Hi Chris
At 17/04/98 15:52:06, cris cheek <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
# Hi Roger,
#
# think you missed the point.
# Does all language not contain and reveal 'feelings'?
Not in my technical part of the woods it don't...it just tells how to turn
my computer on.
# Is 'language' construction not a sign for sentience?
# Does sentience not include what you might call
# "feeling" (a truly 'great' example of vacuous pop -
# now's there's high and low out on a bender),
# at every moment and between moments?
#
# Surely you can't be so glum as to missread irony
Ah. Irony. The translation of which equates to the travelling of humour.
# when it's larded on so conspicuously heavily.
Wow. The smoke signals were missing and I was wearing sun-glasses. So you
weren't being __serious___ then, Silly me.
#
# If anybody unequivocally 'believes' what they read
# especially today, then we really are in 'deep' trouble.
# (there it is again)
I think I am. Unless you ask me to disbelieve everything you say and type.
Which I'm quite willing to do.
# love and love (and again)
# cris (again)
#
# ps, where are 'you' in all this language? where am 'i'?
# hello . . . erm - like, humour or
#
# what do you actually, really 'feel' Roger? and then, why?
At this particular full I feel rather full having eaten a hearty lunch.
Roger.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|