Hi,
'the everyday' is definitely a interesting concept, and I agree that its
fuzziness makes it at the same time frustrating and intriguing.
Theory-wise, I don't have much to add yet, but I remember seeing on
Interactions magazine a nice special section titled "Everyday Futures: A
New Interdisciplinary Area of Research" http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3041276
Might it be worth checking out?
cheers,
G:
Gabriele Ferri, Ph.D.
Design researcher // Play & Civic Media - Amsterdam University of Applied
Sciences
www.gabrieleferri.com
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Levy, P.D. <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> However, it seems to me the ‘everyday’ remains one of these things that
> everybody knows until it is time to describe it, a view that is not
> satisfying from a (design) research perspective.
> I would be very glad if some of you could suggest directions,
> perspectives, or opinions to comprehend better the ‘everyday’ and the way
> it can be tackled by design (research). Or even better if some other people
> are addressing the same topic, and would like to share further on this
> topic...
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------
PhD-Design mailing list <[log in to unmask]>
Discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design
Subscribe or Unsubscribe at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/phd-design
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|