34 +0100 (BST)	87 lines
Re: dprod	<>	Wed, 24 Jun 98 12:50:40 +0200	93 lines
Re: dprod	Pierre Hugonnet	Wed, 24 Jun 1998 13:51:35 +0200	93 lines
Re: dprod	Dr W.W. Schulz	Wed, 24 Jun 1998 14:45:41 +0100 (BST)	118 lines
dprod - dec vax (nag), dec alpha (dec), sun ultra (nagace and sun) intel pc (dec and salford)	Ian Chivers	Wed, 24 Jun 1998 14:31:13 +0000 (GMT)	39 lines
Re: Is DOUBLE PRECISION here to stay?	Dick Hendrickson	Wed, 24 Jun 1998 09:34:26 -0500	58 lines
Re: dprod	Peter Shenkin	Wed, 24 Jun 1998 11:10:20 -0400	53 lines
Re: dprod	<>	Wed, 24 Jun 1998 15:17:44 GMT	25 lines
Re: dprod	<>	Wed, 24 Jun 1998 17:43:38 +0200 (MET DST)	176 lines
Re: dprod	<>	Wed, 24 Jun 98 18:10:10 +0200	63 lines
Re: dprod: Summary of Results	Dr W.W. Schulz	Wed, 24 Jun 1998 18:02:18 +0100 (BST)	37 lines
Re: dprod (fwd)	Van Snyder	Wed, 24 Jun 1998 10:49:32 PDT	64 lines
Re: dprod: Summary of Results	Pierre Hugonnet	Wed, 24 Jun 1998 20:03:16 +0200	40 lines
Re: dprod (fwd)	Van Snyder	Wed, 24 Jun 1998 11:40:46 PDT	41 lines
DPROD Experience	Paul J. Nikolai or Carolyn J. Nikolai	Wed, 24 Jun 1998 14:41:03 -0400	66 lines
Re: dprod	<>	Wed, 24 Jun 1998 23:52:38 EDT	32 lines
Re: dprod: Summary of Results	<>	Thu, 25 Jun 98 09:00:50 +0200	36 lines
Re: dprod - dec vax (nag), dec alpha (dec), sun ultra (nagace and sun) intel pc (dec and salford)	Robin Vowels	Thu, 25 Jun 98 00:08:28 PDT	97 lines
Re: DPROD	Robin Vowels	Thu, 25 Jun 98 00:08:28 PDT	27 lines
Book on efficient implementation with f90?	Magne Rudshaug	Thu, 25 Jun 1998 09:37:29 +0200	28 lines
Re: Book on efficient implementation with f90?	Dr W.W. Schulz	Thu, 25 Jun 1998 09:46:24 +0100 (BST)	74 lines
Is DOUBLE PRECISION here to stay?	David Adams	Thu, 25 Jun 1998 11:44:19 +0100 (BST)	29 lines
Re: dprod: Summary of Results	<>	Thu, 25 Jun 1998 13:08:14 +0200	32 lines
Re: Is DOUBLE PRECISION here to stay?	Dr W.W. Schulz	Thu, 25 Jun 1998 12:38:47 +0100 (BST)	51 lines
Re: Is DOUBLE PRECISION here to stay?	Pierre Hugonnet	Thu, 25 Jun 1998 13:48:56 +0200	156 lines
Re: Is DOUBLE PRECISION here to stay?	Dr W.W. Schulz	Thu, 25 Jun 1998 13:12:25 +0100 (BST)	92 lines
Re: Is DOUBLE PRECISION here to stay?	Pierre Hugonnet	Thu, 25 Jun 1998 14:16:51 +0200	54 lines
Re: Book on efficient implementation with f90?	<>	Thu, 25 Jun 1998 08:54:03 EDT	25 lines
Re: Is DOUBLE PRECISION here to stay?	Thorsten Ohl	Thu, 25 Jun 1998 15:22:14 +0200	36 lines
Re: Is DOUBLE PRECISION here to stay?	Clive Page	Thu, 25 Jun 1998 15:49:50 +0100 (BST)	41 lines
Multiplication accuracy (was: dprod)	<>	Thu, 25 Jun 1998 16:53:36 +0200 (MET DST)	104 lines
Re: Is DOUBLE PRECISION here to stay?	Pierre Hugonnet	Thu, 25 Jun 1998 17:15:59 +0200	120 lines
Re: Is DOUBLE PRECISION here to stay?	Dr W.W. Schulz	Thu, 25 Jun 1998 16:39:01 +0100 (BST)	80 lines
Re: Is DOUBLE PRECISION here to stay?	Pierre Hugonnet	Thu, 25 Jun 1998 17:40:47 +0200	89 lines
Re: Book on efficient implementation with f90?	Peter Shenkin	Thu, 25 Jun 1998 11:47:33 -0400	39 lines
Re: Is DOUBLE PRECISION here to stay?	Peter Shenkin	Thu, 25 Jun 1998 12:01:06 -0400	61 lines
Re: Is DOUBLE PRECISION here to stay?	Pierre Hugonnet	Thu, 25 Jun 1998 18:01:38 +0200	51 lines
Re: Is DOUBLE PRECISION here to stay?	Pierre Hugonnet	Thu, 25 Jun 1998 18:47:02 +0200	47 lines
true dynamic arrays in f90?	Peter Shenkin	Thu, 25 Jun 1998 14:28:47 -0400	63 lines
Re: Is DOUBLE PRECISION here to stay?	David B. Serafini	Thu, 25 Jun 1998 13:55:54 -0500 (CDT)	29 lines
Re: Is DOUBLE PRECISION here to stay?	Keith Bierman ADT/QED	Thu, 25 Jun 1998 12:10:47 -0700	16 lines
Re: true dynamic arrays in f90?	Dr W.W. Schulz	Fri, 26 Jun 1998 07:52:22 +0100 (BST)	66 lines
Re: dprod	Robin Vowels	Fri, 26 Jun 98 00:18:21 PDT	27 lines
Re: Is DOUBLE PRECISION here to stay?	Pierre Hugonnet	Fri, 26 Jun 1998 09:23:42 +0200	66 lines
Re: Is DOUBLE PRECISION here to stay?	Dr W.W. Schulz	Fri, 26 Jun 1998 09:05:20 +0100 (BST)	169 lines
re: Is DOUBLE PRECISION here to stay?	<>	Fri, 26 Jun 1998 10:59:42 +0000	122 lines
Re: Is DOUBLE PRECISION here to stay?	Otto Stolz	Fri, 26 Jun 1998 13:16:54 +0200	181 lines
Re: Book on efficient implementation with f90?	Van Snyder	Fri, 26 Jun 1998 17:58:24 PDT	24 lines
Re: Book on efficient implementation with f90?	Glenn Carver	Sat, 27 Jun 1998 23:53:14 +0100	47 lines
Re: Book on efficient implementation with f90? (fwd)	Van Snyder	Sat, 27 Jun 1998 17:31:56 PDT	32 lines
Re: DPROD	Robin Vowels	Sat, 27 Jun 98 19:20:13 PDT	78 lines
Re: DPROD	Robin Vowels	Sat, 27 Jun 98 19:20:13 PDT	98 lines
Re: DPROD	Robin Vowels	Sat, 27 Jun 98 19:20:13 PDT	98 lines
Re: DPROD	Robin Vowels	Sat, 27 Jun 98 19:20:13 PDT	98 lines
Re: DPROD	Robin Vowels	Sat, 27 Jun 98 19:20:13 PDT	98 lines
Re: DPROD	Robin Vowels	Sat, 27 Jun 98 19:20:13 PDT	98 lines
Re: Popup menus in F90?	Jeffrey Lindemuth	Sat, 27 Jun 1998 23:15:30 -0400	36 lines
Re: DPROD	Robin Vowels	Sat, 27 Jun 98 20:15:43 PDT	134 lines
Popup menus in F90?	Marco P. Rivero	Sat, 27 Jun 1998 22:35:03 -0600	45 lines
Re: [[log in to unmask]: Compiler comparisons]	<>	Sun, 28 Jun 1998 15:45:22 EDT	41 lines
Popup menus in F90? (fwd)	Van Snyder	Sun, 28 Jun 1998 17:17:56 PDT	32 lines
Re: Popup menus in F90?	David Vowles	Mon, 29 Jun 1998 10:58:06 +0930	97 lines
Re: dprod	Robin Vowels	Mon, 29 Jun 98 00:42:05 PDT	38 lines
Re: Is DOUBLE PRECISION here to stay?	Pierre Hugonnet	Mon, 29 Jun 1998 10:02:29 +0200	77 lines
Re: Book on efficient implementation with f90?	David Mosley	Mon, 29 Jun 1998 12:11:51 +0100	57 lines
RE: Popup menus in F90?	Keith Martin	Mon, 29 Jun 1998 10:28:24 -0400	31 lines
Re: Popup menus in F90 (for Mac)?	Clive Page	Mon, 29 Jun 1998 16:18:33 +0100 (BST)	46 lines
popup menus	<>	Mon, 29 Jun 98 10:34:30 CDT	27 lines
Popup menus in F90 (for Mac)?	Stephen R. Chinn	Mon, 29 Jun 1998 11:04:01 -0500	31 lines
popup menus (fwd)	Van Snyder	Mon, 29 Jun 1998 12:00:34 PDT	33 lines
Re: Popup menus in F90 (for Mac)?	Glenn Carver	Mon, 29 Jun 1998 23:29:17 +0100	62 lines
Re: Book on efficient implementation with f90?	<>	Tue, 30 Jun 1998 20:14:01 +1200 (NZST)	29 lines
RE: Popup menus in F90?	Peter Jewell	Tue, 30 Jun 1998 09:45:38 +0100	75 lines
Re: Coding standards	Waveren, Matthijs van	Tue, 30 Jun 1998 10:05:40 +0100	36 lines
Coding standards	Vittorio G. Caffa <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 30 Jun 1998 09:41:44 +1	23 lines
operator( == ) and its negation	Dr W.W. Schulz	Tue, 30 Jun 1998 14:55:10 +0100 (BST)	36 lines
Re: operator( == ) and its negation	<>	Tue, 30 Jun 1998 10:13:06 -0400 (EDT)	23 lines
Re: Popup menus in F90 (for Mac)? some history, too.	David Kopriva	Tue, 30 Jun 1998 10:49:24 -0400	73 lines
Re: operator( == ) and its negation	Miles Ellis	Tue, 30 Jun 1998 15:55:04 +0100	44 lines
Re: Coding standards	Bob Runyan	Tue, 30 Jun 1998 08:12:18 -0700	40 lines
Re: operator( == ) and its negation	Harvey Richardson - Sun UK Principal Systems Engineer	Tue, 30 Jun 1998 16:43:29 +0100 (BST)	42 lines
Re: Coding standards	<>	Tue, 30 Jun 1998 19:22:26 EDT	20 lines
Re: operator( == ) and its negation	Dr W.W. Schulz	Wed, 1 Jul 1998 13:01:09 +0100 (BST)	95 lines
Re: operator( == ) and its negation	Peter Shenkin	Wed, 1 Jul 1998 09:54:55 -0400	44 lines
Re: operator( == ) and its negation	Dr W.W. Schulz	Wed, 1 Jul 1998 19:07:23 +0100 (BST)	70 lines
Re: operator( == ) and its negation	Peter Shenkin	Wed, 1 Jul 1998 14:32:00 -0400	58 lines
Re: operator( == ) and its negation (fwd)	Van Snyder	Wed, 01 Jul 1998 12:11:16 PDT	36 lines
Re: operator( == ) and its negation	Richard Maine	Wed, 1 Jul 1998 12:25:19 -0700 (PDT)	74 lines
real kinds with xlf	Pierre Hugonnet	Thu, 02 Jul 1998 09:19:14 +0200	43 lines
Re: operator( == ) and its negation (fwd)	Dr W.W. Schulz	Thu, 2 Jul 1998 13:13:54 +0100 (BST)	90 lines
Re: real kinds with xlf	<>	Thu, 2 Jul 1998 09:57:03 -0400 (EDT)	70 lines
Re: operator( == ) and its negation (fwd)	Peter Shenkin	Thu, 2 Jul 1998 11:03:34 -0400	45 lines
Re: operator( == ) and its negation (fwd)	Dr W.W. Schulz	Thu, 2 Jul 1998 17:17:24 +0100 (BST)	70 lines
Re: operator( == ) and its negation (fwd)	Peter Shenkin	Thu, 2 Jul 1998 12:31:44 -0400	45 lines
Re: operator( == ) and its negation (fwd)	Dr W.W. Schulz	Thu, 2 Jul 1998 18:23:09 +0100 (BST)	80 lines
Re: operator( == ) and its negation (fwd)	Peter Shenkin	Thu, 2 Jul 1998 14:24:15 -0400	82 lines
Re: operator( == ) and its negation (fwd)	Dr W.W. Schulz	Fri, 3 Jul 1998 09:19:59 +0100 (BST)	70 lines
unsubscribe	Hahn, Brian, A/Prof	Fri, 3 Jul 1998 10:26:53 SAST-2	24 lines
Re: operator( == ) and its negation (fwd)	Thorsten Ohl	Fri, 3 Jul 1998 13:02:09 +0200	50 lines
Generics (was Re: operator( == ) and its negation)	Dr W.W. Schulz	Fri, 3 Jul 1998 12:58:30 +0100 (BST)	140 lines
Re: operator( == ) and its negation (fwd)	Peter Shenkin	Fri, 3 Jul 1998 10:29:04 -0400	38 lines
