On Wed, 27 Nov 1996, John Kunze wrote:
> So I propose that we leave the term "subelement" alone for now, reserving
> it for possible later use in referring to generalized content data. Instead
> of subelement, I propose using the term "qualifier", as in the User Guide.
I'm easy on this one (though I must admit that I prefer sub-element
still); if there's a general virtual head nodding on this mailing list in
the next couple of days I'll change our sub-element listing document to be
a qualifier listing document.
Tatty bye,
Jim'll
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Jon "Jim'll" Knight, Researcher, Sysop and General Dogsbody, Dept. Computer
Studies, Loughborough University of Technology, Leics., ENGLAND. LE11 3TU.
* I've found I now dream in Perl. More worryingly, I enjoy those dreams. *
|