Robin, yes and no. The definition changes and optionality gives
flexibility but I'd like to know better how it works in implementations.
John
At 8:55 AM 9/26/97 -0400, R. Wendler wrote:
>On Thu, 25 Sep 1997, John Perkins wrote:
>
>> The requirement for users to enter two sets of data - info about
>> the original and then about the surrogate - for a single record sets off
>> warning bells.
>
>John, these recommendations aren't designed to "require" anyone to do
>anything. We propose these redefinitions (broadening the elements), in
>order to *permit* someone to supply information about both the
>original and the surrogate if they so choose. The definitions as they
>stand would not allow that. Does that allay your concerns at all?
>
>--Robin
|