Re: operator( == ) and its negation (fwd)	Peter Shenkin	Fri, 3 Jul 1998 10:32:47 -0400	57 lines
Re: operator( == ) and its negation	Ian Chivers	Mon, 6 Jul 1998 11:18:46 +0100 (GDT)	90 lines
Re: operator( == ) and its negation	Clive Page	Mon, 6 Jul 1998 11:48:44 +0100 (BST)	52 lines
list changes	Ian Chivers	Mon, 06 Jul 1998 11:44:39 BST	65 lines
Re: operator( == ) and its negation	Phillip Helbig	Tue, 7 Jul 1998 15:59:14 GMT	42 lines
Re: operator( == ) and its negation	Phillip Helbig	Tue, 7 Jul 1998 16:11:28 GMT	44 lines
Avoiding unnecessary recompilation	Anthony Stone	Wed, 8 Jul 1998 16:29:58 +0100	97 lines
Re: Avoiding unnecessary recompilation	Peter Shenkin	Wed, 8 Jul 1998 11:48:22 -0400	51 lines
Re: Avoiding unnecessary recompilation	stringfellow.n.d	Wed, 08 Jul 1998 18:07:18 +0100	26 lines
Comments on C++	Van Snyder	Wed, 08 Jul 1998 10:50:03 PDT	32 lines
RE: double precision discussion (incl. NaN and Inf)	Dr W.W. Schulz	Fri, 10 Jul 1998 18:28:35 +0100 (BST)	35 lines
Re: RE: double precision discussion (incl. NaN and Inf)	Ian D Chivers	Sun, 12 Jul 1998 10:49:15 +0100 ()	53 lines
Unsubsribe	d2502011	Mon, 13 Jul 1998 12:42:31 +0800	22 lines
How can I do it on f90?	David Leal Valmana	Mon, 13 Jul 1998 14:46:38 -0400	85 lines
Re: How can I do it on f90?	<>	Tue, 14 Jul 1998 10:09:19 +0200 (MET DST)	194 lines
A particular use of procedure names as arguments	David Leal Valmana	Tue, 14 Jul 1998 15:25:20 -0400	52 lines
RE: Book on efficient implementation with f90?	Loren P. Meissner	Tue, 14 Jul 1998 14:58:14 -0700	76 lines
Re: A particular use of procedure names as arguments	Dr W.W. Schulz	Wed, 15 Jul 1998 10:36:20 +0100 (BST)	76 lines
Re: RE: double precision discussion (incl. NaN and Inf)	Jose Marin	Wed, 15 Jul 1998 12:34:07 +0100 (BST)	59 lines
Allocated-array problem	Anthony Stone	Wed, 15 Jul 1998 15:13:26 +0100	32 lines
Re: Allocated-array problem	Anthony Stone	Wed, 15 Jul 1998 15:48:18 +0100	44 lines
Argument name overloading - expert help needed	Swietanowski Artur	Wed, 15 Jul 1998 20:49:18 +0200	98 lines
Re: Argument name overloading - expert help needed	Kurt W. Hirchert	Wed, 15 Jul 1998 14:37:12 -0500	115 lines
Re: Argument name overloading - expert help needed	Phillip Helbig	Wed, 15 Jul 1998 21:49:31 GMT	43 lines
F90 coding standard	Glenn Carver	Wed, 15 Jul 1998 23:21:26 +0100	38 lines
F90 coding standard	Michael Metcalf	Thu, 16 Jul 1998 03:24:54 -0400	28 lines
Re: F90 coding standard	John Bray	Thu, 16 Jul 1998 10:09:13 +0100	22 lines
Re: Argument name overloading - expert help needed	Dr W.W. Schulz	Thu, 16 Jul 1998 13:55:27 +0100 (BST)	76 lines
Re: Argument name overloading - expert help needed	Swietanowski Artur	Thu, 16 Jul 1998 16:54:17 +0200	35 lines
useful url	Ian Chivers	Thu, 16 Jul 1998 15:09:53 +0000 (GMT)	21 lines
Re: F90 coding standard	Jing Guo	Thu, 16 Jul 1998 16:12:42 -0400 (EDT)	38 lines
Re: derived type I/O, where statements	<>	Thu, 16 Jul 1998 17:20:38 -0400 (EDT)	69 lines
derived type I/O, where statements	Michael Metcalf	Thu, 16 Jul 1998 17:35:30 -0400	86 lines
derived type I/O, where statements	Mike Bauer	Thu, 16 Jul 1998 17:00:29 -0500	49 lines
Re: RE: double precision discussion (incl. NaN and Inf)	Jing Guo	Thu, 16 Jul 1998 18:32:51 -0400 (EDT)	82 lines
SUMMARY: F90 coding standards	Glenn Carver	Thu, 16 Jul 1998 23:58:47 +0100	44 lines
A type data deferred-shape array	David Leal Valmana	Thu, 16 Jul 1998 22:53:17 -0400	72 lines
Unsubscribe	Lorenzo Pesce	Fri, 17 Jul 1998 08:11:06 +0200 (CEST)	13 lines
Re: F90 coding standard	John Bray	Fri, 17 Jul 1998 10:18:46 +0100	52 lines
Re: double precision discussion (incl. NaN and Inf)	John Bray	Fri, 17 Jul 1998 10:22:24 +0100	22 lines
Re: RE: double precision discussion (incl. NaN and Inf)	Jose Marin	Fri, 17 Jul 1998 10:49:01 +0100 (BST)	89 lines
Re: A type data deferred-shape array	Dr W.W. Schulz	Fri, 17 Jul 1998 13:46:30 +0100 (BST)	99 lines
Re: F90 coding standard	<>	Fri, 17 Jul 1998 09:00:51 EDT	28 lines
Re: F90 coding standard	John Bray	Fri, 17 Jul 1998 15:54:41 +0100	26 lines
Re: A type data deferred-shape array	Jean-Yves Tillier	Fri, 17 Jul 1998 10:11:14 -0500	26 lines
Re: F90 coding standard	Jing Guo	Fri, 17 Jul 1998 11:53:35 -0400 (EDT)	66 lines
Re: double precision discussion (incl. NaN and Inf)	Peter Shenkin	Fri, 17 Jul 1998 12:14:07 -0400	71 lines
Problems with F90 automatic arrays; was, Re: F90 coding standard	Peter Shenkin	Fri, 17 Jul 1998 13:05:40 -0400	155 lines
Re: Problems with F90 automatic arrays; was, Re: F90 coding standard	Peter Shenkin	Fri, 17 Jul 1998 13:28:54 -0400	46 lines
Problems with F90 automatic arrays; was, Re: F90 coding standard (fwd)	Van Snyder	Fri, 17 Jul 1998 11:01:47 PDT	43 lines
Re: Problems with F90 automatic arrays; was, Re: F90 coding standard	Phillip Helbig	Fri, 17 Jul 1998 18:23:07 GMT	42 lines
Re: Problems with F90 automatic arrays; was, Re: F90 coding standard (fwd)	Mike Lijewski	Fri, 17 Jul 1998 11:23:58 -0700	62 lines
Re: Problems with F90 automatic arrays; was, Re: F90 coding standard (fwd)	Peter Shenkin	Fri, 17 Jul 1998 15:21:49 -0400	55 lines
[Q] proper syntax for Cray pointers	Neil N. Carlson	Fri, 17 Jul 1998 18:38:22 -0600	37 lines
Re: Problems with F90 automatic arrays	John Reid	Sat, 18 Jul 1998 09:59:48 +0100 (BST)	33 lines
Re: Problems with F90 automatic arrays; was, Re: F90 coding standard (fwd)	Robin Vowels	Sun, 19 Jul 98 00:58:49 PDT	71 lines
Re: Re: F90 coding standard	<>	Sun, 19 Jul 1998 07:59:39 EDT	34 lines
Re: Re: F90 coding standard	<>	Sun, 19 Jul 1998 08:18:30 EDT	36 lines
Re: Problems with F90 automatic arrays; was, Re: F90 coding standard	<>	Sun, 19 Jul 1998 08:37:38 EDT	21 lines
Re: Re: F90 coding standard	Peter Shenkin	Sun, 19 Jul 1998 11:19:01 -0400	37 lines
Re: F90 coding standard	John Bray	Mon, 20 Jul 1998 10:47:57 +0100	32 lines
Re: F90 coding standard	John Bray	Mon, 20 Jul 1998 11:02:31 +0100	33 lines
making F90 code Elf90/F compatible	<>	Tue, 21 Jul 1998 01:37:24 EDT	146 lines
Re: making F90 code Elf90/F compatible	Bob Runyan	Tue, 21 Jul 1998 08:07:39 -0700	179 lines
Running a DVF program in Client/Server mode?	David Vowles	Thu, 23 Jul 1998 09:23:38 +0930	41 lines
Visual DEC Fortran 90 for WinNT	Dirk Thorsten Vogel	Thu, 23 Jul 1998 14:35:54 +0200	47 lines
RE: Visual DEC Fortran 90 for WinNT	Nuno Pinhão	Thu, 23 Jul 1998 14:35:44 +0100	88 lines
Re: Running a DVF program in Client/Server mode?	Steve Lionel	Thu, 23 Jul 1998 11:04:47 -0400	44 lines
Re: Running a DVF program in Client/Server mode?	<>	Thu, 23 Jul 1998 11:19:07 -0400	66 lines
RE: Running a DVF program in Client/Server mode?	Nuno Pinhão	Thu, 23 Jul 1998 16:56:25 +0100	36 lines
Colour Highlighting in Fortran Language Reference	Jennifer O'Connor	Thu, 23 Jul 1998 16:51:22 -0400	41 lines
Re: Colour Highlighting in Fortran Language Reference	Richard Friedman	Thu, 23 Jul 1998 14:09:16 -0700 (PDT)	79 lines
Re: Colour Highlighting in Fortran Language Reference	Alberto Fasso'	Thu, 23 Jul 1998 14:23:04 -0700 (PDT)	47 lines
Re: Colour Highlighting in Fortran Language Reference	Phillip Helbig	Thu, 23 Jul 1998 21:57:26 GMT	62 lines
[Fwd: Visual DEC Fortran 90 for WinNT]	Dirk Thorsten Vogel	Fri, 24 Jul 1998 08:10:26 +0200	168 lines
Fortran90 and Emacs 19.34 under WinNT	Dirk Thorsten Vogel	Fri, 24 Jul 1998 08:14:40 +0200	49 lines
Re: Running a DVF program in Client/Server mode?	Petros Dafniotis, DuPont Central R & D	Fri, 24 Jul 1998 09:52:39 +0200	24 lines
Re: Fortran90 and Emacs 19.34 under WinNT	Jean-Yves Tillier	Fri, 24 Jul 1998 09:26:54 -0500	24 lines
Re: Fortran90 and Emacs 19.34 under WinNT	Petros Dafniotis, DuPont Central R & D	Fri, 24 Jul 1998 16:41:50 +0200	23 lines
Re: Fortran90 and Emacs 19.34 under WinNT	Jesper Harder	Fri, 24 Jul 1998 16:51:18 +0200	40 lines
Fortran and VI for Win95	Paulo Avilez Valente	Fri, 24 Jul 1998 17:24:43 +0100	83 lines
MinVal, floops....	David Leal Valmana	Fri, 24 Jul 1998 17:57:06 -0400	54 lines
Re: Colour Highlighting in Fortran Language Reference	Robin Vowels	Sat, 25 Jul 98 21:05:36 PDT	45 lines
comp-fortran-90 list owner on holiday	Ian D Chivers	Sun, 26 Jul 1998 13:43:13 +0100 ()	27 lines
Re: Colour Highlighting in Fortran Language Reference	Peter Shenkin	Sun, 26 Jul 1998 21:59:51 -0400	46 lines
	Pierre Hugonnet	Thu, 06 Aug 1998 18:55:29 +0200	10 lines
Stiff ODE solvers in ELF90 or F90	Loren P. Meissner	Thu, 6 Aug 1998 16:19:57 -0700	36 lines
Modules ideas out there?	Lars Mossberg	Fri, 07 Aug 1998 12:30:34 +0200	50 lines
Re: Modules ideas out there?	Clive Page	Fri, 7 Aug 1998 11:53:48 +0100 (BST)	48 lines
Re: Modules ideas out there?	Dick Hendrickson	Fri, 07 Aug 1998 10:33:25 -0500	30 lines
OOP in Fortran 2000	Dr W.W. Schulz	Mon, 10 Aug 1998 17:09:57 +0100 (BST)	420 lines
