On Fri, 29 Nov 1996, Terry Allen wrote:
> Still, some exploration of requirements for DC qualifiers might be in order
> sometime. How rich a syntax must be required to support DC? Are
> qualifiers on qualifiers contemplated? (in SGML terms, are those
> "subelements" elements or attributes?)
I tend to think of them as "attribute like" myself. Treating them as
"element like" would greatly increase DC's complexity IMHO.
Tatty bye,
Jim'll
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Jon "Jim'll" Knight, Researcher, Sysop and General Dogsbody, Dept. Computer
Studies, Loughborough University of Technology, Leics., ENGLAND. LE11 3TU.
* I've found I now dream in Perl. More worryingly, I enjoy those dreams. *
|