|
|
|
Size
|
Interim summary - Designed Blindness
|
Geoff Wong |
Sun, 31 Jul 2011 19:11:16 +0100 |
76 lines |
Interim Summaries
|
Geoff Wong |
Sun, 31 Jul 2011 18:23:50 +0100 |
28 lines |
Re: meta-narrative syst rev: finally some Foucault?
|
Farah Jamal |
Wed, 27 Jul 2011 15:09:40 +0100 |
1682 lines |
Re: How to persuade funders...
|
Gill Westhorp |
Wed, 27 Jul 2011 09:23:21 +0930 |
972 lines |
Re: How to persuade funders...
|
Trisha Greenhalgh |
Tue, 26 Jul 2011 18:50:22 +0100 |
1440 lines |
Re: How to persuade funders...
|
Marjorie MacDonald |
Tue, 26 Jul 2011 09:49:21 -0700 |
683 lines |
Re: How to persuade funders...
|
Colleen M. Davison |
Tue, 26 Jul 2011 13:38:14 -0300 |
710 lines |
Re: How to persuade funders...
|
Gill Westhorp |
Tue, 26 Jul 2011 09:54:49 +0930 |
618 lines |
Ray's 'Designed blindness' reference
|
Trisha Greenhalgh |
Mon, 25 Jul 2011 19:41:41 +0100 |
4764 lines |
How to persuade funders...
|
Trisha Greenhalgh |
Mon, 25 Jul 2011 19:33:36 +0100 |
847 lines |
Re: Realist compared to other systematic reviews
|
Mark Pearson |
Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:57:26 +0100 |
144 lines |
Theories - local or formal or blind?
|
Raymond Pawson |
Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:41:43 +0100 |
444 lines |
Re: Theories - local or formal
|
Mark Pearson |
Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:25:20 +0100 |
426 lines |
Re: Realist compared to other systematic reviews
|
Gill Westhorp |
Sat, 23 Jul 2011 10:21:03 +0930 |
106 lines |
Re: Theories - local or formal
|
Trisha Greenhalgh |
Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:18:57 +0100 |
395 lines |
Re: Realist compared to other systematic reviews
|
Mark Pearson |
Fri, 22 Jul 2011 14:18:37 +0100 |
65 lines |
Re: Theories - local or formal
|
Mark Pearson |
Fri, 22 Jul 2011 14:05:55 +0100 |
365 lines |
Re: meta-narrative syst rev: responding to Farah
|
Colleen M. Davison |
Fri, 22 Jul 2011 09:14:14 -0300 |
598 lines |
Re: meta-narrative syst rev
|
Marcello Bertotti |
Fri, 22 Jul 2011 13:08:41 +0100 |
413 lines |
Re: meta-narrative syst rev: responding to Farah
|
McCourt, Christine |
Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:13:56 +0100 |
493 lines |
Meta-narrative syst rev: how many meta-narratives
|
Trisha Greenhalgh |
Fri, 22 Jul 2011 06:42:14 +0100 |
1577 lines |
Re: FW: meta-narrative syst rev: responding to Farah
|
Colleen M. Davison |
Thu, 21 Jul 2011 20:13:41 -0300 |
1035 lines |
Re: meta-narrative syst rev: responding to Farah
|
Gill Westhorp |
Fri, 22 Jul 2011 08:20:36 +0930 |
796 lines |
FW: meta-narrative syst rev: responding to Farah
|
Trisha Greenhalgh |
Thu, 21 Jul 2011 21:37:26 +0100 |
8362 lines |
Re: meta-narrative syst rev: responding to Farah
|
Colleen M. Davison |
Thu, 21 Jul 2011 13:37:10 -0300 |
731 lines |
Re: meta-narrative syst rev: responding to Farah
|
Trisha Greenhalgh |
Thu, 21 Jul 2011 17:05:39 +0100 |
943 lines |
Re: Triangulation in RS
|
Trisha Greenhalgh |
Wed, 20 Jul 2011 06:09:52 +0100 |
69 lines |
Triangulation in RS
|
Gill Westhorp |
Wed, 20 Jul 2011 03:15:03 +0100 |
27 lines |
Re: Theories - local or formal
|
Trisha Greenhalgh |
Mon, 18 Jul 2011 06:43:08 +0100 |
278 lines |
Realist compared to other systematic reviews
|
Gill Westhorp |
Mon, 18 Jul 2011 04:35:11 +0100 |
31 lines |
Re: Theories - local or formal
|
Gill Westhorp |
Mon, 18 Jul 2011 11:05:58 +0930 |
237 lines |
Re: Theories - local or formal
|
BMarchal |
Sun, 17 Jul 2011 19:56:26 +0200 |
186 lines |
Re: Theories - local or formal
|
Trisha Greenhalgh |
Sun, 17 Jul 2011 18:29:53 +0100 |
165 lines |
Re: Theories - local or formal
|
BMarchal |
Sun, 17 Jul 2011 12:37:17 +0200 |
120 lines |
Theories - local or formal
|
Raymond Pawson |
Fri, 15 Jul 2011 13:54:10 +0100 |
70 lines |
Re: Theories - magic or material?
|
Gill Westhorp |
Fri, 15 Jul 2011 11:06:57 +0100 |
37 lines |
Theories - magic or material?
|
Raymond Pawson |
Fri, 15 Jul 2011 10:40:25 +0100 |
5391 lines |
Re: How much should we impugn when authors don't make things explicit?
|
Andrew Booth |
Wed, 13 Jul 2011 14:01:18 +0100 |
997 lines |
Re: How much should we impugn when authors don't make things explicit?
|
Trisha Greenhalgh |
Wed, 13 Jul 2011 13:32:01 +0100 |
1056 lines |
Re: How much should we impugn when authors don't make things explicit?
|
Andrew Booth |
Wed, 13 Jul 2011 13:26:55 +0100 |
660 lines |
Re: How much should we impugn when authors don't make things explicit?
|
Trisha Greenhalgh |
Wed, 13 Jul 2011 08:56:50 +0100 |
618 lines |
Re: How much should we impugn when authors don't make things explicit?
|
Gill Westhorp |
Wed, 13 Jul 2011 00:33:09 +0100 |
64 lines |
Re: How much should we impugn when authors don't make things explicit?
|
Colleen M. Davison |
Tue, 12 Jul 2011 15:29:29 -0300 |
145 lines |
How much should we impugn when authors don't make things explicit?
|
Trisha Greenhalgh |
Tue, 12 Jul 2011 07:44:22 +0100 |
102 lines |
Re: Reaction to messges about realis review retention studies
|
Baker, David R. |
Mon, 11 Jul 2011 20:52:49 -0400 |
112 lines |
Re: Reaction to messges about realis review retention studies
|
Gill Westhorp |
Mon, 11 Jul 2011 10:24:25 +0100 |
89 lines |
Reaction to messges about realis review retention studies
|
Marjolein Dieleman |
Fri, 8 Jul 2011 13:28:55 +0100 |
54 lines |
Re: meta-narrative syst rev
|
Farah Jamal |
Mon, 4 Jul 2011 09:10:21 +0100 |
91 lines |
Re: meta-narrative syst rev
|
Trisha Greenhalgh |
Sat, 2 Jul 2011 09:13:18 +0100 |
251 lines |
Re: meta-narrative syst rev
|
Paul Ward |
Thu, 30 Jun 2011 16:33:48 -0700 |
61 lines |