Re: Modules ideas out there?	Walt Brainerd	Mon, 10 Aug 1998 11:23:24 -0600 (MDT)	27 lines
Request	SHAKERI	Mon, 17 Aug 1998 18:27:08 GMT0BST	27 lines
Re: Request	<>	Mon, 17 Aug 1998 22:31:19 EDT	30 lines
generic interfaces	Dr W.W. Schulz	Tue, 18 Aug 1998 10:54:24 +0100 (BST)	149 lines
ARMA Models	Nesmith_T	Tue, 18 Aug 1998 07:49:21 -0400	72 lines
Re: generic interfaces	Kurt W. Hirchert	Tue, 18 Aug 1998 08:42:11 -0500	39 lines
Re: generic interfaces	Ron Sverdlove x2517	Tue, 18 Aug 1998 12:28:11 -0400	46 lines
Re: generic interfaces	Waveren, Matthijs van	Tue, 18 Aug 1998 18:20:52 +0100	43 lines
Co-Array Fortran for parallel programming	John Reid	Tue, 18 Aug 1998 19:19:08 +0100 (BST)	50 lines
Re: generic interfaces	Len Makin, CSIRO Maths & Info Sci, Melbourne.	Wed, 19 Aug 1998 09:32:42 +1000	28 lines
Re: generic interfaces	Jan van Oosterwijk	Wed, 19 Aug 1998 16:34:51 +0200	122 lines
Re: generic interfaces -- A summary	Dr W.W. Schulz	Wed, 19 Aug 1998 16:55:53 +0100 (BST)	54 lines
Re: generic interfaces -- A summary	Dick Hendrickson	Wed, 19 Aug 1998 16:57:56 -0500	81 lines
Re: generic interfaces -- A summary	Dr W.W. Schulz	Thu, 20 Aug 1998 11:12:40 +0100 (BST)	103 lines
Non-advancing I/O	Dr. Volker Typke	Thu, 20 Aug 1998 12:39:31 +0200	78 lines
Re: Non-advancing I/O	<>	Thu, 20 Aug 1998 08:13:46 -0400 (EDT)	31 lines
Re: generic interfaces -- A summary	Petros Dafniotis, DuPont Central R & D	Thu, 20 Aug 1998 16:01:25 +0200	52 lines
fft	Nesmith_T	Thu, 20 Aug 1998 16:59:16 -0400	107 lines
Re: fft	Ralph and Wendy	Thu, 20 Aug 1998 21:47:46 -0700	69 lines
Finding KIND Values with Fortran 90	Dr W.W. Schulz	Fri, 21 Aug 1998 10:04:13 +0100 (BST)	176 lines
fft response	Nesmith_T	Fri, 21 Aug 1998 08:34:22 -0400	63 lines
FFTs Cont	Nesmith_T	Fri, 21 Aug 1998 11:01:48 -0400	77 lines
Re: fft	Otto Stolz	Fri, 21 Aug 1998 10:06:03 -0600	60 lines
Re: KindFinder	Dr W.W. Schulz	Fri, 21 Aug 1998 18:04:27 +0100 (BST)	56 lines
Re: KindFinder	Richard Maine	Fri, 21 Aug 1998 10:30:57 -0700 (PDT)	76 lines
Re: FFT	Robin Vowels	Fri, 21 Aug 98 14:52:28 PDT	73 lines
Fortran 90/95 Information (August)	Michael Metcalf	Tue, 25 Aug 1998 04:11:01 -0400	746 lines
Visual Fortran Bug??	Hari Sundararaghavan	Wed, 26 Aug 1998 12:38:40 -1000 (HST)	73 lines
Array(s) passing when using mixed F90 and F77- performance issues	Petros Dafniotis, DuPont Central R & D	Thu, 27 Aug 1998 09:56:11 +0200	78 lines
Confused about intent of INTENT	Hari Sundararaghavan	Thu, 27 Aug 1998 11:34:53 -1000 (HST)	246 lines
Re: Confused about intent of INTENT	Peter Shenkin	Thu, 27 Aug 1998 18:02:03 -0400	43 lines
Re: Confused about intent of INTENT	Hari Sundararaghavan	Thu, 27 Aug 1998 14:56:40 -1000 (HST)	98 lines
Re: Confused about intent of INTENT	Malcolm Cohen	Fri, 28 Aug 1998 11:43:36 +0000 (BST)	169 lines
Re: Confused about intent of INTENT	Peter Shenkin	Sun, 30 Aug 1998 15:46:34 -0400	31 lines
Re: Confused about intent of INTENT	Phillip Helbig	Mon, 31 Aug 1998 06:22:09 GMT	32 lines
Start the Wish List (Was: Re: Confused about intent of INTENT)	Dan Nagle	Mon, 31 Aug 1998 07:28:20 -0400	52 lines
Re: Start the Wish List (Was: Re: Confused about intent of INTENT)	<>	Mon, 31 Aug 1998 09:11:30 -0400 (EDT)	56 lines
Re: Start the Wish List (Was: Re: Confused about intent of INTENT)	Thorsten Ohl	Mon, 31 Aug 1998 15:43:23 +0200 (CEST)	24 lines
Re: Start the Wish List (Was: Re: Confused about intent of INTENT)	Phillip Helbig	Mon, 31 Aug 1998 14:45:42 GMT	51 lines
Re: Start the Wish List (Was: Re: Confused about intent of INTENT)	Peter Shenkin	Mon, 31 Aug 1998 11:27:01 -0400	56 lines
Re: Start the Wish List (Was: Re: Confused about intent of INTENT)	<>	Mon, 31 Aug 1998 11:33:04 -0400 (EDT)	48 lines
Re: Start the Wish List (Was: Re: Confused about intent of INTENT)	Peter Shenkin	Mon, 31 Aug 1998 11:58:37 -0400	70 lines
Re: Start the Wish List (Was: Re: Confused about intent of INTENT)	Dan Nagle	Mon, 31 Aug 1998 13:54:42 -0400	85 lines
Re: Start the Wish List	James Giles	Mon, 31 Aug 1998 12:24:14 -0600	135 lines
Re: Start the Wish List	Peter Shenkin	Mon, 31 Aug 1998 15:04:21 -0400	90 lines
Start the Wish List (Was: Re: Confused about intent of INTENT) (fwd)	Van Snyder	Mon, 31 Aug 1998 12:04:42 PDT	43 lines
Re: Start the Wish List (fwd)	Van Snyder	Mon, 31 Aug 1998 12:47:14 PDT	132 lines
Start the Wish List (Was: Re: Confused about intent of INTENT)	Richard Maine	Mon, 31 Aug 1998 12:53:23 -0700 (PDT)	50 lines
Start the Wish List (Was: Re: Confused about intent of INTENT)	Phillip Helbig	Mon, 31 Aug 1998 20:18:10 GMT	54 lines
Re: Start the Wish List (Was: Re: Confused about intent of INTENT)	Dr W.W. Schulz	Mon, 31 Aug 1998 21:24:16 +0100 (BST)	86 lines
Re: Start the Wish List (Was: Re: Confused about intent of INTENT)	Dr W.W. Schulz	Mon, 31 Aug 1998 21:41:27 +0100 (BST)	53 lines
Start the Wish List (Was: Re: Confused about intent of INTENT)	Phillip Helbig	Mon, 31 Aug 1998 21:12:25 GMT	58 lines
Re: Start the Wish List	David B. Serafini	Mon, 31 Aug 1998 16:27:49 -0500 (CDT)	40 lines
readonly/private/public stuff, was Re: Start the Wish List	Juergen vonHagen	Mon, 31 Aug 1998 17:42:20 -0400	32 lines
Re: Start the Wish List	Peter Shenkin	Mon, 31 Aug 1998 17:50:24 -0400	57 lines
Start the Wish List (Was: Re: Confused about intent of INTENT)	Richard Maine	Mon, 31 Aug 1998 15:00:35 -0700 (PDT)	30 lines
Re: Start the Wish List (Was: Re: Confused about intent of INTENT)	Peter Shenkin	Mon, 31 Aug 1998 18:15:03 -0400	36 lines
Re: Start the Wish List (fwd)	Van Snyder	Mon, 31 Aug 1998 15:25:48 PDT	99 lines
Re: Start the Wish List (fwd)	Van Snyder	Mon, 31 Aug 1998 15:36:13 PDT	62 lines
Re: Start the Wish List	James Giles	Mon, 31 Aug 1998 16:37:37 -0600	93 lines
Binary stream I/O( was: Start the Wish List)	Jean Vezina	Mon, 31 Aug 1998 20:13:24 -0400	54 lines
Re: Start the Wish List (Was: Re: Confused about intent of INTENT)	<>	Mon, 31 Aug 1998 22:06:24 EDT	23 lines
Re: READONLY (was Wishlist)	Dr W.W. Schulz	Tue, 1 Sep 1998 11:54:11 +0100 (BST)	82 lines
Re: Start the Wish List (Was: Re: Confused about intent of INTENT)	Phillip Helbig	Tue, 1 Sep 1998 11:13:22 GMT	39 lines
Re: Start the Wish List (Was: Re: Confused about intent of INTENT)	Dan Nagle	Tue, 01 Sep 1998 07:17:45 -0400	50 lines
Re: READONLY (was Wishlist)	Jan van Oosterwijk	Tue, 01 Sep 1998 13:29:06 +0200	98 lines
Re: Start the Wish List (Was: Re: Confused about intent of INTENT)	Phillip Helbig	Tue, 1 Sep 1998 12:21:08 GMT	33 lines
Digital F90 warning, what's wrong?	Kevin Maguire	Tue, 1 Sep 1998 15:12:22 +0100 (BST)	45 lines
Re: Start the Wish List (Was: Re: Confused about intent of INTENT)	Richard Maine	Tue, 1 Sep 1998 08:33:46 -0700 (PDT)	135 lines
READONLY	Ray Horne	Tue, 01 Sep 1998 17:52:04 +0100	31 lines
Re: READONLY (was Wishlist) (fwd)	Van Snyder	Tue, 01 Sep 1998 10:14:43 PDT	36 lines
Re: Start the Wish List	James Giles	Tue, 1 Sep 1998 11:35:08 -0600	90 lines
Re: READONLY (was Wishlist) (fwd)	Lawrie Schonfelder	Tue, 1 Sep 1998 21:41:11 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time)	39 lines
Re: READONLY (was Wishlist) (fwd)	Peter Shenkin	Tue, 1 Sep 1998 16:50:36 -0400	38 lines
Re: READONLY (was Wishlist) (fwd)	Van Snyder	Tue, 01 Sep 1998 14:50:03 PDT	81 lines
Re: Start the Wish List (Was: Re: Confused about intent of INTENT)	Dan Nagle	Tue, 01 Sep 1998 19:25:18 -0400	82 lines
Re: Start the Wish List (Was: Re: Confused about intent of INTENT)	Jean Vezina	Tue, 01 Sep 1998 20:12:42 -0400	100 lines
Re: High Hopes? (Start the Wish List)	Dr W.W. Schulz	Wed, 2 Sep 1998 12:18:00 +0100 (BST)	63 lines
debuggers(recomendations)	David R. Leal Valmana	Wed, 02 Sep 1998 12:48:22 +0100	33 lines
Re: Start the Wish List (Was: Re: Confused about intent of INTENT)	Dan Nagle	Wed, 02 Sep 1998 08:43:07 -0400	48 lines
UNSUBSCRIBE	E. D. Chikhliwala	Wed, 2 Sep 1998 06:10:46 -0700	39 lines
Re: Start the Wish List (Was: Re: Confused about intent of INTENT)	Richard Maine	Wed, 2 Sep 1998 07:48:20 -0700 (PDT)	58 lines
Re: READONLY (was Wishlist)	Dick Hendrickson	Wed, 02 Sep 1998 09:52:18 -0500	75 lines
Re: READONLY (was Wishlist)	Richard Maine	Wed, 2 Sep 1998 08:23:40 -0700 (PDT)	35 lines
Re: High Hopes? (Start the Wish List)	James Giles	Wed, 2 Sep 1998 09:51:20 -0600	75 lines
Re: READONLY (was Wishlist)	Dan Nagle	Wed, 02 Sep 1998 12:17:23 -0400	66 lines
Re: READONLY (was Wishlist)	Dr W.W. Schulz	Wed, 2 Sep 1998 18:42:01 +0100 (BST)	109 lines
READONLY	Van Snyder	Wed, 02 Sep 1998 10:58:45 PDT	43 lines
Re: Access Privileges (was READONLY)	Dr W.W. Schulz	Wed, 2 Sep 1998 19:22:55 +0100 (BST)	84 lines
RE: READONLY	Loren P. Meissner	Wed, 2 Sep 1998 11:24:49 -0700	58 lines
Re: Access Privileges (was READONLY) (fwd)	Van Snyder	Wed, 02 Sep 1998 11:37:42 PDT	45 lines
RE: debuggers(recomendations)	Peter Jewell	Thu, 3 Sep 1998 09:05:32 +0100	40 lines
