No matter how poorly designed and un-scientific, I personally believe criticism could be a little more constructive if you wish to provide feedback. This might be put together by a PhD student trying to learn how to commit science, and there is no reason to be harsh without also suggesting ways of improving. Are we not here to help each other?
Best,
Nanna (who also once did an online survey and learned a ton from it)
> On 13 Jun 2018, at 17.18, Nigel Cross <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> This survey is very poorly designed, un-scientific and randomly distributed. Results cannot be usable in any way to contribute to design science or to understanding design expertise.
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> PhD-Design mailing list <[log in to unmask]>
> Discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design
> Subscribe or Unsubscribe at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/phd-design
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
PhD-Design mailing list <[log in to unmask]>
Discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design
Subscribe or Unsubscribe at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/phd-design
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|