Thank you for the question.
I would encourage you to look at feminist pragmatist strands in philosophy as you explore embodied, active-learning practices.
Among others, I would recommend Jane Addams, Grace Lee Boggs, John Dewey, & Nancy McHugh (transactionally situated knowledges), and others
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/femapproach-pragmatism/
Emergent, Relational Revolution: What More Do We Have to Learn from Jane Addams? https://works.bepress.com/danielle_lake/90/ & https://works.bepress.com/danielle_lake/89/
Good luck in your great work.
Danielle Lake, PhD
Director of Design Thinking, Associate Professor Elon University https://works.bepress.com/danielle_lake/
[log in to unmask]
Lindner Hall 200 C
Campus Box 2620 Elon, NC 27244
-----Original Message-----
From: PhD-Design <[log in to unmask]> On Behalf Of Bryan Howell
Sent: Saturday, July 10, 2021 3:47 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Think, Feel, Do, source
Hello,
My first post to this list -
We are searching for the origins of "think, feel, do" as a design method.
We can trace it to ideas which sprouted during the Enlightenment. Kant said, "There are three absolutely irreducible faculties of the mind, namely, knowledge, feeling, and desire," which accompanies the faculty psychology of Wolff, Tetens, and Reid.
We also found a summary from Hilgard, E.R., (1980). The Trilogy of Mind: Cognition, Affection, and Conation. Journal of the Behavioural Sciences, 16, 107-117 on the evolution of the tripartite psychological classification of all mental activities, which also seems to be a direct predecessor to think, feel, do.
The primary question remains, who and when did this tripartite method of analyzation migrate from the schools of philosophy and psychology to the realms of design? We are searching for an understanding of why this migration happened and of course appropriate referencing.
A second question is, and maybe more important, should we use the designerly think, feel, do terminology in our upcoming design study or the established psychological terms, cognitive, affective, and conative?
Thank you for your insights.
Best Regards,
Bryan Howell
-----------------------------------------------------------------
PhD-Design mailing list <[log in to unmask]> Discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design Subscribe or Unsubscribe at https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.jiscmail.ac.uk%2Fphd-design&data=04%7C01%7Cdlake%40elon.edu%7C88f19d5950d44d5f771e08d943dd111c%7Cba18326d711f4ae286816115493a7a53%7C1%7C0%7C637615439032393133%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=D5sV2W7RB6uaL7B964C4EElDd9%2B9qQpvuGTxOGwNXlk%3D&reserved=0
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
PhD-Design mailing list <[log in to unmask]>
Discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design
Subscribe or Unsubscribe at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/phd-design
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|