POINTER Intent	Dr W.W. Schulz	Thu, 3 Sep 1998 10:17:06 +0100 (BST)	97 lines
F and encapsulation vs. the Fortran90/95 standard ...	Thorsten Ohl	Thu, 3 Sep 1998 13:07:47 +0200 (CEST)	55 lines
Re: Start the Wish List	Carlie Coats	Thu, 3 Sep 1998 07:47:59 -0400 (EDT)	45 lines
Re: F and encapsulation vs. the Fortran90/95 standard ...	Malcolm Cohen	Thu, 3 Sep 1998 13:00:02 +0000 (BST)	42 lines
Re: Access Privileges (was READONLY)	Thorsten Ohl	Thu, 3 Sep 1998 15:05:11 +0200 (CEST)	31 lines
Using foresys (incorrect type of argument) ?	Christian de Polignac	Thu, 03 Sep 1998 16:50:40 +0200	43 lines
Re: Using foresys (incorrect type of argument) ?	Petros Dafniotis, DuPont Central R & D	Thu, 3 Sep 1998 16:57:21 +0200	19 lines
Re: Start the Wish List	Richard Maine	Thu, 3 Sep 1998 08:25:33 -0700 (PDT)	40 lines
Re: Using foresys (incorrect type of argument) ?	Malcolm Cohen	Thu, 3 Sep 1998 16:10:19 +0000 (BST)	33 lines
Re: Start the Wish List	Robin	Thu, 03 Sep 98 09:37:52 PDT	99 lines
Re: Using foresys (incorrect type of argument) ?	Kurt W. Hirchert	Thu, 3 Sep 1998 12:37:51 -0500	34 lines
Stream I/O (was Start the Wish List)	Van Snyder	Thu, 03 Sep 1998 11:17:57 PDT	63 lines
RE: debuggers(recomendations) (fwd)	Van Snyder	Thu, 03 Sep 1998 11:26:08 PDT	59 lines
Re: debuggers(recomendations) (fwd)	Peter Shenkin	Thu, 3 Sep 1998 15:06:09 -0400	48 lines
Re: F and encapsulation vs. the Fortran90/95 standard ...	Dick Hendrickson	Thu, 03 Sep 1998 14:11:38 -0500	59 lines
Re: Stream I/O (was Start the Wish List)	Dan Nagle	Thu, 03 Sep 1998 15:37:00 -0400	41 lines
Re: debuggers(recomendations)	Robin	Thu, 03 Sep 98 13:24:20 PDT	36 lines
Re: debuggers(recomendations) (fwd)	Van Snyder	Thu, 03 Sep 1998 13:52:08 PDT	30 lines
Re: debuggers(recomendations) (fwd)	Peter Shenkin	Thu, 3 Sep 1998 17:07:29 -0400	70 lines
Re: Stream I/O (was Start the Wish List)	James Giles	Thu, 3 Sep 1998 16:31:17 -0600	21 lines
RE: Using foresys (incorrect type of argument) ?	Loren P. Meissner	Thu, 3 Sep 1998 15:44:42 -0700	58 lines
Re: Stream I/O (was Start the Wish List)	<>	Fri, 4 Sep 1998 00:58:07 EDT	18 lines
Re: High Hopes? (Start the Wish List)	Dr W.W. Schulz	Fri, 4 Sep 1998 12:40:32 +0100 (BST)	77 lines
F90 Standard clarification needed	Bertrand Meltz	Fri, 4 Sep 1998 14:38:19 +0200 (MET DST)	61 lines
Re: F90 Standard clarification needed	Malcolm Cohen	Fri, 4 Sep 1998 14:35:06 +0000 (BST)	39 lines
Re: High Hopes? (Start the Wish List)	James Giles	Fri, 4 Sep 1998 10:09:45 -0600	71 lines
Re: Random Access	Robin	Fri, 04 Sep 98 15:28:06 PDT	100 lines
Re: Start the Wish List	Robin	Fri, 04 Sep 98 17:11:21 PDT	28 lines
Re: High Hopes? (Start the Wish List)	Van Snyder	Fri, 04 Sep 1998 18:19:25 PDT	41 lines
Re: (x3j3.1998-253) 98-198	Dr W.W. Schulz	Mon, 7 Sep 1998 13:30:54 +0100 (BST)	101 lines
Re: (x3j3.1998-253) 98-198	<>	Tue, 8 Sep 1998 01:00:14 EDT	22 lines
tools to generate interface blocks	Ian Chivers	Tue, 8 Sep 1998 13:18:28 +0000 (GMT)	41 lines
Re: Array(s) passing when using mixed F90 and F77- performance issues	Malcolm Cohen	Tue, 8 Sep 1998 14:25:06 +0000 (BST)	116 lines
Re: What it is wrong in this example?	Neil Carlson	Tue, 08 Sep 1998 12:34:26 -0600	33 lines
What it is wrong in this example?	David R. Leal Valmana	Tue, 08 Sep 1998 19:51:27 +0100	67 lines
Re: What it is wrong in this example?	<>	Tue, 8 Sep 1998 21:02:09 EDT	31 lines
Re: What it is wrong in this example?	Jan van Oosterwijk	Wed, 09 Sep 1998 09:37:20 +0200	221 lines
Re: tools to generate interface blocks	John Reid (guest-pch w44/98)	Wed, 09 Sep 1998 17:12:45 +0200	24 lines
Re: tools to generate interface blocks	<>	Thu, 10 Sep 98 08:50:38 +0200	26 lines
Re: tools to generate interface blocks	John Reid (guest-pch w44/98)	Thu, 10 Sep 1998 12:38:39 +0200	28 lines
Re: tools to generate interface blocks	<>	Thu, 10 Sep 1998 09:16:42 EDT	31 lines
Re: tools to generate interface blocks	Michael Metcalf	Thu, 10 Sep 1998 09:36:07 -0400	35 lines
Re: tools to generate interface blocks	Dick Hendrickson	Thu, 10 Sep 1998 09:29:35 -0500	44 lines
Re: tools to generate interface blocks	Richard Maine	Thu, 10 Sep 1998 07:40:27 -0700 (PDT)	38 lines
Re: tools to generate interface blocks	Clive Page	Thu, 10 Sep 1998 15:51:34 +0100 (BST)	34 lines
EQV vs ==	Dr W.W. Schulz	Fri, 11 Sep 1998 11:33:22 +0100 (BST)	49 lines
Re: EQV vs ==	Harvey Richardson - Sun UK Principal Systems Engineer	Fri, 11 Sep 1998 12:02:56 +0100 (BST)	45 lines
Question about library and modules	Jean-Jacques Wasbauer	Fri, 11 Sep 1998 13:34:14 +0200	111 lines
Sun Workshop 4.2 Fortran and #error	Carlie Coats	Fri, 11 Sep 1998 07:52:30 -0400 (EDT)	43 lines
Re: EQV vs ==	<>	Fri, 11 Sep 1998 12:28:58 GMT	61 lines
Re: Sun Workshop 4.2 Fortran and #error	John Turner	Fri, 11 Sep 1998 10:26:49 -0400 (EDT)	44 lines
Re: Sun Workshop 4.2 Fortran and #error	<>	Fri, 11 Sep 1998 15:39:30 +0100	30 lines
Re: Sun Workshop 4.2 Fortran and #error	Herbert Fruchtl	Fri, 11 Sep 1998 15:41:51 +0100	34 lines
Re: Question about library and modules	Peter Shenkin	Fri, 11 Sep 1998 11:38:19 -0400	65 lines
Re: Sun Workshop 4.2 Fortran and #error	Henry Zongaro	Fri, 11 Sep 1998 11:43:43 -0400	73 lines
Re: Question about library and modules	John Turner	Fri, 11 Sep 1998 12:42:45 -0400 (EDT)	53 lines
Re: Question about library and modules	John Bray	Fri, 11 Sep 1998 17:55:16 +0100	32 lines
Re: EQV vs ==	<>	Fri, 11 Sep 1998 23:22:31 EDT	42 lines
Re: EQV vs ==	Dr W.W. Schulz	Mon, 14 Sep 1998 11:45:37 +0100 (BST)	75 lines
Centralized memory management?	Magne Rudshaug	Mon, 14 Sep 1998 14:52:08 +0200	29 lines
Centralized memory management?	Michael Metcalf	Mon, 14 Sep 1998 09:24:37 -0400	26 lines
Memory control/garbage collection	Balaberda, Randolph - Kan AV	Mon, 14 Sep 1998 09:31:00 -0700 (PDT)	22 lines
HELP ME! I don't known any things !	Miguel Murillo	Mon, 14 Sep 1998 18:52:29 +0200 (CET)	408 lines
Re: Memory control/garbage collection	Jing Guo	Mon, 14 Sep 1998 14:03:36 -0400 (EDT)	66 lines
Re: EQV vs ==	James Giles	Mon, 14 Sep 1998 13:50:47 -0600	54 lines
Re: EQV vs ==	<>	Tue, 15 Sep 1998 00:24:25 EDT	59 lines
Deallocation of ADT with pointer component?	Magne Rudshaug	Tue, 15 Sep 1998 08:16:47 +0200	50 lines
Re: EQV vs ==	Dr W.W. Schulz	Tue, 15 Sep 1998 11:00:35 +0100 (BST)	59 lines
telling the compiler about equivalence	Ted Stern	15 Sep 1998 11:43:29 -0700	58 lines
Re: HELP ME! I don't known any things !	John Reid (guest-pch w44/98)	Tue, 15 Sep 1998 17:07:16 +0200	57 lines
Re: Deallocation of ADT with pointer component?	John Reid (guest-pch w44/98)	Tue, 15 Sep 1998 19:28:22 +0200	54 lines
Re: Deallocation of ADT with pointer component? (fwd)	Van Snyder	Tue, 15 Sep 1998 11:16:02 PDT	56 lines
Re: telling the compiler about equivalence	Otto Stolz	Wed, 16 Sep 1998 09:44:50 -0600	36 lines
performances, again.....	Pierre Hugonnet	Thu, 17 Sep 1998 12:13:24 +0200	50 lines
re: performances, again.....	G. Scott Lett	Thu, 17 Sep 1998 10:04:40 -0500 (CDT)	75 lines
Re: performances, again.....	John Turner	Thu, 17 Sep 1998 11:23:34 -0400 (EDT)	23 lines
Re: performances, again.....	Dan Nagle	Thu, 17 Sep 1998 10:53:19 -0500	56 lines
Re: performances, again.....	Bill Moffitt	Thu, 17 Sep 1998 11:05:34 -0700	75 lines
Re: performances, again.....	Phillip Helbig	Fri, 18 Sep 1998 00:10:26 GMT	56 lines
Re: performances, again.....	Phillip Helbig	Fri, 18 Sep 1998 00:20:02 GMT	28 lines
Re: performances, again.....	David B. Serafini	Thu, 17 Sep 1998 21:33:17 -0500 (CDT)	44 lines
Re: performances, again.....	<>	Fri, 18 Sep 1998 01:06:10 EDT	24 lines
Re: performances, again.....	Dirk Thorsten Vogel	Fri, 18 Sep 1998 08:52:55 +0200	76 lines
Re: performances, again.....	Petros Dafniotis, DuPont Central R & D	Fri, 18 Sep 1998 11:04:37 +0200	38 lines
Re: performances, again.....	Dan Nagle	Fri, 18 Sep 1998 07:32:45 -0500	63 lines
(Addendum) Re: Performance Again	Dan Nagle	Fri, 18 Sep 1998 07:45:43 -0500	36 lines
Re: performances, again.....	Steve Lionel	Fri, 18 Sep 1998 08:51:06 -0400	27 lines
DIGITAL Visual Fortran Technology Guarantee program	Steve Lionel	Fri, 18 Sep 1998 16:55:36 -0400	41 lines
Re: performances, again.....	Peter Shenkin	Sat, 19 Sep 1998 18:44:12 -0400	22 lines
BNF grammar file for Fortran 90?	Magne Rudshaug	Mon, 21 Sep 1998 09:37:07 +0200	27 lines
interface blocks	Eildert Groeneveld	Mon, 21 Sep 1998 09:39:26 +0200 (MEST)	32 lines
Re: interface blocks	<>	Mon, 21 Sep 98 10:06:40 +0200	32 lines
Re: performances, again.....	Pierre Hugonnet	Mon, 21 Sep 1998 10:08:36 +0200	66 lines
Re: BNF grammar file for Fortran 90?	Adrian Slowik	Mon, 21 Sep 1998 10:32:08 +0200	51 lines
Re: interface blocks	<>	Mon, 21 Sep 98 10:58:16 +0200	51 lines
Re: interface blocks	Phillip Helbig	Mon, 21 Sep 1998 09:08:05 GMT	64 lines
