"I have no choice but to completely disagree"
*about design FOR, I think that we agree*
"but in fact, it is seldom actually done in that specific,
linear sequence"
"when one designs FOR groups, the work may be rejected"
"people quickly critique it, giving relevant information more quickly than
the traditional "send out the ethnographers" approach. Then we discard the
product and do the other stages."
*about design BY, * *I think that we agree* * again*
then we, the professional design team, act as assistants. we can provide
resources, mentoring, and in many cases, help expand the solutions
proposed. in other words, we design WITH
the problem is less severe with "Design With" but the difficulty there is
the people who are part of the "with" group. are they representative?
*about design WITH, * *I think that we agree* *again*
"The problem is less severe with "Design With" but the difficulty there is
the people who are part of the "with" group. Are they representative?"
*in the end*
the problem about design WITH is representativeness. but it is the superior
approach to design, cause it is real and not utopic
-----------------------------------------------------------------
PhD-Design mailing list <[log in to unmask]>
Discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design
Subscribe or Unsubscribe at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/phd-design
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|