Surely the issue here is anthropometric hubris, for which "non-anthropometric design" is merely one proposed remedy — and a remedy that still operates inside the framework of hubris, by imagining that we humans have the god-like power of being able to understand and facilitate the desires of other creatures. In Greek mythology, the excessive pride of hubris is inevitably punished by nemesis -- the retribution of the gods -- which in our case seems to be taking the form of climate change.
Maybe the central point of anthropometric hubris is not how we act in our arrogance, but why we feel it. This might be traced to that old Cartesian chestnut: the separation of mind and body. When people talk about ourselves, we always seem to over-estimate the importance of brain, discounting mere body -- and worse, to further over-estimate the seemingly-immaterial influence of transcendent intelligence.
Perhaps we don't properly appreciate our own bodies, let alone those of other living creatures. Minds desire corporate profits, but bodies need clean air. If we properly acknowledged our whole selves, we would design for the animals we really are, rather than for the brains we imagine ourselves to be. This might be an excellent starting point for acknowledging the needs of other animals as well.
Heidi
-----------------------------------------------------------------
PhD-Design mailing list <[log in to unmask]>
Discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design
Subscribe or Unsubscribe at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/phd-design
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|