Re: interface blocks	Phillip Helbig	Mon, 21 Sep 1998 09:17:09 GMT	29 lines
Re: interface blocks	David R. Leal Valmana	Mon, 21 Sep 1998 10:24:58 +0100	56 lines
Re: interface blocks	Phillip Helbig	Mon, 21 Sep 1998 10:05:28 GMT	52 lines
Re: BNF grammar file for Fortran 90?	Dr W.W. Schulz	Mon, 21 Sep 1998 11:46:11 +0100 (BST)	53 lines
Re: BNF grammar file for Fortran 90?	Walt Brainerd	Mon, 21 Sep 1998 09:03:59 -0600 (MDT)	18 lines
Re: BNF grammar file for Fortran 90?	Dr W.W. Schulz	Mon, 21 Sep 1998 16:10:12 +0100 (BST)	34 lines
Re: performances, again.....	Peter Shenkin	Mon, 21 Sep 1998 11:39:13 -0400	110 lines
Re: performances, again.....	Ian Chivers	Mon, 21 Sep 1998 17:27:48 +0100 (GDT)	151 lines
F90 Graphical Capabilities	Dave Wooff	Mon, 21 Sep 1998 16:59:03 GMT+0	23 lines
Re: F90 Graphical Capabilities	William F Mitchell	Mon, 21 Sep 1998 13:12:25 -0400	28 lines
Fortran or Ada?	Siamak Kaveh	Mon, 21 Sep 1998 13:35:47 -0400	73 lines
Re: F90 Graphical Capabilities	Phillip Helbig	Mon, 21 Sep 1998 18:09:43 GMT	46 lines
Re: Fortran or Ada?	Phillip Helbig	Mon, 21 Sep 1998 18:34:51 GMT	35 lines
Announcing DIGITAL Visual Fortran V6	Steve Lionel	Mon, 21 Sep 1998 16:53:42 -0400	102 lines
[Fwd: Re: F90 compiler]	Jean-Yves	Mon, 21 Sep 1998 16:14:38 -0600	108 lines
[Fwd: Rejected [non-member submission] upgrading]	Jean-Yves	Mon, 21 Sep 1998 16:20:58 -0600	257 lines
Re: F90 Graphical Capabilities	<>	Mon, 21 Sep 1998 20:17:05 EDT	19 lines
USE stmts, .mod Files and Slowww Compilations	Hari Sundararaghavan	Mon, 21 Sep 1998 18:46:20 -1000 (HST)	96 lines
Re: USE stmts, .mod Files and Slowww Compilations	Peter Shenkin	Tue, 22 Sep 1998 01:14:14 -0400	69 lines
Re: BNF grammar file for Fortran 90?	James Giles	Mon, 21 Sep 1998 23:43:32 -0600	33 lines
Re: interface blocks	James Giles	Mon, 21 Sep 1998 23:57:30 -0600	47 lines
Re: USE stmts, .mod Files and Slowww Compilations	Hari Sundararaghavan	Mon, 21 Sep 1998 20:03:50 -1000 (HST)	65 lines
Re: Fortran or Ada?	David J Adams	Tue, 22 Sep 1998 10:05:55 +0100 (BST)	90 lines
Re: Fortran or Ada?	Clive Page	Tue, 22 Sep 1998 10:30:59 +0100 (BST)	35 lines
Re: Fortran or Ada?	Dr W.W. Schulz	Tue, 22 Sep 1998 11:20:55 +0100 (BST)	147 lines
Generic interface	Christian de Polignac	Tue, 22 Sep 1998 16:08:56 +0200	137 lines
Re: Generic interface	Jan van Oosterwijk	Tue, 22 Sep 1998 16:44:44 +0200	126 lines
Re: Generic interface	Dr W.W. Schulz	Tue, 22 Sep 1998 16:20:55 +0100 (BST)	98 lines
Re: Generic interface	Petros Dafniotis, DuPont Central R & D	Tue, 22 Sep 1998 17:30:25 +0200	32 lines
input and output of variable sized arrays	A C Dowell	Tue, 22 Sep 1998 16:31:06 +0100 (BST)	39 lines
Re: Generic interface	Malcolm Cohen	Tue, 22 Sep 1998 16:00:02 +0000 (BST)	26 lines
RE: input and output of variable sized arrays	Nuno Pinhão	Tue, 22 Sep 1998 17:10:18 +0100	82 lines
Re: Avoiding unnecessary recompilation	Pierre Hugonnet	Tue, 22 Sep 1998 18:15:55 +0200	133 lines
Re: Generic interface	John Reid (guest-pch w44/98)	Tue, 22 Sep 1998 18:30:56 +0200	85 lines
Re: input and output of variable sized arrays	David R. Leal Valmana	Tue, 22 Sep 1998 17:41:33 +0100	44 lines
A rare behaivor of pointers	David R. Leal Valmana	Tue, 22 Sep 1998 18:48:11 +0100	325 lines
Re: Generic interface	James Giles	Tue, 22 Sep 1998 11:51:42 -0600	91 lines
A rare behaivor of pointers	Michael Metcalf	Tue, 22 Sep 1998 14:17:50 -0400	32 lines
Re: F90 Graphical Capabilities	Robin	Tue, 22 Sep 98 11:27:26 PDT	29 lines
Re: performances, again..... (fwd)	Van Snyder	Tue, 22 Sep 1998 11:43:30 PDT	81 lines
Re: performances, again..... (fwd)	Van Snyder	Tue, 22 Sep 1998 11:46:56 PDT	25 lines
Re: performances, again..... (fwd)	Peter Shenkin	Tue, 22 Sep 1998 15:00:35 -0400	35 lines
Re: performances, again..... (fwd)	Peter Shenkin	Tue, 22 Sep 1998 15:01:36 -0400	40 lines
[makefileII upgrading]	Jean-Yves	Tue, 22 Sep 1998 13:04:14 -0600	253 lines
Re: interface blocks (fwd)	Van Snyder	Tue, 22 Sep 1998 12:20:49 PDT	22 lines
Re: Fortran or Ada? (fwd)	Van Snyder	Tue, 22 Sep 1998 13:51:12 PDT	22 lines
Re: Fortran or Ada? (fwd)	Van Snyder	Tue, 22 Sep 1998 14:02:21 PDT	46 lines
Re: performances, again..... (fwd)	Peter Shenkin	Tue, 22 Sep 1998 17:11:05 -0400	46 lines
Re: performances, again..... (fwd)	Peter Shenkin	Tue, 22 Sep 1998 17:34:55 -0400	64 lines
Re: performances, again..... (fwd)	Peter Shenkin	Tue, 22 Sep 1998 18:10:53 -0400	68 lines
Re: Generic interface	Graham Kipp	Wed, 23 Sep 1998 08:46:52 +1000	56 lines
Re: Re: performances, again.....	<>	Tue, 22 Sep 1998 22:58:12 EDT	25 lines
Re: Re: performances, again.....	<>	Tue, 22 Sep 1998 23:08:06 EDT	32 lines
Re: BNF grammar file for Fortran 90?	<>	Tue, 22 Sep 1998 23:20:59 EDT	68 lines
Re: Re: performances, again.....	Peter Shenkin	Wed, 23 Sep 1998 00:15:55 -0400	51 lines
RE: A rare behaivor of pointers	Olaf Michelsson	Wed, 23 Sep 1998 09:25:45 +0200 (METDST)	92 lines
RE: Generic interface	Olaf Michelsson	Wed, 23 Sep 1998 09:46:47 +0200 (METDST)	135 lines
Re: A rare behaivor of pointers	Dr W.W. Schulz	Wed, 23 Sep 1998 10:09:14 +0100 (BST)	41 lines
RE: Generic interface	Dr W.W. Schulz	Wed, 23 Sep 1998 11:29:41 +0100 (BST)	70 lines
Re: pointers undefined and otherwise	Ted Stern	23 Sep 1998 12:16:22 -0700	76 lines
Re: A rare behaivor of pointers	Peter Shenkin	Wed, 23 Sep 1998 10:30:15 -0400	51 lines
Re: A rare behaivor of pointers	Clive Page	Wed, 23 Sep 1998 16:25:32 +0100 (BST)	42 lines
Re: A rare behaivor of pointers	Thorsten Ohl	Wed, 23 Sep 1998 17:46:07 +0200 (CEST)	28 lines
Re: A rare behaivor of pointers	Peter Shenkin	Wed, 23 Sep 1998 11:54:30 -0400	72 lines
Re: A rare behaivor of pointers	Peter Shenkin	Wed, 23 Sep 1998 11:57:10 -0400	30 lines
Re: A rare behaivor of pointers	Dr W.W. Schulz	Wed, 23 Sep 1998 17:56:34 +0100 (BST)	34 lines
Re: A rare behaivor of pointers	Richard Maine	Wed, 23 Sep 1998 10:16:08 -0700 (PDT)	50 lines
Re: A rare behaivor of pointers	Robert Hill	Wed, 23 Sep 1998 18:17:26 +0100 (BST)	36 lines
Re: A rare behaivor of pointers	Peter Shenkin	Wed, 23 Sep 1998 13:22:16 -0400	36 lines
Re: A rare behaivor of pointers	Malcolm Cohen	Wed, 23 Sep 1998 17:26:31 +0000 (BST)	52 lines
Re: pointers undefined and otherwise	Dr W.W. Schulz	Wed, 23 Sep 1998 18:58:54 +0100 (BST)	48 lines
Re: A rare behaivor of pointers	Dick Hendrickson	Wed, 23 Sep 1998 13:00:49 -0500	50 lines
Re: pointers undefined and otherwise	Michael Metcalf	Wed, 23 Sep 1998 14:36:05 -0400	24 lines
Re: pointers undefined and otherwise	Richard Maine	Wed, 23 Sep 1998 11:36:42 -0700 (PDT)	55 lines
Re: pointers undefined and otherwise	Richard Maine	Wed, 23 Sep 1998 11:54:47 -0700 (PDT)	54 lines
Re: Fortran or Ada?	Robin	Wed, 23 Sep 98 12:00:39 PDT	45 lines
Re: Fortran or Ada?	Robin	Wed, 23 Sep 98 12:21:20 PDT	185 lines
Re: Re: performances, again..... (fwd)	Van Snyder	Wed, 23 Sep 1998 12:27:30 PDT	131 lines
Re: pointers undefined and otherwise (fwd)	Carlie Coats	Wed, 23 Sep 1998 15:36:32 -0400 (EDT)	47 lines
Re: input and output of variable sized arrays	Robin	Wed, 23 Sep 98 12:36:34 PDT	61 lines
Re: pointers undefined and otherwise (fwd)	Richard Maine	Wed, 23 Sep 1998 12:49:17 -0700 (PDT)	46 lines
Re: pointers undefined and otherwise	Peter Shenkin	Wed, 23 Sep 1998 16:37:41 -0400	33 lines
Re: A rare behaivor of pointers	Peter Shenkin	Wed, 23 Sep 1998 16:46:11 -0400	79 lines
Re: pointers undefined and otherwise	Peter Shenkin	Wed, 23 Sep 1998 17:03:37 -0400	30 lines
Re: pointers undefined and otherwise (fwd)	Carlie Coats	Wed, 23 Sep 1998 17:33:28 -0400 (EDT)	41 lines
Re: pointers undefined and otherwise (fwd)	Richard Maine	Wed, 23 Sep 1998 14:55:02 -0700 (PDT)	65 lines
RE: A rare behaivor of pointers	Loren P. Meissner	Wed, 23 Sep 1998 18:43:37 -0700	84 lines
Re: Fortran or Ada?	<>	Thu, 24 Sep 1998 00:23:09 EDT	88 lines
Re: pointers undefined and otherwise	Michael Metcalf	Thu, 24 Sep 1998 03:42:57 -0400	27 lines
Another rare situation with pointers	David R. Leal Valmana	Thu, 24 Sep 1998 12:24:39 +0100	168 lines
Re: A rare behaivor of pointers	Thorsten Ohl	Thu, 24 Sep 1998 14:38:25 +0200 (CEST)	48 lines
list information	Ian Chivers	Thu, 24 Sep 1998 13:19:39 +0000 (GMT)	43 lines
Re: A rare behaivor of pointers	Peter Shenkin	Thu, 24 Sep 1998 11:02:46 -0400	64 lines
Re: A rare behaivor of pointers	Thorsten Ohl	Thu, 24 Sep 1998 17:31:23 +0200 (CEST)	41 lines
Re: A rare behaivor of pointers	<>	Fri, 25 Sep 1998 01:22:10 EDT	26 lines
Pointer behaviour	Dr W.W. Schulz	Fri, 25 Sep 1998 12:27:25 +0100 (BST)	130 lines
	Nuno Pinhão	Fri, 25 Sep 1998 15:30:04 +0100	77 lines
Syntax to read derived-type data with a NAMELIST	Nuno Pinhão	Fri, 25 Sep 1998 15:44:13 +0100	47 lines
Pointer behaviour	Richard Maine	Fri, 25 Sep 1998 08:05:36 -0700 (PDT)	56 lines
Re: Pointer behaviour	Neil Carlson	Fri, 25 Sep 1998 09:14:16 -0600	50 lines
