JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CCP4BB Archives


CCP4BB Archives

CCP4BB Archives


CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CCP4BB Home

CCP4BB Home

CCP4BB  April 2019

CCP4BB April 2019

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: AW: [EXTERNAL] Re: [ccp4bb] High Rfree - ice ring

From:

"[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Thu, 4 Apr 2019 10:46:11 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (134 lines)

Dear Sam,


Cutting out reflections obviously means you lose information. If you are using dials to process your data, then an alternative would be to try the ice ring background modelling algorithm which may give you better results.


Taking the output of dials.integrate you can do this as follows:


dials.model_background integrated_experiments.json


dials.integrate refined.pickle integrated_experiments.json \

  background.algorithm=gmodel \

  background.gmodel.model=background.pickle


Then scale as normal.


You can also use auspex to look at your scaled intensities to see if the ice rings are causing systematic errors.


Best wishes

James


________________________________
From: CCP4 bulletin board <[log in to unmask]> on behalf of Frank von Delft <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: 04 April 2019 11:39:19
To: ccp4bb
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] AW: [EXTERNAL] Re: [ccp4bb] High Rfree - ice ring

You can use sftools to set a shell of reflections to MNF - then Refmac will fill those in with DFc, and that'll presumably be much better than having very wrong reflections.

Whether that will fix your Rfactor is a different story.

phx


On 04/04/2019 11:05, Eleanor Dodson wrote:
You cant exclude one resolution ring in REFMAC - there would be ways to fudge the exclusion from your current file, but much safer to use a data integration tool

On Thu, 4 Apr 2019 at 10:27, <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
Dear Sam,

I would remove the ice ring and reprocess the data. Ice rings may wreak havoc with scaling so at minimum you have to redo the scaling.

Best,
Herman

Von: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>] Im Auftrag von Sam Tang
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 4. April 2019 11:01
An: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
Betreff: [EXTERNAL] Re: [ccp4bb] High Rfree - ice ring


Dear Eleanor and Eric

Thanks for your replies.

Yes indeed when we looked at the plots e.g. R factor vs resln there was a sharp peak near 3.6 - 3.8 A which is where we visibly saw an ice ring on the image. Thus our first thought was to remove the ic ring. (either reprocess or can we bypass this resolution range during refinement?)

The protein is 50 kDa, two molecule in the ASU, seemingly no obvious density was unassigned. We got ~30000 total observations, ~15000 unique observations. NCS restraints was applied.

Best regards
Sam



On Thu, 4 Apr 2019 at 08:57, Eric Montemayor <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
That’s a rather large gap between Rwork and Rfree.  I suspect you have mis-assigned your space group and as a result have a large number of copies in your asymmetric unit.  Any structure can be solved in P1, but that does not mean the true space group is indeed P1. If you use P1 when it’s not actually P1, you will have an unnecessarily overparamerized model, hence the large gap between Rwork and Rfree.

Questions:
1- how many copies in your asymmetric unit in P1?
2- how many atoms in your model vs number of unique reflections?
3- if more than one copy per asymmetric unit, are you imposing NCS restraints during refinement?

-Eric



On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 1:41 PM Sam Tang <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
Hi everyone again

Hmmm I think we have solved a structure in P1 space, to 2.5 A. However after refinement the Rfree stuck at 33%-35% with Rwork around 26%. The structure was solved by MR and current model seems to fit density well. In Refmac log I found that at the resolution corresponding to high R there may be a solvent/ice ring. Since imosflm should be able to exclude ice rings, I am not 100% sure whether it's the cause to high R. But if this is actually the case, is there a way I can exclude certain resolution bins during Refmac (and is it an appropriate way to do so?)

PS - the data is not affected by twining or pseudosymmetry as checked by Xtriage.

Many thanks!

Sam

________________________________

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.jiscmail.ac.uk_cgi-2Dbin_webadmin-3FSUBED1-3DCCP4BB-26A-3D1&d=DwMFaQ&c=Dbf9zoswcQ-CRvvI7VX5j3HvibIuT3ZiarcKl5qtMPo&r=HK-CY_tL8CLLA93vdywyu3qI70R4H8oHzZyRHMQu1AQ&m=UECB-BTblxRTCrEA2arfPs5VNLr4ntyGxszsw_5Jaxc&s=QloAn3zc13ZQX64uxy6UZygomHXUigCIkpTw8ZhYpbk&e=>

________________________________

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.jiscmail.ac.uk_cgi-2Dbin_webadmin-3FSUBED1-3DCCP4BB-26A-3D1&d=DwMFaQ&c=Dbf9zoswcQ-CRvvI7VX5j3HvibIuT3ZiarcKl5qtMPo&r=HK-CY_tL8CLLA93vdywyu3qI70R4H8oHzZyRHMQu1AQ&m=UECB-BTblxRTCrEA2arfPs5VNLr4ntyGxszsw_5Jaxc&s=QloAn3zc13ZQX64uxy6UZygomHXUigCIkpTw8ZhYpbk&e=>

________________________________

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

________________________________

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1


________________________________

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

-- 
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential, copyright and or privileged material, and are for the use of the intended addressee only. If you are not the intended addressee or an authorised recipient of the addressee please notify us of receipt by returning the e-mail and do not use, copy, retain, distribute or disclose the information in or attached to the e-mail.
Any opinions expressed within this e-mail are those of the individual and not necessarily of Diamond Light Source Ltd. 
Diamond Light Source Ltd. cannot guarantee that this e-mail or any attachments are free from viruses and we cannot accept liability for any damage which you may sustain as a result of software viruses which may be transmitted in or with the message.
Diamond Light Source Limited (company no. 4375679). Registered in England and Wales with its registered office at Diamond House, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0DE, United Kingdom


########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager