PLEASE NOTE:
When you click 'Reply' to any message it will be sent to all RAMESES List members.
If you only want to reply to the sender please remove [log in to unmask] from the 'To:' section of your email.
Dear Joanie,
I have experience using co- evidence and it worked very well.
It is also very useful for involving multiple reviewers. At the data extraction phase, we used our own forms but if you would like to do a Cochrane review, the data extraction forms are perfect!
Good luck!
Best wishes,
Emilomo
________________________________________
From: Realist and Meta-narrative Evidence Synthesis: Evolving Standards <[log in to unmask]> on behalf of Joanie Pellet <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2018 6:55 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Extraction tool
PLEASE NOTE:
When you click 'Reply' to any message it will be sent to all RAMESES List members.
If you only want to reply to the sender please remove [log in to unmask] from the 'To:' section of your email.
Dear all,
Being currently at the begining of our realist review process, we'd like to know if anyone used a data extraction software/platform? such as Covidence, which allows to import citations and full text, screen title + abstract and then full text, and do data extraction using customisable forms: https://www.covidence.org/
What is your experience about it?
Many thanks in advance!
Joanie
To UNSUBSCRIBE please see: https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help/subscribers/faq.html#join
To UNSUBSCRIBE please see: https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help/subscribers/faq.html#join
|