Re: A rare behaivor of pointers	Richard Maine	Fri, 25 Sep 1998 08:15:47 -0700 (PDT)	51 lines
Re: A rare behaivor of pointers	Mike Lijewski	Fri, 25 Sep 1998 08:23:47 -0700	69 lines
RE: Pointer behaviour	Loren P. Meissner	Fri, 25 Sep 1998 08:25:04 -0700	36 lines
Request	SHAKERI	Fri, 25 Sep 1998 19:25:34 GMT0BST	22 lines
RE: Request	Loren P. Meissner	Fri, 25 Sep 1998 12:45:12 -0700	50 lines
Re: Pointer behaviour	David Leal Valmana	Fri, 25 Sep 1998 15:38:46 -0500	25 lines
Re: A rare behaivor of pointers	<>	Sat, 26 Sep 1998 01:48:09 EDT	30 lines
Pointer Behaviour	Dr W.W. Schulz	Sat, 26 Sep 1998 18:22:26 +0100 (BST)	123 lines
Re: Pointer Behaviour	Peter Shenkin	Sat, 26 Sep 1998 13:36:12 -0400	39 lines
Re: Pointer Behaviour	David Vowles	Mon, 28 Sep 1998 09:37:03 +0930	67 lines
Re: Request	David Vowles	Mon, 28 Sep 1998 09:59:25 +0930	63 lines
Re: Pointer Behaviour	Peter Shenkin	Sun, 27 Sep 1998 20:59:53 -0400	70 lines
Re: Pointer Behaviour	Walt Brainerd	Sun, 27 Sep 1998 19:58:31 -0600 (MDT)	18 lines
Ariane 5	<>	Mon, 28 Sep 1998 00:25:07 EDT	73 lines
Re: Pointer Behaviour	Phillip Helbig	Mon, 28 Sep 1998 09:01:27 GMT	25 lines
Re: Pointer Behaviour	Mark Stevens	Mon, 28 Sep 1998 10:03:58 -0000	39 lines
UNSUBSCRIBE	E. D. Chikhliwala	Mon, 28 Sep 1998 06:10:37 -0700	39 lines
Re: Pointer Behaviour	Richard Maine	Mon, 28 Sep 1998 11:37:11 -0700 (PDT)	66 lines
inverse	Eildert Groeneveld	Wed, 30 Sep 1998 09:07:24 +0200 (MEST)	29 lines
Re: Ariane 5	David J Adams	Wed, 30 Sep 1998 10:09:30 +0100 (BST)	29 lines
Re: Fortran or Ada?	Robin	Wed, 30 Sep 98 15:02:34 PDT	224 lines
Re: Ariane 5	Robin	Wed, 30 Sep 98 15:30:55 PDT	130 lines
an old question, no doubt...	Comer Duncan	Thu, 1 Oct 1998 13:40:14 -0400	67 lines
RE: an old question, no doubt...	Loren P. Meissner	Thu, 1 Oct 1998 11:26:59 -0700	108 lines
Re: inverse	David Vowles	Fri, 2 Oct 1998 09:03:55 +0930	46 lines
How to do it with Salford	David R. Leal Valmana	Fri, 02 Oct 1998 09:58:59 +0100	38 lines
Re: How to do it with Salford	Petros Dafniotis, DuPont Central R & D	Fri, 2 Oct 1998 11:01:07 +0200	45 lines
RE: How to do it with Salford	Peter Jewell	Fri, 2 Oct 1998 11:27:00 +0100	86 lines
Generic design (actual procedures)	Helmers, Jens Bloch	03 Oct 1998 12:07:29 +0200	69 lines
Re: How to do it with Salford	Mark Stevens	Mon, 5 Oct 1998 08:55:53 -0000	69 lines
Re: Generic design (actual procedures)	Erik Schnetter	Mon, 5 Oct 1998 13:59:24 +0200 (MEST)	63 lines
Running time	ABBASPOUR-FARD	Tue, 6 Oct 1998 12:38:16 GMT0BST	29 lines
Re: Running time	Dan Nagle	Tue, 06 Oct 1998 07:51:50 -0500	59 lines
Re: Generic design (actual procedures)	Helmers, Jens Bloch	06 Oct 1998 21:19:12 +0200	65 lines
Fortran 90 / 95 for FreeBSD	Fabio Luiz Laurenti Garbujo	Tue, 6 Oct 1998 19:50:17 -0300 (EST)	19 lines
Running time	ABBASPOUR-FARD	Wed, 7 Oct 1998 09:37:55 GMT0BST	23 lines
RE: Syntax to read derived-type data with a NAMELIST	<>	Wed, 07 Oct 1998 15:52:28 MET_DST	60 lines
Which compiler can work with DUAL CPU?	Gu Zhonghua	Fri, 9 Oct 1998 10:01:14 +0800	74 lines
RE: Which compiler can work with DUAL CPU?	Steven Lionel	Fri, 9 Oct 1998 08:14:00 -0400	33 lines
	Jeff Knaggs	Fri, 9 Oct 1998 13:35:33 -0400	23 lines
Kind type parameter value for actual and dummy arguments	Jean Claude Berges	Mon, 12 Oct 98 09:13:08 +0200	41 lines
Re: Kind type parameter value for actual and dummy arguments	Dan Nagle	Mon, 12 Oct 1998 06:35:15 -0400	39 lines
Processing telemetry data in Fortran 90	Van Snyder	Mon, 12 Oct 1998 14:00:34 PDT	49 lines
Re: Processing telemetry data in Fortran 90	Peter Shenkin	Mon, 12 Oct 1998 19:54:30 -0400	30 lines
multiply defined	A C Dowell	Tue, 13 Oct 1998 12:37:00 +0100 (BST)	71 lines
Re: Fortran 90 / 95 for FreeBSD	Malcolm Cohen	Tue, 13 Oct 1998 16:42:44 +0000 (BST)	25 lines
Re: Processing telemetry data in Fortran 90	Otto Stolz	Tue, 13 Oct 1998 12:45:44 -0600	68 lines
positionning	Richard Maine	Tue, 13 Oct 1998 12:18:03 -0700 (PDT)	54 lines
test	Jean-Yves	Tue, 13 Oct 1998 13:43:31 -0600	25 lines
positionning	Jean-Yves	Tue, 13 Oct 1998 13:59:41 -0600	41 lines
RE: positionning	Loren P. Meissner	Tue, 13 Oct 1998 13:48:03 -0700	36 lines
positionning	Jean-Yves	Tue, 13 Oct 1998 15:11:20 -0600	55 lines
Re: Processing telemetry data in Fortran 90	Len Makin, CSIRO Maths & Info Sci, Melbourne.	Wed, 14 Oct 1998 09:54:29 +1000	40 lines
MOD and MODULO functions	Jean Claude Berges	Wed, 14 Oct 98 16:25:21 +0200	39 lines
Using KIND correctly	Van Snyder	Wed, 14 Oct 1998 10:24:43 PDT	35 lines
Re: Using KIND correctly	Swietanowski Artur	Wed, 14 Oct 1998 20:39:44 +0200	88 lines
Fortran backspace	Harold P. Hjalmarson	Wed, 14 Oct 1998 16:39:58 -0600	66 lines
Re: Using KIND correctly	Ron Sverdlove x2517	Wed, 14 Oct 1998 18:41:12 -0400	42 lines
Re: Using KIND correctly (fwd)	Van Snyder	Wed, 14 Oct 1998 15:46:55 PDT	33 lines
Re: Using KIND correctly	Richard Maine	Wed, 14 Oct 1998 15:55:21 -0700 (PDT)	31 lines
Re: Using KIND correctly	Jan van Oosterwijk	Thu, 15 Oct 1998 08:45:51 +0200	46 lines
Re: Using KIND correctly	Pierre Hugonnet	Thu, 15 Oct 1998 09:24:16 +0200	62 lines
Re: Fortran backspace	forth.s.a	Thu, 15 Oct 1998 08:58:11 +0100	84 lines
Re: Using KIND correctly	Michael Metcalf	Thu, 15 Oct 1998 04:25:05 -0400	39 lines
Re: Fortran input parsing	Anthony Stone	Thu, 15 Oct 1998 09:38:44 +0100	41 lines
Re: Using KIND correctly	Pierre Hugonnet	Thu, 15 Oct 1998 11:29:35 +0200	64 lines
F90 & Purify	Olivier Ricois	Thu, 15 Oct 1998 12:01:15 +0200	91 lines
Re: Fortran backspace	Dan Nagle	Thu, 15 Oct 1998 06:35:18 -0400	47 lines
Re: Using KIND correctly	Swietanowski Artur	Thu, 15 Oct 1998 15:05:07 +0200	57 lines
Re: Using KIND correctly	Swietanowski Artur	Thu, 15 Oct 1998 15:05:50 +0200	46 lines
[OFF TOPIC] Why not put the comp-forrtan-90 address in "Reply to:"	Swietanowski Artur	Thu, 15 Oct 1998 15:10:49 +0200	29 lines
Re: [OFF TOPIC] Why not put the comp-forrtan-90 address in "Reply to:"	Pierre Hugonnet	Thu, 15 Oct 1998 15:17:07 +0200	41 lines
Re: [OFF TOPIC] Why not put the comp-forrtan-90 address in "Reply to:"	Jan van Oosterwijk	Thu, 15 Oct 1998 15:54:04 +0200	49 lines
Re: F90 and Purify	Peter Shenkin	Thu, 15 Oct 1998 10:00:16 -0400	57 lines
Re: [OFF TOPIC] Why not put the comp-forrtan-90 address in "Reply to:"	Peter Shenkin	Thu, 15 Oct 1998 10:09:54 -0400	37 lines
Re: [OFF TOPIC] Why not put the comp-forrtan-90 address in "Reply to:"	Ian Chivers	Thu, 15 Oct 1998 15:50:59 +0100 ()	82 lines
Re: F90 & Purify	Malcolm Cohen	Thu, 15 Oct 1998 15:07:08 +0000 (BST)	28 lines
Re: F90 and Purify	Malcolm Cohen	Thu, 15 Oct 1998 15:29:43 +0000 (BST)	49 lines
Re: F90 and Purify	Peter Shenkin	Thu, 15 Oct 1998 11:44:39 -0400	73 lines
RE: Using KIND correctly	Loren P. Meissner	Thu, 15 Oct 1998 08:46:26 -0700	50 lines
Re: Using KIND correctly	Malcolm Cohen	Thu, 15 Oct 1998 15:48:11 +0000 (BST)	62 lines
Re: [OFF TOPIC] Why not put the comp-forrtan-90 address in "Reply to:"	Peter Shenkin	Thu, 15 Oct 1998 11:50:25 -0400	36 lines
Re: F90 and Purify	John Bray	Thu, 15 Oct 1998 17:00:40 +0100	28 lines
cull of list members	Ian Chivers	Thu, 15 Oct 1998 17:11:49 +0100 ()	23 lines
[log in to unmask]	Ian Chivers	Thu, 15 Oct 1998 17:14:50 +0100 ()	19 lines
Re: [OFF TOPIC] Why not put the comp-forrtan-90 address in "Reply to:"	Glenn Carver	Thu, 15 Oct 1998 17:41:24 +0100	32 lines
Re: F90 and Purify	Peter Shenkin	Thu, 15 Oct 1998 12:47:21 -0400	85 lines
Re: [OFF TOPIC] Why not put the comp-forrtan-90 address in "Reply to:"	James Giles	Thu, 15 Oct 1998 11:56:51 -0600	30 lines
Re: [OFF TOPIC] Why not put the comp-forrtan-90 address in "Reply to:"	James Giles	Thu, 15 Oct 1998 12:07:06 -0600	24 lines
[log in to unmask]	Michael Metcalf	Thu, 15 Oct 1998 14:22:24 -0400	16 lines
Re: (x3j3.1998-291) stream i/o	Van Snyder	Thu, 15 Oct 1998 11:54:10 PDT	83 lines
Re: F90 and Purify	David B. Serafini	Thu, 15 Oct 1998 15:31:32 -0500 (CDT)	87 lines
Re: F90 & Purify	Bill Moffitt	Thu, 15 Oct 1998 15:42:19 -0700	48 lines
Re: [OFF TOPIC] Why not put the comp-forrtan-90 address in "Reply to:"	Pierre Hugonnet	Fri, 16 Oct 1998 10:52:03 +0200	38 lines
Re: Using KIND correctly	Pierre Hugonnet	Fri, 16 Oct 1998 11:09:12 +0200	82 lines
easy fotran io question	Assefaw Hadish Gebremedhin	Fri, 16 Oct 1998 14:02:17 +0200 (MET DST)	24 lines
Re: easy fotran io question	Pierre Hugonnet	Fri, 16 Oct 1998 15:00:33 +0200	36 lines
Re: MOD and MODULO functions	Robin	Sat, 17 Oct 98 13:11:59 PDT	60 lines
A little advice, please	Loren P. Meissner	Sat, 17 Oct 1998 21:12:27 -0700	64 lines
Re: A little advice, please	<>	Sun, 18 Oct 1998 09:22:29 EDT	20 lines
FW: fortran story	Loren P. Meissner	Sun, 18 Oct 1998 09:11:54 -0700	77 lines
Re: A little advice, please	Peter Shenkin	Sun, 18 Oct 1998 16:05:43 -0400	89 lines
Re: A little advice, please	Peter Shenkin	Sun, 18 Oct 1998 16:21:54 -0400	31 lines
Re: A little advice, please	James Giles	Sun, 18 Oct 1998 16:22:46 -0600	92 lines
Advice required for fortran90	Assefaw Hadish Gebremedhin	Mon, 19 Oct 1998 17:25:04 +0200 (MET DST)	47 lines
Re: Advice required for fortran90	Walt Brainerd	Mon, 19 Oct 1998 10:54:05 -0600 (MDT)	51 lines
Re: (x3j3.1998-302) Re: Defining BYTE and BIT	Van Snyder	Mon, 19 Oct 1998 10:04:20 PDT	47 lines
(x3j3.1998-305) Re: Defining BYTE and BIT vs RECL= (fwd)	Van Snyder	Mon, 19 Oct 1998 10:12:54 PDT	45 lines
RE: (x3j3.1998-305) Re: Defining BYTE and BIT vs RECL= (fwd)	Steven Lionel	Mon, 19 Oct 1998 13:29:52 -0400	32 lines
Re: (x3j3.1998-305) Re: Defining BYTE and BIT vs RECL= (fwd)	Miles Ellis	Mon, 19 Oct 1998 18:41:57 +0100	38 lines
Re: Which compiler can work with DUAL CPU?	G. Scott Lett	Mon, 19 Oct 1998 15:00:51 -0500 (CDT)	49 lines
Re: Advice required for fortran90	Lars Mossberg	Tue, 20 Oct 1998 09:34:28 +0200	112 lines
Re: Advice required for fortran90	<>	Tue, 20 Oct 98 10:08:25 +0200	47 lines
Re: Advice required for fortran90	Tony Harker	Tue, 20 Oct 1998 09:26:37 +0100 (BST)	42 lines
Fortran90 compiler for Linux/Alpha	Antti Kuronen	Wed, 21 Oct 1998 11:37:40 +0300 (EET DST)	28 lines
Re: Fortran90 compiler for Linux/Alpha	Petros Dafniotis, DuPont Central R & D	Wed, 21 Oct 1998 18:10:11 +0200	29 lines
Constructor to derived types ?	Jean Claude Berges	Wed, 21 Oct 98 18:13:52 +0200	72 lines
Constructor to derived types ?	Richard Maine	Wed, 21 Oct 1998 09:28:00 -0700 (PDT)	28 lines
Re: Fortran90 compiler for Linux/Alpha	Malcolm Cohen	Wed, 21 Oct 1998 16:55:12 +0000 (BST)	24 lines
Re: Constructor to derived types ?	Malcolm Cohen	Wed, 21 Oct 1998 17:26:58 +0000 (BST)	29 lines
Maximum Likelihood Method	SHAKERI	Wed, 21 Oct 1998 17:53:50 GMT0BST	22 lines
Fortran 90/95/HPF Information (October)	Michael Metcalf	Thu, 22 Oct 1998 01:30:49 -0400	551 lines
Re: Fortran90 compiler for Linux/Alpha	Petros Dafniotis, DuPont Central R & D	Thu, 22 Oct 1998 08:50:03 +0200	42 lines
Re: Fortran90 compiler for Linux/Alpha	Robin	Wed, 21 Oct 98 23:50:13 PDT	34 lines
Re: Fortran90 compiler for Linux/Alpha	Robin	Thu, 22 Oct 98 10:42:45 PDT	48 lines
Re: Constructor to derived types ?	Lawrie Schonfelder	Fri, 23 Oct 1998 10:23:04 +0100 (British Summer Time)	99 lines
Why? case(non-constant)	Miguel Murillo	Tue, 27 Oct 1998 19:05:09 +0100 (CET)	60 lines
Why? case(non-constant) (fwd)	Van Snyder	Tue, 27 Oct 1998 11:05:01 PST	74 lines
F2000 Standard	SHYAN LAM	28 Oct 98 10:15:53 CST	34 lines
F2000 Standard	Richard Maine	Wed, 28 Oct 1998 08:37:57 -0800 (PST)	50 lines
Re: F2000 Standard	James Giles	Wed, 28 Oct 1998 13:49:58 -0700	60 lines
Re: F2000 Standard	SHYAN LAM	29 Oct 98 09:05:16 CST	45 lines
cpp variables	David B. Serafini	Thu, 29 Oct 1998 16:55:59 -0600 (CST)	21 lines
[No] Warning of lack of support of common extensions	<>	Thu, 29 Oct 1998 20:53:24 EST	42 lines
Re: cpp variables	<>	Thu, 29 Oct 1998 23:47:38 EST	35 lines
Re: cpp variables	David B. Serafini	Thu, 29 Oct 1998 23:32:23 -0600 (CST)	45 lines
Re: [No] Warning of lack of support of common extensions	Dick Hendrickson	Fri, 30 Oct 1998 12:01:52 -0600	81 lines
Re: [No] Warning of lack of support of common extensions	David B. Serafini	Fri, 30 Oct 1998 13:46:53 -0600 (CST)	43 lines
Re: [No] Warning of lack of support of common extensions	<>	Fri, 30 Oct 1998 21:34:11 EST	25 lines
Re: [No] Warning of lack of support of common extensions	<>	Fri, 30 Oct 1998 22:25:56 EST	22 lines
Re: [No] Warning of lack of support of common extensions	Richard Maine	Fri, 30 Oct 1998 23:39:55 -0800 (PST)	36 lines
Re: [No] Warning of lack of support of common extensions	Robin	Sat, 31 Oct 98 11:07:40 PST	62 lines
Re: [No] Warning of lack of support of common extensions	Dick Hendrickson	Sat, 31 Oct 1998 14:16:35 -0600	45 lines
Mailbase Error Report	Nedra Dickman Brill	Sun, 01 Nov 1998 19:32:45	40 lines
Transfer	John Blair-Fish	Wed, 4 Nov 1998 20:03:21 +0000 (GMT)	47 lines
Re: Transfer	Van Snyder	Wed, 04 Nov 1998 12:32:37 PST	59 lines
Re: Transfer	Pierre Hugonnet	Thu, 05 Nov 1998 09:54:30 +0100	81 lines
Byte switching (was re: Transfer)	Malcolm Cohen	Thu, 5 Nov 1998 09:34:22 +0000 (GMT)	49 lines
Re: Transfer	Robin	Thu, 05 Nov 98 10:17:45 PST	41 lines
Re: Transfer	Clive Page	Fri, 6 Nov 1998 10:04:30 +0000 (GMT)	42 lines
Re: Transfer	<>	Fri, 6 Nov 1998 08:58:07 EST	21 lines
array compatibility	Jaehoon Seol	Fri, 6 Nov 1998 10:20:32 -0600 (CST)	34 lines
Re: array compatibility	Malcolm Cohen	Fri, 6 Nov 1998 16:35:55 +0000 (GMT)	57 lines
array compatibility	<>	Fri, 6 Nov 1998 11:40:32 -0500	45 lines
array compatibility	Richard Maine	Fri, 6 Nov 1998 08:54:09 -0800 (PST)	103 lines
RE: array compatibility	Loren P. Meissner	Fri, 6 Nov 1998 10:39:12 -0800	50 lines
Re: Transfer	Robin	Fri, 06 Nov 98 18:11:49 PST	86 lines
Re: Transfer	Friedrich R. Hertweck	Sat, 7 Nov 1998 13:03:44 +0100 (MET)	58 lines
Re: Transfer	Robin	Sat, 07 Nov 98 07:51:11 PST	33 lines
associated Legendre functions	Ingve Simonsen	Sat, 7 Nov 1998 18:05:38 +0100 (CET)	40 lines
Re: A little advice, please	Friedrich R. Hertweck	Sun, 8 Nov 1998 09:09:20 +0100 (MET)	216 lines
RE: A little advice, please	Loren P. Meissner	Sun, 8 Nov 1998 10:57:13 -0800	47 lines
RE: A little advice, please	Loren P. Meissner	Sun, 8 Nov 1998 11:55:51 -0800	95 lines
RE: A little advice, please	Friedrich R. Hertweck	Mon, 9 Nov 1998 07:38:54 +0100 (MET)	46 lines
Re: associated Legendre functions	Jacques Duilio Brancher	Mon, 9 Nov 1998 07:57:59 -0200 (BDB)	225 lines
query about arguments	Comer Duncan	Mon, 9 Nov 1998 13:39:45 -0500	44 lines
Re: A little advice, please	Werner Schulz	Mon, 9 Nov 1998 21:00:04 -0000	29 lines
RE: query about arguments	Loren P. Meissner	Mon, 9 Nov 1998 15:11:24 -0800	45 lines
RE: Why? case(non-constant)	<>	Tue, 10 Nov 1998 16:58:37 MET	63 lines
Some suggestions for F2000	David R. Leal Valmana	Tue, 10 Nov 1998 18:11:29 +0000	107 lines
Re: Some suggestions for F2000	Phillip Helbig	Tue, 10 Nov 1998 18:21:42 GMT	66 lines
Re: Some suggestions for F2000	Pierre Hugonnet	Tue, 10 Nov 1998 19:43:19 +0100	39 lines
RE: Some suggestions for F2000	Loren P. Meissner	Tue, 10 Nov 1998 13:30:46 -0800	39 lines
RE: Some suggestions for F2000	Loren P. Meissner	Tue, 10 Nov 1998 13:30:48 -0800	41 lines
Re: Some suggestions for F2000	<>	Tue, 10 Nov 1998 21:15:09 EST	26 lines
f90 for linux?	Dr. E.L.Heck	Wed, 11 Nov 1998 11:21:52 +0000 (GMT)	28 lines
Re:Some suggestion for F2000	David R. Leal Valmana	Wed, 11 Nov 1998 11:49:49 +0000	61 lines
Re: f90 for linux?	Alvaro Colina	Wed, 11 Nov 1998 14:21:27 +0100	38 lines
Re: f90 for linux?	Juergen vonHagen	Wed, 11 Nov 1998 08:28:47 -0500	27 lines
Re: f90 for linux?	David Brian Serafini	Wed, 11 Nov 1998 07:50:25 -0600 (CST)	12 lines
Re: Some suggestions for F2000	Robin	Wed, 11 Nov 98 11:13:39 PST	85 lines
Re: MODULO	Robin	Wed, 11 Nov 98 11:24:20 PST	70 lines
Re: Re:Some suggestion for F2000	James Giles	Wed, 11 Nov 1998 13:13:06 -0700	82 lines
list requests	Ian Chivers	Wed, 11 Nov 1998 22:39:19 +0000 ()	26 lines
Re:Some suggestion for F2000	Yuan Si	Thu, 12 Nov 1998 09:27:42 +0800	37 lines
Re: Re:Some suggestion for F2000	James Giles	Wed, 11 Nov 1998 19:18:44 -0700	43 lines
Re: Some suggestions for F2000	Pierre Hugonnet	Thu, 12 Nov 1998 09:09:14 +0100	38 lines
Re: Some suggestions for F2000	Pincon Bruno	Thu, 12 Nov 1998 09:39:50 +0100	30 lines
Re: Some suggestions for F2000	Pierre Hugonnet	Thu, 12 Nov 1998 15:08:12 +0100	54 lines
Re: f90 for linux?	Walt Brainerd	Thu, 12 Nov 1998 07:22:01 -0700 (MST)	21 lines
initialization of arrays vs. "data" statements	Luis A. Suarez	Thu, 12 Nov 1998 12:41:03 -0500 (EST)	56 lines
Re: initialization of arrays vs. "data" statements	Miguel Murillo	Thu, 12 Nov 1998 19:06:33 +0100 (CET)	39 lines
Re: initialization of arrays vs. "data" statements	Luis A. Suarez	Thu, 12 Nov 1998 13:22:39 -0500 (EST)	44 lines
Re: initialization of arrays vs. "data" statements	Miguel Murillo	Thu, 12 Nov 1998 19:31:22 +0100 (CET)	57 lines
Re: Some suggestion for F2000	Robin	Thu, 12 Nov 98 10:47:57 PST	67 lines
Re: initialization of arrays vs. "data" statements	John Reid	Thu, 12 Nov 1998 18:51:29 GMT	14 lines
Re: initialization of arrays vs. "data" statements	Phillip Helbig	Thu, 12 Nov 1998 19:02:17 GMT	28 lines
Bit constants initialization	Dan Nagle	Thu, 12 Nov 1998 15:50:49 -0600	35 lines
Re: Some suggestion for F2000	David R. Leal Valmana	Fri, 13 Nov 1998 09:02:41 +0000	58 lines
	<>	Fri, 13 Nov 1998 15:37:44 +0200	43 lines
Re:	David R. Leal Valmana	Fri, 13 Nov 1998 15:27:44 +0000	118 lines
request for help	A C Dowell	Fri, 13 Nov 1998 18:46:26 +0000 (GMT)	111 lines
Re: request for help	Ralph and Wendy	Fri, 13 Nov 1998 14:35:18 -0800	125 lines
Re: Some suggestion for F2000	Robin	Sat, 14 Nov 98 12:19:58 PST	73 lines
thankyou (problem solved)	A C Dowell	Sun, 15 Nov 1998 16:55:59 +0000 (GMT)	26 lines
Re: Some suggestion for F2000	Robin	Mon, 16 Nov 98 09:48:49 PST	65 lines
Re: Suggestion for Fortran 2000	Van Snyder	Mon, 16 Nov 1998 15:01:47 PST	65 lines
Dot_Product	Van Snyder	Mon, 16 Nov 1998 15:28:26 PST	33 lines
RE: Suggestion for Fortran 2000	Loren P. Meissner	Mon, 16 Nov 1998 15:34:50 -0800	46 lines
Macro (was Re: Suggestions for Fortran 2000)	Van Snyder	Mon, 16 Nov 1998 15:34:57 PST	28 lines
Re: Suggestion for Fortran 2000	James Giles	Mon, 16 Nov 1998 17:33:11 -0700	36 lines
f90 for linux	Dr. E.L.Heck	Tue, 17 Nov 1998 13:14:48 +0000 (GMT)	29 lines
RE: Sparse matrices	<>	Tue, 17 Nov 1998 14:25:18 MET	65 lines
Re: [LF] initialization expressions	Jan van Oosterwijk	Tue, 17 Nov 1998 17:11:02 +0100	106 lines
Using F90 routines in support of a F77 library	Neil Carlson	Tue, 17 Nov 1998 11:16:11 -0700	54 lines
Re: Using F90 routines in support of a F77 library	Phillip Helbig	Tue, 17 Nov 1998 18:37:03 GMT	33 lines
Using F90 routines in support of a F77 library	Richard Maine	Tue, 17 Nov 1998 10:37:04 -0800 (PST)	40 lines
Re: Using F90 routines in support of a F77 library	Keith Bierman ADT/QED	Tue, 17 Nov 1998 10:59:01 -0800	17 lines
Re: Using F90 routines in support of a F77 library	Chuck Fisher	Tue, 17 Nov 1998 11:15:57 -0800 (PST)	27 lines
Re: Using F90 routines in support of a F77 library	Bill Moffitt	Tue, 17 Nov 1998 11:30:43 -0800	69 lines
Re: Using F90 routines in support of a F77 library	Glenn Carver	Tue, 17 Nov 1998 21:00:27 +0000	37 lines
Re: Using F90 routines in support of a F77 library	Prakash Narayan	Tue, 17 Nov 1998 15:17:10 -0800 (PST)	22 lines
Re: [LF] initialization expressions	Len Makin, CSIRO Maths & Info Sci, Melbourne.	Wed, 18 Nov 1998 10:30:37 +1100	101 lines
Re: Using F90 routines in support of a F77 library	Bill Moffitt	Tue, 17 Nov 1998 15:41:14 -0800	67 lines
Re: Using F90 routines in support of a F77 library	<>	Tue, 17 Nov 1998 21:30:01 EST	27 lines
Re: Using F90 routines in support of a F77 library	Peter Shenkin	Tue, 17 Nov 1998 21:43:40 -0500	47 lines
Re: [LF] initialization expressions	Otto Stolz	Wed, 18 Nov 1998 11:05:15 +0100	59 lines
Re: [LF] initialization expressions	Malcolm Cohen	Wed, 18 Nov 1998 10:38:01 +0000 (GMT)	65 lines
Re: [LF] initialization expressions	Henry Zongaro	Wed, 18 Nov 1998 09:39:59 -0500	50 lines
Re: [LF] initialization expressions	Henry Zongaro	Wed, 18 Nov 1998 09:40:06 -0500	50 lines
need pointer[s[ to f90 implementions of multigrid	Comer Duncan	Wed, 18 Nov 1998 10:12:51 -0500	39 lines
regular expression parser	Luis A. Suarez	Wed, 18 Nov 1998 12:11:38 -0500 (EST)	22 lines
RE: about Random_Number	Steven Lionel	Wed, 18 Nov 1998 12:57:40 -0500	38 lines
Re: need pointer[s[ to f90 implementions of multigrid	Paul J. or Carolyn J. Nikolai	Wed, 18 Nov 1998 13:16:09 -0500	67 lines
Re: need pointer[s[ to f90 implementions of multigrid	William F Mitchell	Wed, 18 Nov 1998 13:50:53 -0500	57 lines
about Random_Number	David R. Leal Valmana	Wed, 18 Nov 1998 18:52:48 +0000	78 lines
Re: need pointer[s[ to f90 implementions of multigrid	John Turner	Wed, 18 Nov 1998 14:18:54 -0500 (EST)	35 lines
Re: about Random_Number	Dan Nagle	Wed, 18 Nov 1998 15:14:50 -0500	49 lines
Non-advancing output versus $ format	Clive Page	Thu, 19 Nov 1998 17:10:01 +0000 (GMT)	60 lines
Re: Non-advancing output versus $ format	Peter Shenkin	Thu, 19 Nov 1998 12:27:48 -0500	94 lines
RE: Sparse matrices	John Turner	Thu, 19 Nov 1998 12:40:15 -0500 (EST)	55 lines
Re: Non-advancing output versus $ format	David Adams	Fri, 20 Nov 1998 09:31:18 +0000 (GMT)	75 lines
Re: Non-advancing output versus $ format	Malcolm Cohen	Fri, 20 Nov 1998 09:41:07 +0000 (GMT)	72 lines
Re: Non-advancing output versus $ format	Clive Page	Fri, 20 Nov 1998 12:06:22 +0000 (GMT)	30 lines
Re: Non-advancing output versus $ format	Clive Page	Fri, 20 Nov 1998 12:24:50 +0000 (GMT)	69 lines
Re: Non-advancing output versus $ format	Malcolm Cohen	Fri, 20 Nov 1998 14:17:40 +0000 (GMT)	90 lines
$ versus non-advancing	Van Snyder	Fri, 20 Nov 1998 13:21:39 PST	35 lines
Re: Non-advancing output versus $ format	Clive Page	Mon, 23 Nov 1998 10:52:57 +0000 (GMT)	81 lines
Re: Non-advancing output versus $ format	Malcolm Cohen	Mon, 23 Nov 1998 12:14:00 +0000 (GMT)	166 lines
RE: Non-advancing output versus $ format	Steven Lionel	Mon, 23 Nov 1998 08:53:58 -0500	68 lines
RE: Sparse matrices	Ernst A. Meese	Tue, 24 Nov 1998 09:00:33 +0100	104 lines
Re: Non-advancing output versus $ format	Werner Schulz	Tue, 24 Nov 1998 20:24:34 -0000	42 lines
Re: Non-advancing output versus $ format	Clive Page	Wed, 25 Nov 1998 17:47:21 +0000 (GMT)	54 lines
Out of topic - Laguerre	Jacques Duilio Brancher	Wed, 25 Nov 1998 15:47:32 -0200 (BDB)	24 lines
Re: Non-advancing output versus $ format	Phillip Helbig	Wed, 25 Nov 1998 17:53:21 GMT	30 lines
Re: Non-advancing output versus $ format	Clive Page	Wed, 25 Nov 1998 18:06:17 +0000 (GMT)	32 lines
Re: Non-advancing output versus $ format	Phillip Helbig	Wed, 25 Nov 1998 18:17:06 GMT	40 lines
Re: Out of topic - Laguerre	Don Shirer	Wed, 25 Nov 1998 13:17:10 -0500 (EST)	38 lines
Re: Non-advancing output versus $ format	Dan Nagle	Wed, 25 Nov 1998 13:24:41 -0500	51 lines
Re: Non-advancing output versus $ format	Richard Maine	Wed, 25 Nov 1998 11:08:34 -0800 (PST)	74 lines
Out of topic -- Laguerre	Van Snyder	Wed, 25 Nov 1998 12:25:09 PST	34 lines
Non-advancing outupt versus $ format	Van Snyder	Wed, 25 Nov 1998 12:32:48 PST	86 lines
Is there an f90-subset compatible way of doing BLOCK DATA? (what's portable)?	<>	Wed, 25 Nov 1998 21:19:31 EST	35 lines
Re: Is there an f90-subset compatible way of doing BLOCK	Peter Shenkin	Wed, 25 Nov 1998 22:28:15 -0500 (EST)	29 lines
Re: Non-advancing output versus $ format	Otto Stolz	Thu, 26 Nov 1998 10:37:46 +0100	58 lines
CF90 SETPOS extension on SGI?	Jeffrey D. Pursel	Mon, 30 Nov 1998 12:57:35 -0500	31 lines
Byte swapping during I/O on PC's?	Van Snyder	Mon, 30 Nov 1998 17:43:49 PST	20 lines
Re: Byte swapping during I/O on PC's?	Ralph and Wendy	Mon, 30 Nov 1998 21:33:53 -0800	44 lines
Re: Byte swapping during I/O on PC's?	Greynolds, Al	Tue, 1 Dec 1998 05:37:07 -0700	57 lines
Re: Non-advancing output versus $ format	Jaume Jose	Thu, 03 Dec 1998 09:25:45 +0100	67 lines
Re: NAMELIST input	Malcolm Cohen	Fri, 4 Dec 1998 11:52:16 +0000 (GMT)	28 lines
NAMELIST input	<>	Fri, 4 Dec 1998 16:10:50 +1300 (NZDT)	29 lines
Re: Non-advancing output versus $ format	Ian Chivers	Fri, 4 Dec 1998 19:00:21 +0000 ()	88 lines
Toeplitz	Pierre Hugonnet	Mon, 07 Dec 1998 18:04:32 +0100	33 lines
Patches for Digital f90 compiler	Neil Carlson	Wed, 09 Dec 1998 08:54:58 -0700	27 lines
RE: Patches for Digital f90 compiler	Steven Lionel	Wed, 9 Dec 1998 11:16:34 -0500	32 lines
Re: Interface Operator & only	Malcolm Cohen	Wed, 9 Dec 1998 16:46:53 +0000 (GMT)	33 lines
Interface Operator & only	David Leal	Wed, 09 Dec 1998 17:36:13 +0000	75 lines
Debugging suggestions under Digital f90 (unix) needed	Neil Carlson	Wed, 09 Dec 1998 12:10:15 -0700	65 lines
RE: Debugging suggestions under Digital f90 (unix) needed	Steven Lionel	Wed, 9 Dec 1998 14:23:05 -0500	33 lines
Re: Debugging suggestions under Digital f90 (unix) needed	Steven Lionel	Wed, 9 Dec 1998 15:59:50 -0500	65 lines
Bug or feature?	Van Snyder	Wed, 09 Dec 1998 15:41:31 PST	48 lines
Re: Debugging suggestions under Digital f90 (unix) needed	Neil Carlson	Wed, 09 Dec 1998 16:55:07 -0700	33 lines
Re: Bug or feature?	Van Snyder	Wed, 09 Dec 1998 17:16:14 PST	29 lines
Bug or feature?	Richard Maine	Wed, 9 Dec 1998 17:39:09 -0800 (PST)	38 lines
Re: Bug or feature	Van Snyder	Wed, 09 Dec 1998 17:54:35 PST	44 lines
Re: Bug or feature?	Richard Maine	Wed, 9 Dec 1998 17:59:36 -0800 (PST)	49 lines
Re: Bug or feature?	Jan van Oosterwijk	Thu, 10 Dec 1998 09:06:16 +0100	78 lines
Re: Bug or feature?	Jan van Oosterwijk	Thu, 10 Dec 1998 09:54:24 +0100	75 lines
Re: Interface Operator	Malcolm Cohen	Fri, 11 Dec 1998 09:39:48 +0000 (GMT)	55 lines
Interface Operator	David Leal	Fri, 11 Dec 1998 10:22:28 +0000	65 lines
array of pointers	Marcelo Grafulha Vanti	Mon, 14 Dec 1998 11:44:31 -0200	46 lines
Re: array of pointers	Pierre Hugonnet	Mon, 14 Dec 1998 15:11:58 +0100	57 lines
Seasons Greetings and a program that may be of some interest	Lawrie Schonfelder	Tue, 22 Dec 1998 15:40:36 +0000 (GMT)	31 lines
Variable Precision Arithmetic	Lawrie Schonfelder	Wed, 23 Dec 1998 09:49:41 +0000 (GMT)	27 lines
Re: multiply defined	Robin	Fri, 25 Dec 98 10:37:58 PST	21 lines

COMP-FORTRAN-90 Archives

1998

Options

Subject

From

Date

Size

JiscMail Tools

RSS Feeds and Sharing

Search Archives

Archives